Small and medium-sized exporters on the Chinese side cannot bear the burden of the tariffs.

To everyone in the world's media　

I will provide the missing materials so please request by email.

Weekday Edition, June 3, 2025
On the 17th, President Trump criticized Walmart's price hike policy and said, "We should not blame the tariffs." I would like to appeal for the creation of "balanced countervailing duties."

He is pressuring Walmart, claiming that "the tariffs should be accepted (by Walmart itself and China, the exporting country)." I would like to appeal for the balance of exports and imports to be zero tariffs.

Currently, I think imports from China are about 10% of the "standard price," but since Walmart is a discount store, 10% is a big burden.

China is also receiving "discounts," so the burden has reached its limit. The Trump administration should seriously and urgently introduce the "balanced countervailing duties" that I proposed.

Small and medium-sized exporters on the Chinese side cannot bear the burden of tariffs. Therefore, China will import American products and zero the "Trump tariffs" on Chinese products.

Walmart is "smiling" and Trump is "smiling." Countervailing duties would expand world trade.

Small exporting companies would import American beef and pork and sell it to res-taurants. Walmart should introduce producers or sell (export) to Chinese companies.

Traders around the world should use the Trump tariffs to balance trade and make profits. One-sided exports should end. Trump tariffs would expand trade.

Export-only trade with the US should end. Companies that trade with the US should balance trade by importing the same amount as they export. This is the new rule for expanding trade.

I suggest that Europe import Russian energy via the US. In theory, the US would export huge amounts of energy to Europe. The EU's trade surplus with the US would plummet.

The US would have to pay Russia huge amounts for energy. To balance trade, Rus-sia would have no choice but to buy American products.

What will the US export to Russia? Wall Street will start investigating exporting companies. America will enjoy unprecedented economic growth.

The EU will be able to import energy from Russia at low cost and in a stable man-ner. The German economy, which was on the verge of collapse due to rising energy prices, will be revived.

The Trump tariffs will change the course of the world. Many people say that the world economy will shrink, but if the Trump tariffs are added to the "balanced coun-tervailing duties," the world economy will expand dramatically.

I have proposed a policy to expand sales by exporting and importing each other's car models through a sales partnership between GM and Nissan, but the "Walmart example" should also be tried immediately.

The world should not criticize President Trump's tariff policy, but should cooperate with the United States in a positive manner and strive to expand the world econo-my. President Trump, good luck!

Part 1 References
President Trump criticizes Walmart, pressures to prevent "tariff hike"
https://www.jiji.com/jc/article?k=2025051800157&g=int

I will write again tomorrow.

Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".

"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!

First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.

"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.

In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.

However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.

As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".

As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.

Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.

In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".

In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) ​​were also arrested.

The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".

The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.

"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)

The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".

If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).

Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.

The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:

1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."

2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).

3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."

4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."

5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."

6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."

This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."

This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.

The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."

My argument:

"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.

"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.

Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.

The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."

However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.

The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.

Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.

Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.

Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.

Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.

Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."

NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/
NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.

Thank you.

Yasuhiro Nagano

Past articles can be viewed at the blog below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp