GreenTechSupport GTS 井上創学館 IESSGK

GreenTechSupport News from IESSGK

news20090809bil

2009-08-09 22:08:38 | Weblog
[Biography of the Day] from [Britannica]
August 9
EAmedeo Avogadro
Born this day in 1776, Amedeo Avogadro of Italy showed that, under controlled conditions of temperature and pressure, equal volumes of gases contain an equal number of molecules—what became known as Avogadro's law.


[On This Day] from [Britannica]
August 9
48: Pompey defeated by Julius Caesar at the Battle of Pharsalus
During the Roman Civil War of 49–45 BC, Julius Caesar's troops on this day in 48 decisively defeated the army of Pompey at the Battle of Pharsalus, causing Pompey to flee to Egypt, where he was subsequently murdered.


1945: The second atomic bomb dropped on Japan by the United States in World War II struck the city of Nagasaki.

1896: Russian dancer and innovative choreographer Léonide Massine, one of the most important figures in 20th-century dance, was born in Moscow.

1854: Henry David Thoreau's masterwork Walden was published.

1814: Defeated by U.S. General Andrew Jackson, the Creek Indians signed the Treaty of Fort Jackson, requiring them to cede 23 million acres of land, comprising more than half of Alabama and part of southern Georgia.


[Today's Word] from [Dr. Kazuo Iwata]
August 9
None but the brave deserves the fair.
Sweet is pleasure after pain.
Men are but children of a larger growth.
    John Dryden (born this day in 1681)

勇者のみ、ひとり美人に値する。
Yuja-nomi hitori bijin-ni ataisuru.
苦労のあとの楽しみこそよけれ。
Kuro-no ato-no tanoshimi-koso yo-kere.
大人は、大きくなった子供にすぎない。
Otona-wa, okiku-natta kodomo-ni suginai.



[日英混文稿]

news20090809jt1

2009-08-09 21:55:27 | Weblog
[TODAY'S TOP STORIES] from [The Japan Times]

[NATIONAL NEWS]
Sunday, Aug. 9, 2009
Sakai arrested after turning up in Tokyo, admits to drug allegations
Kyodo News

Actress Noriko Sakai, who briefly disappeared in an apparent attempt to evade drug charges, turned up at a Tokyo police station Saturday night and was arrested on suspicion of possessing stimulants.

Sakai turned herself in at around 7:55 p.m. and admitted to the allegations, the Metropolitan Police Department said.

Sakai had disappeared following Monday's arrest of her husband, Yuichi Takaso, 41, for alleged possession of amphetamines.

The Tokyo police obtained an arrest warrant for the 38-year-old former pop idol Friday after finding a small quantity of drugs in her Tokyo apartment, where she lives separately from her husband. The Tokyo police asked Sakai through her lawyer to turn herself in.

Takaso, a self-proclaimed professional surfer, was arrested after a police officer found a plastic bag containing stimulants in his underwear in Tokyo's Shibuya district.

Stimulants and drug paraphernalia were found in Sakai's Minato Ward apartment, and a sample on it was found to match her DNA, the sources said.

Takaso was quoted as telling the police that the drugs in Sakai's apartment were not his.

Sakai withdrew cash from an ATM in Tokyo and bought underwear and other items at a store in Shinjuku Ward shortly after disappearing following her husband's arrest, they said.

The television personality, who is extremely popular in Taiwan, Hong Kong and mainland China, is believed to have gone to Yamanashi Prefecture because signals from her mobile phone were picked up near the town of Minobu on Tuesday evening.

Tokyo police had sent investigators to Yamanashi to search for clues to her whereabouts.

The high-profile case involving the actress drew a strong antidrug response from Chief Cabinet Secretary Takeo Kawamura, the government's top spokesman.

"It is necessary to eliminate the root of an evil because it has been pointed out that drug use is widespread in the entertainment world," Kawamura told a news conference in Ube, Yamaguchi Prefecture. "We need to tackle this issue so drug use will never spread among the youth."

Meanwhile, it was learned Saturday that Sakai's 30-year-old brother was indicted for using drugs last month in Fukuoka Prefecture. He was arrested July 17 after testing positive for drug use in a urine test, according to sources.

After her marriage in 1998 and the birth of her son in 1999, she appeared in commercials and re-created her image as a good mother in a happy family.

In 1993, Sakai appeared in an event promoting campaigns against drug abuse.


[NATIONAL NEWS]
Sunday, Aug. 9, 2009
Senate clears Roos as next ambassador to Japan
Compiled from Kyodo, AP

WASHINGTON — The Senate on Friday approved President Barack Obama's nomination of John Roos as the next U.S. ambassador to Japan.

The Senate also confirmed Utah Gov. Jon Huntsman as ambassador to China the same day. Huntsman is a popular Republican who is viewed as a potential presidential candidate for 2012. He is a fluent Chinese speaker with deep ties to China.

Roos, 54, is expected to take up his post in Tokyo later this month. He will serve as the point man for U.S. policy on Japan.

The California-based lawyer reportedly collected at least $500,000 for Obama's presidential campaign but was relatively unknown outside fundraising and legal circles. His selection drew fire from some in Japan who doubt his qualifications at a time when North Korea's nuclear and missile threats are major sources of concern.

He will also have to address another key issue he may be unfamiliar with — overseeing a pact committing Japan and the United States to follow through on the planned transfer of U.S. Marines from Okinawa to Guam by 2014.

Chief Cabinet Secretary Takeo Kawamura said Saturday he expects Roos to arrive around Aug. 18.

"He is very close to President Obama. We have expectations of Mr. Roos, who can speak directly with the president in moving forth Japan-U.S. relations," Kawamura said.

Apparently trying to dispel concerns about Roos' relative lack of diplomatic experience, Obama on Thursday underlined the "great importance" he attached to the selection of the next U.S. ambassador to Japan and voiced confidence that Roos will do a good job in the position.

"And after careful consideration I made the determination that the person who I thought could best do this is somebody with superb judgment, somebody with an outstanding intellect, somebody who is a very close friend of mine and a close adviser," Obama said.

He said Roos is "somebody who I'm confident is going to be able to help to strengthen both the regional and the global relationship between the United States and Japan."

"He's somebody who will be able to advise me directly on issues that may arise and opportunities that may arise in the U.S.-Japanese relationship. He is somebody who is, I know, going to be working incredibly hard to make sure that he is listening to and understanding the full scope of Japanese concerns," Obama added.

