29/12/2016 (evening) Accoding to Prof.KAKISHIMA, the 3 victims above and I had the same character, that is, "Fundamentalists". Hummmmm. What the word means? Also according to her, "fundamentalist" means that a person who behaves as he expresses on himself. Maybe, honest people should be called as "fundamentalists" by Prof.KAKISHIMA.
In other words, in Faculty of Law at Univ. of Tokyo, it's common that a figure behaves totally against what he says. So, we, honest people are minority, and shall not survive. Hypocrats are their standard model, probably.
It reminds me the expression that Prof.Yoichi HIGUCHI used. He said to us, students of graduate school at that time, "In Europe, Judges in Constitutional Courts says that they don't separate their theory in University from practice in the courts. It was impressive for me. "
It signified that for prof.HIGUCHI, it's common that the attitude as a professor should be different from as a lawyer in practice. They declare something morally respectful, while they act vulgerly in effect. In a class room, they accuse rapists, while in a train, they themselves are allowed to turn to be a sexual attackers, we can say.
One of his pupil, ex-professor of Univ. of TOHOKU and actual professor of Tokyo Metropolitan University called prof.ARIKAWA of Constitutional Law, in fact, touched a lady's body without her will in the train, because she was his favorete type, when he was associate professor of Univ. of Tokyo. He was expulsed from Univ. of Tokyo, however, soon he was employed by Univ. of TOHOKU, one of the renoun university of Japan, from which Prof.HIGUCHI had graduated. How easily he was forgiven in academic society in Japan!
For male professors, touching female body is highly common and should be treated as most tolerant as possible. They want mom's bust always and it's a males' nature, they think, probably. They can't recognize difference between baby and adult. How weak their recognition ability is! With this weak recognition ability, how they can teach and how they can live, I wonder. Strange existences, their name is Japanese professors of Law.
In other words, in Faculty of Law at Univ. of Tokyo, it's common that a figure behaves totally against what he says. So, we, honest people are minority, and shall not survive. Hypocrats are their standard model, probably.
It reminds me the expression that Prof.Yoichi HIGUCHI used. He said to us, students of graduate school at that time, "In Europe, Judges in Constitutional Courts says that they don't separate their theory in University from practice in the courts. It was impressive for me. "
It signified that for prof.HIGUCHI, it's common that the attitude as a professor should be different from as a lawyer in practice. They declare something morally respectful, while they act vulgerly in effect. In a class room, they accuse rapists, while in a train, they themselves are allowed to turn to be a sexual attackers, we can say.
One of his pupil, ex-professor of Univ. of TOHOKU and actual professor of Tokyo Metropolitan University called prof.ARIKAWA of Constitutional Law, in fact, touched a lady's body without her will in the train, because she was his favorete type, when he was associate professor of Univ. of Tokyo. He was expulsed from Univ. of Tokyo, however, soon he was employed by Univ. of TOHOKU, one of the renoun university of Japan, from which Prof.HIGUCHI had graduated. How easily he was forgiven in academic society in Japan!
For male professors, touching female body is highly common and should be treated as most tolerant as possible. They want mom's bust always and it's a males' nature, they think, probably. They can't recognize difference between baby and adult. How weak their recognition ability is! With this weak recognition ability, how they can teach and how they can live, I wonder. Strange existences, their name is Japanese professors of Law.
※コメント投稿者のブログIDはブログ作成者のみに通知されます