The United States should announce a "balanced countervailing duty" system in which t

To everyone in the world's media　

I will provide the missing materials so please request by email.

Weekday edition, May 22, 2025
It is said that the balance of power within the Trump administration is changing. President Trump is "happy" to have "good friends"!

The high tariff policy is led by Peter Navarro, a senior advisor to the president who is a leader of the "protectionist faction." I believe that "high tariffs" are necessary to "bring the other party to the negotiating table."

Scott Becent, the Treasury Secretary of the "fair trade faction," says that "tariffs are just a negotiating tool." So how will they eliminate the "trade deficit"?

I understand the arguments of the "fair trade faction," but a "trade balance" cannot be achieved through national-level negotiations. In other words, the situation will remain the same as before.

I believe that a system is needed to balance "exports and imports" at the corporate level, and have proposed a system called "provisional name: balanced countervail-ing duties." Companies will have to make efforts "at the risk of life and death."

The United States should announce a "balanced countervailing duty" that will result in "zero tariffs" if companies achieve "export and import balance" at the "corporate level."

"Balanced countervailing duties" is a system in which if a company achieves "ex-port-import equilibrium" in trade with the United States for a certain period of time, the tariff will be "zero".

This is a system in which the United States subtracts "export amount from import amount" and imposes "Trump tariffs" on the difference. If a company makes an ef-fort, the "tariff" will be zero.

If a fabless company like Apple exports "American products" from the United States to China and the United States imports "iPhones" from China, the "Trump tariff" will be imposed on the "export-import difference".

If a Chinese company exports "general stores, textile products, etc." to the United States and exports "American products" from the United States to China, the "Trump tariff" will be imposed on the "export-import difference".

If Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. of Japan exports Nissan cars to the United States on a car transport ship and imports American-made cars on the return journey, the Trump tariff will be imposed only on the "export-import difference".

Toyota Tsusho, Toyota's trading company, was originally established for the pur-pose of exporting Toyota cars and importing products from exporting countries.

If a balanced countervailing duty is created, Toyota can import American products through Toyota Tsusho and reduce the Trump tariff to zero.

President Trump imposed the Trump tariff to eliminate the trade deficit. The world was surprised. Instead of complaining about Trump, the world should develop things that can be imported from the United States.

The problem is the EU. They don't want to import American products. That's why I propose that the United States import energy from Russia (intermediary trade) and export it to Europe.

Import from the United States what Russia exports to the United States and bal-ance the trade balance. It is faster for the United States to negotiate with Russia than with the EU. The world is rosy.

Part 1 References
[Scanner] Changes in the balance of power within the US administration... Tariff "fair trade faction" adjusts, diplomatic "hardliner against China" weakens
https://www.yomiuri.co.jp/world/20250504-OYT1T50102/

I will write again tomorrow.

Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".

"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!

First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.

"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.

In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.

However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.

As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".

As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.

Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.

In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".

In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) ​​were also arrested.

The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".

The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.

"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)

The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".

If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).

Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.

The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:

1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."

2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).

3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."

4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."

5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."

6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."

This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."

This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.

The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."

My argument:

"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.

"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.

Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.

The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."

However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.

The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.

Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.

Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.

Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.

Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.

Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."

NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/
NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.

Thank you.

Yasuhiro Nagano

Past articles can be viewed at the blog below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp