I too have questioned the new NAFTA. Why doesn't the US produce cars at the Mexican border

To everyone in the world's media　

I will provide the missing materials so please request by email.

July 22, 2025 Japanese version
It was clear that the North American Free Trade Agreement (USMCA) would fail. It was the fault of the first Trump administration's "deep state." He should scrap the USMCA.

I think Trump fell into the trap of the Abe administration in Japan. Trump prais-es Abe, but I think he is really angry.

I think the Trump tariffs of the second Trump administration are a "counterat-tack" against Japan's "Trump deception." The Ishiba administration should be "prepared" for Trump's revenge.

Since NAFTA came into effect in 1994, Japanese companies have been expand-ing into Mexico for 30 years. The Japanese government has exploited NAFTA and USMCA.

Since 1994, Mexico has developed into a low-cost manufacturing base for US companies with the expansion of Japanese companies. The roundabout exports of Chinese companies can be said to be a "copy of Japan."

This is because many Japanese manufacturing companies (1,272 as of October 2021) have relocated their production bases to Mexico and are actively export-ing to the United States.

US automobile-related companies have expanded production in Mexico to in-crease cost competitiveness, but President Trump argued that this has led to a decrease in US production and investment, slowing economic growth. Trump's analysis is correct.

Nevertheless, the new NAFTA came into effect in July 2020 under the new name USMCA (United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement). It's crazy, really.

I, too, have questioned the new NAFTA. Why doesn't the US produce cars on the Mexican border instead of in Mexico? I'm so angry.

I think it's President Trump's "hatred for non-white immigrants." It's his only flaw. He said he would accept immigrants who benefit the US. There is a possi-bility...

So I continued to propose establishing a "special zone on the Mexican border" and accepting illegal immigrants with the "qualification" of "(tentative name)" Temporary Resident Immigrants.

I believe that if the residence of "temporary immigrants" is limited to a "special zone," Trump's concerns will be resolved and they will contribute to the Ameri-can economy as "extremely low-wage workers."

On the other hand, the state of Texas, which supports Trump, has given tax in-centives to companies to attract headquarters and factories. Toyota and others have built new factories in Texas.

However, there are no "illegal immigrants" among the workers employed in Texas. Naturally, the wages are more than eight times higher than in Mexican factories. This is not attractive.

The "special zone" I propose is an area adjacent to the Mexican border. This is because it is an entry route for illegal immigrants (temporary immigrants).

The wages of "temporary immigrants" are "lower" than those of "China and Mexico." Why doesn't the Trump administration create a "special zone (factory zone)"? They should accept my proposal. Then America can regain the "factory of the world."

Part 1 Reference Materials
"The Future of the Second Trump Administration and the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA)"
"The Current State of the International Situation from Around the World"
https://www.cfiec.jp/activities/nakagawa_0115/

I'll write again tomorrow.

Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".

"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!

First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.

"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.

In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.

However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.

As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".

As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.

Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.

In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".

In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) ​​were also arrested.

The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".

The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.

"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)

The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".

If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).

Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.

The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:

1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."

2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).

3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."

4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."

5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."

6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."

This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."

This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.

The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."

My argument:

"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.

"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.

Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.

The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."

However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.

The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.

Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.

Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.

Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.

Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.

Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."

NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/
NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.

Thank you.

Yasuhiro Nagano