【中国の「ゼロコロナ」政策全面敗北？】

本日は連載一時休止で、久しぶりに世界の動き・時事ネタを。
先般来中国で「白紙革命」という事象が出現していた。
過剰な「ゼロコロナ」政策に対して若者たちを中心に「PCRはいらない」
「習近平やめろ」「共産党やめろ」という声が上げられた。
IT技術を悪用するにいいだけ悪用して
全人民監視国家を作り上げ、終身独裁体制を作ったと思われた途端、
独裁政権に無辜の人びとがきわめて素朴な「民主主義」的な声を上げた。
世界中がハラハラして、天安門以来の大弾圧、恐怖が再来かと
身構えて注視していたけれど、現在までの情勢では習近平側の政策後退が
次々と露わになってきている。
中国から日本に亡命している石平氏の最新12/10youtube動画によると
「◇習政権、「ダブル敗戦」の大打撃
◇止まらない経済沈没、苦しいときの「日本頼み」か 」という解説。
その報道によると、習近平は自らの独裁強化の政策手段として
悪用していた「ゼロコロナ」政策への民の批判の声に対して一気に腰砕け。
自ら過ちを認めることなく、直接の担当者「中国国家衛生健康委員会」からの
政策転換「新十条」発表で公然と逃げ出しはじめている状況が解説されていた。
１　PCR定期検査の廃止
２　48時間以内のPCR陰性証明提示義務の廃止
３　自治体間移動の際のPCR陰性証明提示義務の廃止
など、ほぼ全面的な「ゼロコロナ政策」破綻の自己暴露。
氏の背景解説によれば、未曾有の経済危機が中国に迫っていることが
この政策転換の背景にあって、いかにもシリに火が付いた状態とされていた。
中国の経済指標は次々と悪化の様相を呈してきているとのこと。
世界各国からの資本逃避の動きが加速してきて
これまで居丈高に「中国市場に参入させてやる」態度で接していたのが
掌返ししてきている様子も伝えられていた。
困ったときには日本を再び利用しようという魂胆丸見えの姿勢とか。

歴史的に中国で繰り返されてきた政治動乱が再びなのか。
いまのところ、氏の解説がこの事実報道の嚆矢のようなので、
言われていることが本当に事実であるのかどうか、
他の報道なども慎重に見極めていく必要があると思われる。
これが事実であれば、世界に与えていく影響は大きいだろう。
ゼロコロナなどという不合理な政策は世界全体から放逐されていく。
一方で衛生管理・医療資源の脆弱な中国では感染拡大が広がる可能性もあり
そのことが世界経済にも大きな後退要因になる。
経済圏としてのアジア地域経済にとっても不安定化要因。
それは日本を直撃してくる可能性が高い。
しばらくは、こういう推移を注視する必要がありますね。
＜写真は奈良県の高鴨神社で本文とは無関係＞


English version⬇

China's "Zero Corona" Policy Totally Defeated?
The dictatorship quickly crumbled in response to the blank check revolution of "no PCR," "stop Xi Jinping," and "stop the Communist Party" and abandoned the zero corona? ...

Today, we take a pause in our series of articles on world developments and current events.
Recently in China, a "blank slate revolution" has emerged.
In response to the excessive "zero-corona" policy, people, especially young people, have been saying "No more PCRs," "Stop Xi Jinping," and "Stop the Communist Party.
The "zero-corona" policy was met with cries of "No more PCR," "Stop Xi Jinping," and "Stop the Communist Party.
Abuse IT technology as much as you want to abuse it.
Once it was thought that he had created a state of total surveillance of the people and a dictatorship for life, the
Once the dictatorship was thought to have been created, innocent people raised very simple "democratic" voices against the dictatorship.
The world was on edge, bracing itself for a return of the great repression and terror
But the situation to date has revealed a series of policy setbacks on the part of Xi Jinping.
However, the situation to date has revealed one policy setback after another on the part of Xi Jinping.
According to the latest youtube video on 12/10 by Mr. Shi Ping, who has been living in exile in Japan from China
The Xi administration has suffered a double defeat.
The video also explains that Xi Jinping's administration has been suffering from a "double defeat," and that he is "relying on Japan" in times of hardship.
According to the report, Xi Jinping has been using the "zero-corner" policy, which he has been abusing as a means of strengthening his dictatorship, as a policy measure.
The report states that Xi Jinping has been buckling under the criticism of the people for his "Zero Corona" policy, which he has been abusing as a means to strengthen his dictatorship.
Without admitting his own mistakes, Xi Jinping announced the "New Ten Articles," a change in policy, from the "National Health and Medical Commission of China," which is directly in charge of the policy.
The situation was explained as follows
1 Abolition of periodic PCR testing
2 Abolition of the obligation to present PCR negative proof within 48 hours
3 Abolition of the obligation to present PCR-negative proof when moving between municipalities
and so on, almost a total self-exposure of the collapse of the "zero-corona policy".
According to his background explanation, the unprecedented economic crisis looming in China
The background of this policy shift was considered to be the state of fire in Siri.
China's economic indicators have been deteriorating one after another, he said.
The flight of capital from countries around the world is accelerating.
The Chinese government, which had been taking a stout stance to "let them enter the Chinese market," is now turning its back on them.
But it was also reported that they are now turning their back on the Chinese market.
They are now taking a "let them enter the Chinese market" attitude, but they are now turning their back on Japan when they are in trouble.

Is this the same political upheaval that has historically repeated itself in China?
So far, his commentary seems to be the pioneer of this factual reporting, so I wonder if what is being said is really true.
I will carefully watch other reports to see if what is being said is really true or not.
We will have to carefully examine other news reports to see if what is being said is really true.
If this is true, it will have a great impact on the world.
Irrational policies such as zero coronas will be thrown out of the entire world.
On the other hand, there is a possibility that the spread of infection will spread in China, where sanitation and medical resources are fragile, and this will be a major setback to the global economy.
This would also be a major setback for the global economy.
It is also a destabilizing factor for the economies of the Asian region as an economic zone.
It is highly likely that it will hit Japan directly.
We need to watch these developments closely for a while.
<Photo: Takagamo Shrine in Nara Prefecture, unrelated to the text

【国家創成＝経済発展と神武東征 日本列島37,000年史-40】

きのう皇學館大学・岡田登名誉教授の説をご紹介しました。
日本政治の初源期においての最大のポイントが「外交」であったという考え。
経済としての日本社会の発展は弥生の水田農耕が列島に拡散していったことで
その農耕最適地がどんどん東進していった。
九州南部は独特の土壌地質であって、水田農耕としては瀬戸内海地域から
さらに畿内地域、東海・北陸と経済社会拡大が進展していった。
アジアからの旺盛な移民流入もあったに違いない。
ことは食糧にかかわることなので当然人口爆発ということと同義だった。
そういう社会環境の進展の中で祭政として方向性を領導する支配層は
中国社会が国家を生成させることで発展の加速力を得ていることを
交渉・交易の過程で強烈に体験させられただろうと思う。
漢は鉄という産業の最重要ポイントを「国家管理」することで
社会発展をこれみよがしに周辺の社会に強く認識させていった。
漢字という共通コミュニケーション手段をも創造し、
社会コントロール方法としての「政治支配」構造をつくり出していた。
こういった「外圧」があったときに歴史年代の日本社会がどう対応したか。
直近では明治の開国、そして戦後の社会変動を見れば、
日本の選択というのは一択だった可能性がもっとも高い。
そういう「外圧」をむしろ積極的にテコにして社会進化を進める。
統一国家というものの強烈な「有用性」を目の当たりにすれば
それを積極的に導入し「学んで」咀嚼していくのが列島人社会の特質。
明治国家、戦後国家がたどったと同じ内容のことが最初期体験として
この段階で生起したと考える方がはるかに妥当だと思える。

