★ NO ONE IS WATCHING THIS CHART (dont miss this)!! Bitcoin News Today & Ethereum Price Prediction

NO ONE IS WATCHING THIS CHART (dont miss this)!! Bitcoin News Today & Ethereum Price Prediction


Educational update!
Taking about each different correlation of Bitcoin with each different kind of the price inflation.

As a service (●aaS) via the public cloud

As a service (●aaS) via the public cloud



The information technology (IT) services are categorised into various levels nowadays. At this time, the business models providing customers and clients with the services via the online connection such as the internet rather than using services only within the on-premises environment. Most notably, there are three categories of services, the software as a service (SaaS), the platform as a service (PaaS), and the infrastructure as a service (IaaS).

Nowadays, many IT service providers offer the subscription service available online rather than the offline purchasing. The notable advantages are agility, availability, and scalability of the resource preparation as well as reliance on the providers for the content and security update and the physical space saving for the physical stuff. The shared access offered by the public cloud is now popular than ever.

The internet connection is not only the online connection option. There is a service called the direct connect connecting users' computer and the server network of the provider located in a remote data centre. The internet connection requires to secure the connection security preventing various incidents such as data breach and information fraud as well as the available IP address allocated to this connection. Then, the direct connect service to the public cloud system is often preferred in order to keep the stable access with an efficient financial cost per use (the internet connection tends to be more expensive for a regular high volume information transaction). For example, there is a movement for various financial institutes to shift their crypto asset management from the internet connection to the direct connect access to the specialised data centre.

The most familiar service may be the SaaS because it is convenient for users to start using it. The software is already prepared by the providers so that they can simply use the ready-made application and data by just accessing it. Many companies adopt the Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) outsourced as subscribing to this service via online instead of purchasing cartridge, CD, or the licence cord offering the software product. The disadvantage is its inflexibility of customisation and modification of applications and data adapted to the users' own requirements and environments.

The PaaS offers a more flexible service for customising and modifying applications and data via the platform composed of the operating system (OS) e.g., Microsoft (MS) Windows, middleware, and runtime is ready. When MS introduced its public cloud service MS Azure, many people thought its compatibility with the commonly distributed OS, the MS Windows, would be high. By contrast, the operation system and its server network architecture may require more flexibility enough to customise their own platform. Then, the IaaS introduced in the next paragraph can be the option.

The IaaS has become popular for the IT engineers to install since Amazon introduced its public cloud service called Amazon Web Service (AWS). The notable benefit is reducing the workloads for maintenance and security update as well as saving space and labour for the physical infrastructure composed of servers, databases, and their network in their on-premises. It is even beneficial to combine the already established on-premises environment and the public cloud services as a hybrid. Another notable useful point is Autoscaling elastically adjusting the volume use by means of its fluctuant demand, which is beneficial not only for the access and service maintenance management but also the financial accounting including the cost calculation and the tax payment. Because AWS was the first pioneer having popularised the public service, this seems to be the main business core of Amazon nowadays.

In conclusion, considering these characteristics, it is predicted that more businesses will shift their IT basis to this "as a service" due to their convenience and resource scalability. In one of the Bank of England press conferences in 2021, the adoption of the public cloud services by many major private banks was hotly debated. Regardless of its controversy over the national compliance issues, it seems to be the unstoppable inevitable phenomenon across the border in 2020s like the globalisation movement of socio-economy seen in 2000s.

Autoscaling オートスケーリング

 * Without Autoscaling: The fixed cost approach

 * With Autoscaling: The variable cost approach

 

 

Autoscaling is one of the remarkable advantages of using the public cloud because of its elasticity of the volume usage. This factor is also beneficial by means of the financial accounting.  However, Autoscaling is not that perfect as much as the salespersons from the public cloud providers advertise.  This short essay picks up the typical benefits and challenges of installing the public cloud especially because of its Autoscaling.

 

Autoscaling is a notable advantage of the public cloud which is usually emphasised in the introductory guideline of the public cloud advertisement. First of all, it allows its users to elastically adjust their quantity usage at each time period, instead of fixing the quality usage, depending on the fluctuant quantity demanded at each time period. This is useful to avoid both the dead-weight of the volume usage while the low access traffic and the volume shortage while the high access traffic.

Focusing on the accounting aspect, it can covert its usage cost to the variable operational cost instead of the capital or fixed-cost = liability. In many cases, it is often advantageous because it is likely to avoid paying the high tax levied onto the capital expenditure. By contrast, the cost covered for the public cloud is often accounted as the variable operational cost which is actually useful to reduce the total tax payment. Regardless of the total cost amount, in many administrative accounting cases, it provides individuals and their firms with the tax payment advantages.

At the same time, Autoscaling does not perfectly work as the textbooks and the introductory guideline of the public cloud explains. In reality, there is a limit of calling for extra instances at once because there is a certain maximum number of the server instances within a certain time period e.g., being able to call 5 instances per minute. There is a physical barrier of scaling the instances depending on each situation.

Furthermore, there is a case that the load balancer misjudges the health check of each connected server instance and the access control. This load balancer can accidentally call unwanted instances by falsely detecting as broken, deleted, or over-capacity or some errors of the monitoring tools and the metric/log information. In addition, there can also be a human error of typing the programmes of directing the traffic control or the security/monitoring setup. This may incur a considerable financial disadvantage of excess instances called by Autoscaling. 

All in all, the Autoscaling mechanism is still an attractive characteristic of using the public cloud to optimise the operational availability as well as the financial efficiency. Nevertheless, it must take an account of the dysfunctions of Autoscaling such as the latency of calling the instances and the extra possible costs caused by both machinery and human errors. On the top of what the salespersons and the textbooks indicate, the users had better refer to the actual experiences of its real application.

株式会社資本主義に反抗しよう！

Let's be sceptical about Corporate Capitalism!


The current world socio-economic situation can be expressed by the quote of Friedrich Nietzsche "God is dead." as the invisible hand of God explained by Adam Smith no longer corrects the distribution flow of labour and capital in the spontaneous order of the laissez-faire market. The gravestone of its death is created out of the current gigantic economies of scale for the majority of existing industries. Moreover, the courage of individual economic agents is undermined in front of the staunch fortress fortified with allows and spikes of high skill-set requirements and the massive wall of the barriers to the market entrant imposed by bureaucracy and regulations protecting the corporate tycoons dominating their strong hold.

The current form of the market economy is oligopolistic where a few numbers of elite oligarchies secure their dominance. This is because that they can take an advantage of their huge economies of scale basing their factors of production which enables them to drastically expand their quantity and brand name of their products superior to those smaller rivals. Although their offering goods and services with their high quality and fast speed are beneficial for the majority individuals to enjoy, the market entry for any new entrant to compete with these already established corporations has become significantly more discouraged than the past. In another word, the world socio-economy basing these individuals' life is then more dependent on these corporate oligarchies staying in the market for a long term.

The social mobility of individuals nowadays is more discouraged than a few decades ago because there is a huge gap between those who are fortunate enough to obtain the skill-sets required by the market and the others not fortunate enough. Each individual's own competence, effort, and motivation are no longer enough to outperform in the current market competition because it requires the significantly higher financial and time costs to secure their competitive advantage than the past. It is not only the matter of material well-beings but also the accessible information available in their living community determine their fortune of acquiring their initiative. Therefore, it requires the public management to offer a certain degree of the equality in outcome to accomplish the equality in opportunity.