The remarks, made when Obama met with Roos at the White House, reinforce the view that Obama chose Roos because they enjoy strong personal ties, similar to those between former President George W. Bush and his envoy to Japan, Thomas Schieffer.

Roos has said that the large California law firm he leads was "intimately involved" with several topics of interest to Japan, including software growth, the rise of the Internet and the emergence of biotechnology, clean technology and renewable energy.

During a Senate confirmation hearing late last month, Roos called the Japan-U.S. alliance "the cornerstone of security and stability in the East Asia-Pacific region" and pledged to work hard to solidify the "special bond" between the two nations if his nomination is confirmed.

Roos also said at the time that close bilateral relations will remain unchanged even if the Democratic Party of Japan wrests power from the long-governing Liberal Democratic Party in the Aug. 30 general election as opinion polls indicate.


[NATIONAL NEWS]
Sunday, Aug. 9, 2009
Ex-minister Watanabe starts new political party
Kyodo News

Former Cabinet minister Yoshimi Watanabe said Saturday that he has launched a new political party called Your Party with three other former members of the Lower House and a current member of the Upper House.

Minna no To, which literally means "party for everyone," will field 13 candidates in the Aug. 30 House of Representatives election and endorse two new independent candidates.

Kenji Eda, one of the former Lower House members who joined Watanabe, told a news conference it is unlikely Your Party will work with the ruling Liberal Democratic Party after the election.

"We are eyeing cooperation with the Democratic Party of Japan," he said.

Watanabe, who was in charge of administrative reform, left the LDP in January after becoming disenchanted with Prime Minister Taro Aso's policies, saying they were out of step with people's needs. Watanabe also questioned Aso's leadership and the pace of reforms to the national civil servant system.

The other members of Your Party include House of Councilors member Keiichiro Asao, who was expelled from the DPJ last month after announcing he would run for a district seat in Kanagawa during the upcoming election.


[NATIONAL NEWS]
Sunday, Aug. 9, 2009
Arrest, drugs shatter Sakai's 'pure' image
Kyodo News

Actress Noriko Sakai's arrest and the discovery of illegal stimulants and drug paraphernalia in her home have shocked fans in Japan and elsewhere who believed in her "pure and straight" image.

The case is also posing a daunting challenge to the police, who are trying to crack down on deep-rooted drug use in the entertainment industry.

Until the arrest warrant was actually issued Friday, Sakai's fans and production office were concerned for the safety of the 38-year-old actress. But it soon became apparent she was merely to evade the police.

Sayuri Kobayashi, a Beijing-based journalist, said Sakai is the most well-known Japanese actress among Chinese in their 30s and 40s.

"She is very popular in all of the Chinese-speaking region in Asia," she said.

Music analyst Takashi Usui said Sakai's successful return to acting after childbirth turned her into a role model for many women.

"Because of that, she may have suffered from tremendous stress that we can never imagine," Usui said.

Insiders in the entertainment world say the use of illegal drugs may be becoming fashionable among younger entertainers and that police are growing more concerned about the strong influence they have on society.

While arrests over marijuana have been on the rise, those for stimulants have been declining since peaking in 1984, police data show. Compared with about 24,000 in 1984, arrests have dropped to less than half, reaching about 11,000 in 2008, police said.

However, arrests linked to drugs in the entertainment world have jumped in recent years, they said.

"People in the entertainment industry have a huge influence in society. We must strictly tackle the problem," a senior official of the National Police Agency said.

news20090809jt2

2009-08-09 21:48:18 | Weblog
[TODAY'S TOP STORIES] from [The Japan Times]

[NATIONAL NEWS]
Sunday, Aug. 9, 2009
Doctors deserting LDP ahead of poll
Kyodo News

The embattled Liberal Democratic Party is losing support among doctors, traditionally key supporters of the ruling party, ahead of the Aug. 30 general election, a Kyodo survey said Saturday.

The survey found that the number of prefectures in which doctors' groups plan to back LDP candidates in all electoral constituencies has dropped to 19 from 29 in the previous Lower House poll taken in 2005.

Particularly notable is Ibaraki Prefecture, where a doctors' group has recommended candidates from the Democratic Party of Japan in all seven constituencies.

Many practitioners and their relatives have broken ties with the LDP over policies including the launch last year of a new health care plan for people aged 75 or older.

The survey also suggests local construction groups are distancing themselves from the LDP as well.

The number of prefectures in which such groups decided to support LDP candidates in all electoral constituencies has fallen to 29 from 34 in the 2005 election.

The figure for local agricultural groups in the latest survey remained little changed at 31 prefectures, compared with 30 in 2005.

Tax-stance survey
Seventy percent of the governing Liberal Democratic Party's prospective candidates for the general election support Prime Minister Taro Aso's proposal to raise the 5 percent consumption tax after the economy recovers, a Kyodo News survey showed.

In contrast, more than 80 percent of the Democratic Party of Japan's candidates oppose it.

The findings were based on questionnaires sent to 1,220 prospective candidates seeking information about their policies ahead of the pivotal Aug. 30 election. Responses were received from 1,035, or 85 percent.

Of those who responded, 698 are planning to run for one of the eight main parties — 229 for the LDP, 33 for New Komeito, the LDP's junior coalition partner, 230 for the DPJ, 162 for the Japanese Communist Party, 33 for the Social Democratic Party, nine for the People's New Party, and one each for the Japanese Renaissance Party and New Party Nippon.

According to the survey, 71.6 percent of the LDP's prospective candidates back the proposal but 82.6 percent of the opposition DPJ's candidates oppose it.

Of the New Komeito hopefuls, 48.5 percent back the proposal and 42.4 percent failed to give a clear response. None of the JCP and SDP candidates backed the proposal.

Of the 698 planning to run for a main party, 57.3 percent oppose Aso's tax hike and 26.6 percent support it.

But of the 1,035 total respondents — which includes 337 independents and minor party candidates — 68.8 percent oppose the tax hike and 18.7 percent support it.

In response to a question on top issues for the House of Representatives election, 686 from the eight parties, or 90.7 percent, cited social security reform, including the pension and medical care schemes. On the Constitution, 40.6 percent of the LDP candidates supported a partial revision of the charter, including war-renouncing Article 9.

In contrast, 33.0 percent of the DPJ candidates and 54.5 percent of the New Komeito candidates supported a partial constitutional revision excluding Article 9.

Article 9 stipulates that "the Japanese people forever renounce war as a sovereign right of the nation and the threat or use of force as means of settling international disputes . . . land, sea, and air forces, as well as other war potential, will never be maintained."

None of the JCP and SDP candidates supported revising the Constitution.

When asked about their preferred framework for government after the election, a DPJ-led coalition was selected by 37.8 percent, the largest group, of respondents from the eight parties.

In the survey, 41.0 percent of the LDP candidates called for a strict or partial restriction of fielding of so-called hereditary candidates, compared with 88.3 percent of DPJ candidates and 66.7 percent of New Komeito candidates.


[NATIONAL NEWS]
Sunday, Aug. 9, 2009
Japan won't force aid on disputed isles

UBE, Yamaguchi Pref. (Kyodo) Chief Cabinet Secretary Takeo Kawamura said Saturday that Japan will not force Russia to accept its offer to provide humanitarian aid to four Russian-held islands off Hokkaido it claims sovereignty over.

"It is not something we will force upon them," the government's top spokesman said in Ube, Yamaguchi Prefecture, a day after the Russian Foreign Ministry rejected the aid. "We take that in its own way."

Russia said it notified the Japanese Embassy in Moscow of the decision on Friday.

Russia has taken a tougher stance on the bilateral territorial row ever since the Diet enacted a revised law in July declaring the four islands — Kunashiri, Etorofu, Shikotan and the Habomai group of islets — an "integral part" of Japan.

Kawamura effectively denied there was any correlation between the new law and the rejected aid, saying the latest move just shows that "Russia's economic situation has stabilized."

Japan started providing humanitarian aid, such as medical supplies and food, in 1992, after the islands' residents began facing economic difficulties following the collapse of the former Soviet Union.

However, the medical supplies were canceled in January after envoys on a humanitarian mission from the Japanese Foreign Ministry refused to submit disembarkation cards upon arrival on Kunashiri Island because doing so would signify Japan recognized it as part of Russia.


[NATIONAL NEWS]
Sunday, Aug. 9, 2009
Foreigner's 'karoshi' case a first
Kyodo News

The relatives of a Chinese man who died of heart failure last year sought compensation Friday at a local labor standards inspection office, claiming his long working hours as a trainee at a plating company in Ibaraki Prefecture killed him.

The alleged case of "karoshi," or death by overwork, is the first in Japan to seek damages for the death of a foreign trainee, a group of lawyers dealing in such issues said.

Jiang Xiaodong, from Jiangsu Province, died in his sleep in a dormitory in June last year at the age of 31. He came to Japan in December 2005 on a vocational training program.

The plating company, situated in Itako, forced Jiang to work long hours — as many as 100 hours of overtime a month — even though he wasn't supposed to work overtime under the training system, according lawyer Shoichi Ibusuki, who is representing his relatives.

From his second year onward, when Jiang became an apprentice, his overtime work surged to 150 hours, with only two days off a month. He was paid \114,000 a month, and \400 to \820 per hour for overtime.

Under the training system, established in 1993, foreigners are put through a year of training and promoted to apprentices in their second year.

Ibusuki said Jiang was unable to resist the harsh labor because he had handed over around \140,000 to his agency in China as guarantee money and "feared that he would be forced to return home and (the agency) would take his money."

His wife, Feng Zhu, was quoted as saying by the lawyer that he called to tell her he "gets tired after working long hours," and that she was dissatisfied his Japanese agency's claims that the company forced him to work only 20 hours' overtime a month.

In fiscal 2008, 34 foreign vocational trainees and apprentices died from accidents and disease at work, the highest number on record, according to the Japan International Training Cooperation Organization.


[NATIONAL NEWS]
Sunday, Aug. 9, 2009
Memorial held for wartime Chinese forced laborers
Kyodo News

A memorial service was held in Tokyo on Saturday for 6,830 Chinese forced laborers who died in various parts of Japan during the war after being brought here against their will, the first to mourn all Chinese who perished in such circumstances.

About 300 people — including around 70 from China, families of the dead and monks — took part in the service at a temple in Sumida Ward.

Two Chinese who survived the ordeal also attended.

"I hope the two countries will not only look back on history and pray for peace but also take opportunities such as this memorial service to lead to mutual friendship," Chinese Ambassador to Japan Cui Tiankai said at the event.

Separate memorial services have been held in other places in the past, but this year's event was organized in conjunction with the 60th anniversary of the discovery of the remains of Chinese laborers in a mine in Akita Prefecture, organizers said.

Many Chinese died of poor nutrition, overwork and illness after being brought here to toil in 135 places, such as coal mines and shipyards, across the nation, organizers said.

news20090809jt3

2009-08-09 21:39:57 | Weblog
[TODAY'S TOP STORIES] from [The Japan Times]

[NATIONAL NEWS]
Sunday, Aug. 9, 2009
Former minister Tagawa dies at 91
Kyodo News

Seiichi Tagawa, a former home affairs minister and head of the now-defunct New Liberal Club, died Friday of old age at a nursing home in Yokosuka, Kanagawa Prefecture, his family said. He was 91.

In 1976, Tagawa, along with other lawmakers including Yohei Kono, left the ruling Liberal Democratic Party and formed the New Liberal Club.

The New Liberal Club formed a coalition government with the LDP in December 1983, with Tagawa serving as home affairs minister in the government of then Prime Minister Yasuhiro Nakasone.

Tagawa was elected 11 times to the House of Representatives after entering the chamber in 1960.

After the New Liberal Club was disbanded in 1986, Tagawa formed and led the now-defunct Progressive Party the following year and later devoted himself to fighting corruption.

He retired from politics in 1993.

Kono, Tagawa's cousin, served as Lower House speaker until the chamber was dissolved last month.


[NATIONAL NEWS]
Sunday, Aug. 9, 2009
KANSAI: Who & What
Kyoto invites foreigners to try out 'Student Day'


Kyoto is inviting foreign students at universities and colleges in the city to participate in International Student Day from 10 a.m. to noon on Oct. 17.

The event will give Kyoto's foreign students an opportunity to enjoy traditional stage performances and tea ceremonies at Nijo Castle in Nakagyo Ward.

Participation is free and 150 students will be invited. Those who wish to participate must enter a drawing by phone or fax or apply online through the city's Web site by Aug. 15.

To apply, call (075) 661-3755 or send a fax to (075) 661-5855 listing your name, address, telephone number, school name, nationality and e-mail address. To apply online, go to the Web site at www.city.kyoto.lg.jp/sogo/page/0000012821.html (in Japanese) and fill out the inquiry form.