日本社会でもその地理的な要素から農業発展には濃度の違いが生まれ
各地域で「八百万」の支配構造が自然に生成されていただろうけれど、
その各指導層としては経済で根幹的に重要な鉄の確保が
中国国家によって左右される現実の中で、それへの対応を常に迫られていた。
各地域間の覇権同士では競合関係もあっただろうし、
それらの「合従連衡」関係も進展していったに違いない。
出雲王権とはこういうゆるやかな連合関係の存在だったか。
そういうなかで「神武東征」という「日本」国家の起動要因が生成した。
こういった「大状況把握」がふさわしいとわたしには思えます。
そして「統一政権国家」というものの実効性を考えれば
対外的な文化導入地域としては北部九州が適地だとはいえ、
政権の列島支配のバランスを考えれば「東征」に蓋然性がある。
この時代の、そしてそれ以降の社会の構図として
畿内地域が中央政府所在地としてはもっとも妥当だったのだろう。
最終的に奈良平野地域が選択されたのには、独自の条件もあっただろう。
この要因分析とその後の社会発展に於いてこの選択が日本人と国家にとって
最適解であったかどうかは検証の余地があるだろう。
一方で奈良平野が選択されたことで生じた社会経済文化的な特異要因も
大いに検証されていく必要があると思う。こっちの方が興味深いか（笑）。


English version⬇

The Creation of a Nation = Economic Development and the Jimmu Expedition to the East 37,000 Years of the Japanese Archipelago - 40]
Eastward expansion of rice paddy farming throughout Japan. The economic and social development by the establishment of the Chinese state was seen on the side. The probability of the Jinmu expedition and the creation of a nation increased.

Yesterday I introduced a theory by Professor Emeritus Noboru Okada of Kōgakukan University.
He believes that diplomacy was the most important factor in the early period of Japanese politics.
The development of Japanese society as an economy was the result of the spread of Yayoi rice paddy farming across the archipelago.
The optimum land for agriculture moved eastward.
Southern Kyushu has a unique soil geology, and paddy field agriculture was developed in the Seto Inland Sea region, the Kinai region, the Tokai region, the Tokai region, and the Tokai and Tokai regions.
The economic and social expansion of the region continued to progress from the Seto Inland Sea region to the Kinai region, and then to the Tokai and Hokuriku regions.
There must have been a strong influx of immigrants from Asia.
The population explosion was naturally synonymous with the food shortage.
In such an evolving social environment, the ruling class, which guided the direction of the government as a ceremonial regime, had the responsibility to ensure that Chinese society would be able to generate a nation.
Chinese society was gaining an acceleration of development through the creation of the state.
The Han Dynasty was the most important industrial power in the iron industry, and it was the most important industry in China.
By "state controlling" the most important point of industry, iron, the Han
The Han Dynasty, by "state control" of the most important point of its iron industry, made the surrounding societies aware of its social development.
The Han also created a common means of communication in the form of Chinese characters
This was a way to control society and create a structure of "political domination".
How did Japanese society in the historical period respond to such "external pressure"?
Looking at the most recent period, the opening of Japan to the outside world in the Meiji era, and the social changes that occurred after the war, it is clear that Japan had only one choice.
It is most likely that Japan had only one choice.
Japan's social evolution was driven by such "external pressure" rather than by its own positive leverage.
If we see the strong "usefulness" of a unified nation, we will actively introduce and "learn" it.
The characteristic of the archipelagic societies is that they actively introduce, "learn," and chew it up.
It is much more likely that the same thing that happened to the Meiji and postwar nations
It is far more plausible to think that the same thing that happened to the Meiji and postwar states occurred at this stage of their initial experience.

Even in Japanese society, the geographical factors created differences in the concentration of agricultural development.
The "eight million" ruling structure would have been naturally generated in each region, but the leaders would have been more concerned with the economy.
However, the reality is that the Chinese state is in charge of securing iron, which is fundamentally important for the economy.
The leaders of each of these regions had to deal with the reality that the Chinese nation was in control of the availability of iron, which was fundamentally important to their economies.
There may have been competition among regional hegemons.
The Izumo kingdom was not a loose, united entity, but a "combination" of the two.
The Izumo royalty may have existed in such a loose federative relationship.
It was in such a situation that the "Jimmu expedition" was the starting factor of the "Japanese" state.
I believe that this kind of "grasp of the larger situation" is appropriate.
And if we consider the effectiveness of the "unified government state
Although northern Kyushu was the best place to introduce Japanese culture to the outside world, it was not the best place to introduce Japanese culture to the Japanese people.
However, the balance of the regime's control over the archipelago makes the "Eastern Expedition" more probable.
The composition of society in this period and beyond
The Kinai region was probably the most appropriate location for the central government.
The final choice of the Nara Plain region may have had its own unique conditions.
In analyzing these factors and the subsequent social development, it is important to examine whether this choice was the optimal solution for the Japanese people and the nation.
There is room to verify whether this choice was the best solution for the Japanese people and the nation in the analysis of these factors and the subsequent development of society.
On the other hand, the socioeconomic and cultural peculiarities that resulted from the selection of the Nara Plain also need to be examined.
I think it is necessary to examine the socioeconomic and cultural peculiarities that resulted from the selection of the Nara Plain. This is more interesting (laugh).

