goo blog サービス終了のお知らせ 

日本の朝

日本の朝に、食の話題、癒し写真、テレビやラジオの話題、そして社会の話題などを提供していきます。

Surprisingly, DOGE claims to have semi-forced the cut of 280,000 government

2025-06-27 05:07:53 | 世界の皆さんへメール

To everyone in the world's media 


I will provide the missing materials so please request by email.


Weekday Edition, June 27, 2025
Thank you, Musk, for the "130 days" with DOGE. But did President Trump and Elon Musk's "honeymoon" "disappear" on June 5?

Musk openly criticized President Trump's "grand and beautiful" tax and spend-ing bill, and President Trump accused Musk of "losing his mind" and "this is a monkey show."

Surprisingly, DOGE claims to have semi-forced the cut of 280,000 government employees and cut government spending by about $150 billion to $170 billion from January to March 2025.

President Trump said he was "very disappointed" in Musk's criticism of the "One Big Beautiful Bill," an spending bill that includes his signature policy.

However, if the Trump administration cuts ties with SpaceX, it will likely deal a major blow to the American space program and give the rapidly developing Chinese space program a clear advantage in the field. So…

However, Elon Musk, who just left the Trump administration, expressed regret on the 11th, saying that some of the recent criticism of Trump had "gone too far."

The only way for the "two" to get along is for both Trump and Musk to "give up" on "China's rare metal regulations."

The Chinese government is tightening export controls on rare metals (im-portant minerals such as rare earth elements).

In particular, minerals essential for the manufacture of semiconductors and electric vehicles, such as gallium, germanium, antimony, and tungsten, are subject to regulation.

These regulations are seen as China's response to US restrictions on China, or for national security reasons.

The biggest challenge in the Trump tariffs is rare metals. Using rare metals in automobiles is impossible from a security perspective. A ban would solve every-thing.

The Trump administration should restrict the use of rare metals in automobiles. The United States should promote "hydrogen cars," which replace gasoline fuel with hydrogen fuel.

GM, Nissan, Tesla, and ExxonMobil should partner to develop hydrogen cars.

ExxonMobil should produce hydrogen cheaply from natural gas, liquefy or compress it, and fill "hydrogen cartridges".

"GM, Nissan, and Tesla" should manufacture "hydrogen cars" that use "hydro-gen cartridges". Tesla should develop "hydrogen fuel cars" that do not use "ra-re metals, etc."

Wouldn't it be ok for China to become a country of "electric cars" driven by "motors"? The US should take the lead in "hydrogen cars".

If "existing" gas stations could "refill hydrogen" by "refilling hydrogen cartridg-es", "American hydrogen cars" would take the world by storm in the blink of an eye.

Part 1 References
Musk regrets "going too far" in his criticism of Trump
https://news.yahoo.co.jp/articles/e6b2c7576191976f8b55b416c029c16b80a80279

I'll write again.


Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".

"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!

First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.

"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.

In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.

However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.

As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".

As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.

Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.

In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".

In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) ​​were also arrested.

The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".

The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.

"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)

The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".

If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).

Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.

The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:

1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."

2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).

3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."

4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."

5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."

6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."

This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."

This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.

The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."

My argument:

"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.

"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.

Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.

The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."

However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.

The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.

Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.

Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.

Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.

Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.

Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."

NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/
NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.

Thank you.

Yasuhiro Nagano

Past articles can be viewed at the blog below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

 

コメント
  • X
  • Facebookでシェアする
  • はてなブックマークに追加する
  • LINEでシェアする

Surprisingly, DOGE claims to have semi-forced the cut of 280,000 government

2025-06-27 05:06:45 | 世界の皆さんへメール

To everyone in the world's media 


I will provide the missing materials so please request by email.


Weekday Edition, June 27, 2025
Thank you, Musk, for the "130 days" with DOGE. But did President Trump and Elon Musk's "honeymoon" "disappear" on June 5?

Musk openly criticized President Trump's "grand and beautiful" tax and spend-ing bill, and President Trump accused Musk of "losing his mind" and "this is a monkey show."

Surprisingly, DOGE claims to have semi-forced the cut of 280,000 government employees and cut government spending by about $150 billion to $170 billion from January to March 2025.

President Trump said he was "very disappointed" in Musk's criticism of the "One Big Beautiful Bill," an spending bill that includes his signature policy.

However, if the Trump administration cuts ties with SpaceX, it will likely deal a major blow to the American space program and give the rapidly developing Chinese space program a clear advantage in the field. So…

However, Elon Musk, who just left the Trump administration, expressed regret on the 11th, saying that some of the recent criticism of Trump had "gone too far."

The only way for the "two" to get along is for both Trump and Musk to "give up" on "China's rare metal regulations."

The Chinese government is tightening export controls on rare metals (im-portant minerals such as rare earth elements).