Those accepted will receive their invitation by early October. The event will be postponed to Oct. 18 in case of rain.

For more information, access www.city.kyoto.lg.jp/sogo/page/0000065429.html (in Japanese).

Nara illumination event to wind down on Friday

Nara To-Kae, a summer illumination event that began Aug. 5, will take place from 7 p.m. to 9:45 p.m. until Aug. 14.

More than 20,000 candles will light up some of the most traditional sites in the ancient capital, such as Kofuku-ji Temple and Todai-ji Temple. On Aug. 10, two free shakuhachi concerts and an accordion concert will be held at Sagi Pond from 7:30 p.m. and from 8:30 p.m.

For further information or an access map, visit www.toukae.jp/ (in Japanese and English) or contact the organizer at info@toukae.jp

International House to hold Japanese classes

The Osaka International House is seeking participants for a Japanese class to be held from September to December.

The Tanoshii Nihongo class is oriented for foreign residents interested in learning everyday conversation. There are four different levels of classes, which are held every week on either Tuesday or Wednesday from 7 p.m. to 8:30 p.m.

Those who wish to attend must take an advance placement interview between 7 p.m. and 8:30 p.m. on Aug. 18 and 19. The interviews are conducted only in Japanese. Reservations must be made by phone.

Tuition is \5,000, which includes a textbook. The venue is a six-minute walk from Uehonmachi Station on the Kintetsu Line or a 10-minute walk from Tanimachi 9-chome Station on the Tanimachi or Sennichimae subway lines.

For advance reservations for interviews, call (06) 6773-8989. For details, visit the organizer's Web site (www.ih-osaka.or.jp/i.house/english/), which also has an access map to the venue.

Jazz tunes add swing to Kobe illumination show

The jazz-themed illumination event "Kobe Swing of Lights" is being held every night in Kobe Harbor Land until Aug. 23.

"Kobe Swing of Lights" is a 10-minute light show held to the music of around 10 jazz standards, including "What a Wonderful World" by Louis Armstrong and "Moonlight Serenade" by Glenn Miller. It is held twice a night at 8 p.m. and 9 p.m. On weekends, the 9 p.m. show features a special ending with fireworks. The shows are best viewed from the east side of Mosaic shopping arcade near JR Kobe Station.

Admission is free, but shows may be canceled in case of heavy rain.

For more information, contact the organizer at (078) 303-1010 or visit the Web site swing-of-lights.com/ (in Japanese).


[BUSINESS NEWS]
Saturday, Aug. 8, 2009
DPJ hints at fiscal plan by yearend
Kyodo News

The Democratic Party of Japan envisions formulating around the end of this year a basic policy on how to restore the nation's fiscal health, including numerical targets in four years, party sources said Thursday.

The party will also consider presenting a target year in which the nation could put the primary fiscal balance of the central and local governments in the black, the sources said.

The plans are based on the premise that the party will take power and stay there for the next four years by ousting the Liberal Democratic Party-New Komeito ruling coalition in the Aug. 30 general election.

The policy would be mapped out around the end of this year, when the government finishes compiling a budget for the fiscal year beginning next April, or later, the sources said.

A new tax commission that would replace the government's tax commission, and a new "national strategy bureau" — both of which are planned to be set up under a DPJ-led government — would be in charge of devising the policy, the sources added.

The DPJ did not address the fiscal issue in its campaign platform, which was announced on July 27, provoking the LDP and New Komeito to criticize the opposition for being less than responsible.

The DPJ has decided it needs to show how it aims to restore the nation's fiscal health as a party in power, given the worsening of the nation's fiscal state amid the global economic downturn and the projected ballooning of social security costs, the sources said.

But because tax revenues are not projected to expand rapidly, the government is expected to continue issuing bonds in the next fiscal year and later.

Given the situation, the key to restoring the nation's fiscal health under a DPJ-led government lies in how it would be able to find a new source of money by reorganizing the budget items and cutting waste, which the DPJ has vowed to do, pundits say.

The formulation of such a policy could also affect discussions on hiking the 5 percent consumption tax, which the DPJ has vowed not to do for at least four years.

For years, the government had been aiming to achieve a surplus in the primary balance — revenue matching spending, excluding debt payments — by March 2012, but gave up after issuing bonds to pay for a series of economic stimulus packages.

The government decided in June to try to achieve a surplus in the primary balance at the national and local levels by March 2020 through a consumption tax hike.

The amount of outstanding government bonds is projected to come to \591 trillion at the end of next March, according to the government.

Sell fewer bonds: DPJ
The Democratic Party of Japan said it will try its best to make the state budget less dependent on annual issues of government bonds if it comes to power after the Aug. 30 election, one of its key lawmakers said Friday.

"We want to lower the rate of dependence on government bonds, as well as the amount of new bonds if possible," said Kohei Otsuka, who played an important role in formulating the main opposition party's pledges for the coming House of Representatives election.

At a meeting with market analysts, Otsuka, deputy head of the DPJ's research council, tried to ease concerns about Japan's ballooning deficit.

Otsuka said it would be unrealistic not to issue any government bonds in light of the country's huge budgetary needs.

But he argued that the DPJ's policy pledges — which some see as spendthrift — would not lead to a fiscal deterioration as the party is planning to keep a lid on costs by cutting wasteful public spending, instead of issuing deficit-covering bonds.

Asked about the DPJ's foreign-exchange policy, Otsuka, a former Bank of Japan official, said ensuring market stability is a key concern.

Regardless of whether the government changes, Japan's management of its ample foreign currency reserves should be consistent and take into account Tokyo's strong ties with Washington, he said.

news20090809jt4

2009-08-09 21:22:24 | Weblog
[TODAY'S TOP STORIES] from [The Japan Times]

[ENVIRONMENT]
Sunday, Aug. 9, 2009
NATURAL SELECTIONS
From flossing to . . . philosophy?

By ROWAN HOOPER

Next time I visit Kyoto, it's not the temples I'll want to see — it's the monkeys.

On the slopes of Mount Arashiyama in Kyoto Prefecture is Iwatayama Monkey Park, home to some 150 wild Japanese macaques. The park also plays host to scientists from the renowned Primate Research Institute at Kyoto University.

Jean-Baptiste Leca is one of those researchers. He was watching a group of the monkeys at Iwatayama last year when he noticed a 14-year-old female perform an unusual behavior — she pulled hair out of her own back and used it to floss her teeth.