【辛酉思想と対中外交「日本」創生 日本列島37,000年史-39】

邪馬台国論争、日本王権の古代史ではさまざまな研究がされているけれど、
いまだに「通説」と言われる決定打は出てこない。
とくに古事記・日本書紀の記述で歴代天皇の在位年が人間の体力常識を越えて
異常な高齢生存と記述されているので「神話」とされてきたことが
大きな要素になっているのだと思います。実はこの点について最近、
皇學館大学名誉教授の岡田登氏の解説に感銘を受けました。
歴史作家で直木賞作家の安部龍太郎氏は好きな作家なのですが、
かれが２年前に小学館から出版した「日本はこうしてつくられた:
大和を都に選んだ古代王権の謎」という本の中でこの岡田氏の説が紹介されていた。
〜９代までの天皇の在位年の異常な長さの原因は国家創成期の対外関係、
日本国家を認定させるための唐王朝との外交折衝の結果だという。
唐側には皇帝は「辛酉」の年に天命を受けて国家を創設する思想があって
それに合わせるには、本来１世紀はじめ頃と推認される初代神武天皇が
その思想に合致させるために紀元前660年に即位したことになった。〜
※辛酉というのは西暦年を60で割って1が余る年。革命要素があるとされる。

第10代の崇神天皇について考古的に「纏向遷都」が事実とされてきている。
以降の天皇の在位記録については合理性があるとされているので、
この説に強く惹かれた次第です。
結果、神武東征は１世紀初頭という説が常識的な判断となる。
そしてもうひとつ、日本の国家創生には東アジア、とくに中国王権との
強い緊張関係が非常に重要な要素だったというポイント。
われわれ現代人は、国家は当然の存在という常識バイアスが強いけれど、
言うまでもなく創成期にはそういうバイアスはない。
もっと直接的な「脅威」が存在していたという方が必然性が高い。
国立歴史民俗博物館での展示では、こういう事情を背景説明するように
この時期の中国王権・漢の社会について確証に基づいた解説。
わが国の寺院建築などでよくみられる「四神」イデオロギーが一般化している。
そして「漢字」という文字の体系によって政府の記録が保存され
その文書として「木簡」形式とそれを緊結させる製本方法までが誕生している。
秦の時代からの社会の全把握システムが成熟をみせてきている。
鉄という経済推進力、政治システムの発展進化。
軍事的な脅威という以上に根底的な「危機意識」が日本の支配層に
急速に拡大していったことは体感的に理解できる。
その危機意識が神武という存在に凝集し「東征」を成功させたのではないか。
各地に生成されていた古代地域権力にとってもこの危機認識が共有されていた。
奈良盆地での日本国家生成のリアリティを強く感じる。


English version⬇

The State Society of the Han Dynasty in China in the 1st and 2nd Centuries. 37,000 Years of Japanese Archipelago History-39
The year of Jinmu's accession to the throne was set in accordance with the idea that heavenly destiny would be revolutionized in the year of the rooster. Responded to the description with diplomatic pressure. Shared recognition of the necessity of a unified archipelago nation. ・・・・・・.

