I believe that the imposition of "high tariffs" is unavoidable in order to eliminate the U

To everyone in the world's media　

I will provide the missing materials so please request by email.

June 26, 2025 Weekday Edition
Treasury Secretary Bessent suggested extending the deadline for the suspen-sion of reciprocal tariffs. Experts say that the Trump tariff policy is at a dead end. I suggest that we should try to make a comeback with "balanced counter-vailing duties (tentative name)".

I think that the imposition of "high tariffs" is inevitable to eliminate the US trade deficit. However, to pave the way to "zero tariffs", "balanced countervailing du-ties (tentative name)" should be introduced.

We should promote the balance of exports and imports by imposing "balanced countervailing duties (tentative name)" on a company/organization basis, not on a national basis.

Companies/organizations in importing countries should be subject to "Trump tariffs" on the "difference" between exports and imports to the US.

If the difference between exports and imports is "zero", the "tariff" will also be zero. There will be no complaints about this.

If "companies/organizations" individually find it difficult to import from the US, they should ask trading companies to do it and balance their exports and im-ports with the US on a "trading company basis".

The Trump administration should demonstrate the effectiveness of the "bal-anced countervailing duty (provisional name)" in the "major industry" of auto-mobiles. American cars should be loaded onto car carriers and exported to Ja-pan.

First, the Trump administration should "mediate" a sales partnership between Japan's "Nissan Motors" and the US's "GM". Nissan salesmen should be happy.

Nissan will export Nissan cars to the US on "Nissan's car carriers". Nissan will import "GM Cadillacs and used GM cars" as "return cargo from the dedicated ship".

Nissan will pay "tariffs" on the "export-import difference". If exports and im-ports are the same amount, the "Trump tariff" will be "zero". Tariffs should be levied on the trade deficit.

Nissan will mainly sell "GM Cadillacs" as Nissan's highest-end cars at all Nissan dealerships. Used cars such as pickup trucks will be sold at Nissan's used car dealerships.

Considering Nissan's sales power, it will be common to see "GM cars" on the streets of Japan in one or two years, and they will gain a high market share. President Trump's dream will come true!

"GM" will mainly sell "Nissan minicars" at "all GM dealerships". GM will surely succeed with the synergy with "GM cars".

"Nissan minicars" come in "gasoline cars" and "EVs", but "gasoline cars" should be sold.

Until "hydrogen cars" are completed, the United States should sell "gasoline cars" to avoid conflicts with China over "rare metals" and other things.

Part 1 References
Treasury Secretary Bessent hints at extending the deadline for the suspension of mutual tariffs: Trump's tariff policy is at a dead end
https://www.nri.com/jp/media/column/kiuchi/20250612_2.html

I will write again.

Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".

"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!

First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.

"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.

In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.

However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.

As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".

As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.

Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.

In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".

In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) ​​were also arrested.

The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".

The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.

"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)

The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".

If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).

Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.

The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:

1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."

2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).

3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."

4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."

5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."

6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."

This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."

This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.

The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."

My argument:

"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.

"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.

Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.

The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."

However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.

The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.

Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.

Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.

Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.

Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.

Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."

NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/
NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.

Thank you.

Yasuhiro Nagano

Past articles can be viewed at the blog below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp