Yassie Araiのメッセージ

ときどきの自分のエッセイを載せます

朝日記240707 私のよびかけ 「もし、日本ができないとすると・・」

2024-07-07 05:50:52 | 自分史
朝日記240707 私のよびかけ「もし、日本ができないとすると・・」
 
 
~~~~~ あの朝日記の再掲載です~~~~
 
 
~~~~~私のよびかけ~~~
ワシントンポストがあの福島原発災害のさなかに日本によせた論説をおもいだし、その朝日記を再掲した。さて、きょうは東京都知事選挙である。候補者の数が50余、その品性もさることながら、マンネリ沈滞で、それこそ「ふたつの毒饅頭をわけて食べる」様相は消えていない。そう、戦災、大地震災害となお、深刻、さまざま話題をさらったが、この国がこれまで未曽有の困難のさなかから立ち上がってきたことは世界知性からの誇りであり、かつこの国がなおこのプラネットでの人類未来への希望の灯台と目されていること、否なるべきことをいま、ともどもそのこころざしを共有したい。停滞放漫感のただよう東京に勇気ある若者が立ち上がった、理性のある活力の東京を指揮しようと立つ。もうひとり国の安全の前線指揮にあってこの国の立ち位置の脆弱さからの立ち直りを解く初老の武人も再度立つ。わたしはこの二人を評価したい。すくなくも、これまでの掌にあった指揮は思考力のうすい、ポピュリストであり、自己撞着方のひとであったことを判断しよう。もうひとり感性はするどいが、ことの本質をみず、欠点をあげつらい吹聴し自らの思考過程をも経ないでまかせ提案のひと、これも単なるポピュリストの指揮候補者である、この二人には退場を願おう。前二人のうちどちらかは迷うのであるが、一択のときだ、今回、松明を高く掲げたあの若者にともかくも賭けよう。投票はおおきな実験である。これに参加し一筋の灯台の明り筋をみよう。
~~~
 
コメント
  • X
  • Facebookでシェアする
  • はてなブックマークに追加する
  • LINEでシェアする

朝日記240706  朝日記記事「チャールズ・サンダース・パース」へのご案内

2024-07-06 13:13:41 | 自分史

 

朝日記240706  朝日記記事「チャールズ・サンダース・パース」へのご案内

 

~~~~~

朝日記240705  (総表紙・目次)「翻訳チャールズ・サンダース・パース」

~~~~~

上記翻訳あたっての感想(荒井康全);

アメリカプラグマティズムの祖であるパースについての解説です。パースは彼の生きた時代では孤独孤立した状態におかれたが、その残したものは巨大であり、本質的であり、その影響は今世紀に至ってなお新鮮なる影響を与えている。特に 信号-対象ー観察者というTriadicsの発想は、デカルト主義の主観―客観の二元論を越えて、対象を物質系にとどめるのではなく、信号と対象という2元をカップルにし情報系をとりこんだこと、これを誰が見ているのか、なにに指向させるのか、観察者(主体、人間)という仮説と制御のサイクルから認識を得るという目的論的思考枠組み(プラグマティズム)を提起した。20世紀の後半におきた哲学界でのソシュール・チョムスキーらの「言語論的転回」、またウィーナー・ノイマン・チュールング等の科学技術界でおきた情報通信制御系から人工知能への展開への「低音通奏的」知的底流を成しているという共通認識があり、それ故に彼の知的パラダイムは世界的に広がっている。近代文明が非明示的ではるが構造的転換についての悲観からあらたな人類知のあらたなパラダイムを探求するという点で学術知の世界は一致している。このWiki記事はパース哲学を通じてこれらの真摯なる気概のあふれるチャレンジをみる。これはわれわれにとっても新たな啓蒙を感じさせにはおかない。その文脈は一読に値するとあえて言っておきたい。

本文へ  ↓

朝日記240705  (総表紙・目次)「翻訳チャールズ・サンダース・パース」

 

コメント
  • X
  • Facebookでシェアする
  • はてなブックマークに追加する
  • LINEでシェアする

朝日記240705  (その17) 文献類7 「翻訳チャールズ・サンダース・パース」

2024-07-05 14:02:05 | 研究論説

朝日記240705  (その17) 文献類7 「翻訳チャールズ・サンダース・パース」

朝日記240705  (総表紙・目次)「翻訳チャールズ・サンダース・パース」

 

 文献類7 external linsk, sister projects,categories, author right;

External links

 

Charles Sanders Peirceat Wikipedia's sister projects

 

 

Categories

 

 

 

 

コメント
  • X
  • Facebookでシェアする
  • はてなブックマークに追加する
  • LINEでシェアする

朝日記240705  (その16) 文献類6 「翻訳チャールズ・サンダース・パース」

2024-07-05 13:56:40 | 研究論説

朝日記240705  (その16) 文献類6 「翻訳チャールズ・サンダース・パース」

朝日記240705  (総表紙・目次)「翻訳チャールズ・サンダース・パース」

 注意 弧の文献の通し検索番号は 以下の番号+150です。 例 下の番号2は検索番号152である;

 

  1. ^Peirce, "Carnegie Application", The New Elements of Mathematics 4, p. 54.
  2. ^Peirce (1867), "Upon Logical Comprehension and Extension" (CP 2.391–426), (Writings of Charles S. Peirce, 2:70–86 Archived 2019-12-09 at the Wayback Machine).