The good old days of the laissez-faire free market capitalism are gone. Instead, the more static socioeconomic political form of the corporate capitalism has come. Rather than the free-minded courageous individual economic agents, the already established aristocrats called corporate shareholders and government bureaucrats secure their dominance. Majority individuals now belong to one big institute of either corporation or government. Even small/medium sized business owners are working under the subcontract with either a bigger corporation or government. The profit share of these corporations is heavily distributed to major shareholders and corporate executives instead of rewarding majority individual workforce members propping up the daily business activities. Therefore, the priority on rewording the merit of individual workforces tends to be undermined under the current socio-economic structure.

It sounds like being a big government advocate by claiming for more positive public interventions. However, its attempt is to avoid the excess centralisation of the capital flows monopolised by corporatist oligarchies and the unfair heavy regulations imposed by government bureaucrats protecting their interest. Without this intervention, the government will become even bigger under the influence of these corporate oligarchies as their political influence is overwhelming the others with relatively less advantages. This should be the intervention to decentralise the whole socio-economic structure to encourage more healthy and fair competitions which the laissez-faire capitalism of the good old days used to promote.

What the big government advocates such as the orthodox Marxists should be criticised is their excess centralisation of the means of production. Even though they have an originally good will of deserving the majority, it often fails to deserve the majority because this centralised political system put higher priority on deserving those elite bureaucrats at first. This failure of the centralised means of production takes place under the current corporatist capitalism due to its excessively centralised flow of the capital.

As John Maynard Keynes affirmed, the reform of optimising the balance of private and public sector with the positive intervention to the market with a right harmony is the key to enable the free as well as the fair market economy to survive. Yet, the Keynesian policy also contains the risk of failing into the paternalism by the central government conducting the intervention. Then, it will be necessary to spread the policy decision makings out to much smaller scale such as local authorities and cooperatives.

The power weight of the public corporations over the private corporation is way more excess than the past. The dominance of the investors/shareholders of these public corporations induces the asymmetric distribution of their profit share which undermines the contribution by the majority individual workforces. The initiative attracting these investors is necessary whilst the distribution weight of the profit share provision is overweighted onto them nowadays. In order to appreciate the contribution by these majority individuals providing the actual workforces, their reward should be derived from not only the labour costs but also some pies from the profit share.

It should also take reviving small and medium sized enterprises into consideration. The oligopoly of the major private banks perpetuates the public corporations' dominance over the private corporations of small and medium sized businesses. This is another reason to shift the economic and political power to the local authority and cooperative which are able to monitor the business performance of their local enterprises as they are located close to each other. Instead of merely relying on the major private banks, rending and legal support from the local authority and cooperative should be more available. The initiative of expanding the decentralised public sector is to encourage more private businesses of not only the big public corporations but also the multiple numbers of the private corporations.

All in all, it is the time to be sceptical about the big government of the market monopoly! Majority individuals need to capture the power by empowering the decentralised public managements to counter the centralised public body by the puppet government of these corporatist aristocrats. The grass-root political lobbying must take place to capture the socio-economic freedom of majority individuals!!

リバタリアン、形而上学的な過激派 Libertarian, the metaphysical radical

Libertarianism is well known political philosophy promoting the high degree of freedom in both the economic scale and the social scale of the Political Compass. In another word, Libertarian is known to be the economic right wing and the social left wing. While Libertarian reveals a remarkably unique characteristic in terms of politics, it also takes a notable position in terms of the philosophical spectrum. Libertarian perspective of the subject of philosophy called metaphysics is in an extreme side of its spectrum.

Metaphysics focuses on how and why the world is constructed and structured as well as how human individuals' actions and minds take place, are influenced by, and affect the others and the world. The spectrum of the metaphysical perspectives is spread between the determinism and its opposition.

The extreme side of the determinism regards that individuals' mind and their action derived from it are purely dependent on the outside influences. Therefore, there is only one world so that there is no such a thing as a parallel world while the fate determines how the world and individuals living there. In such a view, the free will of individuals is irrelevant to exist because their mind and actions derived from it are simply determined by means of the complex flow of the world and its fate.

Most of the philosophical perspectives accept there is some degree of freedom from the determined factors, which allows to change the predetermined outcomes to a certain extend within restriction imposed by fates and inevitability. Despite many inevitable factors determining their minds and actions limiting individuals' free will over their life and surrounding environment, there are still non-determined factors available to change with their will.

Even politically radical theories stand on somewhere between these two sides of the metaphysical perspective. The notable materialist political philosophy Marxism describes that individuals' minds and actions are predetermined by means of the historical inevitability even though it highlights the emerging will of the proletariat class individuals. Owing to this theory, individuals' minds and actions are not quite derived from individuals' free will. These individuals will of changing their living condition is derived from their material needs and wants, which have been suppressed through the history, rather than the proactive free will.

On the other hand, Libertarianism defies this materialist view because it regards highly of the free will of autonomous individuals which stimulates individuals' minds and actions instead of their frustrated material needs and wants. It also explains that their free will is detached from the influence of either their material conditions or the externally derived factors. By means of its theory (regardless of its feasibility in real), the will of all individuals is free and independent from their material as well as externally influences. Therefore, each individual has her/his own influencing power over their life, their surrounding environment, and their destiny.

Libertarians also challenges another materialist theory called Capitalism although they are often categorised into the identical political spectrum. The material Capitalism affirms that their self-proclaimed objective factors such as the market force derive individuals even though they are politically free. Under Capitalist philosophy, individuals are stimulated by the material profitability in the market force.

By contrast, Libertarian claims for a freedom from such a materialist motive even if it may incur the loss for gaining something more than their instant materialist gain which they pursue for their own unique purpose. Libertarians cling to a freedom to live independently from not only the political cohesion but also from the market force if it does not deserve their will.

Moreover, Libertarianism is radically spiritualistic despite its strong social and moral political principle. What Libertarians call the free will is nothing more than a spirit, the non-physical element forming individuals' characteristics, not highly dependent on their physical conditions or any outside materialistic influences. In an individual's mind is completely independent from the materialistic influence, there must be some non-physical element driving this individual. This is often called spirit in general.

As similar to religious/spiritual thinkers, Libertarians believe in and count on the power of spirit which they call the free will, which may eventually enable them to alter the shape of their personal traits as well as their world environment. However, there is a notable difference between Libertarianism and the majority religion/spiritualism. Libertarianism avoids agitating the mass individuals with a superstitious belief because it leaves a room for each individual to think of their own belief within their own mind. Furthermore, the distinctive spiritual thought of Libertarianism is that each individual spirit lives in each detached own spiritual universe so that it is totally different from a conformist type of spiritualism which many religions are based on.

Libertarian word view describes that each parallel world universe exists per each autonomous individual's will so that the infinite number of the parallel worlds as the products of these free wills thus exists. Libertarian perspective insists on the extreme side opposed to the determinism. It explains that the world is the product of the complex interactions of actions and minds derived from the free wills of individuals. In another word, the unlimited number of the parallel world exist due to the complex entanglements of the multiple interactions of the free wills.