Although various studies have been conducted on the controversy of the "evil kingdom" and the ancient history of Japanese kingship, no definitive "common theory" has yet emerged.
However, there is still no definitive "common theory" that has emerged.
In particular, the reigning years of emperors in the Kojiki and Nihonshoki are described as abnormally old, beyond the common sense of human physical strength, so it has been described as a "myth.
The fact that the reigns of emperors in the Kojiki and Nihonshoki are considered "myths" is a major factor in this.
I think this is a major factor. In fact, I have recently read a book on this point by
I was impressed by the commentary of Noboru Okada, professor emeritus at Kōgakukan University, who is a history writer and Naoki Prize-winning author.
Ryutaro Abe, a Naoki Prize-winning historical writer, is one of my favorite authors.
He published a book titled "This is How Japan Was Created" two years ago from Shogakukan:
In his book "How Japan Was Created: The Mystery of the Ancient Kingship that Chose Yamato as Its Capital," published by Shogakukan two years ago, Okada's theory was introduced.
〜The reason for the unusual length of the reign of emperors from the first to the ninth emperor was foreign relations during the founding period of the nation, and
The reason for the unusual length of the reign of the first nine emperors was the result of diplomatic negotiations with the Tang Dynasty to have the Japanese nation recognized as a state.
The Tang Dynasty had the idea that an emperor was to receive a heavenly command and establish a state in the year of the "Xin-Yu" (the year of the rooster).
In order to conform to this, the first Emperor Jinmu, who is estimated to have been around the beginning of the 1st century, was appointed as the first emperor of the Tang Dynasty.
To match this idea, the first Emperor Jinmu, who is estimated to have ascended the throne in the early 1st century B.C., was supposed to have ascended the throne in 660 B.C. ~.
*Hin-Yu is the year in which the Western year is divided by 60 and one is left over. It is said to have revolutionary elements.

It has been archaeologically accepted as a fact that the 10th Emperor Sojin was the first to reign.
Since it is considered reasonable for the reign records of subsequent emperors
I was strongly attracted to this theory.
As a result, the theory that the Jinmu expedition took place in the early 1st century is a common-sense decision.
And one more thing, the strong tension with East Asia, especially with the Chinese royalty, was a very important element in the creation of the Japanese nation.
The other point is that strong tension with East Asia, especially with the Chinese royalty, was a very important factor in the creation of the Japanese state.
We modern people have a strong common sense bias that a nation is a natural entity, but it goes without saying that such a bias existed in the early days of the nation.
However, it goes without saying that we do not have such a bias in the early days of Japan.
It is more inevitable that a more direct "threat" existed.
In the exhibition at the National Museum of Japanese History, as if to explain the background of this situation
The exhibition at the National Museum of Japanese History provides an explanation of Chinese royalty and Han Chinese society during this period, based on evidence.
The "Four Gods" ideology, which is often seen in temple architecture in Japan, has become common.
The Chinese writing system of "Chinese characters" was used to keep government records.
The "wooden letter" format and the bookbinding method to bind them together were born as documents.
The entire system of grasping society that had existed since the Qin Dynasty had reached maturity.
The economic driving force of iron, and the development and evolution of the political system.
The rapid expansion of the Japanese ruling class's sense of crisis, which was more fundamental than a military threat, was a result of the rapid expansion of their sense of understanding.
This sense of crisis was manifested in the existence of the Jinmu.
This sense of crisis may have coalesced in the presence of Jinmu, who successfully led the "Eastern Expedition" to Japan.
This sense of crisis was also shared by the ancient regional powers that had been established in various regions.
I strongly feel the reality of the formation of the Japanese nation in the Nara Basin.

【日本国家創成期の国際関係 日本列島37,000年史-38】

さていよいよ日本列島に国家というものが生成される歴史過程になる。
邪馬台国論争とか、古代史最大のナゾという領域なので
国立歴史民俗博物館展示でも総じて抑制的でしたが、しかし、
その後の社会変化にとって決定的でもある。避けて通るわけにも行きません。
観察者としての個人的見解ということでご理解いただければ幸い。
できるだけ客観的な事象に絞って稿を進めてみたい。

中国では秦の成立以降、中央集権的な「中華皇帝」国家が出現する。
それ以前の書物でもいくつかの「倭国」に触れた記述があるとされるけれど、
いわゆる「正史」で記述されるのは、漢の時代になる。
中国では王朝の交代ごとに前代の正史が書かれる。
前漢（紀元前206年-8年）と後漢（25年-220年）が「漢王朝」の時代。
初出は「漢書地理志」で成立は紀元後84年とされる。
班固という人物が書き前漢時代から後漢の初期のことを述べている。
1.東の海に倭人の住む島がある。倭人の国は百ケ国以上に分かれている。
2.定期的に漢に倭の国々の王の使いがやって来て、貢ぎ物を持ってくる。
もうひとつが「後漢書東夷伝」で成立は紀元後432年。
范曄という人物記述のこの後漢の歴史書では以下の通りの記載。
1.西暦57年に倭の奴国王が貢物。日本は小国分立中。奴国は日本の最南端と。
後漢の皇帝である光武帝は金印を与えた。奴国王であることを認証。
2.永初元年（107年）倭国王帥升等、生口160人を献じ、請見を願う。
成立年代に即して整理するとこういう記録があることになる。

