お題：反論する権利の行使にはどんな制限も必要ありませんか。
The right to freedom of speech has been limited by the Constitution of Japan.
It says that the public welfare can not be hurt by any individual rights.
Except for this rule, there should not be any limits on the right to freedom of speech.
I give two reasons to support my opinion.
First, the right to freedom of speech is the most important for people to establish the democratic society.
If it were limited by additional laws, people would have difficulties to keep their social lives.
Second, most people hope that hate speeches should be banned.
In that case, the Constitution of Japan is effective.
In short, the rule that newly confines the right to freedom of speech is not necessary.
For these reasons, I believe that the right to freedom of speech should be guaranteed.
The right to freedom of speech has been limited by the Constitution of Japan.
It says that the public welfare can not be hurt by any individual rights.
Except for this rule, there should not be any limits on the right to freedom of speech.
I give two reasons to support my opinion.
First, the right to freedom of speech is the most important for people to establish the democratic society.
If it were limited by additional laws, people would have difficulties to keep their social lives.
Second, most people hope that hate speeches should be banned.
In that case, the Constitution of Japan is effective.
In short, the rule that newly confines the right to freedom of speech is not necessary.
For these reasons, I believe that the right to freedom of speech should be guaranteed.
