After the war, deceived as a 'domoy (to return home)' from the dominant region of Japan,

Everyone who subscribes to Sankei Shimbun should have seen the Sankei Shimbun particularly shining this morning.
The Sankei argues only the truth as black as black, white as white.
Facing against Russia not giving an inch, on the contrary, on the controversy that editorial adviser is dealing with Ambassador of Russia to Japan ...
As for the opinion of the article counsellor, as for him, being describing a complete fact refers to the editorial supposing that it isn't wrong at all.
In other words, it is because the excellent journalist soul appeared in the Sankei Shimbun today.
It is a surrebuttal to the Russian ambassador by our editorial adviser about Northern Territories.
By Russian Galuzin Ambassador to Japan, Saito Tsutomu, an editorial adviser to the Sankei Shimbun, objected to the contents of the lecture on the Northern Territories issue by using SNS (membership exchange website).
In a speech, Mr. Saito talked about how the Soviet Union robbed the four northern islands after accepting Japan's Potsdam Declaration.
Ambassador pointed out that ‘Do you condemn the Soviet Union who participated in the war against Japan in 1945. Do you call the acquisition of Yuzhno-Kurilsky District that was totally legitimated Crime’?
On the contrary, the Sankei Shimbun will post Mr. Saito's rebuttal.
= 2 pages ‘argument’ and ‘day of the Northern Territories’
About my remarks at the 'Kyushu Sound Argument social meeting' on January 24th, I received 'objection' by my name from Russian.
He has the reputation of being a brilliant student of Japan School in the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, but with all due respect, it is hard to say that it is a decent objection.
About 'acquisition' of the 'Northern Territories' (referred to as Yuzhno-Kurilsky in Russia), he said unfamiliar expression from the beginning 'It was totally legally done'
I thought that some sort of new evidence came out, but that was none.
It seems that it was uncomfortable that ‘acquisition’ was excluded as a state ‘crime’. 
I have been claiming that the Northern Territories and being carried away together with this one Japanese prisoners of war in the Soviet Union and the abduction case by North Korea is an unresolved 'national crime' after the war, so at this late hour, Ambassador's 'objection' is mea culpa.
The Soviet militaries tore Soviet-Japanese Neutrality Pact one-sidedly in August, 1945 and toward Japan entered the war, and they invaded 4 islands of the unarmed body after yielding and occupied directly in Iosif Vissarionovich Stalin by the order.
If this is not a 'crime', what is it?
However, there is 'the international crime' which violates 'Atlantic Charter' which wrote ' the territory nonexpansion' in addition to the state crime clearly.
It takes out that Japan was an alliance with the Nazi Germany which did a Jewish holocaust about the ambassador as the only material of the refutation to me.
This relating can not be understood at all.
Hitler is ‘the most sinful criminal’, but do you want to say that Stalin is different.
Do you say that Japan, too, is therefore a criminal the same as Nazis in 'the ally'?
I want to ask you in reverse.
What 'the holocaust' it did Japan when and where?
Speaking of ‘death of factory’ pointed out by the ambassador, how will you explain the cruelty of Siberian detention?
After the war, deceived as a 'domoy (to return home)' from the dominant region of Japan, 600,000 Japanese are kidnaped to the frosty place, being abused by slave labor 60,000 (neither number is unknown) but also died an unnatural death.
In fact, my deceased father had gone through a lot of hardships as detainee.
'Katyn massacre' that about 20,000 Polish officers are massacred in the western part of Russia during the Second World War occurred.
Stalin consistently continued telling a big lie to the world as ‘the work of Nazi Germany’, but in the international appeal of the Political government's persistent truth elucidation, Gorbachev period finally gave him recognition as ‘Stalin's crime’.
I would also like to encourage you to read the world history textbooks widely by Mr. Galuzin.
* I could not stop tears while translating Saito's paper into English.
Mr. Saito is also a person living life as a national treasure of Japan.