In particular, minerals essential for the manufacture of semiconductors and electric vehicles, such as gallium, germanium, antimony, and tungsten, are subject to regulation.

These regulations are seen as China's response to US restrictions on China, or for national security reasons.

The biggest challenge in the Trump tariffs is rare metals. Using rare metals in automobiles is impossible from a security perspective. A ban would solve every-thing.

The Trump administration should restrict the use of rare metals in automobiles. The United States should promote "hydrogen cars," which replace gasoline fuel with hydrogen fuel.

GM, Nissan, Tesla, and ExxonMobil should partner to develop hydrogen cars.

ExxonMobil should produce hydrogen cheaply from natural gas, liquefy or compress it, and fill "hydrogen cartridges".

"GM, Nissan, and Tesla" should manufacture "hydrogen cars" that use "hydro-gen cartridges". Tesla should develop "hydrogen fuel cars" that do not use "ra-re metals, etc."

Wouldn't it be ok for China to become a country of "electric cars" driven by "motors"? The US should take the lead in "hydrogen cars".

If "existing" gas stations could "refill hydrogen" by "refilling hydrogen cartridg-es", "American hydrogen cars" would take the world by storm in the blink of an eye.

Part 1 References
Musk regrets "going too far" in his criticism of Trump
https://news.yahoo.co.jp/articles/e6b2c7576191976f8b55b416c029c16b80a80279

I'll write again.


Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".

"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!

First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.

"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.

In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.

However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.

As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".

As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.

Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.

In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".

In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) ​​were also arrested.

The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".

The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.

"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)

The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".

If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).

Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.

The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:

1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."

2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).

3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."

4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."

5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."

6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."

This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."

This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.

The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."

My argument:

"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.

"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.

Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.

The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."

However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.

The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.

Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.

Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.

Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.

Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.

Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."

NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/
NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.

Thank you.

Yasuhiro Nagano

Past articles can be viewed at the blog below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

 

コメント
  • X
  • Facebookでシェアする
  • はてなブックマークに追加する
  • LINEでシェアする

驚くべきことに、DOGEは2025年1月から3月にかけて28万人の政府職員削減を半ば強制し、政府支出を約1500億ドルから1700億ドル削減したと主張している。

2025-06-27 04:45:45 | 世界の皆さんへメール

世界のメディアの「皆様」 へ 


私は不足する資料は提供いたしますのでメールで請求をしてください。


平日版、2025年6月27日
マスク氏、DOGEとの「130日間」をありがとう。しかし、トランプ大統領とイーロン・マスク氏の「蜜月」は6月5日に「消滅」したのだろうか?

マスク氏はトランプ大統領の「壮大で美しい」増税・歳出法案を公然と批判し、トランプ大統領はマスク氏を「正気を失っている」「これは猿芝居だ」と非難した。

驚くべきことに、DOGEは2025年1月から3月にかけて28万人の政府職員削減を半ば強制し、政府支出を約1500億ドルから1700億ドル削減したと主張している。

トランプ大統領は、自身の看板政策を含む歳出法案「One Big Beautiful Bill」に対するマスク氏の批判に「非常に失望した」と述べた。

しかし、トランプ政権がスペースXとの関係を断絶すれば、アメリカの宇宙計画に大きな打撃を与え、急速に発展する中国の宇宙計画がこの分野で明確な優位に立つ可能性が高い。そこで…

しかし、トランプ政権を去ったばかりのイーロン・マスク氏は11日、最近のトランプ氏への批判の一部は「行き過ぎていた」と述べ、遺憾の意を表明した。

「二人」がうまくやっていける唯一の道は、トランプ氏もマスク氏も「中国のレアメタル規制」には「見切り」をつけるべきです。

中国政府はレアメタル(希土類元素などの重要鉱物)の輸出規制を強化している。

特に、ガリウム、ゲルマニウム、アンチモン、タングステンなど、半導体や電気自動車の製造に不可欠な鉱物が規制対象となっている。

これらの規制は、米国の対中規制への中国の反応、あるいは国家安全保障上の理由によるものと見られている。

トランプ関税における最大の課題はレアメタルだ。希少金属を自動車に使用することは安全保障上不可能です。禁止すれば全て解決します。

トランプ政権は、レアメタルを自動車で使うことを制限するべきです。アメリカはガソリン燃料を水素燃料に置き替えた「水素自動車」を推進するべきです。

GM、日産、テスラ、エクソンモービルは、水素自動車の開発で提携すべきです。

エクソンモービルは、水素から天然ガスから安価に生産し、液化または圧縮して「水素カートリッジ」に充填すべきです。

「GM、日産、テスラ」は「水素カートリッジ」を採用した「水素自動車」を製造するべきです。テスラは「レアメタルなど」を使用しない「水素燃料車」を開発するべきです。

中国が「モーター」で駆動する「電気自動車」の国になっても構わないのではないか。米国は「水素自動車」で主導権を握るべきだ。

もし「既存の」ガソリンスタンドが「水素カートリッジを補充」することで「水素を補充」できれば、「アメリカの水素自動車」は瞬く間に世界を席巻するだろう。

パート1 参考文献
マスク氏、トランプ氏への批判を「行き過ぎた」と後悔
https://news.yahoo.co.jp/articles/e6b2c7576191976f8b55b416c029c16b80a80279