All in all, considering the Libertarian perspective, Libertarian distinctively rejects any theory describing individuals will is reactive to the deterministic forces. In reality, majority of Libertarians tend to compromisingly admit that there are still various obstacles preventing individuals' will from fully controlling themselves and their surroundings such as their naturally limited capability and compatibility as well as unpredictable spontaneously occurring events.

Nevertheless, they still keep the radical metaphysical view, fundamentally regarding highly of the power of each individual free will, as their fundamental principle of their philosophical thought. Their fundamentalist perspective is radically opposed to the metaphysically determinism so that Libertarianism certainly stands on the edge of the metaphysical perspective spectrum.

Hence, Libertarians are perhaps the most metaphysically radical thinkers among all the philosophers when it comes to metaphysics.

暗号通貨（例：ビットコイン）とブロックチェーン、Ｐ２Ｐネットワークはマックス・スティルナーの政治思想に酷似

Crypto currencies based on the Block-chain technology e.g., BItcoin and the P2P networking are like Stirnerism in economy and finance!

The crypto-currencies are recognised as a double-edged blade for economy; it will stimulate economy with its innovative force whereas it also disturbs economy by challenging the already established stable system. A famous astrologist has warned that these crypto-currencies will face a huge catastrophic shock in their market.

It might be called an anarchist revolution in the world economic and financial systems. In particular, Stirnerism can be explained as the blockchain P2P network like Bitcoin.



Frankly speaking, Stirnerist socio-political structure can be compared to the network of the blockchain like the one used in the cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin. This network system does not have any central server monitoring the entire system as a control tower.

Instead, each individual computer calculates and verifies the interactions and actions among the community utilising this network system. This is called the peer to peer (P2P) network where their application architecture is distributed among these individual computers. These individual computers participate in their tasks and workloads as the peers. The privilege and the equipment are equally distributed among these peers, and there is no authorities overriding their rules of activities.

Like this P2P network, Stirnerian socioeconomic model requires the high competency level of all individuals participating in its socioeconomics. Like the P2P computer network system, all the participants must have a reasonably high specification level to cooperatively sustain the entire network structure. Each individual must be knowledgeable about the fair judgement and aware of their self-responsibility of contributing to their public goods and services (I.e., the free ride must be prevented with the best effort).



The P2P network system of both the blockchain and Stirnerism face the identical characteristics of their challenges. This P2P system still need to tackle issues of managing of data serving and access authentication. Establishing an centralised system is efficient to store and serve the collectively used data, services, and public goods because maintenance can be concentrated on the limited places. By contrast, the P2P network requires all agents to share the same responsibility of maintaining, managing, and updating their quality of what required to prop up this whole entire system.



In the past when the information technology is not developed as much as nowadays, there has no civilisation having succeeded in establishing such an individualist mutualist anarchist society like Stirnerism even for a short time period. This is simply because it was unimaginable. By contrast, Stirnerism has become imaginable to establish to the certain extend by comparing the socio-politics with the hard scientific technology since the introduction of the blockchain and its P2P network.

There is an expectation that engineers and scientists develop the current P2P network system to transform it to the more efficient and manageable alternative. This innovation expected in the future will be beneficial to continue this currently ongoing revolution of decentralising the structure of both the information technologies and political science.

Bitcoin (BTC)の未来

「暗号通貨暴落」で取引暗号通貨の主軸をイーサリアム(ETH)からビットコイン(BTC)へ多くを移管させたことをお話しました。暗号通貨市場の暴落が起こったわけですが、やはり本家であるBTCは今後生き続けると思います。それでYouTubeみていたらこのような投稿を見つけましたのでシェアします。

中南米のエルサルバドルがまさか去年の９月からビットコインを自国通貨として導入したとは知らなかったです。やはり暗号通貨そのものはメリットが大きく、信用通貨（ドルやポンド、ユーロ、円など我々が普通に慣れ親しんでいる通貨）の金利も上がっていることが多いのと、今ハイテク株の下落が起こっているのと同時に、暗号通貨系も下落した。

しかし、やはり金融インフラが弱い発展途上国だからこそやはりその長所から導入され利用されるメリットはありますね。これは電話線インフラが無い国の方が携帯電話やスマホの普及が早かったことから推測できます。

これを占星術的にいうと、やはり去年から本格化した風の時代の影響ですね。おそらく２０２３年に冥王星が水瓶座に入り、２０２５年には天王星が双子座に入る２０２５年には風の時代への移行が加速しますので、最新テクノロジーを用いた国家の統制に寄らない仮想通貨の普及は今よりも加速するでしょうね。

それで冥王星水瓶座の時代で日本の経済社会における冬の時代がくるというのも、たぶん現金至上主義的な傾向が見受けられるほどの日本だから、暗号通貨だけでなく多くの最新テクノロジーの受け入れが遅いでしょうね。恐らく利権団体だけでなく大衆レベルもなんとなく怖いとかルーズなイメージを最新テクノロジーに対して持ちがちである故、スピード感とカジュアルさの求められる風の時代では苦労すると思いますよ。

やはりビットコインは天王星の象意でしょうし、オウンサインである水瓶座に冥王星が入るときにおそらく多くの日本人が知らずのうちに欧米諸国だけでなく多くの発展途上国での使用が活性化されるかも。特に日本だけでなくイギリスや一部西ヨーロッパでも既存の銀行と信用通貨市場は旧態依然なので、おそらく新興国や発展途上国が経済的にだいぶ追いつていくでしょうね。

国家や所得差を通り越して浸透する暗号通貨により先進国と呼ばれる国々の旧態依然の銀行と金融体制を凌駕していく。そして今まで大変で手数料も多く取られた国境をまたいだ海外送金もブロックチェーンネットワークを使い電子的に即座に行われる。貧しかった人々への負担が減ると同時に旧体制の既得権益が衰退する、正に天王星と水瓶座、１１室の時代かもしれませんね。

Stirnerism: The most theoretically completed but the least feasible political philosophy

Max Stirner is a political philosopher who invented the idea and the logical construction of individualistic anarchism. This essay comprehensively refers to his political philosophy as Stirnerism. Stirnerism is a unique theory which challenges not only the other non-anarchist political theories but also all the existing anarchist theories. At the same time, Stirnerism seems to be the most theoretically completed but the least feasible political philosophy to implement in real.

In terms of the mainstream political analyses, the establishment of anarchist state falls into either the communism rejecting the private property right and the monetary economy or the survivalist capitalism where none provides the re-distribution of the wealth even when the monopoly oppresses the mass. By means of the feasible policy implementation, it is more likely to end up with resulting in such a state. Stirnerism attempting both protecting the private property right and preventing the wealth monopoly by few.

Stirnerism claims for relinquishing not only the hereditary monarchy and aristocracy but also the nation state itself as well as the entire legal system propping up it. This is the characteristics shared with the other forms of anarchism. In contrast to other forms of anarchism, Stirnerism distinguishes itself from the contemporary anarchism by insisting on preserving the private property right for each individual and the market economy as a form of their freedom of exchange and choice. It appears each individual's own right to materially deserve her/himself and their own natural desire and own freedom of choice as one of its fundamental principles. Stirnerism regards that the existence of nation state government hinders individual freedom and right instead of protecting them.

