To everyone in the world's media
I will provide the missing materials so please request by email.
July 28, 2025
The moment it is thrown, an electromagnetic wave explodes, stopping drones, robots, and missiles all at once! It seems that "EMP weapons" will soon be used in the Ukrainian war.
In 1945, the age of nuclear weapons began with the Hiroshima-Nagasaki at-tacks. Just 12 years later, a nuclear test conducted by the United States caused an unbelievable phenomenon.
Street lights and communication devices 1,400 kilometers from the launch site stopped functioning in an instant. The time for this to be used in Ukraine is ap-proaching.
The term EMP (electromagnetic pulse) first attracted attention in 1962, when the United States conducted a high-altitude nuclear test called "Starfish Prime." Should this be called a "weapon of terror" or a "weapon of peace"?
The Soviet Union (now Russia) also conducted similar experiments and recog-nized the threat of EMP. During the Cold War, it was noted as a means of de-stroying each other's urban functions. A new concept of missile defense, EMP preemptive attack, has emerged.
Russia is exhausted by the prolonged Ukrainian war. If nuclear weapons are used, it will lead to unconditional surrender or nuclear war in World War III.
However, the international community condemns the use of nuclear weapons. That is why the United States could not use nuclear bombs in the Vietnam War.
In this Ukrainian war, I think President Putin has considered using nuclear weapons in Ukraine many times. President Putin believes that using nuclear weapons would not gain support from the BRICS countries.
As the Ukrainian war shows, wars using conventional weapons are not con-demned. In the world, as long as nuclear weapons are not used, they are con-sidered legitimate weapons.
However, non-nuclear EMP weapons that generate EMP without using nuclear weapons have also appeared today. I think Russia has already developed them. President Putin is hesitant.
President Putin should use "non-nuclear EMP weapons". This is a weapon that has never been used in actual combat. President Putin should use "non-nuclear EMP weapons" in Ukraine.
Even if Russia uses "EMP weapons", it will not "kill" people. It does not destroy buildings. It does not emit CO2, so it is a safe weapon that protects the envi-ronment.
However, due to the effects of the powerful electromagnetic pulse, products that are "civilized equipment" equipped with electronic devices will break down and become unusable. Most weapons will probably become unusable.
Before Russia uses it in the Ukrainian war, Russia should hold a meeting with the leaders of the United States and China. It is a meeting to create a "Tripartite Military Alliance (G3MA)" of the three countries.
If the G3MA is formed, Ukraine and European countries will not be able to counter the G3MA. If the three countries unilaterally decide to "end the war," they will not be able to counter the G3MA.
Part 1 References
History of military use of electromagnetic pulse (EMP) and the future of concern
https://electricity.ayakashi-web.com/category47/category51/entry235.html
I will write again tomorrow.
Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".
"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!
First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.
"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.
In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.
However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.
As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".
As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.
Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.
In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".
In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) were also arrested.
The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".
The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.
"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)
The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".
If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).
Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.
The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:
1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."
2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).
3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."
4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."
5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."
6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."
This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."
This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.
The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."
My argument:
"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.
"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.
Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.
The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."
However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.
The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.
Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.
Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.
Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.
Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.
Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."
NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/
NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/
For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.
Thank you.
Yasuhiro Nagano