再度の消費増税

３月１６日現在で、ようやく消費増税が良くない政策である
という現実に目が向けられるようになった。増税につぐ増税。
さらに節約が続きデフレとなるのか？　我が家の家計は？
As of March 16, people came to finally understand the
fact that the consumption tax increase policy was no good.
When you noticed the big lie of the tax increase power (
=Ministry of Finance, some scholars, and media), they
cannot carry out the second consumption tax increase.
In the first place, this consumption tax increase
discussion dates back to the Great East Japan Earthquake
five years ago. Just after the great earthquake disaster,
the Prime Minister Naoto Kan at the time (the Democratic
Party) planned a reconstruction tax increase in partnership
with President Teiichi Tanigaki of the LDP which was an
opposition party in those days.
These two people should not have discussed makeshift
revival. This plan was found to be a mistake immediately.
There exists a leveling theory of taxation, if the one-time
disaster for 100 years, for example, the government
publishes 100-year bond, and it is a right policy that
the nation bears by a one-100th every year. At the time
of a great earthquake disaster, government should not
cover the financial resources in the tax increase. The
nation must have a painful experience twice. Twice!
Some people and medias promoted a reconstruction tax
increase in defiance of a theory. And Ministry of Finance
was on this back. In that way a revival tax increase
was established. For Ministry of Finance, the revival tax
increase is only the first stage. It was a consumption tax
increase for the next stage.
In the Noda Administration after the Kan Administration,
the consumption tax increase was carried out. Prime Minister
Noda who was under complete control of Ministry of Finance
at the time said, "I will not do what is not written in my
manifesto, and white ant extermination is necessary before
a tax increase". However, Prime Minister Noda forced
the consumption tax increase that was not written in the
manifesto. He did not do the white ant extermination either.
He was an easy-to-use man for Ministry of Finance. Prime
Minister Noda did a general election and should have
asked a consumption tax increase, but he skipped a
democratic process and originally maintained the
consumption tax increase bill.