Other species of monkey have been seen collecting stray human hairs and twining them into a string in order to floss, but the behavior had not been reported in the wild until then, and never in Japanese macaques.

"Our study is one of the rare reports on the spontaneous appearance of tool-use behaviour in Japanese macaques under natural conditions," Leca told me in a recent e-mail.

"Just like the use of twigs as 'toothpicks' by chimpanzees, bonobos and orangutans, the use of hair as dental floss can be considered tool-use in a hygiene context. It's health maintenance, which is a form of self-medicative behavior."

There have previously been reports that chimps and other apes may "self- medicate," that is eat certain "medicinal" plants when they are sick with gut parasites. There has also been some excitement around the idea that further study of this behavior may help us find new drugs. And inevitably, the discovery of self-medication in apes has been discussed by scientists in terms of the evolution of medicine in human societies.

Leca and his colleagues argue that flossing in macaques is a form of medication. Unlike chimps that swallow leaves to flush out parasites, however, no other monkeys at Iwatayama have started flossing.

The Kyoto University team under Leca recently published their report on flossing in the journal Primates, and it got me thinking. Japanese macaques are fastidious about hygiene, washing sweet potatoes in sea water before eating them, and famously bathing in hot springs. Both behaviors fit well with the popular image of Japan being ultrahygienic and clean.

What else can they do? Atsushi Iriki, of the Saitama Prefecture-based Brain Science Institute of RIKEN [Rikagaku Kenkyusho, a huge natural sciences research institute founded in 1917 that is almost entirely government funded] argues that macaques have a sense of self. They can also learn to use tools.

I suppose it's going too far to suggest that monkeys are familiar with the precepts of Confucianism — but oddly enough, it wouldn't be the first time nonhuman primates have been spoken of as "religious."

I was talking to geneticist Steve Jones, from University College London, at a party earlier this year, and I asked him if chimps had religion. It was fairly late in the evening and there had been a lot of free alcohol at the party, but luckily Jones didn't think I was a raving maniac.

He told me of an incredible behavior that one individual has been seen doing in a chimp sanctuary in Spain. The animal, named Marco, dances with abandon during thunderstorms. The world-famous primatologist Jane Goodall has also reported seeing chimps dancing in front of waterfalls, and hurling rocks.

Now here's some serious anthropomorphizing: the waterfall dance and the thunderstorm dance could be some kind of primitive display of awe at what to them is an incomprehensible natural phenomenon. They appear to "marvel" at their surroundings. Chimps seem to have it in them to acknowledge a higher power. Forget evolution of medicine — this is evolution of religion.

I wonder if the chimps "get" anything from doing this. I can imagine that people who pray feel consoled if they think a higher power is watching over them, and people such as priests who interpret what supposed higher powers mean gain certain status in society. What do chimps get from the waterfall dance? Perhaps simply joy.

Just down the road from Kyoto in another of Japan's ancient capitals, Nara, where I saw something almost like this.

Nara Park is famously home to more than 1,000 sika deer that roam the 600-odd-hectare grounds freely. I remember finding a tiny shrine in a wooded, hilly part of the park, where a few deer loitered, foraging. Nara deer are designated National Treasures, but it was only after World War II that they received that protection. Until then they were considered divine and sacred, as in Shinto they are regarded as messengers of the gods.

I had spent a meditative, restorative afternoon cycling gently around the park. Seeing the deer and the tiny shrine I fancied that I could understand how people once thought them divine animals. (I thought the same thing about foxes when visiting the magical Inari Shrine just outside Kyoto, the "headquarters" of all fox spirits in Japan.)

The scene — deer peacefully hanging out at a shrine — might have suggested animal divinity, but the deer themselves were of course clueless. They might as well have been foraging around a vending machine for all they cared.

Primates, chimps at least, seem to be different. With the amount the Kyoto researchers are learning about macaques, however, I wonder if it's only a matter of time before we get a "spiritual" insight into their lives. And what an insight that would give us into ours.

Perhaps I should be content with what we're already learning about the complexities of Japanese macaques. But let me restate what I want to do next time I'm in Kyoto: The ideal visit would combine both monkeys and temples.

news20090809jt5

2009-08-09 21:18:52 | Weblog
[TODAY'S TOP STORIES] from [The Japan Times]

[LIFE IN JAPAN]
Sunday, Aug. 9, 2009
COUNTERPOINT
Humor may be universal, but Japan's is largely its smut-free own

By ROGER PULVERS

Swedes crack jokes about Norwegians, Poles knock the Russians, and though everyone likes a good Italian joke, they're less funny than they used to be thanks to the genuinely grotesque antics of Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi.

But Japanese do not tell jokes at the expense of their neighbors, the Koreans and Chinese.

They also don't tell jokes centering on taboos, other religions, people with variegated sexual preferences or people in power. The dirty joke is virtually unknown here; and when foreign fellows tell them to their Japanese girl friends, the reaction is invariably a swift geeee! (yuk!), followed by sayonara (goodbye).

So, if you can't make fun of taboos, other nationalities or religions, powerful people or the highlights of sexual proclivities, what's left to be funny about?

The Japanese sense of social propriety dictates that humor in bad taste is vulgar. The nation, after all, adopted its modern sensibility in these matters from Victorian England and the Kaiser's Germany. Decorum was there to protect the privileges of the upper classes — and the lower classes from themselves. Humor of the "wrong" sort was not only frivolous, it could be dangerous: It could call the naked king "naked," and take the mickey out of a fearsome authoritarian mouse.

Japanese humor can generally be categorized as "harmless fun." There is the comedy-of-manners type one sees, for instance, in the films of Yasujiro Ozu, particularly the ones made before World War II. This is always based on the universal mores of daily Japanese life, and Ozu often used light Hollywood-style background music to subtly bring out amusing aspects of the inter- relationships between urban and rural life while avoiding the heavy-handed or slapstick.

Much the same goes for the humor of the novelist Masuji Ibuse (1898-1993), whose wit may be described as toboketa (feigningly innocent). His writings frequently portray a character playing the fool in order to show up the quaint eccentricities of others.

Since such comedy-of-manners humor is often based on wordplay and knowledge of local customs, it can easily be missed by non-Japanese. Indeed, many may view both Ozu and Ibuse as being super-serious, almost Zen-like masters.

