Even though Koizumi became the Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, agricultural

To everyone in the world's media　

I will provide the missing materials so please request by email.

July 15, 2025 Japanese version
The majority of Japanese people support President Trump's "demand for im-ports of (US rice)". He claims that Japan is reluctant to import US rice and is preparing to impose a new level of tariffs on Japan. "Do more!"

There is a shortage of "staple rice" in Japan, and the price has more than dou-bled compared to a year ago. "Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Koizumi" sold "government stockpile rice", but the "rice shortage" has not been resolved.

Despite Koizumi's appointment as "Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisher-ies", agricultural stakeholders are blocking the import of rice from "America". Many Japanese people are hoping that Trump will "put pressure" on the Japa-nese government.

Traditionally, "staple rice" has been supplied at a stable price in Japan. "Rice stakeholders" have plotted to raise "rice prices" on the grounds of rising "ferti-lizer costs" and "fuel costs" due to inflation.

Rice farmers have reduced the cultivation of rice for food and promoted the cul-tivation of rice for animal feed. The negative effects of this became apparent in May of last year, when rice prices soared.

By stopping "staple rice" and growing "feed rice," they planned to reduce the import of feed such as corn from the United States. It was as if they had been punished by God.

Around May of last year, the price of rice, which was about 2,000 yen for 5 kg, suddenly rose to about 4,000 yen, and recently reached 4,300 yen. Due to dis-cretionary contracts for stockpiled rice, the price has recently "dropped" below 4,000 yen, but it is common for it to exceed 4,000 yen.

In Europe and the United States, if the price of staple foods "doubles" or more, the streets will be filled with "protest demonstrations." In developing countries, the "protest demonstrations" may cause "prime ministers and ministers" to flee the country.

The Japanese people are protesting in the elections. The Ishiba administration is on the brink of death. Why don't they ask President Trump for "urgent rice exports"?

The government's "minimum access rice" ended early. Now private companies are importing "California rice, etc."

When private companies import rice, a tariff of 341 yen per kilogram is imposed. For 5 kilograms, it is 1,705 yen. Imported rice is sold for about 3,800 yen.

The Japanese people have no choice but to rely on President Trump. Please put pressure on the Japanese government to "zero" the "rice tariff" indefinitely.

On June 30, President Trump posted on social media, "Japan does not buy rice from us. And yet Japan is suffering from a serious rice shortage." Thank you for the voice of justice.

I heard that President Trump hinted at new tariffs on Japan over "rice." What are the new tariffs? President Trump, please do your best for the impoverished Japanese people.

Part 1 References
President Trump hints at new tariffs on Japan over rice - US government official says "negotiations are ongoing"
https://www.bloomberg.co.jp/news/articles/2025-06-30/SYOL28DWX2PS00

I'll write again tomorrow.

Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".

"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!

First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.

"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.

In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.

However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.

As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".

As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.

Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.

In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".

In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) ​​were also arrested.

The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".

The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.

"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)

The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".

If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).

Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.

The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:

1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."

2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).

3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."

4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."

5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."

6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."

This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."

This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.

The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."

My argument:

"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.

"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.

Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.

The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."

However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.

The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.

Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.

Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.

Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.

Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.

Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."

NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/
NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.

Thank you.

Yasuhiro Nagano