この時代、漢は朝鮮半島いまの平壌周辺に「楽浪郡」を置いた。
巨大集権国家が日本列島の近くに権力拠点を作ったことが、
半島地域を介して日本列島社会にも激震をもたらせたと想像できる。
すでに弥生の水田農耕社会が広がっていた列島社会、
日常的な戦争行為が繰り返されていた「倭国乱れる」状況の中で
それぞれの族長層にとって、この巨大武権国家の成立、
その地方政庁・郡がすぐ近隣に出現したことが、
どれほどの外交的緊張事態であったか、火を見るよりもあきらか。
その状況の中で自分の利益追求を図るのが自然。
結果、周囲のクニに対してこの状況を利用して優越性を持とうとも考える。
たぶん、楽浪郡の以東地域、朝鮮半島社会では激震となり日本列島社会でも
このような動揺は普遍的に起こった。
なんといっても最先端文明利器としての鉄を独占的に管理している強国。

経済的にも軍事的にもその関係が地域での力関係に影響を持ったことは自明。
朝貢関係というアジア世界で一般的な国家生成過程が始まった。
このことが、日本列島の祭政にとってかなり決定的な要因になっていく。
朝貢体制に翼賛する方向もあり、一方で地域社会の求心性が高まりもする。
ただし、朝鮮半島社会も基本的にはそうであったように、
日本社会は後者の方向に向かっていったと言えるのでしょう。
中国国家に対しては独立性の高い民族自決の方向を基本的に選択した。
この楽浪郡との関係が動機として強かったように思える。


English version⬇

International Relations at the Founding of the Japanese Nation: The 37,000-Year History of the Japanese Archipelago - 38
The emergence of the Han Dynasty's ruling body called Yeoknam-gun in the northern part of the Korean Peninsula caused an upheaval in the society of the peninsula. The Kuni society of the Japanese archipelago is also hit by the upheaval.

Now comes the historical process of the creation of a nation in the Japanese archipelago.
Since this is an area of the greatest riddle in ancient history, such as the "Yabataikoku" controversy, the National Museum of Japanese History exhibition was generally restrained.
The National Museum of Japanese History exhibition was generally restrained, but it is, however, also decisive for the social changes that have taken place since then.
However, it is also decisive for the social changes that have occurred since then. We cannot avoid it.
I hope you will understand that this is my personal view as an observer.
I would like to focus on objective events as much as possible.

After the establishment of the Qin Dynasty, a centralized "Chinese emperor" state emerged in China.
Although there are some descriptions of "Yamato" in books written before the establishment of the Qin Dynasty, there are no descriptions in the so-called "authentic history" of Japan.
However, it was not until the Han dynasty that the so-called "authentic history" of Japan was written.
In China, an official history of the previous dynasty is written for each dynastic change.
The Former Han Dynasty (206-8 B.C.) and the Later Han Dynasty (25-220 B.C.) were the periods of the "Han Dynasty.
The first edition of the "Han Book of Geography" is said to have been written in 84 A.D.
It was written by a man named Hanguo, and describes the period from the Former Han Dynasty to the early years of the Later Han Dynasty.
There is an island in the eastern sea where the Japanese live. The Japanese nation is divided into more than a hundred countries.
2. Periodically, envoys of the kings of the Japanese nations would come to Han to bring tribute.
The other is the "Later Han Book of Oriental and Barbarian Biography," which was established in 432 AD.
In this history book of the Later Han Dynasty, written by a man named Fan Ye, the following is described.
In 57 A.D., King Nukoku of Japan paid tribute. Japan was in the process of dividing into smaller countries. Nukoku is the southernmost part of Japan.
Emperor Kwangmu, the emperor of the Later Han Dynasty, gave a gold seal Authenticating that he was the King of Nukuni.
In the first year of Eishu (107th year), the king of Nukoku, Marshal Masu, presented 160 people and asked for their cooperation.
The records of this period are as follows.

