As long as Zelenskyy is president, I think it will be impossible to "end the Ukrainian

To everyone in the world's media　

I will provide the missing materials so please request by email.

May 28, 2025 Weekday version
Regarding Russia's proposal for direct negotiations with Ukraine in Turkey on the 15th of this month, negotiations should begin between the parties involved. Zelen-sky is too hasty.

Russian propaganda calls President Zelensky illegal and a criminal. For President Putin, "it would be humiliating to meet with President Zelensky, who says it is ille-gal," they said.

US media reports that Foreign Minister Lavrov and others will attend from the Rus-sian side, but Russia denies this as well. First of all, it is necessary to create a solu-tion to the problem between the parties involved.

Russian media reports that there is no possibility that President Putin will agree to a summit with President Zelensky. Mr. Zelensky should prepare a meeting content that can be agreed upon.

President Putin "pointed out" that there is a "big gap" between the claims of Russia and Ukraine. But Mr. Zelensky is ignoring that "big gap".

It took three years for direct talks between Russia and Ukraine to resume. Russia's position is clear. Zelensky's position is also clear. In other words, there is a "gap" that cannot be agreed upon.

I think it is impossible to "end the Ukrainian war" as long as Zelensky is president. However, European citizens and businesses are forced to live difficult lives.

If the United States acts as an intermediary and exports "Russian energy" to Eu-rope, Europe will be able to import Russian energy cheaply and stably, just as it did before the war.

President Putin should hold a bilateral meeting with President Trump. It is difficult to discuss a ceasefire. Ukraine will have no choice but to "end the war" when it runs out of war funds and soldiers.

The two sides should discuss "lifting sanctions against Russia" and "energy exports from Russia to Europe" on the premise of a ceasefire. Russia should export "energy" to Europe via the United States.

I think the United States and Russia can agree to "lift sanctions against Russia" on the premise of a ceasefire. The problem is that the "EU" is opposed. In that case, the United States should "lift the sanctions" on its own.

Furthermore, Europe will be able to take measures to counter the "Trump tariffs". The premise is that the US will introduce a "balanced countervailing duty" system.

European companies will use trading companies to import Russian energy through the US (intermediary trade). The EU will be able to export EU exports with zero Trump tariffs for the amount of energy imports.

By having the EU import Russian energy through the US (intermediary trade), the EU's trade surplus with the US will be largely resolved.

If an exporting country's automobile company imports American cars and sells them as "GM cars" through its own domestic sales network, the exporting country's tar-iffs on the import amount of the imported GM cars will be zero.

Exporting country companies can reduce the Trump tariffs to zero through "corpo-rate efforts." The White House should understand this. The Trump tariffs are also a policy to expand trade. 

Part 1 References
Russia proposes direct negotiations: Ukraine waits for participants to announce and decides on countermeasures
https://www3.nhk.or.jp/news/html/20250515/k10014806091000.html

I will write again tomorrow.

Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".

"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!

First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.

"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.

In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.

However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.

As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".

As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.

Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.

In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".

In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) ​​were also arrested.

The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".

The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.

"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)

The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".

If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).

Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.

The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:

1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."

2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).

3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."

4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."

5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."

6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."

This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."

This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.

The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."

My argument:

"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.

"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.

Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.

The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."

However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.

The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.

Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.

Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.

Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.

Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.

Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."

NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/
NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.

Thank you.

Yasuhiro Nagano