また書きます。


第2部。「入管法違反事件」「平日版」。
日本は「法治国家」ではない「異常な人権侵害国家」です。

「国際社会」の「皆様」、助けてください!

まずは、2010年の「入管法違反幇助罪」の「冤罪」について読んでください。

「第1章」。事件の概要は以下のとおりです。

2008年秋、私の会社(私が社長)は「留学ビザで留学中の中国人」を雇う約束をしました。私は彼らに「レフコ」が翌春大学を卒業したら「雇用する」という「雇用契約書」を「交付」しました。

しかし、その後、2008年に「リーマンショック」が起こりました。

その結果、翌年以降の「システム開発」の受注は「キャンセル」されました。

その結果、「LEFCO」は2009年に「入社予定だった者」の「雇用」を「取り消した」。

そのため「彼ら」は、2009年に卒業した後も、学生時代にアルバイトをしていた飲食店で働き続けた。

2010年5月、中国人は「在留資格外活動」による「入管法第70条違反」で逮捕された。

彼らが逮捕された後の2010年6月、私と採用担当の中国人(KingGungaku)も逮捕された。

その理由は、中国人の「入管法第70条違反(資格外活動)」に対する「刑法の(幇助の罪)」です。

<逮捕理由>検察は、私とキンググンガクが中国人に「虚偽の雇用契約書」を渡したことは、「刑法の幇助の罪」に当たるとした。

「第2章」。判決文の罪状:(恣意的で滑稽)

起訴状の罪状は「入管法第22条の4の4」の「規定そのもの」です。

虚偽の書類を提出して「在留資格」を取得した場合、法務大臣は「裁量」で「在留資格」を取り消すことができる。(そして、強制送還される)。

したがって、中国人が「虚偽の書類」を提出しても、犯罪にはならない。無実の行為を「幇助」することは犯罪ではない。

判決文の「処罰理由」:
1. 中国人が「虚偽の雇用契約書」を提出して「在留資格」を取得したこと。
2. そして、入管法に違反したこと(在留資格外活動)。
3. 中国人が「在留資格」を得たのは、「我々」が中国人に「偽の雇用契約書」を提供したからだ。
4. 中国人が「在留資格」を得たため、日本に「居住」できた。
5. そのため、中国人は「不法就労」できた。
6. したがって、中国人に「偽の雇用契約書」を「提供」した「我々」は、中国人の「資格外の活動」を「幇助」したとして処罰された。

これは恣意的な「法の論理」の「誤り」である。
この理屈は「風が吹けば樽屋が(儲かる)」という「論法」だ。これは国際的にも「法的論理」に反する。

「起訴状の犯罪理由」は、「特別法」である「入管法」の規定が、「一般法」である「刑法」より優先するので、犯罪にできない。

私の主張:
「1」:入管法は、外国人が虚偽の書類を提出して在留資格を取得した行為(入管法:22-4-4条、在留資格の取消)は、法務大臣が「行政処分」で取り消しする、と規定している。これで終わりだ。

「2」:「資格外の就労の活動」を行った中国人は無罪である。その理由は、彼らの「雇用主」が入管法73-2条の「不法就労の助長の罪」で処罰されていないからである。

したがって、「法の下の平等」の原則の下では、中国人は無罪である。

日本政府は、全く同じ「犯罪的理由」で「外交官やフィリピン大使館職員」を処罰した。
しかし、中国政府と同様に、フィリピン政府も沈黙している。

続きは土曜版に掲載します。

第3部。特区建設。新たなビジネスモデル。
「特区」は難民や移民を「一時的移民」労働者として「受け入れ」、居住地を「特区」内に限定する。

先進国は彼らを低賃金労働者として活用し、再び高度経済成長を実現する。
難民や移民は仕事を得て、人間らしい希望のある生活を送ることができる。
一時的移民は低賃金だが「衣食住、医療費、教育は無料」です。
NO2:https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/
NO1:https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

NO4:~NO10:は「日曜版」をご覧ください。

よろしくお願いします。

長野恭博

過去の記事は下記ブログでご覧いただけます。
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

ご質問等ございましたら、お気軽にお問い合わせください!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

コメント
  • X
  • Facebookでシェアする
  • はてなブックマークに追加する
  • LINEでシェアする