Then, as well as the amazing wealth of humor in the arts of premodern Japan (a topic too involved to delve into here), there is also a big-stick, brazen, vaudeville tradition dating back at least to the yose (variety) theaters of the Meiji Era (1868-1912). Ribbing, bizarre gesticulating, comic physical antics and acrobatics, absurd punning (some of it groaningly awful) . . . all of this was seen on the yose stages nationwide.

Such side-splitting entertainment made an easy transition to radio, and then to television. This is where the astonishingly popular, so-called waido ("wide," or variety) shows take their inspiration from.

The prime entrepreneurial mover behind this ongoing yose tradition is Yoshimoto Kogyo, the Osaka-based owarai (laugh) factory that has churned out TV stars such as Sanma Akashiya and Shinsuke Shimada — both of whom got their start as manzai (stand-up comedy duo) performers.

Though Sanma was born in Wakayama and raised in Nara, and Shinsuke is from Kyoto, both present a very brash, open-ended Osaka-style sense of humor that borders on what Tokyoites might consider the indecorous and common. Perhaps that's why they are so popular — for saying with gusto and relish things that few others could get away with.

Japanese come down pretty hard and humorous on that easy target of jest, the hayseed, or country bumpkin. There are lots of funny stories about Japan's ever-present onoborisan — yokels who get into a mess in the big city. The Japanese — many of whom are not far removed from their family's farming roots — readily laugh at the oaf or blockhead in what often appears to be a rustic kind of humor: clodhoppers aren't called "clods" for nothing.

I am fond of the joke about a Japanese country fellow who went alone to New York, fancying himself up to the task of surviving in the Big Apple. He sat down at a crowded bar and ordered a biiru (beer) — a request the bartender didn't understand. Finally, after several repetitions, the bartender got the message — and the Japanese hick was proud of the fact that his English had made the grade.

"Heineken?" asked the bartender.

"No," answered the hick, "Chiba-ken."

Chiba-ken, in Japanese, means Chiba Prefecture — so the hick mistakenly thought the bartender was asking where he came from in Japan.

But there is also a blacker, more incisive current in Japanese humor, as is evident in the satires and parodies by writers such as Ango Sakaguchi (1906-55) and Hisashi Inoue, who, at age 74, is still very much alive and kicking at backward institutions and intolerant practices.

There is, too, the self-deprecating humor of Osamu Dazai (1909-48) and the Osaka-wit of Sakunosuke Oda (1913-47) — much of it expressed in cutting Osaka dialect.

In their works, these writers all show up shortcomings in Japanese society by satirizing and parodying its illiberal sanctimoniousness. In the process, they underline how the Japanese most certainly laugh about themselves as much as the next nationality — but to appreciate that laughter, a solid background in the culture and language is essential. Even then it might be elusive, because Japanese humor is, if nothing else, not in your face.

Indeed, it's not in their faces either, being often exceedingly deadpan and, like much in this culture, understated.

I am reminded of the samurai who couldn't pay his liquor bill. He went to the liquor dealer and declared: "I am ready to do the honorable thing." Then he pulled out a little sword and proceeded to stick it into his belly, stopping halfway.

"What are you doing?" cried the liquor dealer. "Aren't you going to finish what you started?"

The samurai, holding the sword, looked up, groaned in excruciating pain, and whispered: "I can't finish here. I haven't paid my rice bill yet."

This Japanese story has a point . . . and it is aimed directly at themselves.

Perhaps this is a Japanese equivalent of the Jack Benny joke about him being mugged, in which the late U.S. comedian, famous for his alleged thriftiness, recounts how the mugger pointed a gun at him and barked: "Your money or your life?"

Benny hesitated.

"Well?" growled the mugger.

Benny scratched his head and said: "Just a minute, I'm thinking about it."

Wherever you come from, your best joke is always on yourself.

news20090809jt6

2009-08-09 21:09:54 | Weblog
[TODAY'S TOP STORIES] from [The Japan Times]

[LIFE IN JAPAN]
Sunday, Aug. 9, 2009
Under a cloud: Lessons and legacies of the atomic bombings
Jeff Kingston revisits the epochal events of August 1945 in Hiroshima and Nagasaki and draws on pundits in Japan, India and Pakistan to assess their ongoing political and social fallout

By JEFF KINGSTON

Global fashion icon Issey Miyake recently made headlines by divulging in a New York Times article he penned on July 13 that he is a hibakusha, a survivor of the atomic bombings of Japan.

Only 7 when he witnessed the incineration of his hometown of Hiroshima at 8:15 a.m. on Monday, Aug. 6, 1945, he recalled: "I still see things no one should ever experience: a bright red light, the black cloud soon after, people running in every direction trying desperately to escape — I remember it all. Within three years, my mother died from radiation exposure."

Miyake had remained quiet all these years, not wanting to be defined by his past or to become known as the "hibakusha designer." But he was inspired to speak out after an April 5 speech by U.S. President Barack Obama in Prague, in which he announced his intention to work toward abolishing nuclear weapons, declaring, " . . . as a nuclear power, as the only nuclear power to have used a nuclear weapon, the United States has a moral responsibility to act."

Miyake explained that he wants to support this process by reminding people of the nightmare he hopes nobody else ever endures. Like other hibakusha, he also hopes that during Obama's first official visit to Japan, tentatively scheduled for November, the president will go to Hiroshima to jump-start his avowed quest for nuclear disarmament by viscerally reminding everyone of what is at stake.

On last Thursday's 64th anniversary of the first atomic-bombing, Hiroshima Mayor Tadatoshi Akiba lent his support, saying that most people in the world want the elimination of nuclear weapons. He declared: "We are the Obamajority. Together we can eliminate nuclear weapons. Yes we can."

To this day, though, expert opinion remains divided between those who think the atomic bombs saved lives and caused the quick Japanese surrender that followed on Aug. 15, 1945, and those who challenge those claims and provide alternative explanations of why U.S. President Harry S. Truman used the bombs.

Nonetheless, since 1945 both the Japanese and U.S. governments have pushed the controversy off to the side in their shared focus on harmonious bilateral relations. For the Japanese government, too — relying as they do on the U.S. nuclear umbrella — the atomic bombings are an especially delicate issue.

Former Defense Minister Fumio Kyuma had to resign in 2007 after igniting a public outcry by suggesting that the U.S. decision "could not be helped."

And just this week, Toshio Tamogami, the former Air Self-Defense Force chief ousted over his apologist views concerning Japan's militarist past, sparked a furor and reopened wounds in his speech, "Casting Doubt on the Peace of Hiroshima," delivered there on Aug. 6. He said, "As the only country to have experienced nuclear bombs, we should go nuclear to make sure we don't suffer a third time."

