The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.
I am emphasizing the sentence except for the headline.
The newspaper that does not tell the truth
‘Japan's quality paper’ cannot lie - so believing that overseas media have quoted the Asahi newspaper report as it is.
I used to doubt that the number ‘200,000 people’ was once, but I thought that the so-called ‘comfort women’ was vaguely the truth of history.
Therefore, when the Asahi Shimbun admitted misinformation, the feeling of disappointment and embarrassment came up.
From then on, the intention of including some self-discipline, I planned to work hard so that the honor of Japan will not be hurt anymore.
Thanks to Michael Yong, a journalist who wrote an article in English that wholly denied the '200,000 people thesis', now 'Washington Post' and 'New York Times' are no longer to tell 200,000 people of sexual slavery.
By the way, it was the 'Japan Times' that it did not quit until the end.
Management organization has changed, and anti-Japanese color has diluted, but before that, there were three articles about teaching a masochistic view of history a day.
That's why I called it 'Anti-Japan Times' (laugh).
Unfortunately, still, many of the world's media are misunderstood as 'comfort women = sex slave.'
So, it corrects the article in English and Korean, 'Let's stop misunderstanding expression' calling to the overseas media, will Asahi Shimbun be the compensation at least which it is possible to do?
A single mother is a beautiful, gay couple marriage should be allowed, religion is not very meaningful ... I do not like the ‘New York Times’ or ‘Washington Post’ that obtrude liberal ideas.
But what makes them different from the Asahi Shimbun is that they do not write at least intentional lies.
And misinformation will be corrected immediately.
As you are sure they do not dislike President Trump, it is criticism based on facts to the last.
They are different from CNN without compunction lying.
This draft continues.