  3. Jump up to:ab See pp. 404–409 in "Pragmatism" in The Essential Peirce, 2. Ten quotes on collateral experience from Peirce provided by Joseph Ransdell can be viewed here at peirce-l's Lyris archive. Note: Ransdell's quotes from Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, 8.178–179 are also in The Essential Peirce, 2:493–494, which gives their date as 1909; and his quote from Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, 8.183 is also in The Essential Peirce, 2:495–496, which gives its date as 1909.
  4. ^Peirce, letter to William James, dated 1909, see The Essential Peirce, 2:492.
  5. Jump up to:ab c See "76 definitions of the sign by C. S. Peirce", collected by Robert Marty (U. of Perpignan, France).
  6. ^Peirce, A Letter to Lady Welby (1908), Semiotic and Significs, pp. 80–81:

I define a Sign as anything which is so determined by something else, called its Object, and so determines an effect upon a person, which effect I call its Interpretant, that the latter is thereby mediately determined by the former. My insertion of "upon a person" is a sop to Cerberus, because I despair of making my own broader conception understood.

  1. ^Representamen (/ˌrɛprɪzɛnˈteɪmən/ REP-ri-zen-TAY-mən) was adopted (not coined) by Peirce as his technical term for the sign as covered in his theory, in case a divergence should come to light between his theoretical version and the popular senses of the word "sign". He eventually stopped using "representamen". See The Essential Peirce, 2:272–273 and Semiotic and Significs 193, quotes in "Representamen" at Commens Digital Companion to C.S. Peirce.
  2. ^Eco, Umberto (1984). Semiotics and the Philosophy of Language. Bloomington & Indianapolis: Indiana University Press. p. 15ISBN 978-0-25320398-4.
  3. Jump up to:ab Peirce (1909), A Letter to William James, The Essential Peirce, 2:492–502. Fictional object, 498. Object as universe of discourse, 492. See "Dynamical Object" at Commens Digital Companion to C.S. Peirce.
  4. ^See "Immediate Object", etc., at Commens Digital Companion to C.S. Peirce.
  5. Jump up to:ab Peirce (1903 MS), "Nomenclature and Divisions of Triadic Relations, as Far as They Are Determined", under other titles in Collected Papers (CP) v. 2, paragraphs 233–272, and reprinted under the original title in Essential Peirce (EP) v. 2, pp. 289–299. Also see image of MS 339 (August 7, 1904) supplied to peirce-l by Bernard Morand of the Institut Universitaire de Technologie (France), Département Informatique.
  6. Jump up to:ab On the varying terminology, look up in Commens Digital Companion to C.S. Peirce.
  7. ^Popular Science Monthly, v. 13, pp. 470–482, see 472 or the book at WikisourceCollected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, 2.619–644 [623]
  8. ^See, under "Abduction" at Commens Digital Companion to C.S. Peirce, the following quotes:
    • On correction of "A Theory of Probable Inference", see quotes from "Minute Logic", Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, 2.102, c. 1902, and from the Carnegie Application (L75), 1902, Historical Perspectives on Peirce's Logic of Science 2, pp. 1031–1032.
    • On new logical form for abduction, see quote from Harvard Lectures on Pragmatism, 1903, Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, 5.188–189.

See also Santaella, Lucia (1997) "The Development of Peirce's Three Types of Reasoning: Abduction, Deduction, and Induction", 6th Congress of the IASSEprint.

  1. ^"Lectures on Pragmatism", 1903, Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, 5.171.
  2. ^A Letter to J. H. Kehler (dated 1911), The New Elements of Mathematics 3, pp. 203–204, see in "Retroduction" at Commens Digital Companion to C.S. Peirce.
  3. ^Peirce (1868), "Nominalism versus Realism", Journal of Speculative Philosophy 2, n. 1, pp. 57–61. Reprinted (CP 6.619–624), (Writings of Charles S. Peirce, 2:144–153 Archived 2008-05-31 at the Wayback Machine).
  4. ^On developments in Peirce's realism, see:
    • Peirce (1897), "The Logic of Relatives", The Monist VII, n. 2 pp. 161–217, see 206(via Google). Reprinted Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, 3.456–552.
    • Peirce (1905), "Issues of Pragmaticism", The Monist XV, n. 4, pp. 481–499, see 495–496(via Google). Reprinted (CP 5.438–463, see 453–457).
    • Peirce (c. 1905), Letter to Signor Calderoni, Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, 8.205–213, see 208.
    • Lane, Robert (2007), "Peirce's Modal Shift: From Set Theory to Pragmaticism", Journal of the History of Philosophy, v. 45, n. 4.
  5. ^Peirce (1893–1894, MS 949, p. 1)
  6. ^Peirce (1903 MS), Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, 6.176: "But I now define a pseudo-continuum as that which modern writers on the theory of functions call a continuum. But this is fully represented by [...] the totality of real values, rational and irrational [...]."
  7. ^Peirce (1902 MS) and Ransdell, Joseph, ed. (1998), "Analysis of the Methods of Mathematical Demonstration", Memoir 4 Archived 2013-11-03 at the Wayback Machine, Draft C, MS L75.90–102, see 99–100. (Once there, scroll down).
  8. ^See:
    • Peirce (1908), "Some Amazing Mazes (Conclusion), Explanation of Curiosity the First", The Monist, v. 18, n. 3, pp. 416–444, see 463–464. Reprinted Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, 4.594–642, see 642.
    • Havenel, Jérôme (2008), "Peirce's Clarifications on Continuity", TransactionsWinter 2008 pp. 68–133, see 119. Abstract.
  9. ^Peirce in his 1906 "Answers to Questions concerning my Belief in God", Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, 6.495, Eprint Archived February 23, 2008, at the Wayback Machine, reprinted in part as "The Concept of God" in Philosophical Writings of Peirce, J. Buchler, ed., 1940, pp. 375–378:

I will also take the liberty of substituting "reality" for "existence." This is perhaps overscrupulosity; but I myself always use exist in its strict philosophical sense of "react with the other like things in the environment." Of course, in that sense, it would be fetichism to say that God "exists." The word "reality," on the contrary, is used in ordinary parlance in its correct philosophical sense. [....] I define the real as that which holds its characters on such a tenure that it makes not the slightest difference what any man or men may have thought them to be, or ever will have thought them to be, here using thought to include, imagining, opining, and willing (as long as forcible means are not used); but the real thing's characters will remain absolutely untouched.

  1. ^See his "The Doctrine of Necessity Examined" (1892) and "Reply to the Necessitarians" (1893), to both of which editor Paul Carus
  2. ^Peirce (1891), "The Architecture of Theories", The Monist 1, pp. 161–176, see p. 170, via Internet Archive. Reprinted (CP 6.7–34) and (The Essential Peirce, 1:285–297, see p. 293).
  3. ^Peirce, C.S. (1871), Review: Fraser's Edition of the Works of George Berkeley in North American Review 113(October):449-72, reprinted in Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce 8, paragraphs 7–38 and in Writings of Charles S. Peirce v. 2, pp. 462–486. Peirce Edition Project Eprint Archived 2018-07-06 at the Wayback Machine.
  4. ^See "tychism", "tychasm", "tychasticism", and the rest, at http://www.helsinki.fi/science/commens/dictionary.html Archived August 22, 2010, at the Wayback Machine Commens Digital Companion to C.S. Peircehttps://web.archive.org/web/20111024011940/http://www.helsinki.fi/science/commens/dictionary.html
  5. ^See p. 115 in Reasoning and the Logic of Things (Peirce's 1898 lectures).

 

コメント
  • X
  • Facebookでシェアする
  • はてなブックマークに追加する
  • LINEでシェアする

朝日記240705  (その15-2) 文献類5 「翻訳チャールズ・サンダース・パース」

2024-07-05 13:52:29 | 研究論説

 

朝日記240705  (その15-2) 文献類5 「翻訳チャールズ・サンダース・パース」

朝日記240705  (総表紙・目次)「翻訳チャールズ・サンダース・パース」

 注意 弧の文献の通し検索番号は 以下の番号+120です。 例 下の番号2は検索番号122である;

 

  1. ^Peirce (c. 1906), "PAP (Prolegomena to an Apology for Pragmatism)" (MS 293), The New Elements of Mathematics 4, pp. 319–320, first quote under "Abduction" at Commens Digital Companion to C. S. Peirce.
  2. ^Peirce (1903), "Pragmatism – The Logic of Abduction", Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, 5.195–205, especially 196. Eprint.
  3. ^Peirce, Carnegie application, MS L75.279–280: Memoir 27 Archived 2011-05-24 at the Wayback Machine, Draft B.
  4. Jump up to:ab See MS L75.329–330, from Draft D of Memoir 27 Archived 2011-05-24 at the Wayback Machine of Peirce's application to the Carnegie Institution:

Consequently, to discover is simply to expedite an event that would occur sooner or later, if we had not troubled ourselves to make the discovery. Consequently, the art of discovery is purely a question of economics. The economics of research is, so far as logic is concerned, the leading doctrine with reference to the art of discovery. Consequently, the conduct of abduction, which is chiefly a question of heuretic and is the first question of heuretic, is to be governed by economical considerations.

  1. ^Peirce, C. S., "On the Logic of Drawing Ancient History from Documents", The Essential Peirce, 2, see pp. 107–109. On Twenty Questions, see 109:

Thus, twenty skillful hypotheses will ascertain what 200,000 stupid ones might fail to do.

  1. Jump up to:ab c d e Peirce (1868), "Some Consequences of Four Incapacities", Journal of Speculative Philosophy 2, n. 3, pp. 140–157. Reprinted Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, 5.264–317, Writings of Charles S. Peirce, 2:211–242, The Essential Peirce, 1:28–55. Arisbe Eprint.
  2. ^Peirce believed in God. See section #Philosophy: metaphysics.
  3. ^However, Peirce disagreed with Hegelian absolute idealism. See for example Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, 8.131.
  4. ^See in "Firstness", "Secondness", and "Thirdness" in Commens Digital Companion to C.S. Peirce.
  5. ^Peirce (1893), "The Categories" MS 403. Arisbe Eprint Archived 2014-07-31 at the Wayback Machine, edited by Joseph Ransdell, with information on the re-write, and interleaved with the 1867 "New List" for comparison.
  6. ^"Minute Logic", CP 2.87, c. 1902 and A Letter to Lady Welby, CP 8.329, 1904. See relevant quotes under "Categories, Cenopythagorean Categories" in Commens Dictionary of Peirce's Terms (CDPT), Bergman & Paalova, eds., U. of Helsinki.
  7. ^See quotes under "Firstness, First [as a category]" in CDPT.
  8. Jump up to:ab The ground blackness is the pure abstraction of the quality black. Something black is something embodying blackness, pointing us back to the abstraction. The quality black amounts to reference to its own pure abstraction, the ground blackness. The question is not merely of noun (the ground) versus adjective (the quality), but rather of whether we are considering the black(ness) as abstracted away from application to an object, or instead as so applied (for instance to a stove). Yet note that Peirce's distinction here is not that between a property-general and a property-individual (a trope). See "On a New List of Categories" (1867), in the section appearing in CP 1.551. Regarding the ground, cf. the Scholastic conception of a relation's foundation, Google limited preview Deely 1982, p. 61.
