Civilizations and value 26 ( political and social governance to be determined automatically )

On the other hand, in the private sector, C (creative work), M (managerial work), anprofessionals are involved in these. If anything, it may be that more people are involved H (welfare work, etc.) remain, but it is said that only a small number of  H (welfare work) in the private sector. Some C, M, and H will remain in the public sector , but I think many people will have their own jobs while sharing public duties as citizens.

 

In countries like China , the Communist Party will likely advocate public ownership of productive power . However, in a democratic country, from a process standpoint, democratization must precede the public ownership of productive power . However, even in China, although it is a developing dictatorship, it is a society that has already achieved a certain degree of development and has reached the forefront of the international economy, so it is becoming increasingly difficult to argue that the country is owned not by its people but by a single party. I wonder if this will come to be seen as nothing more than sophistry. This may also lead to the proposition that it is the people or the party that can develop a nation. The question of whether such a model can be shared among civilizations will also arise .

 

New democracy and new scholarship are a ` `fight back'' and an answer to fill the gap* that has arisen due to the inability of social structure to keep up with technological efficiency. Asking why social science has fallen so far behind* will lead us to search for the value of a new era . It is also the content of the response to the challenges of the times , and will enrich the content .

 

*Social science has fallen behind.

The lagging behind in the social sciences seems to be symbolized by the fact that countries eventually find themselves in a state of conflict, which leads to conflicts and wars to repeat themselves. In democratic countries, this may be seen in populism's inability to truly solve the country's problems and its inability to quickly resolve problems with vested interests. Even in autocratic countries, it may appear as time passes when it becomes impossible to maintain strong control. What will appear over time in democratic and authoritarian states is a decline in their overall power. A situation began to emerge in which military power was emphasized in order to prevent deterioration, and eventually a state of war developed.

 

do not understand how comprehensive power was created or what the various forces that support comprehensive power are. They are simply asserting their opinions and acting as part of it. The reason why the claims of such parts cannot be sorted out and adjusted is because there are ``authorities'' in each area who are the subjects of the power of the parts. The overall deterioration of power can be attributed to the fact that the relationship between these (partial) people in power and the masses has become difficult. In particular, the latter relationship between those in power and the masses emerges as a difference in the ``filter'' between democratic and coercive systems.

 

However, what both have in common is that it is better for political and social governance to be determined automatically according to the situation rather than being determined arbitrarily. Isn't it better than letting the situation go unaddressed and eventually becoming unable to adjust and leading to war? This way of thinking may become an important aspect of the idea of a ``new social science.''

 

The essence of the problem lies in the evolution of social structural forces , and in bringing them closer to the speed of development of technological efficiency forces .  How will AI, big data, ICT , robots , autonomous driving using electricity or hydrogen , new energy, etc. be connected with social stcturural power? Can it become a smart city or smart state? Driving a car is not the only thing that will be automated. I think it means that politics, the economy, and society itself will become partially automated. These will ultimately prove the richness of the content of the new industrial revolution .

 

*Smart State

 In a narrow sense, a smart city can be described as city management based on data that combines ICT, AI, and big data. Just as such cities were born, city-states were established, and eventually nations were established, will a smart state be established in the form of European civilization? Or will a smart state be established by the nation from above, like in China? The forms of its development will vary. Copenhagen, Amsterdam, and Stockholm are highly rated as smart cities, and Estonia is a smart state. It is interesting because it feels similar to the geographical scope of the former Hanseatic League. The atmosphere of a smart state's society will differ greatly depending on whether it is a city federation or a state that forcibly adopts new technologies from above.

all rights reseved M Ariake