朝日記240705 （その1６） 文献類６ 「翻訳チャールズ・サンダース・パース」

朝日記240705  （その1６）　文献類６　「翻訳チャールズ・サンダース・パース」

朝日記240705  （総表紙・目次）「翻訳チャールズ・サンダース・パース」

　注意　弧の文献の通し検索番号は　以下の番号+１５０です。　例　下の番号２は検索番号１５２である；

 

1. ^Peirce, "Carnegie Application", The New Elements of Mathematics 4, p. 54.
2. ^Peirce (1867), "Upon Logical Comprehension and Extension" (CP 2.391–426), (Writings of Charles S. Peirce, 2:70–86 Archived 2019-12-09 at the Wayback Machine).
3. ^ Jump up to:^ab See pp. 404–409 in "Pragmatism" in The Essential Peirce, 2. Ten quotes on collateral experience from Peirce provided by Joseph Ransdell can be viewed here at peirce-l's Lyris archive. Note: Ransdell's quotes from Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, 8.178–179 are also in The Essential Peirce, 2:493–494, which gives their date as 1909; and his quote from Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, 8.183 is also in The Essential Peirce, 2:495–496, which gives its date as 1909.
4. ^Peirce, letter to William James, dated 1909, see The Essential Peirce, 2:492.
5. ^ Jump up to:^ab c See "76 definitions of the sign by C. S. Peirce", collected by Robert Marty (U. of Perpignan, France).
6. ^Peirce, A Letter to Lady Welby (1908), Semiotic and Significs, pp. 80–81:

I define a Sign as anything which is so determined by something else, called its Object, and so determines an effect upon a person, which effect I call its Interpretant, that the latter is thereby mediately determined by the former. My insertion of "upon a person" is a sop to Cerberus, because I despair of making my own broader conception understood.

8. ^Representamen (/ˌrɛprɪzɛnˈteɪmən/ REP-ri-zen-TAY-mən) was adopted (not coined) by Peirce as his technical term for the sign as covered in his theory, in case a divergence should come to light between his theoretical version and the popular senses of the word "sign". He eventually stopped using "representamen". See The Essential Peirce, 2:272–273 and Semiotic and Significs 193, quotes in "Representamen" at Commens Digital Companion to C.S. Peirce.
9. ^Eco, Umberto (1984). Semiotics and the Philosophy of Language. Bloomington & Indianapolis: Indiana University Press. p. 15. ISBN 978-0-25320398-4.
10. ^ Jump up to:^ab Peirce (1909), A Letter to William James, The Essential Peirce, 2:492–502. Fictional object, 498. Object as universe of discourse, 492. See "Dynamical Object" at Commens Digital Companion to C.S. Peirce.
11. ^See "Immediate Object", etc., at Commens Digital Companion to C.S. Peirce.
12. ^ Jump up to:^ab Peirce (1903 MS), "Nomenclature and Divisions of Triadic Relations, as Far as They Are Determined", under other titles in Collected Papers (CP) v. 2, paragraphs 233–272, and reprinted under the original title in Essential Peirce (EP) v. 2, pp. 289–299. Also see image of MS 339 (August 7, 1904) supplied to peirce-l by Bernard Morand of the Institut Universitaire de Technologie (France), Département Informatique.
13. ^ Jump up to:^ab On the varying terminology, look up in Commens Digital Companion to C.S. Peirce.
14. ^Popular Science Monthly, v. 13, pp. 470–482, see 472 or the book at Wikisource. Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, 2.619–644 [623]
15. ^See, under "Abduction" at Commens Digital Companion to C.S. Peirce, the following quotes:
    • On correction of "A Theory of Probable Inference", see quotes from "Minute Logic", Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, 2.102, c. 1902, and from the Carnegie Application (L75), 1902, Historical Perspectives on Peirce's Logic of Science 2, pp. 1031–1032.
    • On new logical form for abduction, see quote from Harvard Lectures on Pragmatism, 1903, Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, 5.188–189.

See also Santaella, Lucia (1997) "The Development of Peirce's Three Types of Reasoning: Abduction, Deduction, and Induction", 6th Congress of the IASS. Eprint.