Across the once-wartorn Pacific, however, raising awareness in the United States about the devastation has been a dilemma because highlighting the suffering endured by the Japanese is sometimes perceived as a way of deflecting attention away from the torment Japan inflicted throughout the region.

Indeed, in 1995 the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum in Washington, D.C. fueled controversy by planning an exhibition to present, and challenge, the case for Truman's decision to drop two atomic bombs on two Japanese cities. However, intense political pressures forced the axing from the exhibition of the revisionist critique of Truman's decision.

In the wider world, meanwhile, ongoing nuclear weapons proliferation suggests that the lessons of Hiroshima and Nagasaki are not as appreciated as they should be.

It is against this background that The Japan Times invited a writer from Pakistan and one from India to discuss the implications of proliferation, along with two Japanese academics asked to share their thoughts about the legacy of the atomic bombs.

Jeff Kingston is Director of Asian Studies at Temple University Japan Campus in Tokyo.


[LIFE IN JAPAN]
Sunday, Aug. 9, 2009
Many in India hail its nukes

Pankaj Mishra is an Indian writer and frequent contributor to the New York Review of Books. His most recent books are "An End to Suffering: The Buddha in the World" (2004) and "Temptations of the West: How to be Modern in India, Pakistan and Beyond" (2006).

In India, have lessons been learned from the atomic bombings of Japan in 1945?

I wish I could say yes, but that is not the case.

Let's go back to the 1945 war-crimes tribunal in Tokyo (the International Military Tribunal for the Far East, 1946-48). There, (Indian) Justice Radhabinod Pal, who was once well known in India but is now all but forgotten, argued that the Allied powers were also guilty of war crimes, citing the atomic bombings. This alienated his fellow judges at the tribunal, but as a result he became famous and respected in Japan.

In the late 1940s, Indian opinion severely judged the atomic bombings, but since then public opinion has shifted dramatically — especially since India's first nuclear-weapon test in 1974. At that time there was not much domestic public reaction, but in 1998 when India tested nuclear warheads there were massive celebrations across the country and the Indian middle class was ecstatic. The capacity to blow up the world was seen as a great advance and marked India's arrival, at least in the minds of the people, as a great superpower.

It is depressing that the lessons of Hiroshima and Nagasaki have not been learned. The atomic bomb is just seen as a bigger, more powerful and more destructive bomb, and there is no appreciation for the devastating consequences and radioactive fallout. This is why officials and pundits can speak blithely about nuclear exchanges.

Pal's views about atomic bombings as war crimes are completely forgotten.

The media has not been helpful, and rather is part of the problem because it has been jingoistic and nationalistic regarding nuclear weapons. India is in the grip of a "nation rising" euphoria and sees nuclear weapons contributing to the glory and international prominence of India, putting it on an imaginary par with the United States, Russia and China as a great superpower. Nuclear weapons are emblematic of national pride and widely supported by the public out of their ignorance about what they can do and what would happen if India launched one.

Were the atomic bombings war crimes?

In the early post-World War II era, yes, they were overwhelmingly seen as war crimes. Today, among those who know about the atomic bombings, virtually everyone would condemn them as war crimes. But most Indians are simply not aware of this history.

Is there support in India for nuclear disarmament?

There is a consensus that using nuclear weapons is a bad idea because the neighbor can retaliate. However, there is also a consensus that having nuclear weapons is a good idea. Back in 1998, the ruling Congress party opposed the tests, but it has since changed its stance, and all parties now support having nuclear weapons.

Antinuclear activists were discouraged under the Bush administration (U.S. President George W. Bush (2001-09) and by the deal made with India on nuclear programs. This deal reflected the influence of the India-American lobby that has a similar clout on India-related issues as the Jewish lobby has on Israeli matters. The Bush administration deal symbolized India's rise as the central ally of the U.S. in Asia as a counterweight to China. This fantasy of India as a great superpower appeals to them because a deal with the U.S. means "Big Daddy" endorses India.

(U.S. President Barack) Obama has abandoned this Cold War thinking, and that is raising anxieties in the Indian government. But antinuclear activists are heartened by Obama's comments about disarmament and the revival of the antinuclear movement in the U.S.

news20090809jt7

2009-08-09 21:08:14 | Weblog
[TODAY'S TOP STORIES] from [The Japan Times]

[LIFE IN JAPAN]
Sunday, Aug. 9, 2009
'It is time to discuss this more frankly'

Kazuhiko Togo, Professor of International Politics at Kyoto Sangyo University, is a former Ambassador to the Netherlands and the author of 2005's "Japan's Foreign Policy 1945-2003" and 2008's "Rekishi to Gaiko" ("History and Diplomacy"). He is also a grandson of Shigenori Togo (1882-1950), who, after serving as Ambassador to Germany and then to the Soviet Union, was appointed Foreign Minister from 1941-42 and again from April to August 1945. After the war, he was sentenced to 20 years' imprisonment for war crimes, and died in prison.

What do you think are the critical issues concerning the atomic bombs in contemporary Japan?

Ambassador Togo's written response is as follows: Surprisingly, there has been little serious debate in Japan about the Hiroshima-Nagasaki atomic bombs (of Aug. 6 and Aug. 9, 1945) in the context of Japan-U.S. relations. Conservative opinion leaders tended to look at the issue in the context of the U.S. nuclear umbrella, while liberal opinion leaders tended to look at this issue as an object of universal evil that requires global abandonment. But Defense Minister Fumio Kyuma's statement in June 2007 that "the dropping of atomic bombs could not be helped" provoked anger among Japanese people, and his ensuing resignation shows that something is changing.

The government has no intention to politicize this issue with the U.S. government, and I concur that clearly this is a wise policy. But at the level of academics and opinion leaders, the time has come to discuss the issue more frankly. Here are four points that in my view come to the mind of many Japanese:

First, are the Americans truly aware about the nature of atrocities committed? People who were subjected to the bomb are still suffering from physical pain, and they are literally dying because of the radioactive aftereffects. The apocalyptic description of the massacre is shocking enough, but how many Americans are aware that the bombs continue to have such a lingering fatal impact? Japanese victims of the bombs in general have accepted the postwar settlement and are suing only the Japanese government requesting more adequate compensation. But does this postwar settlement justify U.S. disinterest in this unprecedented human suffering caused by the U.S. during World War II?