Stirnerism also claims for preventing the monopoly by few hijacking the pure free market economy to protect majority individuals' right to enjoy their freedom and right. In another word, it insists on discouraging another form of government, such as a monopolistic corporation and an organised criminal faction, monopolising both economy and society. This is what John Maynard Keynes thought of with the government positive intervention by reforming its governance instead of abolishing it. By means of economic and social policy, Stirnerism and Keynesian share the similar quality despite their complete characteristic difference.

To accomplish these Stirnerist attempts, the existence of the cooperative which is sustained by each individual's voluntary contribution to a public administration. The efficient and fair administration of public goods and services will be the key to accomplish Stirnerian deal which is identical to Keynesian policy. Stirnerism replaces nation state government with an alternative operatable form of governance without a nation state, which is the spontaneously established cooperative by the voluntary union of individuals.

This problem which this public sector model based on the cooperative faces is that it requires the high competency level of all individuals participating in its socioeconomics. Like the P2P computer network system, all the participants must have a reasonably high specification level to cooperatively sustain the entire network structure. Each individual must be knowledgeable about the fair judgement and aware of their self-responsibility of contributing to their public goods and services (I.e., the free ride must be prevented with the best effort).

Instead of one or few authorities commanding the majority to do what they have got to do in their daily life, the majority mass have a lot of responsibilities as an exchange for their freedom and right. These mass individual must be enlightened enough to look after themselves and be knowledgable and responsible about forming a contract with the other individuals. In another word, individuals have to be aware of themselves as social beings who are responsible enough to accomplish their social duty as their exchange for living there with their autonomic freedom and right.

Overall, having taken these issues into consideration, Stirnerism sounds really ideal whilst it also sounds a lot of works to implement in real. More than the other political philosophical theories, it requires almost all individuals participating together to be enlightened enough to understand and fulfil the required specification necessary for Stirnerian P2P style social contacts. Perhaps, some future technological advancements may provide individuals with the solution to enable it to be feasible. Hence, it is still challenging to put Stirnerism into practice in real world even though it is still a very attractive as well as interesting theory worth considering for its implementation.

暗号通貨暴落とイーサリアム(ETH)

本日、記録的な暗号通貨の暴落です。特にここ数日はアルトコイン（Alternative Coins: 老舗のビットコイン(BTC)以外の通貨の呼称）の下落が酷い。それで特に愕然としたのが、イーサリアム(ETH)の下落はショッキングである。

小生は実はイーサリアム(ETH)に結構投資していました。もともとICO (Initial Coin Offering: 誤解を恐れず超簡潔にいうと暗号通貨でベンチャーへ資金融資すること）およびブロックチェーン（誤解を恐れず超簡潔にいうと暗号通貨の取引履歴を表す数式、つまり通貨一つ一つについている通帳みたいなもんなど記録される）の技術を利用して暗号通貨を通して行われる契約内容を記録しブロックチェーン上に公開できる機能などがあり有望視していた。

だからETHは今後も可能性あるし他のアルトコイン等よりかは優良株であると見ていました。ですから、今回暴落したから逆に購入するチャンスと狙い購入したら回復方向に向かったBTCからは更なる下落方向へシフトした！・・・もうショックで錯乱しそうになりましたよ。

それで、これはおかしいと思い簡潔にリサーチしましたら、どうもETHそのものが下落する要因を孕んでいたんですよね。実は新規ベンチャー企業にとって便利だし多くの大手企業も支援していたはずのICOが、実はかなり減っているらしいですね。やはり経済の先行き不安が大きく、起業家への投資を含めた前衛的な投資そのものが下火になっているようです。

う～ん、木星海王星が合だったが、天王星と土星のスクエアの影響がもろに出ていますね。実体や中央統制システムが無い（P2Pシステムというそれぞれの参加者コンピューターが同時にシステムを支えています。誤解を恐れず超簡潔に説明すると、そのブロックチェーン決済の証明をすることにCPUとメモリを貢献することがマイニング）が無いということで海王星とも思えました。でも、やはりブロックチェーンを使用した決済の際に使用するCPUとメモリを貢献する、そして数式とブロックチェーンやP2Pを使用した新しい試み、そしてCPUとメモリの使用量つまり電力でマイニング貢献するという性格上、やはりかなり天王星的でしょうね。そして安全性と堅実性、実体性を尊重する土星とスクエアだからやっぱ暗号通貨はヤバいって暗示があったんでしょうね。

ここは小生の読みが甘かったこと激しく自戒しております。それにしても、木星と更に火星が今小生の金星MCと合ですが、同時に小生の火星ICにオポなんですよね・・・・。これはやられましたわ！T火星が複合アスもっていてしかもIC合のN火星とオポ、しかも更に木星でT火星の威力倍増・・・ってこのことだったわけですなと実際にきてわかりました。結構MC金星に対しての合への期待もあったのですが、やっぱICオポの方が影響力でましたね。・・・この失敗を次のもっと大きな目標達成のための幸運へ転換するための出来事ととらえたい一心。


PS ビットコイン(BTC)とイーサリアム(ETH)の取引チャートの分析はこのオーストラリア人のジョッシュ君が毎日更新してくれてます。早口だがはっきりしていてよく構成されている英語だから英語のリスニング訓練にも最適。コンパクトに適格にまとめていますので日々の情報収集にお勧めです。
Bitcoin will REVERSE after THIS HAPPENS! Bitcoin News Today, Bitcoin Price Prediction, Bitcoin Crash

ETHEREUM BOUNCE BEFORE ANOTHER DUMP?? Ethereum Price Prediction 2022 & Ethereum News Today (ETH)

Tolerating Uselessness

The article entitled "Useless" was posted last time. Its attempt was to prove the uselessness should not treated as a sin and it can actually be a virtue with reference to Taoist teaching. This is an emerging crisis labelling individuals to ostracise them with the useless label, which Prof. Yuval Harari has warned of in his book "21 lessons for the 21st century". Taoism is indeed innovative enough to appreciate the uselessness and the lack of the conformity required for industrial socioeconomic structures. This project is designed to be a salvation for individuals labelled as useless as well as non-conforming. 

The current socioeconomic structure has become more capital intensive than the past. Employees and clients tend to require individuals to be equipped with multiple high skill-sets demanding money and time as well as their talents including efforts, innate abilities, and fortune to be in a right environment to achieve it. It has become materially more convenient with remarkably rapid technological innovations deriving the microeconomic advantages for firms and fortunate talented individuals. By contrast, the rest majority individuals are less likely to enjoy their microeconomic advantages while losing the equality of the opportunity to increase their income, seek better employment, and drastically improve their lifestyle.

The emerging crisis of labelling individuals as useless does not only take place in Capitalism but also in Socialism which regards highly of bearing social responsibility for all individuals. As a matter of fact, Socialism insists on participating in increasing the productivity and individuals' conformity to achieve it more than Capitalism because its productivity is demanded for deserving the whole society. Therefore, the problem of the social exclusion can be intensive in Socialism where none can be free to isolate themselves from conforming to their society. 

Almost all the political and moral philosophies having existed in the world regard of uselessness as the negative characteristic of individuals. They also insist that individuals should bear their responsibility for being non-conformists themselves without seeking supports from other individuals and society. These philosophies affirm there is a socioeconomic model with its standard which individuals are ought to comply with to achieve what they regard highly of. 

 

By contrast, Taoism is extremely unique as a political and moral philosophy adapting a tolerant perspective in its political and moral philosophy. The element of these academic subjects is intensively the Yang 陽 (light) kind claming for consistency, good-will, order, and perfection. When individuals and their society too much cling to accomplishing what these academic subjects insist on, it disturbs the balanced harmony of the natural world because the Yang 陽 element becomes excess. In order to maintain the balance, it requires to accept the Ying 陰 (shadow) element representing ambiguity, necessary-evil, passiveness, and, most importantly, tolerance. 

Perhaps, the socioeconomics had better focus more than usefulness for achieving their material prosperity and the philosophical and moral perfection. It had better re-evaluating the importance of slowing down the unbalanced growth among individuals and their living environments as well as tolerating the imperfection of how individuals and their society shape themselves. Instead of expecting all individuals to comply with their standard, the socioeconomic should rather take account of the factor that there are individuals unable to either be useful for the society standard or conforming to the social structure. 

All individuals are endowed with something necessary to be born in this terrestrial world by birth although nobody can be sure what it really is. It is extremely arrogant to judge an individual as no worth to live in the world as though someone were pretending to be the creator often called God pleaching. Uselessness in the terrestrial world has the use which is unable to be known by means of the mainstream terrestrial human standard. There are still several matters in this terrestrial world nature which human individuals do not yet know. 

On the other hand, there is an advantage for individuals to be useless. It means that they are less likely to be exploited than those who are treated as useful. Taoism refers to a tree with a distorted shape having survived without being chipped off as a resource. The existence of a tree is already helping to supply oxygen by its photosynthesis and taking a part of the dynamic natural environment. Furthermore, as explained in Taoism, this distorted shape can be comfortable to lean onto to be relaxed with. Judging from this story, an individual labelled as useless and/or non-conforming should be proud of her/himself instead of feeling miserable or giving up her/his life.

Having considered these matters, the tolerance seems to be the key to accept individuals labelled as useless. Instead of either abandoning them being excluded from the society mainstream or forcing them to conform to the socioeconomic standard, it might be feasible not to artificially fix the problem so promptly. As Taoism teaches, individuals had better lean how to be passive to the freely flowing spontaneous natural flow of how their surrounding environment changes. Moreover, everyone should be proud of themselves without being either arrogant or miserable. All in all, useless is just one shape existing in the natural world so that it has its own freedom to exist.

ロングライフ

長寿

世界の人間の平均余命は大幅に伸びているため、それ以前に生命を脅かす予期せぬ事故が発生しない限り、これらの個人は最終的に100歳以上まで生きる傾向があります。同時に、最近では、収入を増やし、キャリアパスを改善し、次世代にかなり満足のいく未来を提供する機会がないことに不満を言う人が増えています。平凡、悲惨、そして絶望は、過去よりもさらに長く彼らの人生を悩ませています。これらの個人は彼らのより長い平均余命でより幸せになりましたか？考えてみましょう。

退職年齢に焦点を当てると、多くの国が60歳に設定していましたが、一部の国では65歳または70歳にまで延長しました。前世紀の半ばまで、多くの労働者が70歳になる前に亡くなりました。彼らは、引退後の死の前に残された余暇を惜しまないと主張した。対照的に、彼らの引退後の残り時間はほぼ30年であり、失業を免れるには長すぎます。年金制度は、これらの失業中の高齢者の世話をするための予算を支えるためにもはや持続可能ではありません。予算の無能力は、高齢者人口の増加だけでなく、新世代の出生率の低下にも起因しています。

今日の技術開発は非常に優れているため、多くの企業と少数の幸運なエリート個人がミクロ経済学の利点を享受しています。同時に、世界経済全体が労働集約型ではなく資本集約型にシフトしており、これは労働需要、すなわち雇用が縮小していることを意味します。さらに、彼らの収入とキャリアパスを改善する機会は、企業が合理的な賃金でそれらを雇うためのより厳しいスキルセットとメリットを必要とします。最近、個人の結果の平等のある程度は、以前よりも機会の平等を達成するために不可欠です。しかし、現在の世界の社会経済政策は、依然として、多数派の個人にそのような機会を提供するのに十分な能力も寛大さもありません。

先進国の大多数で出生率が低下しています。これらの居住者は、国民経済の周囲の物理的資源を楽しんでいますが、アクセスの分配は制限されています。主な原因は、マクロ経済市場の乗数の縮小により、可処分所得と社会的流動性の機会の不平等が拡大していることです。したがって、彼らの将来への絶望は彼らが彼らの子孫を産むことを妨げ、彼らは彼ら自身の平凡さと絶望から逃れるのに苦労します。

肉体的な平均余命の拡大に加えて、儲かるライフスタイルにアクセスする機会を欠いている大多数の世界市民にとって、心理的な人生の感覚は長くなっています。これらの個々の市民は、彼らの人生が彼らの儲かるライフスタイルを楽しんでいる少数派のエリートより確かに長いことに気付くかもしれません。彼らは、人間が退屈で、惨めで、そして/または苦痛であると過ごすとき、代わりに刺激的で、魅力的で、そして/または心地よく過ごすときよりも、通過するのに長い時間を費やすように感じます。したがって、タイトルは、「長寿命」の「長」が何を意味するかを考えると、単に「長寿命」です。

経済政策は、社会の最も恵まれないメンバーでさえ、基本的な市民文化の生活水準を享受できるようにしながら、大多数の個人を幸せにするために存在する必要があります。それは異なる経済政策の観点の問題ではありません。市場経済や集産主義経済を支援するかどうかにかかわらず、個人が市民社会で共生するために協力する環境全体を考慮に入れるという目的が存在しなければなりません。そうでなければ、経済学の研究の存在理由はありません。

さらに、誰もが時代遅れの規範や価値観にとらわれることなく、この世界の新しいパラダイムに順応するのに十分積極的でなければなりません。多くの個人は、前世紀の初めに存在していたこれらの時代遅れの規範や価値観を今でも信じているか、それに適応することを余儀なくされています。前述の要因により、企業も政府も仕事と収入の安全を保証しません。したがって、企業や政府などの所属機関が指示したことに反応してはなりません。代わりに、彼らは新しい雇用のためのより良い機会を継続的に探したり、学校に戻ったり、自分の人生哲学を再考するために自由な時間を割いたりする方が良いでしょう。

自由民主主義国では、大多数の個人市民は依然として、これらの前述の要因を無視するエリート官僚を許可する独自の政府党を選出する独自の責任を負っています。おそらく、彼らはまだ自分たちの生活状況をよく理解するのに十分な悟りを持っています。そのような事実を実現するために自分自身を守るために、よりエゴイスティックであることがしばしば重要です

Long life

The life expectancy of human individuals in the world has significantly extended so these individuals will eventually tend to live up to 100 years old or beyond unless there is any unexpected accident threatening their life happening before then. At the same time, more individuals nowadays tend to complain about their lack of opportunities for increasing their income gain, improving their career path, and offering a reasonably satisfactory future for the next generation. Mediocrity, misery, and hopelessness are haunting their life even longer than the past. Have these individuals become happier with their longer life expectancy? Let's consider it.

