I have been proposing that Nissan and GM enter into a trial sales partnership,

To everyone in the world's media　

I will provide the missing materials so please request by email.

July 14, 2025 Japanese version
Japan should import "American cars" from the United States "tax-free". The Trump administration should seriously negotiate with the Japanese government about my specific proposal.

Japan considers automobiles a "key industry" and will not accept the "Trump tariffs". The Japanese government should seriously promote the import of "American cars".

Trump criticizes, "Japan does not accept our cars. Yet, they bring millions of Japanese cars into the United States. This is unfair." He is right.

Trump said, "I have explained this to Japan, and Japan understands." If that is the case, the "Japanese and American governments" should "adopt" "my pro-posal".

Trump's goal is to "eliminate the trade deficit", and in the case of automobiles, it is to protect the US automobile industry. My proposal is a solution to Trump's request.

I continue to propose that "Nissan and GM" enter into a trial sales partnership and Nissan import and sell "GM's Cadillacs, etc." This is the only solution.

To achieve this, the Trump administration should impose "Trump tariffs" on the "imbalance between exports and imports." Moreover, they should be imposed on a "corporate group basis" rather than a country basis.

I consider this system to be a "tariff system for correcting trade imbalances." In other words, the United States should impose "Trump tariffs" on the "imbalance amount obtained by subtracting the amount of imports from the amount of ex-ports."

He once again expressed his dissatisfaction with the automobile trade with Ja-pan, calling it "unfair." Therefore, GM and Nissan should enter into a trial sales partnership and wait for the situation to improve.

Nissan will export "Nissan cars" to the United States on a "Nissan dedicated ship." This is the same as before. However, currently, a 27.5% tariff is imposed. Nissan's corporate efforts will be to reduce this tariff to zero.

Nissan will load "GM cars such as Cadillacs" and "used GM cars" onto a "Nissan dedicated ship" as "return cargo" and import them to Japan.

The Trump tariffs will be applied to Nissan's net exports, that is, the amount of Nissan vehicle exports minus the amount of imports from GM. If the difference is zero, there will be zero tariffs.

This will allow Nissan to continue producing cars in Japan. America will be able to export American cars to Japan. American cars will be exported to Japan on the car carriers that Trump dreamed of.

Nissan will sell GM cars (including used cars) at Nissan dealerships. And GM should sell Nissan minicars at GM dealerships across the US.

The Japanese government should remove all barriers to the import of GM cars, and the US government should exceptionally lift the ban on the import and sale of minicars. Then the two countries will be on an equal footing.

Part 1 Reference Materials
Trump: "Dear Japan, 25% tariffs on automobiles" "Letter sent to Japan notify-ing withdrawal of trade agreement" (FOX News)

https://www.yomiuri.co.jp/economy/20250630-OYT1T50023/

I will write again tomorrow.

Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".

"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!

First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.

"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.

In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.

However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.

As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".

As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.

Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.

In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".

In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) ​​were also arrested.

The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".

The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.

"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)

The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".

If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).

Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.

The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:

1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."

2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).

3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."

4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."

5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."

6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."

This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."

This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.

The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."

My argument:

"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.

"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.

Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.

The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."

However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.

The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.

Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.

Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.

Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.

Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.

Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."

NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/
NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.

Thank you.

Yasuhiro Nagano