The following is in the paper in Sankei newspaper this morning by Professor Hiroshi Furuta of the University of Tsukuba Graduate School, titled 'There is neither progress nor inevitability in history'.
It should be a paper to be read not only by Japanese citizens but also by people all over the world.
It was after August 4 years ago that I learned the existence of the world's leading Korean scholars for the first time as a scholar of this unusual power.
Until then, I had been subscribing and reading the Asahi Newspaper for a long time, I did not know him at all.
The biased coverage of the Asahi Shimbun who had purposely excluded learned scholars with such unusual power was also extreme.
The Asahi newspaper did not inform at all about genuine scholars and journalists like him and Takayama Masayuki.
The Asahi Shimbun, continued to make people appear on the page, like inflexibly uniform, which is a scholar and a so-called cultural person who only talks about masochistic view of history and anti-Japanese thought (contradicting Japan by condescending attitude) arising from it, with pretended-moralism and political correctness.
It continued to be made to read an article as the intention of such Asahi Shimbun by the subscriber.
Or 'plausible lie' by 'the people engage in prostitution of the anti-Japanese at Iwanami belvedere' has been read continuously.
As one of the results, all the subscribers of the Asahi Shimbun have been planted to the unconscious realm of nonsense that has no grounds for say, saying that Korea should not be said bad, for example.
It is an evident fact that Japanese people and Japanese citizens are suffering huge losses even now because the other party was a country of ‘abysmal evil’ and ‘plausible lie’.
Not being announcing that Asahi Shimbun is their own fabrication report to the world still, too, is undeniable fact.
I am emphasizing the sentence except the headline.
In the 1970s, the Frenchman began to be noisy that a 'big story' ended and the modern is over.
When the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991 British said dispassionately that the modern was over.
The Germans is bullish that ended in the 1990s is a small modern era, the future is a full-fledged modern, because they will begin to do once again that it is 'recursive modernization', but it eventually became obscure.
Americans are special, there is no ancient or medieval, so they are not interested in the modern era classification.
It is always modern for them.
We were deceived by the German philosophy.
As for Japanese, because of the long-standing educational system of German philosophy, we are totally immersed in ‘modern’.
We believed that ‘history will progress.’
If we think calmly, such a thing is impossible.
The Inca that appeared as an ancient empire in the 15th century had been destroyed by Pizarro who came from the Middle Age Spain in the 16th century.
Ancient and medieval coexist at the same time, and one ended in ancient times.
A man who thought ‘I was cheated or fooled’ said ‘History is jagged’.
Yes, we were being deceived, by Hegel and Marx.
Hiromatsu Wataru, a philosopher, said, 'As Hegel himself, he believes that history will evolve such as the time of the Father of God, the era of the Son of God, the age of God that is the Holy Spirit that follows it, in the idea, I wonder if he was meant to be a prophet of the Holy Spirit era of God' (Hiroyuki Ito, Hiromatsu Wataru 'What can you do with philosophy').
In the case of Marx, it is more elaborate, history progresses step by step, socialism, communism finally comes, so encourage revolutionaries with peace of mind.
As a result, revolution occurred in some countries, became a socialist regime, many people became unhappy with tyranny control and status system.
First, are tyranny and social status a characteristic of ancient times?
There was a serious problem because the ‘agriculture's being collectivized’ in which the state exploited farmers directly.
Was not this a return to the ancient economy?
This draft continues.