Focusing on the retiring age, many countries used to set it as 60 years old while some countries have extended it to 65 or even 70. Up to the middle of the last century, many workers died off before turning to be 70 years old, so they claimed to spare their leisure time left before their death after their retirement. By contrast, their time left left after their retirement is almost 3 decades which are way too long to spare for their joblessness. The pension scheme is no longe sustainable to prop up the budget for looking after these jobless elder individuals. The budget incapability is derived from not only the increasing elderly population but also the shrinking fertility rate of the newer generations.

The technological development is so superb nowadays that many firms and a few fortunate elite individuals enjoy their microeconomic advantages. At the same time, the entire world economy is shifting toward the capital intensive rather than the labour intensive which implies that the labour demand i.e., employment is shrinking. Furthermore, the opportunity of improving their income and career path requires more demanding skill-sets and merit for firms to hire them with a reasonable wage. Recently, the certain degree of the equality of outcome for individuals is more essential to accomplish the equality of opportunity than it used to be. However, the socioeconomic policies of the current world are still neither competent nor generous enough to offer such an opportunity for majority individuals.

The fertility rate is dropping down in majority of developed countries. Even though these residents enjoy their surrounding physical resources of their national economy, the distribution of their access is restricted. The main cause is that the inequality of their disposable income and their social mobility opportunity is expanding due to the shrinking macroeconomic market multiplier. Therefore, their desperation for their future prevents them from bearing their offspring, and they struggle to escape from their own mediocrity and desperation.

In addition to the physical life expectancy expansion, the psychological feeling of life has become longer for the majority world citizens lacking the opportunity to access the lucrative lifestyle. These individual citizens may find their life is indeed longer than the minority elites enjoying their lucrative lifestyle. They feel like spending longer time to pass when human individuals spend their time spend as boring, miserable, and/or painful than when they spend it exciting, attractive, and/or pleasantly instead. Therefore, the tittle is simply "Long life" to think of what the "long" of the "long" life implies.

Economic policies should exist to make the majority individuals happy while ensuring that even the least fortunate members of their society enjoy the basic civil cultural standard of living. It is not a matter of different economic policy perspectives. Regardless of supporting the market economy or the collectivist economy, the objective taking the whole environments where individuals cooperate to cohabit in a civic society into consideration must exist. Otherwise, there is no raison d'etre of the study of economics.

In addition, everyone must be proactive enough to adjust themselves to the new paradigm of this world without being restrained by the obsolete norms and values. Many individuals still believe in or are forced to adapt to these obsolete norms and values having existed in the early past of the last century. Neither company nor government will guarantee their job and income security due to the aforementioned factors. So, they must not be reactive to what their belonging institutes such as companies and government direct them. Instead, they has better continuously look for a better opportunity for a new employment, going back to schooling, or sparing some free time to re-think of their own life philosophy.

In liberal-democratic countries, the majority individual citizens still have their own responsibility of electing their own governmental party allowing the elite bureaucrats ignoring these previously mentioned factors. Perhaps, they are still enlightened enough to understand their own life situation well. It is often important to be more egoistic to protect themselves to realise such factors. When a person cannot make her/himself happy, this person cannot deserve the others well. They key is the positive energy flow of one person energising her/him to enable her/him to entertain and help the others.

The government and the corporations taking the initiative in the market economy take an advantage of it by forsaking the majority citizens. Thus, these individual citizens are ought to be angry and more selfish to insist on their needs and wants without being restraint by the altruistic norms and values. In addition, they should be egoistic also to be honest for themselves without compromising their own desires and dreams even if the others disagree or become excessively being worried about this attitude. Hence, the most ostensible, practical, and simple answer to solve this problem is to "Live your own life" regardless of its physical or psychological length of life.

需給ギャップの再評価：幸福はそれの新しい指標となるでしょう

本家英語ブログ「Re-evaluating the output gap: Happiness shall be the new indicator of it」を Google Translate で訳したもの。

長期的な潜在生産能力と短期的なリアルタイム生産性の間のギャップを示す需給ギャップと呼ばれるマクロ経済用語があります。景気循環、つまりリアルタイムでの生産性レベルの出力は、長期的な傾向とともに変動し、潜在的な生産性レベルを提供する構造的能力を示していると考えるのが一般的でした。需給ギャップは、景気循環とその長期的なトレンドとの間のギャップです。その後、トレンドに合わせた景気循環を安定させるためにマクロ経済政策が介入すべきだと示唆していた。

しかし、この理論は、景気循環とその傾向の間に違いがないと見なすリアルビジネスサイクル理論によって大きく挑戦されてきました。この理論により、循環的な景気循環は、構造的生産性自体が変動することを確認するため、常に構造的能力に合わせて調整されます。したがって、景気循環を安定させるための介入がこの理論によれば意味をなさないように、循環的生産性と構造的生産性の間に違いはありません。

リアルビジネスサイクル理論の台頭は、その後、さまざまな経済地域のマクロ経済的介入を思いとどまらせました。そして、世界金融危機などの大規模な景気後退の後に起こった景気後退は、より永続化する可能性が高くなっています。心に残る失業、実質所得の減価償却、そして個人の日常生活の不満は、彼らの原因を単なる構造的無能力であると主張することによって無視される傾向があります。

日本やヨーロッパのさまざまな国などの多くの国では、特に比較的若い世代の人々は、収入とキャリアの見通しを徐々に増やすより良い機会にアクセスする可能性が低いため、人生に不満を示す傾向があります。主な原因の1つは、経済成長の速度の鈍化と市場乗数が過去よりも多様な所得分配を刺激していることです。この現象は、将来への絶望によって引き起こされた少子化と、高齢者よりも比較的若い世代のより介入主義的または集団主義的な社会経済政策を求める政治的支援に反映されています。

それにもかかわらず、これらの絶望的な比較的若い世代の主張と期待は、すでに確立された富と社会的地位を享受しているより政治的に強力で人口の多い高齢者による抑圧のために無視される可能性が非常に高いです。彼らの抑圧の理由は、現在利用可能な構造的能力よりも経済を刺激する能力がないため、少なくとも彼らが主張することに従って、利用可能なものと行われるべきものとの間にギャップがないことです。

一方で、すべての世代の個人をより満足させるためにすべきことは何もないと推測するのは疑わしい。不満とは対照的に、幸福は単に心理的なものであると主張する人もいるかもしれません。そのため、その尺度は主観的であり、現実世界の経済全体の生産性ギャップを拡大するために参照することは信頼できません。

同時に、この心理的要因は、満足のいく収入の増加、儲かる財産の所有権、健康を支える医療サービスへの効率的なアクセス、広く利用可能な生活パターンの選択などの身体的幸福に由来することがよくあります。したがって、個人の幸福は経済政策の方向性を決定する重要な要素でなければなりません。