  9. ^A quale in this sense is a such, just as a quality is a suchness. Cf. under "Use of Letters" in §3 of Peirce's "Description of a Notation for the Logic of Relatives", Memoirs of the American Academy, v. 9, pp. 317–378 (1870), separately reprinted (1870), from which see  6 via Google books, also reprinted in CP 3.63:

Now logical terms are of three grand classes. The first embraces those whose logical form involves only the conception of quality, and which therefore represent a thing simply as "a —." These discriminate objects in the most rudimentary way, which does not involve any consciousness of discrimination. They regard an object as it is in itself as such (quale); for example, as horse, tree, or man. These are absolute terms. (Peirce, 1870. But also see "Quale-Consciousness", 1898, in CP 6.222–237.)

  1. ^See quotes under "Secondness, Second [as a category]" in CDPT.
  2. ^See quotes under "Thirdness, Third [as a category]" in CDPT.
  3. ^Lewis, Clarence Irving (1918), A Survey of Symbolic Logic, see ch. 1, §7 "Peirce", pp. 79–106, see  79 (Internet Archive). Note that Lewis's bibliography lists works by Frege, tagged with asterisks as important.
  4. ^Avery, John (2003) Information theory and evolution, p. 167; also Mitchell, Melanie, "My Scientific Ancestry Archived October 8, 2014, at the Wayback Machine".
  5. ^Beil, Ralph G. and Ketner, Kenneth (2003), "Peirce, Clifford, and Quantum Theory", International Journal of Theoretical Physics 42, n. 9, pp. 1957–1972.
  6. ^Houser, Roberts, and Van Evra, eds. (1997), Studies in the Logic of Charles Sanders Peirce, Indiana U., Bloomington, IN.
  7. ^Misak, ed. (2004), The Cambridge Companion to Peirce, Cambridge U., UK.
  8. Jump up to:ab Peirce (1882), "Introductory Lecture on the Study of Logic" delivered September 1882, Johns Hopkins University Circulars, v. 2, n. 19, pp. 11–12 (via Google), November 1882. Reprinted (The Essential Peirce, 1:210–214; Writings of Charles S. Peirce, 4:378–382; Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, 7.59–76). The definition of logic quoted by Peirce is by Peter of Spain.
  9. ^Peirce (1878), "The Doctrine of Chances", Popular Science Monthly, v. 12, pp. 604–615 (CP 2.645–668, Writings of Charles S. Peirce, 3:276–290, The Essential Peirce, 1:142–154).

... death makes the number of our risks, the number of our inferences, finite, and so makes their mean result uncertain. The very idea of probability and of reasoning rests on the assumption that this number is indefinitely great. ... logicality inexorably requires that our interests shall not be limited. ... Logic is rooted in the social principle.

  1. ^Peirce, Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, 5.448 footnote, from "The Basis of Pragmaticism" in 1906.
  2. Jump up to:ab c Peirce, (1868), "Questions concerning certain Faculties claimed for Man", Journal of Speculative Philosophy 2, n. 2, pp. 103–114. On thought in signs, see p. 112. Reprinted Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, 5.213–263 (on thought in signs, see 253), Writings of Charles S. Peirce, 2:193–211, The Essential Peirce, 2:11–27. Arisbe Eprint Archived 2007-10-14 at the Wayback Machine.
  3. ^Peirce (1902), The Carnegie Institute Application, Memoir 10, MS L75.361–362, Arisbe Eprint Archived 2011-05-24 at the Wayback Machine.
  4. Jump up to:ab Peirce, "Grounds of Validity of the Laws of Logic: Further Consequences of Four Incapacities", Journal of Speculative Philosophy II, n. 4, pp. 193–208. Reprinted Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, 5.318–357, Writings of Charles S. Peirce, 2:242–272 (Peirce Edition ProjectEprint Archived 2010-05-28 at the Wayback Machine), The Essential Peirce, 1:56–82.
  5. ^Peirce (1905), "What Pragmatism Is", The Monist, v. XV, n. 2, pp. 161–181, see 167. Reprinted Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, 5.411–437, see 416. Arisbe Eprint.
  6. ^Peirce 1907, Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, 5.484. Reprinted, The Essential Peirce, 2:411 in "Pragmatism" (398–433).
  7. ^See "Quasi-mind" in Commens Digital Companion to C.S. Peirce.
コメント
  • X
  • Facebookでシェアする
  • はてなブックマークに追加する
  • LINEでシェアする

朝日記240705  (その15-1) 文献類4 「翻訳チャールズ・サンダース・パース」

2024-07-05 13:48:09 | 研究論説

 

朝日記240705  (その15-1) 文献類4 「翻訳チャールズ・サンダース・パース」

朝日記240705  (総表紙・目次)「翻訳チャールズ・サンダース・パース」

 注意 検索番号は 以下の番号+90です。 例 下の番号2は検索番号92である;

  1. Jump up to:ab c Putnam, Hilary (1982), "Peirce the Logician", Historia Mathematica 9, 290–301. Reprinted, pp. 252–260 in Putnam (1990), Realism with a Human Face, Harvard. Excerpt with article's last five pages.
  2. ^It was in Peirce's 1885 "On the Algebra of Logic". See Byrnes, John (1998), "Peirce's First-Order Logic of 1885", Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 34, n. 4, pp. 949–976.
