To everyone in the world's media
I will provide the missing materials so please request by email.
August 20, 2025
Trump misjudged the situation in the Ukraine war. Ukraine has no chance of victory. There's a Japanese proverb that goes, "There are miraculous victories, but no miraculous defeats."
I believe President Putin should end the war with a non-nuclear EMP. With global warming, the world needs to change the way wars are fought. Gunpow-der weapons should be banned.
Nuclear EMPs are banned. However, the U.S. Congress has expressed serious concerns. They're making a big fuss about Russia trying to destroy Starlink with an electromagnetic pulse.
That's why, as a first step, I propose using a non-nuclear EMP against Russia. A non-nuclear EMP is usable because it doesn't involve a "nuclear explosion."
The U.S. Congress has stated that without SpaceX's Starlink satellite internet system, Ukraine would have experienced an information blackout during the Ukraine war.
There are bans that could destroy large numbers of satellites themselves. A high-altitude nuclear explosion would create a powerful EMP (electromagnetic pulse), destroying electronic circuits and disabling Western satellites.
This would affect not only military satellites but also communications, broad-casting, navigation, and observation satellites, threatening serious disruption to military and civilian infrastructure.
Although the use of nuclear weapons in space was banned during the Cold War in the late 1960s, Congress is concerned that President Putin is considering us-ing nuclear weapons on satellites.
They fear that Russia will use nuclear weapons against satellites rather than dropping them on Earth. Of course, the electromagnetic waves raining down on Earth would destroy electronic circuits on the ground.
The United States does not have the capability to defend its own satellites! Therefore, the use of a "high-altitude EMP" is "impossible to prevent." This is a point that all experts agree on.
The United States is concerned that Russia will abandon the Outer Space Treaty (established in 1967), which guarantees freedom of exploration and use of out-er space, prohibits territorial occupation, and the principle of peaceful use of outer space.
President Trump's announcement that he plans to build a "Golden Dome" to protect outer space from high-altitude missile attacks is clearly nonsense.
The use of nuclear weapons in outer space is prohibited by the 1963 Partial Nu-clear-Test-Ban Treaty (PTBT) and the Outer Space Treaty. President Putin may withdraw from both treaties.
That is why I am proposing that Russia end the Ukraine war with a non-nuclear EMP before using an EMP from a high-altitude nuclear explosion.
I believe that the adoption of a non-nuclear EMP as a weapon would change the "common sense of weapons." Current weapons manufacturing facilities would become redundant, and the defense industry would be thrown into chaos.
EMP weapons do not kill or injure people. They do not destroy buildings. They do not emit carbon dioxide. The world should make EMP the next generation of weapons. Trump should be a leader in this effort.
Part 1: References
Will President Putin Take "Prohibited" Actions? U.S. Congress expresses serious concerns: "Russia is attempting to disrupt Starlink with electromagnetic puls-es."
https://jbpress.ismedia.jp/articles/-/79452
I'll write again tomorrow.
Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese)
Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".
"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!
First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.
"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.
In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.
However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.
As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".
As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.
Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.
In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".
In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) were also arrested.
The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".
The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.
"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)
The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".
If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).
Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.
The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:
1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."
2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).
3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."
4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."
5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."
6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."
This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."
This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.
The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."
My argument:
"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.
"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.
Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.
The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."
However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.
The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.
Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.
Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.
Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.
Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.
Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."
NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/
NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/
For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.
Thank you.
Yasuhiro Nagano