中央銀行から提供されたお金は、大多数の市民が不幸を示しているように見える場合、日常生活で必要としている個々の市民に、より直接的に分配されるべきです。逆に。社会の大多数の個人が贅沢で不道徳で、愛情のこもった行動を過度に危険にさらし始めたら、マネーサプライはもっと厳しくされるべきです。今日のマネーサプライは、マネーサプライの流動性が行き詰まっている特権企業や政府機関によって独占されており、そのアクセスに固執している人々には分配されていません。

対照的に、不足していると人々が見つける必要性と欲求は、過去よりも表面的でなく、無形です。個人の情報リソースへのアクセス、およびこれらの情報リソースを処理するための教育と技術は、今日の身体的および感情的に満足のいくライフスタイルを維持するために重要です。さらに、彼らのライフスタイルの質は、悲惨な痛みを伴う長寿ではなく、良い長寿を生きるために、過去よりも考慮することがさらに重要になっています。国内総生産（GDP）などの従来の総生産性の数値を使用してライフスタイルの質の程度を測定することは困難です。たとえば、個人のさまざまな社会的グループ間の所得分布を使用して分析する時期である必要があります。

全体として、需給ギャップなどはまだ残っています。それは、その特性が変化した場合にすぎません。 個人の幸福度で分析することは注目に値するが、GDPの数字では注目に値しないかもしれない。 経済的介入の程度を決定するために、従来の対応策に代わる手段を導入する必要があります。

法実証主義の弁護：自由主義と両立する権威主義 (ポリティカルコンパス)

法実証主義の弁護：自由主義と両立する権威主義 (ポリティカルコンパス)

権威主義はしばしば自由主義の二律背反と見なされます。しかし、ジェレミ・ベンサムのような一部のリベラリスト哲学者は、個人全体とその社会を仲介する中核的な仲介機関としての合理的な権威の存在を高く評価しました。この合理的な権威は、公正な判断を下すすべての個人にふさわしい公共財として存在しなければなりません。

さらに、すべての個人に提供される法的な民法の公平性と一貫性を確保するために、それは何らかの形の中央機関を必要とします。この存在の反証は、英米コモンローなどの慣習法、国連（UN）の慣習法、およびローマ時代以前に存在していたさまざまな部族の法典であると考えられています。

多くの自由主義者、特に古典的自由主義と自由主義を支持する人々は、慣習法/自然法はその分散型の形式のために、より自由主義的な法的構造であると断言する傾向があります。しかし、慣習法/自然法の相容れない側面は、それが宗教的およびポピュリストの熱意などの道徳的な起業家によって非常に頻繁に影響を受けるということです。これは逆に、マイノリティに対する不法な道徳的政策と抑圧を引き起こす可能性があります。

さらに、慣習的/自然法による判断は、弁護士などの通訳者の知性と社会的力に影響されることがよくあります。弁護士がより強力であるほど、被告/原告が訴訟に勝つ可能性が高くなります。したがって、より重要な身体的富と社会的地位を持つこれらの個人は、倫理的および法的な正当性に関係なく、はるかに高い利点を利用する可能性が高くなります。

一方、一貫した民法によって支持された法実証主義は、道徳的な起業家による道徳的な独占を防ぎます。これらの法的規範は、公正な社会契約を機能させるために、社会の個人のコンセンサスの下で作成されます。これは通常、すべての個人に、身体的富や社会的地位に関係なく、すべての個人にふさわしい公共財として存在する単一の公共団体によって検証された公正な判断を提供するために設計されています。

もう一つの懸念は、権威主義が非自由主義的特徴につながるという非常に高いリスクがまだあるということです。この2種類の権威主義を区別する重要なポイントは、それが法の支配なのか、人による支配なのかということです。社会主義者、特に正統派マルクス主義を支持する人々は、彼らの利益を保護するブルジョアジーのイデオロギー的生産として法を非難するので、法による支配の重要性を損なう傾向があります。

正統なマルクス主義の見方は、もともと過半数に値するプロレタリア独裁政権を選出し始めました。これらのプロレタリア独裁者の党は、彼らの行動を修正する外部介入がない限り、腐敗の誘惑に陥りがちです。裕福で特権的なエリートは、公正と節度を保証する法の支配の下でさえ権力を獲得するという利点を持っているかもしれません。しかし、これは法律がどのように存在するかによって直接引き起こされるのではありません。それは単に、法的な構造に関係なく、裕福で社会的に特権のある個人がより有利になることができるという場合です。

モンテスキューは、彼の著書「法の精神」の中で、共和国が個々の市民に平等と公正を提供するためには、個人が遵守するための社会的モデルとしての法律が必要であると主張しました。非自由主義的権威主義が多ければ多いほど、法律の重要性は低くなります。これは、特権を享受している個人の選択された数だけに規則が存在するためです。

正統派マルクス主義のような古い社会主義の過ちは、法の存在を人による支配に置き換えることによって法の存在に逆らうことです。人、この場合はプロレタリア党員によるこの規則の下で、法の支配を持つ自由民主主義国家よりもプロレタリア政府が支配するこの規則の不平等はさらに拡大する。

公正な第三者の見解を維持するために、特定の個人グループの利益から切り離された一貫した形式によって実施される法の支配。民法は、同棲する個人間の強いコンセンサスの下で作成される純粋な仲介構造として存在する必要があります。

Authoritarianism is often regarded as the antinomy of Liberalism. However, some Liberalist philosophers such as Jeremy Bentham regarded highly of the existence of the rational authority as a core intermediary body of mediating the whole individuals and their society. This rational authority must exist as a public good deserving for all individuals with a fair judgement.

Furthermore, in order to ensure the fairness and the consistency of legal civil codes provided for all individuals, it requires some form of a central body. The antinomy of this existence is considered to be the customary law such as British and American Common law, the customary law of the United Nation (UN), and various tribal legal codes having existed in the pre-Roman period.

Many Liberalists, especially those supporting Classical-Liberalism and Libertarianism, tend to affirm that the customary/natural law is a more liberalist legal structure because of its decentralised form. However, the incompatible aspect of the customary/natural law is that it is very often influenced by the moral entrepreneurs such as religious and populist zealots. This might conversely induce illberal moral policies and oppressions toward the minorities.

Moreover, the judgement of the customary/natural is frequently influenced by the intelligence and the social power of the interpreters such as the lawyers. More powerful the lawyers are, more chances for defendants/plaintiffs to win the court case. Therefore, these individuals with more significant physical wealth and social status are more likely to take a significantly higher advantage regardless of their ethical and legal justifiability.

On the other hand, Legal Positivism propped up by the consistent civil codes prevents the moral monopoly by moral entrepreneurs. These legal codes are created under the consensus of individuals in a society to functionalise their fair social contracts. It is usually designed for providing all individuals with the fair judgements verified by a single public body existing as a public good deserving for all individuals regardless of their physical wealth and social status.

Another concern is that there is still a very high risk that an authoritarianism leads to an illiberal characteristics. The key point which distinguishes these two kinds of authoritarianism is whether it is the rule by law or the rule by persons. Socialists especially those supporting the orthodox Marxism tend to undermine the importance of the rule by law because they condemn the law as the bourgeoisie ideological production protecting their interests.

The orthodox Marxian perspective has originally started to elect the proletariat dictatorship deserving for a majority, the party of these proletariats are prone to the seduction to corruption unless there is any outside intervention correcting their actions. The wealthy and privileged elites may have an advantage to gain the power even under the rule by law ensuring fairness and moderation. But, this is not directly caused by how the law exists: It is simply the case that the wealthy and socially privileged individuals are more able to be advantageous regardless of any legal structure.

Montesquieu, in his book Spirit of the Laws, insisted that the republic providing individual citizens with equality and fairness requires the law as a social model for individuals to comply with. The more illiberal authoritarianism, the less significant of the law is because the rule exists for the only selected number of individuals enjoying their privileges.

The mistake of the old socialism such as the orthodox Marxism is defying the existence of law by replacing it with the rule by persons. Under this rule by persons, the proletariat party members in this case, the inequality furthermore expands in this rule dominated by the proletariat government than those liberal democratic nations with the rule by law.

In order to keep the fair third person's view, the rule by law implemented by a consistent form which is detached from any interest of a particular group of individuals. The civil code should exist as the pure intermediary structure which is created under the strong consensus among individuals cohabiting together.

守れ、日本国憲法！国民の文化的生活水準の確保(憲法第二十五条)と平和憲法(憲法第九条)のためなら天皇制廃止を妥協してでも護憲派を貫きましょう！

国民の文化的生活水準の確保(憲法第二十五条)と平和憲法(憲法第九条)のためなら天皇制廃止を妥協してでも護憲派を貫きましょう！ 日本国の再軍備を何としてでも阻止するためにも日本国ができるだけ戦禍から遠ざかることを切に願わんばかりです。国民の文化的生活水準の確保(憲法第二十五条)と憲法第九条を守るためなら天皇制廃止を妥協せざるをえなくても平和憲法の護憲派の立場を貫きたい所存でございます。

おそらく確実に世界中での貧富の差は拡大し、そこで世界中の裕福層は自分達の利権保護のために進化し続けるテクノロジーを駆使していくでしょう。その中でその他大勢を支配していくためには、各国に人種や国籍を問わず彼等の傀儡を何人か置いておいてシステムを運営しながら間接的に大衆個人等から収奪していくシステムが既に確立しているからです。

もう一度言います、文化的生活水準の確保(憲法第二十五条)と平和憲法(憲法第九条)のためなら天皇制廃止を妥協してでも護憲派を貫きましょう！

実は改憲の動きが強まっているのも小生が今年、日本を出る予定です。数年前に帰国せざるを得ない理由がございました。しかし諸々の事象があり現在ではもうこの国に未練が無くなりました。親族との縁を切る覚悟でこの際日本国から足を洗う決意ができました。まだ彼の地での生活基盤は確立しておりませんが、餓死や事故死も覚悟してでも外国へ渡る決心がつきました。それでも腐っても我が母国、少しでもこれ以上状況が悪化しないことを切に願います。その一つとして現存のリベラルな憲法は最後の砦です。憲法を甘くみている人々が大きいですが、意見主張する際の原則として存在するため羅針盤としても大切な存在意義があります。そこだけでも日本国の存続意義のためにも切望し続けております。

 

そして女系天皇の支持もよろしく！小生は現在の日本国憲法の維持および女系天皇の容認を認める条件で支持します。

小生は現在の日本国憲法の維持および女系天皇の容認を認める条件で支持します。今まで徹底的に天皇制廃止を望んでいた小生ですが、日本に帰国してから◎ゆちゃんとひ★☆ちゃんと出会ってから彼女みたいなめんこいおなごなら象徴として崇拝するのも悪くないと感じました。そして最初はAKB48とその信者をバカにしていたことがございましたが、地方勤続時代にフォーチュンクッキーというお店がございましてそこの嬢等と戯れているうちにアイドル萌悪くないんじゃないの、AKB48総選挙万歳！っと思うようになりあのアイドルっ子たちが天皇になるんだったら天皇制を支持しても良いかなとも思い始めてきました。それこそ古来日本の神道のあるべき姿に帰化すると思いまして、柳田国男先生のアナーキスト民俗学との整合性も取れてvery good だと思います！

では「日本deサバイバル」は

※ 2022年３月７日の投稿ですが、「★ フェルミ漫画大学 【漫画】お金系」を加えましたので再投稿します。

では否応なしに日本に残らざるを得ない人そしてあらゆる選択肢の中でどうしても日本に残ることを考慮している人々のためにも一考いたしました。正に「日本deサバイバル」についてです。

まず、日本は経済的にも文化的にも貧しくなるでしょうね。たぶん、今よりも余暇に使えるお金も減りかつ周りのエンターテイメントもつまらないものとなっていくでしょう。

ですが、石油の輸入さえ止まらなければまず食料はなんとか自給できるようです。その場合は食べれるお肉の量や食卓のバラエティは減少するでしょうが、野菜は日本国内で自給できますし魚介類も全人口を補えるレベルとはいいがたいが動物性たんぱく質の摂取頻度を下げて漁業を何とか支えていけばなんとか日本国民は養えるようです。つまり、昔ながらのつつましい日本人の食卓に戻ればまず食料に関してはそこまで恐れることはないでしょうね。

ただ日本人の可処分所得も減っていくことでしょうから貯蓄もままならないギリギリの生活をする日本人は多くなる恐れはございます。その場合は、本当に身近な家族や親族そして近しい友人関係により重きを置きその尊さを実感するでしょうね。ですから、家族や親戚との関係が特別悪くないのなら無理して日本出る必要もないのかと思います。

まぁ、経済が貧しくなるということでそれが引き金になって起こる社会問題は発生しそうではありますが、恐らく外国がらみの問題は減っていくことになるでしょうね。理由は、日本も貧しくなりますが、欧米も庶民レベルでは同時にそこそこ貧しくなっていき、そもそも大勢が外国にまで出向いて何かをするという時代ではなくなるからです。これからの世の中、国家間の貧富の差は縮小していく中その中での個人間の貧富の差が拡大していきますので、ある意味世界は平等になっていくのです。

おそらく確実に世界中での貧富の差は拡大し、そこで世界中の裕福層は自分達の利権保護のために進化し続けるテクノロジーを駆使していくでしょう。その中でその他大勢を支配していくためには、各国に人種や国籍を問わず彼等の傀儡を何人か置いておいてシステムを運営しながら間接的に大衆個人等から収奪していくシステムが既に確立しているからです。

PS もし日本で生活していてマジで困ったら迷わず『生活保護』を取りましょう！小生のブログで生活保護関係YouTubeチャンネルを紹介しておりますので詳しく知りたいお方はそちらもご参照願います。

あと、お金についての悩みについてのヒントの YouTube Channel。こちらも小生の日本語ブログに「★ フェルミ漫画大学 【漫画】お金系」で動画を抜擢しました。

 

2022年5月2日

OTONO投稿, YouTuber紹介, 政治経済社会, 未分類, 未来予測