People from all over the world know this the truth in this translation, it must know the foolishness

Following are entries entitled Anti-Japanese Japanese who burned ‘requisition worker’ ruling on monthly magazine Hanada released today,

Second trial decision

From the interview feature of journalist Ms. Sakurai Yoshiko and Professor of Moralology Institute, Visiting Professor at Reitaku University Nishioka Takeshi.

All monthly magazines Hanada and WiLL released today are subscribed to by all Japanese citizens at the nearest bookstore.

People from all over the world know this the truth in this translation, it must know the foolishness that is being handled in anti-Japanese propaganda.

Especially agents in China and the Korean Peninsula belonging to each committee of the UN are in sync with their 'abysmal evil' and 'plausible lies', knowing their own evil and shame they must know.

‘Plaintiff is a former requisition worker’ lie

Sakurai

Korea once again gave a violence against international common sense.

The Korean Dharma (Supreme Court) ordered compensation of the company on October 30 at the final appeal trial of four former Korean workers who complained of NIPPON STEEL & SUMITOMO METAL CORPORATION (formerly NIPPON STEEL CORPORATION) In support of Second trial decision, we sent a ruling to order the company to pay damages of 400 million won (40 million yen).

This is clearly against the Japan - Korea Claim Agreement signed in 1965. In case

On the same day, Prime Minister Abe strictly criticized the ruling as "it is an unlikely decision in light of international law," and stated his policy to respond resolutely as the Japanese government.

For the repeated violence of lawless country Korea that cannot keep international agreement, there are a number of harsh opinions in Japan.

Nishioka

In the first place, The Asahi Shimbun and other media in the Japanese press reported ‘requisition worker judgment’, but the four plaintiffs are not requisition workers.

They did not come toJapan by ‘requisition’.

One person arrived in Japan in 1941, three in Japan in response to ‘recruitment’ in 1943.

Two of them watched advertisements for NIPPON STEEL CORPORATION's employee recruitment in Pyongyang, received an interview of the personnel in charge, passed and came to Japan by their leadership.

Sakurai

This point is very important.

At the House of Representatives Budget Committee on November 1, Prime Minister Shinzo Abe said, ‘I am grasping this case because it is a worker from the former Korean Peninsula.’

Nishioka

Mobilization of Korean workers based on National Mobilization Law was about to direct workers to the military industry, but from the conclusion it was a failure.

I will explain step by step.

First, the law was promulgated in 1938.

Mobilization by the National Requisition Ordinance began in 1939 on the inside, while Requisition Ordinance was not invoked in Korea, initially in ’recruitment’.

'Requisition' is from the end of the war from September 1944.

Sakurai

In other words, the four plaintiffs were workers who came to work in Japan in response to recruitment before September 1944 when the plaintiff began to recruit.

This draft continues.