In this period, the Han Dynasty established "Yeoknam-gun" in the vicinity of what is now Pyongyang on the Korean peninsula.
The fact that a large centralized state established a base of power near the Japanese archipelago is a clear indication that the Han Dynasty had a strong influence on Japanese society through the peninsula region.
The establishment of a power base near the Japanese archipelago by a large centralized state can be imagined to have sent tremors through the peninsula to the society of the Japanese archipelago.
The Yayoi paddy-field farming society had already spread across the archipelago.
In the midst of the "Japanese Warring States" situation, in which daily acts of war were being repeated, it is not difficult to imagine the impact of this huge earthquake on the local society.
The establishment of this huge military power state, and its local government offices and counties
The fact that the local government offices and counties of the state appeared in the immediate vicinity was a source of great diplomatic tension.
It is obvious how much diplomatic tension there was for each of the chiefs.
Under such circumstances, it was natural for them to pursue their own interests.
As a result, they also wanted to take advantage of the situation to gain superiority over the surrounding kunis.
Perhaps, such an upheaval, which has become a major shock in the Korean Peninsula and society east of Yerelam-gun, will also be felt in the Japanese archipelago.
Such upheavals occurred universally in the Japanese archipelago.
After all, this is a powerful country that exclusively controls iron as the most advanced civilized weapon.

It is obvious that the relationship had an impact on power relations in the region, both economically and militarily.
The tribute relationship, a state-generating process common in the Asian world, began.
This would become a fairly decisive factor for the ritual government of the Japanese archipelago.
There was a winging of the tribute system, and on the other hand, the centripetal force of the local community increased.
However, as was basically the case with Korean society
Japanese society could be said to have moved in the latter direction.
It basically chose the direction of national self-determination with a high degree of independence vis-à-vis the Chinese nation.
This relationship with Rakunami-gun seems to have been a strong motive.

【沖縄の貝塚文化と農耕・戦争社会 日本列島37,000年史-37】

さて国立歴史民俗博物館の先史時代から国家創成期までの展示の
大更新に突き動かされ、それを学び日本史を再学習する意味のブログシリーズ、
「日本列島37,000年史」ですが、明日からは次の国家創成期に移りたい。
考古発見事実に基づいた歴史の再構築と思えて、突き動かされてきました。
そういう意味では以降は文献資料も多くなってくる時代なので
最大の興味分野になってくるでしょう。
・・・というところですが、先日北海道島の異質な状況についても触れた。
独自の文化スタイルを維持した様子は北海道人なので学習もしています。
いろいろな遺跡などにも足を運んでまざまざと実感がある。
一方で、沖縄についてはあんまり考古を知らない。
一応、那覇の博物館などは見学しているけれどあんまりピンとこなかった。
グスク時代（12-16世紀頃）以前の社会の実相はどうも不明。
沖縄では稲作の弥生時代はなくその時代は主に漁撈中心の生業が考えられている。
そのために貝塚時代後期、あるいは弥生・古墳並行時代と呼ばれる。
代表的な貝塚遺跡といわれる沖縄県うるま市「宇堅貝塚」ではゴホウラ製貝輪2点、
イモガイ製貝輪6点、方格規矩鏡破片3点などが出土。
ほかにガラス玉、板状鉄斧、砥石、弥生後期土器などが出土している。
しかし社会の実相研究が進んでいるとは言い切れない。国立歴史民俗博物館や、
沖縄県立博物館の研究成果などに今後期待していきたいところ。

で、国立歴史民俗博物館展示では上のようなイメージが創作されていた。
沖縄や奄美地域では珊瑚礁地形環境に適応した「貝塚文化」とまとめられている。
いかにも海人族的なライフスタイルと言えるでしょうか。
なので結果としては貝類などを採集して肉身を食したあと、
その貝殻を一定加工して本土に「交易品」として提供し、
対価としてコメや鉄器などの有用物資を獲得するライフスタイル。
環境要件は違いがあるけれど北海道の「続縄文」と似た生業なのでしょうか。
北海道では「農耕」は明治期まで本格的には開始しなかった。
その結果、政治権力のようなものも「部族」的な首長制がみられる程度。
それに対して沖縄ではグスク期が12-15世紀にははじまり、そこで
農耕が普遍化開始した途端にグスク（城郭）と政治・戦争、軍事が世を覆う。
やはり農耕が政治とか権力とかの基盤であることを端的に表している。