16. ^"Lectures on Pragmatism", 1903, Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, 5.171.
17. ^A Letter to J. H. Kehler (dated 1911), The New Elements of Mathematics 3, pp. 203–204, see in "Retroduction" at Commens Digital Companion to C.S. Peirce.
18. ^Peirce (1868), "Nominalism versus Realism", Journal of Speculative Philosophy 2, n. 1, pp. 57–61. Reprinted (CP 6.619–624), (Writings of Charles S. Peirce, 2:144–153 Archived 2008-05-31 at the Wayback Machine).
19. ^On developments in Peirce's realism, see:
    • Peirce (1897), "The Logic of Relatives", The Monist VII, n. 2 pp. 161–217, see 206(via Google). Reprinted Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, 3.456–552.
    • Peirce (1905), "Issues of Pragmaticism", The Monist XV, n. 4, pp. 481–499, see 495–496(via Google). Reprinted (CP 5.438–463, see 453–457).
    • Peirce (c. 1905), Letter to Signor Calderoni, Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, 8.205–213, see 208.
    • Lane, Robert (2007), "Peirce's Modal Shift: From Set Theory to Pragmaticism", Journal of the History of Philosophy, v. 45, n. 4.
20. ^Peirce (1893–1894, MS 949, p. 1)
21. ^Peirce (1903 MS), Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, 6.176: "But I now define a pseudo-continuum as that which modern writers on the theory of functions call a continuum. But this is fully represented by [...] the totality of real values, rational and irrational [...]."
22. ^Peirce (1902 MS) and Ransdell, Joseph, ed. (1998), "Analysis of the Methods of Mathematical Demonstration", Memoir 4 Archived 2013-11-03 at the Wayback Machine, Draft C, MS L75.90–102, see 99–100. (Once there, scroll down).
23. ^See:
    • Peirce (1908), "Some Amazing Mazes (Conclusion), Explanation of Curiosity the First", The Monist, v. 18, n. 3, pp. 416–444, see 463–464. Reprinted Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, 4.594–642, see 642.
    • Havenel, Jérôme (2008), "Peirce's Clarifications on Continuity", TransactionsWinter 2008 pp. 68–133, see 119. Abstract.
24. ^Peirce in his 1906 "Answers to Questions concerning my Belief in God", Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, 6.495, Eprint Archived February 23, 2008, at the Wayback Machine, reprinted in part as "The Concept of God" in Philosophical Writings of Peirce, J. Buchler, ed., 1940, pp. 375–378:

I will also take the liberty of substituting "reality" for "existence." This is perhaps overscrupulosity; but I myself always use exist in its strict philosophical sense of "react with the other like things in the environment." Of course, in that sense, it would be fetichism to say that God "exists." The word "reality," on the contrary, is used in ordinary parlance in its correct philosophical sense. [....] I define the real as that which holds its characters on such a tenure that it makes not the slightest difference what any man or men may have thought them to be, or ever will have thought them to be, here using thought to include, imagining, opining, and willing (as long as forcible means are not used); but the real thing's characters will remain absolutely untouched.

25. ^See his "The Doctrine of Necessity Examined" (1892) and "Reply to the Necessitarians" (1893), to both of which editor Paul Carus
26. ^Peirce (1891), "The Architecture of Theories", The Monist 1, pp. 161–176, see p. 170, via Internet Archive. Reprinted (CP 6.7–34) and (The Essential Peirce, 1:285–297, see p. 293).
27. ^Peirce, C.S. (1871), Review: Fraser's Edition of the Works of George Berkeley in North American Review 113(October):449-72, reprinted in Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce 8, paragraphs 7–38 and in Writings of Charles S. Peirce v. 2, pp. 462–486. Peirce Edition Project Eprint Archived 2018-07-06 at the Wayback Machine.
28. ^See "tychism", "tychasm", "tychasticism", and the rest, at http://www.helsinki.fi/science/commens/dictionary.html Archived August 22, 2010, at the Wayback Machine Commens Digital Companion to C.S. Peirce. https://web.archive.org/web/20111024011940/http://www.helsinki.fi/science/commens/dictionary.html
29. ^See p. 115 in Reasoning and the Logic of Things (Peirce's 1898 lectures).