  3. ^Brady, Geraldine (2000), From Peirce to Skolem: A Neglected Chapter in the History of Logic, North-Holland/Elsevier Science BV, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
  4. ^See Peirce (1898), Lecture 3, "The Logic of Relatives" (not the 1897 Monist article), Reasoning and the Logic of Things, pp. 146–164 [151]
  5. ^Peirce (1898), "The Logic of Mathematics in Relation to Education" in Educational Review 15, pp. 209–216 (via Internet Archive). Reprinted Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, 3.553–562. See also his "The Simplest Mathematics" (1902 MS), Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, 4.227–323.
  6. ^Peirce condemned the use of "certain likelihoods" (The Essential Peirce, 2:108–109) even more strongly than he criticized Bayesian methods. Peirce used Bayesian inference in criticizing parapsychology (Writings of Charles S. Peirce, 6:76).
  7. ^Miller, Richard W. (1975), "Propensity: Popper or Peirce?", British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, v. 26, n. 2, pp. 123–132. doi:1093/bjps/26.2.123Eprint.
  8. ^Haack, Susan and Kolenda, Konstantin (1977), "Two Fallibilists in Search of the Truth", Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes, v. 51, pp. 63–104. JSTOR 4106816
  9. ^Peirce CS, Jastrow J. On Small Differences in Sensation. Memoirs of the National Academy of Sciences 1885; 3:73–83.
  10. Jump up to:ab c Peirce (1893), "Evolutionary Love", The Monist 3, pp. 176–200. Reprinted Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, 6.278–317, The Essential Peirce, 1:352–372. Arisbe Eprint Archived May 20, 2007, at the Wayback Machine
  11. Jump up to:ab Peirce (1897) "Fallibilism, Continuity, and Evolution", Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, 1.141–175 (Eprint), placed by the Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, editors directly after "F.R.L." (1899, Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, 1.135–140).
  12. Jump up to:ab Peirce (1903), Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, 1.180–202 and (1906) "The Basis of Pragmaticism", The Essential Peirce, 2:372–373, see "Philosophy" at Commens Digital Companion to C.S. Peirce.
  13. ^"Charles S. Peirce on Esthetics and Ethics: A Bibliography Archived 6 April 2003 at the Wayback Machine" (PDF) by Kelly A. Parker in 1999.
  14. ^Peirce (1902 MS), Carnegie Application, edited by Joseph Ransdell, Memoir 2 Archived 2013-11-03 at the Wayback Machine, see table.
  15. ^See Esthetics at Commens Digital Companion to C.S. Peirce.
  16. ^Eco, Umberto (December 1976). "Peirce's Notion of Interpretant". Modern Language Notes. 91 (6).
  17. ^George Frederick Simkin, Colin (1993). Popper's Views on Natural and Social Science. E.J. Brill. p. 41.
  18. ^Atkin, Albert. "Charles Sanders Peirce (1839—1914)"Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
  19. ^James, William (1897), The Will to Believe, see p. 124.
  20. ^See Pragmaticism#Pragmaticism's name for discussion and references.
  21. Jump up to:ab "That the rule of induction will hold good in the long run may be deduced from the principle that reality is only the object of the final opinion to which sufficient investigation would lead", in Peirce (1878 April), "The Probability of Induction", p. 718 (via Internet Archive ) in Popular Science Monthly, v. 12, pp. 705–718. Reprinted in Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, 2.669–693, Writings of Charles S. Peirce, 3:290–305, The Essential Peirce, 1:155–169, elsewhere.
  22. ^Peirce (1902), Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, 5.13 note 1.
  23. ^See Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, 1.34 Eprint (in "The Spirit of Scholasticism"), where Peirce ascribed the success of modern science less to a novel interest in verification than to the improvement of verification.
  24. ^See Joseph Ransdell's comments and his tabular list of titles of Peirce's proposed list of memoirs in 1902 for his Carnegie application, Eprint
  25. Jump up to:ab See rhetoric definitions at Commens Digital Companion to C.S. Peirce.
  26. ^Peirce (1905), "Issues of Pragmaticism", The Monist, v. XV, n. 4, pp. 481–499. Reprinted Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, 5.438–463. Also important: Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, 5.497–525.
  27. ^Peirce, "Philosophy and the Conduct of Life", Lecture 1 of the 1898 Cambridge (MA) Conferences Lectures, Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, 1.616–648 in part and Reasoning and the Logic of Things, 105–122, reprinted in The Essential Peirce, 2:27–41.
  28. Jump up to:ab c Peirce (1899 MS), "F.R.L." [First Rule of Logic], Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, 1.135–140, Eprint
  29. Jump up to:ab Peirce (1908), "A Neglected Argument for the Reality of God", published in large part, Hibbert Journal 7, 90–112. Reprinted with an unpublished part, Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, 6.452–485, Selected Writings pp. 358–379, The Essential Peirce, 2:434–450, Peirce on Signs 260–278.
  30. ^See also Nubiola, Jaime (2004), "Il Lume Naturale: Abduction and God", Semiotiche I/2, 91–102.

 

 

コメント
  • X
  • Facebookでシェアする
  • はてなブックマークに追加する
  • LINEでシェアする

朝日記240705  (その14) 文献類3 「翻訳チャールズ・サンダース・パース」

2024-07-05 13:43:55 | 研究論説

 

朝日記240705  (その14) 文献類3 「翻訳チャールズ・サンダース・パース」

朝日記240705  (総表紙・目次)「翻訳チャールズ・サンダース・パース」

 注意 検索番号は 以下の番号+60です。 例 下の番号62は検索番号32である;

  1. ^Brent 1998, pp. 374–376
  2. ^Brent 1998, pp. 279–289
  3. ^Brent 1998, pp. 261–264, 290–292, 324
  4. ^Brent 1998, pp. 306–307, 315–316
  5. ^In 2018, plans have been made to erect a memorial monument for Peirce at the site of burial – see: Justin Weinberg, 'A Proper Memorial Monument for Peirce', website Daily Nous, March 14, 2018.
  6. ^Russell, Bertrand (1959), Wisdom of the West, p. 276
  7. Jump up to:ab Anellis, Irving H. (1995), "Peirce Rustled, Russell Pierced: How Charles Peirce and Bertrand Russell Viewed Each Other's Work in Logic, and an Assessment of Russell's Accuracy and Role in the Historiography of Logic", Modern Logic 5, 270–328. Arisbe Eprint Archived 2013-09-24 at the Wayback Machine
  8. ^Popper, Karl (1972), Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach, p. 212
  9. ^See Royce, Josiah, and Kernan, W. Fergus (1916), "Charles Sanders Peirce", The Journal of Philosophy, Psychology, and Scientific Method 13, pp. 701–709. Arisbe Eprint
  10. ^Ketner et al. (1986), Comprehensive Bibliography, p. iii
  11. ^Hookway, Christopher (2008), "Pragmatism", Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
  12. ^Brent 1998, p. 8
  13. ^"Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society". Indiana University Press Journals. Archived from the original on 2015-12-04. Retrieved 2017-06-17.
  14. ^"Peirce, Benjamin: Charles Sanders". Webster's Biographical Dictionary. Springfield, Massachusetts. 1960 [1943].
  15. ^Fisch, Max (1986), Peirce, Semeiotic, and Pragmatism, Kenneth Laine Ketner and Christian J. W. Kloesel, eds., Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana U. Press.
  16. ^Theological Research Group in C.S. Peirce's Philosophy (Hermann Deuser, Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen; Wilfred Härle, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Germany).
  17. ^Postmodernism and Christian PhilosophyQuid Sit Postmodernismus?, p. 93, archived.
  18. ^Burks, Arthur, Introduction, Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, 7, p. xi.
  19. ^Robin, Richard S. (1967), Annotated Catalogue of the Papers of Charles S. Peirce Archived 2019-10-27 at the Wayback Machine. Amherst MA: University of Massachusetts Press.
  20. ^"The manuscript material now (1997) comes to more than a hundred thousand pages. These contain many pages of no philosophical interest, but the number of pages on philosophy certainly number much more than half of that. Also, a significant but unknown number of manuscripts have been lost." – Joseph Ransdell (1997), "Some Leading Ideas of Peirce's Semiotic", end note 2 Archived 2008-01-14 at the Wayback Machine, 1997 light revision of 1977 version in Semiotica 19:157–178.
  21. ^Houser, Nathan, "The Fortunes and Misfortunes of the Peirce Papers", Fourth Congress of the IASS, Perpignan, France, 1989. Signs of Humanity, v. 3, 1992, pp. 1259–1268. Eprint
  22. ^Memorandum to the President of Charles S. Peirce Society by Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen, U. of Helsinki, March 29, 2012. Eprint.
  23. ^See for example "Collections of Peirce's Writings" at Commens, U. of Helsinki.
  24. ^See 1987 review by B. Kuklick (of Peirce by Christopher Hookway), in British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 38, n. 1, pp. 117–119. First page.
  25. ^Auspitz, Josiah Lee (1994), "The Wasp Leaves the Bottle: Charles Sanders Peirce", The American Scholar, v. 63, n. 4, Autumn 1994, 602–618. Arisbe Eprint Archived 2013-11-03 at the Wayback Machine.
  26. Jump up to:ab Burks, Arthur W., "Review: Charles S. Peirce, The new elements of mathematics", Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 84, n. 5 (1978), pp. 913–918 (PDF).
  27. ^Peirce (1860 MS), "Orders of Infinity", News from the Peirce Edition Project, September 2010 Archived 2013-03-29 at the Wayback Machine (PDF), p. 6, with the manuscript's text. Also see logic historian Irving Anellis's November 11, 2010 comment Archived April 23, 2017, at the Wayback Machine at peirce-l.
  28. ^Peirce (MS, winter of 1880–1881), "A Boolian Algebra with One Constant", Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, 4.12–20, Writings of Charles S. Peirce, 4:218–221. Google Preview. See Roberts, Don D. (1973), The Existential Graphs of Charles S. Peirce, p. 131.
  29. ^Peirce (1881), "On the Logic of Number", American Journal of Mathematics 4, pp. 85–95. Reprinted (CP 3.252–288), (Writings of Charles S. Peirce, 4:299–309). See Shields, Paul (1997), "Peirce's Axiomatization of Arithmetic", in Houser et al., eds., Studies in the Logic of Charles S. Peirce.
  30. Jump up to:ab Peirce (1885), "On the Algebra of Logic: A Contribution to the Philosophy of Notation", American Journal of Mathematics 7, two parts, first part published 1885, pp. 180–202 (see Houser in linked paragraph Archived 2016-02-12 at the Wayback Machine in "Introduction" in Writings of Charles S. Peirce, 4). Presented, National Academy of Sciences, Newport, RI, October 14–17, 1884 (see The Essential Peirce, 1, Headnote 16 Archived 2014-10-19 at the Wayback Machine). 1885 is the year usually given for this work. Reprinted Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, 3.359–403, Writings of Charles S. Peirce, 5:162–190, The Essential Peirce, 1:225–228, in part.
コメント
  • X
  • Facebookでシェアする
  • はてなブックマークに追加する
  • LINEでシェアする

朝日記240705  (その13) 文献類2 「翻訳チャールズ・サンダース・パース

2024-07-05 13:35:08 | 研究論説

朝日記240705  (その13) 文献類2 「翻訳チャールズ・サンダース・パース」

朝日記240705  (総表紙・目次)「翻訳チャールズ・サンダース・パース」

 注意 検索番号は 以下の番号+30です。 例 下の番号2は検索番号32であう

  1. ^Brent 1998, p. 367
  2. ^Fisch, Max (1983), "Peirce as Scientist, mathematician, historian, Logician, and Philosopher", Studies in Logic (new edition), see p. x.
  3. ^See "Peirce Edition Project (UQÀM) – in short Archived 6 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine" from PEP-UQÀM.
  4. ^Houser, Nathan, "Introduction Archived 2011-06-07 at the Wayback Machine", Writings of Charles S. Peirce, 5:xxviii–xxix, find "Allison".
  5. ^Brent 1998, p. 202
  6. ^Randall R. Dipert (1994) The Life and Logical Contributions of O. H. Mitchell, Peirce's Gifted Student
  7. ^Brent 1998, pp. 150–154, 195, 279–280, 289
  8. ^"Discovering the American Aristotle | Edward T. Oakes". December 1993.
  9. ^Brent 1998, p. xv
  10. ^Devlin, Keith (2000). The Math Gene. Basic Books. ISBN 978-0-46501619-8.
  11. ^Brent 1998, pp. 98–101
  12. ^Brent 1998, p. 141
  13. ^Brent 1998, p. 148
  14. ^Houser, Nathan, "Introduction Archived 2011-06-07 at the Wayback Machine", Writings of Charles S. Peirce, 6, first paragraph.
  15. ^Brent 1998, pp. 123, 368
  16. ^Brent 1998, pp. 150–151, 368
  17. ^In 1885 (Brent 1998, p. 369); in 1890 and 1900 (p. 273); in 1891 (pp. 215–216); and in 1892 (pp. 151–152, 222).
  18. ^Brent 1998, p. 77
  19. ^Brent 1998, pp. 191–192, 217, 270, 318, 321, 337.
  20. ^Brent 1998, p. 13
  21. ^Brent 1998, pp. 369–374
  22. ^Brent 1998, p. 191
  23. ^Brent 1998, p. 246
  24. ^Brent 1998, p. 242
  25. ^Brent 1998, p. 271
  26. ^Brent 1998, pp. 249–255
  27. ^Brent 1998, p. 371
  28. ^Brent 1998, p. 189
  29. ^Brent 1998, p. 370
  30. ^Brent 1998, pp. 205–206
コメント
  • X
  • Facebookでシェアする
  • はてなブックマークに追加する
  • LINEでシェアする

朝日記240705  (その12) 文献類1 「翻訳チャールズ・サンダース・パース」

2024-07-05 13:18:50 | 研究論説

朝日記240705  (その12) 文献類1 「翻訳チャールズ・サンダース・パース」

朝日記240705  (総表紙・目次)「翻訳チャールズ・サンダース・パース」

 

文献類

 

See also

Contemporaries associated with Peirce

Notes

    1. ^ Benjamin was one of the founders of linear algebra.
    2. ^ Much of the mathematics of relations now taken for granted was "borrowed" from Peirce, not always with all due credit; on that and on how the young Bertrand Russell, especially his Principles of Mathematics and Principia Mathematica, did not do Peirce justice, see Anellis (1995).[67]

References

    1. Jump up to:a b c Hacking, Ian (1990). The Taming of Chance. A Universe of Chance. Cambridge University Press. pp. 200–215ISBN 978-0-52138884-9.
    2. Jump up to:a b c d Stigler, Stephen M. (1978). "Mathematical statistics in the early States". Annals of Statistics. 6 (2): 239–265 [248]. doi:10.1214/aos/1176344123JSTOR 2958876MR 0483118.
    3. Jump up to:a b Crease, Robert P. (2009). "Charles Sanders Peirce and the first absolute measurement standard". Physics Today. 62 (12): 39–44. Bibcode:2009PhT....62l..39Cdoi:10.1063/1.3273015S2CID 121338356. Archived from the original on 2013-01-12. In his brilliant but troubled life, Peirce was a pioneer in both metrology and philosophy.
    4. Jump up to:a b Cadwallader, Thomas C. (1974). "Charles S. Peirce (1839–1914): The first American experimental psychologist". Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences. 10 (3): 291–298. doi:10.1002/1520-6696(197407)10:3<291::AID-JHBS2300100304>3.0.CO;2-NPMID 11609224.
    5. Jump up to:a b Wible, James R. (December 2008). "The economic mind of Charles Sanders Peirce". Contemporary Pragmatism. Vol. 5, no. 2. pp. 39–67.
    6. Jump up to:a b Nöth, Winfried (2000). "Charles Sanders Peirce, Pathfinder in Linguistics".
      Nöth, Winfried (2000). "Digital Encyclopedia of Charles S. Peirce".
    7. Jump up to:a b c d Houser, Nathan (1989), "Introduction Archived 2010-05-30 at the Wayback Machine", Writings of Charles S. Peirce, 4:xxxviii, find "Eighty-nine".
    8. ^ "Peirce", in the case of C. S. Peirce, always rhymes with the English-language word "terse" and so, in most dialects, is pronounced exactly like the English-language word "purse."
