On the 4th, Trump posted on social media in all caps, "RELEASE MARINE

To everyone in the world's media　

I will provide the missing materials so please request by email.

 
2025-4-15: Weekday edition,
Good luck, Le Pen! Trump is rooting for you! President Trump has expressed his support for Marine Le Pen, leader of the struggling National Rally.

Le Pen, who is considered a leading candidate for the next French presidential elec-tion, was convicted of embezzling EU funds and was banned from campaigning for five years. It seems that France also has a "dark government".

On the 4th, Trump wrote on social media in "all caps" "RELEASE MARINE LE PEN" and "The court's decision is a witch hunt". Trump has won the "witch hunt". Good luck, Le Pen!

I think Trump "hates the left wing who reset the economy with war". The Trump administration has "openly" expressed support for far-right parties in Europe in the past, attracting attention.

Trump himself has promoted an "America First" foreign and trade policy and taken action to overturn Europe's post-war security system. I think he will succeed.

I think Le Pen's case is the same as Trump's adultery scandal. "They are torment-ing her for a small crime, probably a crime she has no memory of. It's a so-called 'accounting mistake,'" Trump says.

Trump is once again trying to abuse the law to stifle freedom of speech. They are trying to censor his political opponents. Trump has won the judiciary. Le Pen will surely win too.

Trump emphasized that this time, "finally," the French judiciary has reached the point where it is trying to imprison political opponents.

The Japanese judiciary is even worse, arbitrarily making people criminals for acts that are clearly stated as "innocent" in the text of the law. I am a victim of that.

According to an Ifop poll, the National Rally is overwhelmingly ranked at the top of the list of parties that effectively fight Islamism in France. We need to think about a strategy.

The French people "don't want to accept illegal immigrants in 'mainland France,'" "want to hire low-wage workers at wages lower than in China," and "want a richer life."

The National Rally can realize the wishes of the French people. Le Pen will not "re-set" the economy with "war." If Le Pen "utilizes" illegal immigrants, France can produce higher quality, lower cost products than China and become an economic superpower.

France should create a "special zone" in Algeria and accept illegal immigrants as low-wage workers in the "special zone." This way, mainland France will not have to accept illegal immigrants.

In mainland France, "French people" will produce high-value-added materials and products, and ship (export) them to the "special zone" via a "supply chain."

The products will be assembled in the "special zone in Algeria." Products that are cheaper than Chinese products will be exported from the "special zone" to the world.

The more products are exported from the special zone, the higher the sales of "high-value-added materials and parts" in mainland France will be. "Le Pen" should explain my proposal to the public in an easy-to-understand way.

Part 1 Citations and References

Trump supports Le Pen after being banned from running in French presidential elec-tions

https://www.cnn.co.jp/world/35231384.html

I'll write again tomorrow.

Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".

"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!

First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.

"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.

In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.

However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.

As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".

As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.

Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.

In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".

In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) ​​were also arrested.

The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".

The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.

"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)

The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".

If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).

Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.

The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:

1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."

2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).

3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."

4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."

5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."

6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."

This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."

This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.

The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."

My argument:

"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.

"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.

Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.

The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."

However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.

The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.

Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.

Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.

Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.

Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.

Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."

NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/
NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.

Thank you.

Yasuhiro Nagano

Past articles can be viewed at the blog below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp