2017-02-05 07:21:02 NHKonline
The State of Washington federal district court which prohibits and commands the presidential decree you can't enter
The State of Washington federal district court which prohibits and commands the presidential decree you can't enter
February 4 19:21.
Federal district court took out a decision of the temporary injunction to which fast shutdown of presidential decree is dictated by all-America about presidential decree of Nakato and the American president of cards who ordered to prohibit 7 countries of person's African entry temporarily. An alleged plan was indicated so that the White House might suspend the effect of this decision immediately in a courthouse about this decision.
An American president of cards took out the presidential decree he ordered to prohibit entry of Nakato and 7 African people temporarily.
On the other hand after we assumed "A recovery caused an impossible damage to a resident in the state and economy, and it was also against the public profit." in the State of Washington, "I promote discrimination based on the race and a religion and violate a constitution.", as the temporary injunction which causes an appeal as well as asks fast shutdown of execution was being represented to the federal district court in Seattle.
Federal district court admitted this statement on the 3rd and took out a decision of the temporary injunction to which fast shutdown of presidential decree is dictated by all-America about this. About a reason of a decision, a courthouse, "Presidential decree has a bad influence on employment, education and economic activity, the damage is important and it also continues now.", it's made etc..
Ferguson Secretary of Justice of the State of Washington stated "Even though he compared and said a president, it wasn't possible to exceed a law. It was a victory of a constitution."
Spicer spokesman, press attache of the White House announces statement on the 3rd about a decision, "The Department of Justice is going to ask to suspend execution of a decision of a courthouse immediately also defend presidential decree. I'm convinced that this presidential decree is legal and is an appropriate one.", as, dissatisfaction was represented to a courthouse as well as the idea that it's alleged was made clear so that the effect might be suspended immediately because the effect of the decision of a temporary injunction had formed already.
American media are telling "The presidential decree into which approval and disapproval is divided failed big." by a newsletter as well as are telling the etc. by which "a decision is received, and what kind of correspondence is performed at a site of an immigration doesn't become" clear.
A movement of filing a suit is successive to State of Massachusetts and State of New York at all part concerning this presidential decree.
An appeal of the State of Washington?
If the State of Washington is constitutional violation, the State of Washington is in the petition by the trial which did and asked fast shutdown, "A recovery causes an impossible damage to a resident and economy, and it's also against the public profit.", a reason of an appeal is being explained.
In particular, about the financial page, "There are Microsoft, Amazon and STARBUCKS COFFEE in the State of Washington, and many emigrants and refugees are employed, when a laborer with high specialty can't secure it, it'll be a heavy blow in management in the world.", it's made etc..
Such as mentioning that close to 100 emigrants commute from 7 countries presidential decree gives, Iran, Iraq and Syria are also made etc. "such student gets back by education and a study by presidential decree, with the danger which suffers impossible damage, crosses a university in the future and loses a student" in University of Washington about an educational face while doing.
On the other hand the federal district court out of which a decision of the temporary injunction to which fast shutdown of presidential decree is dictated was taken is explaining "Presidential decree has a bad influence on employment, education and economic activity, the damage is important and it also continues now." about the reason.
The decision which alleges by the State of Massachusetts and refuses
Presidential decree is received in the United States, and, state government and a citizen group are all part, it's constitutional violation, as the movement about which I file a suit spreads. Among these the Midwest State of Minnesota was added to the trial about which Nishibe State of Washington filed a suit on the 30th last month as a plaintiff later. The State of Hawaii also announced on the 3rd, that the Secretary of Justice of a state had challenged a federal government and had caused an appeal. A muslim group and a group of human rights have caused more similar appeals at Nanbu State of Virginia, east State of New York and east State of Massachusetts. Among these federal district court of the State of Massachusetts took out the decision which refuses the statement of a provisional injunction that prohibition of presidential decree is asked on the 3rd.
Rice media?
I'm telling CNN television the etc. the presidential decree into which approval and disapproval is divided was big, and in which I "failed" about this decision. Leading newspaper and Wall Street journal are an electronic edition, "I won't know immediately this decision is received, and what kind of correspondence is performed by an on-site level.", as, the point of view which isn't certain will be handed down to whether 7 of person's national entry will be resumed immediately.
A protest demonstration participant is voice of a welcome.
The voice which welcomes the decision the federal district court in the State of Washington took out in the evening for 3 days was successive between the citizen who participated in protest demonstration in opposition to the presidential decree I ordered to prohibit 7 countries of person's entry.
Among these the lady who participated in a demonstration march around the White House in metropolitan Washington, "I'm happy.", at the appreciated top, "I'm not saying that a president still withdraws and, a separate person has the family, too, so, we keep coming into action remonstrantly.", I was speaking. A different lady, "I'd like to applaud. Everyone should resist a president.", I was speaking.
A possibility that judicial rivalry forms with polity.
Prof. Yasushi Watanabe of Keio University conversant with American politics, "A prohibited temporary injunction was taken out though it announced pledge from whole election of an emigrant and the president of cards who gets strict correspondence by refugee's entry by the shape as the presidential decree. It'll be the shape that you quiver the root of insistence surely for political power of cards, and there is a possibility that rivalry forms between the administration and the judicial center.", it's being analyzed.
Because we assume that it's alleged so that the White House may suspend the effect of the decision of a temporary injunction, but it's opaque time in detail, "Department of Homeland Security and the situation how that doesn't the airport staff know whether to correspond and is he confused would continue for a while.", as confusion indicated the point of view which continues concerning 7 countries of person's entry for the time being.
2017-02-05 07:21:02 NHKonline
入国禁止の大統領令差し止め命じる ワシントン州連邦地裁
入国禁止の大統領令差し止め命じる ワシントン州連邦地裁
2月4日 19時21分
中東やアフリカの７か国の人の入国を一時的に禁止することなどを命じたアメリカのトランプ大統領の大統領令について、連邦地方裁判所は全米で大統領令の即時停止を命じる仮処分の決定を出しました。この決定についてホワイトハウスは裁判所に直ちにこの決定の効力を停止するよう申し立てる考えを示しました。
アメリカのトランプ大統領は、中東やアフリカの７か国の人の入国を一時的に禁止することなどを命じた大統領令を出しました。
これに対してワシントン州は「州内の住民や経済に回復不能な損害を与え、公共の利益にも反している」としたうえで「人種や宗教に基づく差別を助長するもので憲法に違反している」としてシアトルにある連邦地方裁判所に訴えを起こすとともに執行の即時停止を求める仮処分を申し立てていました。
これについて連邦地方裁判所は３日、この申し立てを認め、全米で大統領令の即時停止を命じる仮処分の決定を出しました。決定の理由について裁判所は「大統領令は雇用や教育、経済活動に悪影響を与えており、被害は重大で、今も続いている」などとしています。
ワシントン州のファーガソン司法長官は「たとえ大統領といえども法を超えることはできない。憲法の勝利だ」と述べました。
決定についてホワイトハウスのスパイサー報道官は３日、声明を発表し、「司法省は早急に裁判所の決定の執行を停止するよう求め、また、大統領令を守るつもりだ。この大統領令は合法で適切なものだと確信している」として、裁判所に不服を申し立てるとともに、仮処分の決定の効力がすでに生じていることから直ちに効力を停止するよう申し立てる考えを明らかにしました。
アメリカメディアは、「賛否が分かれている大統領令は大きくつまずいた」と速報で伝えるとともに、「決定を受けて入国管理の現場でどのような対応が行われるのかは明らかになっていない」などと伝えています。
今回の大統領令をめぐってはマサチューセッツ州やニューヨーク州など各地で提訴の動きが相次いでいます。
ワシントン州の訴えは
ワシントン州が憲法違反だとして即時停止を求めた裁判では、ワシントン州は訴状の中で「住民や経済に回復不能な損害を与え、公共の利益にも反している」と訴えの理由を説明しています。
特に、経済面については「ワシントン州にはマイクロソフトやアマゾン、スターバックスなどがあり多くの移民や難民が雇用されているが、高い専門性を持つ労働者が確保できなければ世界での経営に痛手となる」などとしています。
また教育の面についても、ワシントン大学にはイランやイラク、シリアなど大統領令があげている７か国から１００人近い移民が通っていることをあげるなどしながら「こうした学生は大統領令によって教育や研究などで回復不能な損害を受けるし、大学は将来にわたって学生を失う危険性がある」などとしています。
これに対して大統領令の即時停止を命じる仮処分の決定を出した連邦地方裁判所は、その理由について「大統領令は雇用や教育、経済活動に悪影響を与えており、被害は重大で、今も続いている」と説明しています。
マサチューセッツ州では申し立て退ける決定
アメリカでは、大統領令を受けて州政府や市民団体が各地で憲法違反だなどとして提訴する動きが広がっています。このうち、中西部ミネソタ州は、西部ワシントン州が先月３０日に提訴した裁判に後日、原告として加わりました。また、ハワイ州も州の司法長官が３日、連邦政府を相手取って訴えを起こしたと発表しました。さらにイスラム教徒の団体や人権団体は、南部バージニア州、東部ニューヨーク州、東部マサチューセッツ州などで同様の訴えを起こしています。このうちマサチューセッツ州の連邦地方裁判所は、３日、大統領令の差し止めを求める仮処分の申し立てを退ける決定を出しました。
米メディアは
ＣＮＮテレビは今回の決定について「賛否が分かれる大統領令は大きくつまずいた」などと伝えています。有力紙、ウォール・ストリート・ジャーナルは電子版で、「この決定を受けて、現場レベルでどのような対応が行われるのかは直ちにわからない」として、７つの国の人の入国がすぐに再開されるかどうかははっきりしないという見方を伝えています。
抗議デモ参加者は歓迎の声
７か国の人の入国を禁止することなどを命じた大統領令に反対し、抗議デモに参加していた市民のあいだからは、３日夜、ワシントン州にある連邦地方裁判所が出した決定を歓迎する声が相次ぎました。
このうち、首都ワシントンのホワイトハウス周辺でデモ行進に参加していた女性は、「うれしいです」と喜んだうえで、「まだ大統領が撤回すると言っていないし、家族が離れ離れの人もいるので私たちは抗議活動を続けます」と話していました。また、別の女性も「拍手を送りたいです。大統領にみんなが抵抗すべきです」と話していました。
行政と司法の対立関係生じる可能性も
アメリカ政治に詳しい慶応大学の渡辺靖教授は「移民や難民の入国により厳格な対応を取るというトランプ大統領の選挙中からの公約を、大統領令という形で発令したにもかかわらず差し止める仮処分が出された。トランプ政権にとってはまさに主張の根幹を揺さぶられる形になり、行政府と司法府の間に対立関係が生じる可能性がある」と分析しています。
また、ホワイトハウスが、仮処分の決定の効力を停止するよう申し立てるとしているものの、具体的な時期は不透明なことから「国土安全保障省や空港職員などもどのように対応すればよいかわからず、混乱する状況がしばらく続くだろう」として当面７か国の人の入国を巡って混乱が続くという見方を示しました。
