The vast majority of Trump supporters are against U.S. involvement in war. They think

To everyone in the world's media　

I will provide the missing materials so please request by email.

June 30, 2025 Weekday Edition
President Macron has a clear view, unlike President Trump. He has stated that he is "against" military action that would lead to regime change in Iran. Presi-dent Trump is probably "playing the shamisen".

The cause of the Ukraine war was the establishment of a "pro-EU regime" by the EU and the United States. Has President Macron reflected on this?

At the G7 summit, President Macron said that he does not want Iran to have nuclear weapons, and that "attempting regime change" through "military at-tacks" would be the "biggest mistake". He seems to have "transformed" into a "wise man".

German Chancellor Merz praised Israel's attack on Iran, saying that "Israel is doing the 'dirty work' for its Western allies." He's an idiot!

The majority of Trump supporters are against US intervention in the war. I think Trump is "playing the shamisen".

"Playing the shamisen" originally means to play the shamisen, but it also means "to deceive by saying something that is not true."

Steve Bannon, former chief strategist for MAGA and former aide to Trump, said one of MAGA's core principles is not to get into the "quagmire of war."

Bannon also said that Trump's bitter experience in the 2003 Iraq War, launched by the Bush administration, motivated him to run for president in 2016 and ex-pand his influence. What's up with Trump?

Former Fox News anchor Tucker Carlson is also against military attacks, going so far as to say that "an all-out war with Iran would effectively end President Trump's term in office."

Laura Loomer, a Jew close to Trump, tweeted that "one airstrike on (Iran's) nu-clear facilities does not constitute all-out war." Total lunatic.

Evangelical pastor John Hagee told FOX News that we should do whatever is necessary to "neutralize" Iran. Evangelicals are not insane.

If Israel goes to war with Iran, Germany will support it. The German (Nazi) ar-my will join the war as an "apology" for the genocide of the Jews.

According to the US military information site "Global Firepower," Israel's mili-tary strength (as of 2025) is 15th out of 145 countries, and Iran's is 16th.

Even including reserve forces, Iran's military strength is 960,000, and Israel's is only 630,000. There is a high probability that America's participation in the war will "fail." I'm worried about next year's midterm elections.

It seems that President Trump is "playing the shamisen too much." He attacked Iran's nuclear facilities on June 21. Don't worry, everyone. Iran named the facil-ities and stated that "there was no damage to the nuclear facilities." Is this Iran "playing the shamisen?"

Part 1 References
The French President is against military action that would lead to regime change in Iran. This is clearly different from President Trump.
https://jp.reuters.com/world/security/7KD3IOPKWVKKPDEEKT256Y36HU-2025-06-17/

I will write again.

Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".

"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!

First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.

"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.

In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.

However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.

As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".

As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.

Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.

In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".

In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) ​​were also arrested.

The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".

The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.

"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)

The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".

If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).

Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.

The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:

1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."

2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).

3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."

4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."

5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."

6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."

This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."

This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.

The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."

My argument:

"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.

"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.

Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.

The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."

However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.

The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.

Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.

Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.

Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.

Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.

Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."

NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/
NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.

Thank you.

Yasuhiro Nagano