I believe that Crimea has not historically been Ukrainian territory. When the Soviet Un

Yasuhiro Nagano Opinion

May 10, 2025 (Saturday edition)
In an interview published in the April 25 issue of Time magazine, US President Trump said that the Crimean Peninsula in southern Ukraine, which Russia annexed in 2014, will "remain Russian territory." That's right!

US President Trump said that the Crimean Peninsula will "remain Russian territory." Zelensky claimed that "he would understand." I think it's impossible because he doesn't know history.

US President Trump denied that Ukraine would join (NATO), saying "I don't think it's possible." I think "NATO" should be "exclusively defensive."

I think that Crimea is not Ukrainian territory historically. When the Soviet Union collapsed and Ukraine became an independent country, Crimea was first recognized as a territorial issue between Russia and Ukraine.

Crimea has a strong sense of belonging to Russia, and if Ukraine had unilaterally "seceded" from Russia, Crimea could have become a battlefield between Russia and Ukraine.

The Crimean Peninsula is dominated by Russians and "Ukrainians who speak Russian as their mother tongue," who make up more than half of the population.

On December 8, 1991, Russian President Yeltsin, Ukrainian President Kravchuk, and Belarusian Verkhovna Rada Chairman Shushkevich met in the resort town of Belovezha.

The Russian negotiating team had no intention of unconditionally recognizing Crimea as Ukrainian territory. The Treaty Establishing the "CIS" includes the following clauses regarding borders:

"The Contracting Parties recognize and respect each other's territorial integrity and the inviolability of existing borders within the framework of the Community. Importantly, Russia has insisted that Ukraine's ownership of Crimea can only be recognized within the framework of the Community.

If Ukraine leaves the Community and joins the camp hostile to Russia, Russia will claim sovereignty over Crimea. Even after that, pro-Russian sentiment remains strong in this part of Ukraine, and the issue of its ownership was reignited during the Crimean crisis in 2014.

In 2014, Ukraine's pro-Russian government was overthrown by the Maidan Revolution, supported by Western countries, and after a pro-Western government was established, the Putin administration decided to unilaterally annex Crimea.

In the 2010s, then-President Yanukovych The region was preparing to conclude an agreement to strengthen relations with the EU, but suddenly shelved the signing in November 2013. The reason behind this is said to be pressure from Russia, which is wary of Ukraine and the EU approaching each other.

In resentment, Ukrainians began a large-scale protest on November 21 at Independence Square (Maidan) in the center of the capital Kyiv. The demonstrations intensified, and in February 2014, the Yanukovych regime collapsed.

After the collapse of the Yanukovych regime, pro-Russian armed forces supported by Russia rose up in the Crimean Peninsula in southern Ukraine and the Donbas region (Donetsk Oblast and Luhansk Oblast) in the east.

In March 2014, Russia declared the annexation of Crimea based on the results of a unilateral "referendum." In the Donbas region, conflict broke out between pro-Russian armed forces who occupied major parts of the region and Ukrainian government forces.

In February 2022, President Putin "recognized" the "two states of Donbas" as states, and then declared the start of a "special military operation" against Ukraine, claiming that it was to end the conflict.

If the EU (NATO) had not "dragged" Ukraine into NATO, the Maidan Revolution, the collapse of the Yanukovych regime, the annexation of Crimea, the conflict in Donbas, and the Ukrainian war would not have happened. I think President Trump is making a calm judgment.

Part 1 Reference Materials
Trump tells US magazine that Crimea "will remain with Russia" - Will he accept a change in the status quo by force?

https://www.sankei.com/article/20250426-NIXE4CURCZPOFGMG37TX6VWJ4I/
Collapse of the Soviet Union and Crimea
https://jnapcdc.com/LA/crimea2/crimea_02.html

I will write again tomorrow.

Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Saturday Edition".
Please see the weekday edition for Chapters 1 and 2.

"Chapter 3". I also appealed to the international community.
"I" explained my case using "legal logic" and claimed "innocence". However, the police and prosecutors said that I should "admit" my "guilt" in "general terms".

However, Article 31 of the Japanese Constitution stipulates that punishment can only be imposed based on "legal and administrative law".

The judge explained the "causal relationship" using the logic of "when the wind blows, the (cooper) makes money". The international community will "laugh" when they "see" the (reason for punishment) in Chapter 2.

❤Click below to read the full article!
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

 

I am "appealing" for two things.
1: The foreigner was "illegally working" outside of his "legal residence status". However, he is innocent due to "equality under the law".

2: The prosecution "applied" the "act of aiding and abetting" of "Article 22, Paragraph 4, Item 4 of the Immigration Control Act (cancellation of residence status)" to the violation of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act as the "crime of aiding and abetting" of Articles 60 and 62 of the Criminal Code. In this case, the provisions of the Immigration Control Act (administrative measures) take precedence.

Prosecutors do not have the "legal skills" to prepare an indictment. Prosecutors do not have the "legal ability" to prepare an indictment. In Japanese, it's like "mixing miso paste and feces."

In 2010, "me and the Chinese" who violated the Immigration Control Act, and in 2013, Philippine embassy staff and diplomats were also punished for the same reason.

Under pressure from the international community, the Japanese government revised the Immigration Control Act.

However, the Japanese government has not "apology" to "me, the Chinese, and the Filipinos." It has not "restored their honor or paid compensation."

In response to criticism from the international community, the Japanese government amended the Immigration Control Act in December 2016 to make it punishable to "provide" a "false employment contract." This came into effect in January 2017.

However, Article 39 of the Constitution means that people cannot be "punished" "retroactively."

Japan needs to re-educate its special-class public servants and educate its Diet members on the Constitution and laws.

"Chapter 4." Look at the "indictment."

The facts stated "state" the "facts" of "innocence." (Japanese/English)
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
"My Claim" (Japanese)
https://blog.goo.ne.jp/nipponnoasa/e/d28c05d97af7a48394921a2dc1ae8f98
"My Claim" (English)
https://blog.goo.ne.jp/nipponnoasa/e/ac718e4f2aab09297bdab896a94bd194

This case is an error in the arbitrary application of the law by police officers, prosecutors, and judges. Reeducation of special public officials is necessary.

"Chinese, Korean, Filipino, American, etc." There are tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands of victims all over the world. It's an abnormal number.

"Chapter 5". After his release, he emailed the Japanese embassy, ​​OHCHR, and ICC for help.

The ambassador of African country A cannot protest to the Japanese government in his capacity as ambassador. (Because country A is supported by the Japanese government), but he can get his friends at the ICC to take action.

I think an international organization probably pointed this out to the Japanese government.

After that, the Immigration Control Act was amended in December 2016 to make it possible to punish the act of providing false employment contracts. This came into effect in January 2017.

But no one has not notified us of anything.

Furthermore, Article 39 of the Constitution stipulates that laws cannot be applied retroactively to punish people.

There are tens of thousands, even hundreds of thousands, of victims around the world, and they are said to be "Chinese, Korean, Filipino, American, etc." This is an abnormal number.

The rest will be published in the Sunday edition.

Part 3. Construction of a special zone. A new business model. NO2, https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/
NO1, https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

Please see the "Sunday Edition" for the 4th to 10th installments.

Thank you.

Yasuhiro Nagano

Past articles can be viewed at the blog below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/