Russia's conditions for ending the war are that the occupied territories become Russia

To everyone in the world's media　

I will provide the missing materials so please request by email.

July 29, 2025
Regarding military assistance to Ukraine, President Trump said he would supply weapons to Ukraine via NATO. NATO would cover 100% of the costs. I think Russia will definitely end the war with an "EMP".

Putin has said he wants to "end" the Ukrainian war. Trump says he is consider-ing providing Ukraine with "Patriot" air defense systems.

Russia's conditions for ending the war are that the occupied territories become Russian territory, that Ukraine is unarmed and neutral, that the "bank deposits" collected by the EU are returned, "etc."

Russia has no intention of compromising on the conditions for ending the war. The Ukrainian war is a "war of aggression" started by "Biden and Zelensky" and Europe, and President Trump also "recognizes" this.

This time, Russia is keeping a close eye on President Trump's movements. If the United States does so, Russia will have no choice but to end the Ukrainian war with an "EMP". I think they will use a "non-nuclear EMP" this time.

An EMP attack would destroy all civilian infrastructure, including smartphones, computers, and Wi-Fi, planes and trains would be out of control, and cities would fall into panic. Probably "many weapons" would also be disabled.

I think Russia will test a non-nuclear EMP this time, not a nuclear explosive EMP. The Patriot air defense system would probably be disabled.

If the Patriot air defense system is disabled by a non-nuclear EMP, the US will have no room for support. Ukraine would surrender unconditionally at this point.

If France attacks Moscow with a nuclear bomb, Russia would nuke Paris with a Hiroshima-type nuclear bomb. Trump would start negotiations to "avoid World War III" and the Ukrainian war would end with unconditional surrender.

Either way, I think the Ukrainian war will move on to the next stage of conven-tional weapons. I hope this war will end with a non-nuclear EMP.

No one knows if a "non-nuclear EMP" can "neutralize" the "Patriot". That is why Russia wants to "test" Ukraine.

If the "Patriot" is rendered inoperable by a "non-nuclear EMP," America will lose credibility as a "defense weapon." There is a high possibility that the alternative "air defense system" will also become unusable.

Of course, if "normal missiles" and "drones" also become inoperable, America will be "embarrassed." Trump is probably concerned about this point.

President Putin will use hundreds of "non-nuclear EMPs." If that fails, he will use "EMP nuclear weapons" that explode nuclear bombs at high altitudes.

If President Putin fails with "EMP nuclear weapons," he will attack with a large number of "Hiroshima-type nuclear bombs." Let's hope that the first "non-nuclear EMP" will end the war.

Part 1 Reference Materials
President Trump's "Statement on Russia on the 14th" Russia is keeping a close eye on it
https://www3.nhk.or.jp/news/html/20250712/k10014861211000.html

I'll write again tomorrow.

Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".

"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!

First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.

"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.

In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.

However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.

As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".

As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.

Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.

In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".

In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) ​​were also arrested.

The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".

The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.

"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)

The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".

If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).

Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.

The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:

1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."

2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).

3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."

4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."

5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."

6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."

This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."

This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.

The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."

My argument:

"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.

"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.

Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.

The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."

However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.

The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.

Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.

Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.

Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.

Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.

Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."

NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/
NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.

Thank you.

Yasuhiro Nagano