さて農耕は現代までの人口増加をもたらしたけれど、ネクスト社会は
この増加した人口を維持し続けていけるのかどうか。
農耕とは人類の巨視的な地球気候対応だとすれば、逆に農耕が成立しにくい環境が
今後生起する可能性もあるのだとも思う。
また世界はむしろ社会的原因で人口減少局面を迎えてきているとも思う。
「地球の意思」は人類をどうしようとしているのでしょうか？
・・・これで弥生の世は終了し、いよいよ日本国家創成期へ。


English version⬇

Okinawa's Shell Mound Culture, Agriculture, and War Society 37,000 Years of Japanese History-37
Okinawa began agriculture around the 12th century. Okinawa began agriculture around the 12th century and entered the age of warring gusuku. Proof that agriculture was the foundation of politics, war, and power. ...

Now, the National Museum of Japanese History and Folklore's exhibition from the prehistoric age to the founding of the nation
I was motivated by the great renewal of the National Museum of Japanese History's exhibition from the prehistoric age to the period of the nation's founding.
Tomorrow, I would like to move on to the next topic, the period of the founding of the nation.
I have been motivated by the idea of reconstructing history based on archaeological findings.
In that sense, it's a period that will have a lot of literary materials from then on.
This will be my greatest field of interest.
I mentioned the other day the heterogeneous situation of the island of Hokkaido.
I am also learning about how they maintained their own unique cultural style because I am a Hokkaido native.
I have visited various archaeological sites and have a vivid sense of it.
On the other hand, I do not know much about the archaeology of Okinawa.
I have visited a museum in Naha, but it didn't really hit me.
The reality of the society before the Gusuku period (12th to 16th century) is still unclear.
In Okinawa, there was no Yayoi period when rice was cultivated, and the main occupation during that period is thought to have been fishing.
For this reason, it is called the late shell mound period or the parallel Yayoi and Kofun periods.
Uken Shell Mound in Uruma City, Okinawa Prefecture, which is said to be a representative shell mound site, has two gohora shell rings and six mussel shell rings.
At Uken Shell Mound in Uruma City, Okinawa Prefecture, two gohora shell rings, six mussel shell rings, and three pieces of square rectangular mirrors have been excavated.
In addition, glass beads, plate iron axes, whetstones, and pottery from the late Yayoi period have also been excavated.
However, it cannot be said that research on the actual state of society has progressed. The National Museum of Japanese History and Folklore, the Okinawa Prefectural Museum, and other museums have conducted research on the actual state of society.
The National Museum of Japanese History and Okinawa Prefectural Museum's research results will be expected in the future.

In the National Museum of Japanese History exhibition, the above image was created.
In the Okinawa and Amami areas, it is summarized as "shell mound culture" adapted to the coral reef topography environment.
How can we say that this is a very sea people lifestyle?
So, as a result, after gathering shellfish and other animals and eating their flesh.
After gathering shellfish and eating the meat, the shells were processed and offered to the mainland as "trade goods" in exchange for rice and ironware.
In exchange, they acquired useful commodities such as rice and ironware.
Although there are differences in environmental requirements, is this lifestyle similar to that of the "Sequel to Jomon" in Hokkaido?
In Hokkaido, "agriculture" did not begin in earnest until the Meiji period.
As a result, political power was limited to a "tribal" chief system.
In Okinawa, on the other hand, the Gusuku period began in the 12th-15th century, and it was there that agriculture began to become universal.
As soon as agriculture became universalized, gusuku (castles), politics, war, and military affairs dominated the world.
This is a clear indication that agriculture is the foundation of politics and power.

Agriculture has brought about population growth up to the present day, but the next society must be able to sustain this increase in population.
Can the next society sustain this increase in population?
If agriculture is mankind's macroscopic response to the global climate, there is a possibility that an environment will arise in the future that will make it difficult for agriculture to be established.
If agriculture is a macroscopic response to the global climate, there is a possibility that an environment will arise in the future that will make it difficult for agriculture to take root.
I also believe that the world is entering a phase of population decline due to social causes.
What does the "will of the earth" have in store for mankind?
...With this, the Yayoi period has come to an end, and we are finally entering the period of the creation of the Japanese nation.