    9. ^ "Note on the Pronunciation of 'Peirce'". Peirce Project Newsletter. Vol. 1, no. 3–4. December 1994. Archived from the original on 2016-03-03. Retrieved 2009-04-06.
    10. ^ Weiss, Paul (1934). "Peirce, Charles Sanders". Dictionary of American Biography. Arisbe. Archived from the original on 2013-11-03. Retrieved 2007-12-12.
    11. ^ "Peirce, Benjamin: Charles Sanders". Webster's Biographical Dictionary. Merriam-Webster. Springfield, Massachusetts. 1960 [1943].
    12. ^ Weiss, Paul (1934). "Peirce, Charles Sanders". Dictionary of American Biography. Internet Archive.
    13. Jump up to:a b Peirce, Charles Sanders (1886). "Letter, Peirce to A. Marquand"Writings of Charles S. Peirce. Indiana University Press. pp. 5:541–543. ISBN 978-0-25337201-7. See Burks, Arthur W. (1978). "Charles S. Peirce, The new elements of mathematics" (PDF). Book Review. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society. Eprint. 84 (5): 913–918. doi:10.1090/S0002-9904-1978-14533-9. Also Houser, Nathan. "Introduction". Writings of Charles S. Peirce. Vol. 5. p. xliv.
    14. ^ Fisch, Max, "Introduction Archived 2018-10-22 at the Wayback Machine", Writings of Charles S. Peirce, 1:xvii, find phrase "One episode".
    15. ^ Brent 1998, p. 40
    16. ^ "Peirce, Charles Sanders" (1898), The National Cyclopedia of American Biography, v. 8, p. 409.
    17. ^ Brent 1998, pp. 54–56
    18. ^ Brent, Josep (1998). Charles Sanders Peirce: A Life (2nd ed.). Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University Press. pp. 363–364. ISBN 978-0-25321161-3.
    19. ^ Brent 1998, pp. 19–20, 53, 75, 245
    20. Jump up to:a b c d Burch, Robert (2001, 2010), "Charles Sanders Peirce", Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
    21. ^ Brent 1998, p. 139
    22. ^ Brent 1998, pp. 61–62
    23. ^ Brent 1998, p. 34
    24. ^ Menand, Louis (2001). The Metaphysical Club. London, UK: Flamingo. pp. 161–162. ISBN 978-0-00712690-3.
    25. ^Menand, Louis (2001). The Metaphysical Club. London, UK: Flamingo. pp. 161–162. ISBN 978-0-00712690-3.
    26. ^Brent 1998, p. 69
    27. ^Brent 1998, p. 368
    28. ^Brent 1998, pp. 79–81
    29. Jump up to:ab c d Moore, Edward C., and Robin, Richard S., eds., (1964), Studies in the Philosophy of Charles Sanders Peirce, Second Series, Amherst: U. of Massachusetts Press. On Peirce the astronomer, see Lenzen's chapter.
    30. ^Menand (2001), p. 201.
コメント
  • X
  • Facebookでシェアする
  • はてなブックマークに追加する
  • LINEでシェアする

朝日記240705  (その11)11. 科学の哲学 「翻訳チャールズ・サンダース・パース」

2024-07-05 11:10:33 | 研究論説

 

朝日記240705  (その11)11. 科学の哲学 「翻訳チャールズ・サンダース・パース」

朝日記240705  (総表紙・目次)「翻訳チャールズ・サンダース・パー.

 

  1. 科学の哲学 Philosophy of science

 

科学の哲学 Philosophy of science

Main article: Classification of the sciences (Peirce)

 

Peirceはセノスコピー"Cenoscopy"と科学総見"Science of Review"の二つの分野を位置付けたoutlinedをした、その両方とも彼は哲学philosophyと呼んだのである。双方とも科学の哲学philosophy about science.を含むものである。1903年に彼は大なり小なり理論的基礎を整備したのであり、それは以下である:[102]  

 

  1.  発見の科学 Science of Discovery.
    1. 数学 Mathematics.
    2. セノスコピーCenoscopy (この項で上述したような哲学-範疇的categorial、規範的normative、形而上学的metaphysical) もしくは第一哲学First Philosophyとして位置付けるものであり、一般における実証的現象positive phenomenaに関心があり、特定の科学からの発見には寄らず、探求と科学的手法の一般研究inquiry and scientific methodを含む。
    3. イデオスコピーIdioscopy, または特定の科学(自然と精神nature and mind). 
  2. 総見の科学 Science of Review、これは極限的哲学としてのものであるが,以下を整理するものである; "... 発見の結果、その消化にはじまり、科学哲学形成philosophy of scienceへの努力にむかう". 彼の例ではHumboldt'の宇宙Cosmos, 、Comte'sの実証主義哲学Philosophie positive, および Spencer'の合成哲学 Synthetic Philosophyを含む;
  1. 実用的科学Practical Scienceまたは芸術 the Arts.

 

Peirceは彼の科学総見のなかで、科学のクラス別けと理論を位置付けた(これには数学と哲学を含むものである)。

彼のクラス分けは彼が長年研究によるものであるが、論議をおこしとひろい知識をひきつけるものであり、そしてつぎの二つの業績として興味あるものである、それは彼の哲学を航海するための海図として、および彼の時代において到達した学問についての調査である。

朝日記240705  (総表紙・目次)「翻訳チャールズ・サンダース・パー.

 

コメント
  • X
  • Facebookでシェアする
  • はてなブックマークに追加する
  • LINEでシェアする