Second, in accordance with the existing norms of international law and the simple logic of fairness and human rights today, how can one justify the killing of Japanese women, children and elderly people for the sheer sake of protecting the life of American soldiers, whose destiny was to fight and die for their country? It is axiomatic to say that indiscriminate bombing of noncombatants and cities was a common practice during World War II, including by Japan. But does this "relativization" justify the catastrophic level of atrocities inflicted on Japanese civilians by the atomic bombs?

Third, were the atomic bombs really necessary to end the war? Efforts made by American scholars to question this point are commendable.

Two key questions remain. First, from April 1945 the Japanese government was engaged in serious efforts to end the war. Their efforts culminated in the dispatch of a formal instruction to the Japanese Ambassador in Moscow on July 13 that the Emperor wanted to terminate the war, and asking (Soviet premier Joseph) Stalin to receive his special envoy (former Prime Minister Fumimaro) Konoe to negotiate the terms of surrender. Stalin and (U.S. President Harry S.) Truman agreed on July 18 at Potsdam (in Germany) to remain evasive in responding to the Japanese request. Stalin was determined to attack Japan before it capitulated. But why did Truman stay evasive?

The second key question concerns the final order to drop two bombs in early August that was issued on July 25 by (U.S. Secretary of War Henry L.) Stimson and (U.S. Secretary of State George) Marshall, with, no doubt, Truman's approval although a written record was not found, and the Potsdam Declaration was issued on July 26. The key clause that might have facilitated a Japanese surrender, i.e., preservation of the Imperial household, was not included in the Potsdam Declaration despite experts' recommendation. It gives an impression that Truman reserved sufficient time for the two bombs to be dropped before Japan's capitulation. Is this perception correct, and if so, why did he do so?

Fourth, are the Americans aware that it is not the conservatives who are now most vocal in condemning the dropping of the two bombs as violating international law, but rather that it is the best of Japanese liberals who have condemned the U.S. actions as crimes against humanity? Saburo Ienaga (a prominent historian), who sued the Japanese government for 30 years for not allowing more detailed descriptions in school textbooks of atrocities committed by Japanese soldiers, made it clear that "the three major atrocities committed during World War II are Auschwitz, Unit 731 (the Imperial Japanese Army's germ-warfare unit) and Hiroshima." Another example is (Hiroshima Peace Institute professor) Yuki Tanaka, known as a strong advocate of comfort women's rights, who helped organize an international people's tribunal in 2006 that found U.S. leaders guilty of war crimes for dropping the atomic bombs.

It is difficult for me to propose some definite solution on this controversial, political and emotional issue. In general, I support the proposal by veteran journalist Fumio Matsuo for a reciprocal wreath presentation by the U.S. president at Hiroshima and the Japanese prime minister at the (USS) Arizona Memorial in Pearl Harbor as an initial gesture of reconciliation. But more important may be the expansion of exchanges among citizens' groups for the sheer purpose of improving mutual understanding during this initial stage of reconsidering this historical memory.

news20090809jt8

2009-08-09 21:07:21 | Weblog
[TODAY'S TOP STORIES] from [The Japan Times]

[LIFE IN JAPAN]
Sunday, Aug. 9, 2009
'No public discourse' in Pakistan about its nukes

Kamila Shamsie is a Pakistan-born novelist who was educated in the United States and now lives in London, from where she recently gave the interview below. In her 2009 novel "Burnt Shadows," Kamila Shamsie explores the indelible mark that the larger sweep of history leaves on people caught up in its maelstroms. It is an ambitious epic delving into personal sufferings against the backdrop of tragic histories spanning six decades, three generations and five countries.

The book opens in Nagasaki in 1945, where the protagonist, a young Japanese woman named Hiroko Tanaka, falls in love only to lose her German fiance, Konrad Weiss, in the atomic bombing. Trying on her mother's summer kimono she steps out to the veranda just as the flash and blast incinerates the city, burning the garment's beautiful swan design onto her back.

This hibakusha (atomic bomb survivor) later travels to New Delhi to visit the family that might have become her in-laws, ends up marrying a Muslim man working for them, and is then caught up in the 1947 Partition of British India (between present-day India, Pakistan and Bangladesh) — eventually settling in Pakistan.

Following miscarriages brought on by exposure to radiation, which afflicted many hibakusha, she gives birth to a son. However, the lives of Hiroko's and Konrad's families continue intersecting with devastating consequences — an allegory for what happens in a world run by whites in their self-interest, despite any fitful good intentions they might have.

This is a novel that accuses, but also tries to convey the personal consequences of war, racism and geopolitics. Shamsie connects the dots, showing how powerfully the past shapes the present — and shadows the future. Hiroko comes to a rueful awakening, lamenting, "I understand for the first time how nations can applaud when their governments drop a second nuclear bomb."

Her book makes us think about how unimaginable horrors easily become possible in war.

What inspired this novel?

The story idea came from the 1998 nuclear tests by India and Pakistan, and then when they were at the brink of war in 2002. I wanted to write a story set in Asia with the shadow of nuclear weapons in the background. It was to be about a Pakistani man and a Japanese woman, and that led me to Nagasaki — with the India-Pakistan confrontation a murmur looming behind.

I wasn't able to visit Nagasaki due to difficulties securing a visa, all the documents they wanted and the need for a sponsor. And I knew that even if I went I could not see prewar Nagasaki. The city itself is not the focus of my book as much as what people can decide to do to others in the context of war.

When I was researching about the atomic bombs I was reading (U.S. Pulitzer Prize-winning author and journalist) John Hersey (1914-93) about Hiroshima, and he mentioned the presence of Germans there. So then I had my character for Konrad, the fiance.

Nagasaki is the most cosmopolitan and Christian city in Japan, with a long history of exchanges and contacts with the outside world. Thus it is ironic that of all cities it was one to suffer this fate.

My grandmother was half-German and living in Delhi during World War II. It was difficult for her as a German to live in British India at that time. So she became the inspiration for Konrad's sister, even though her life was very different. And once Hiroko left Nagasaki after the bomb and visited Konrad's relatives in India it was natural that she was caught up in the Partition, which brought her together with a Pakistani man and took her to Pakistan — my center of gravity.

The arc of the story continues to touch on the encounter between different parts of the world, one that was transformed, especially for Pakistan, by 9/11. And so her son is also caught up in these tragedies of history that become tragic personal histories.

I once attended a lecture and the speaker drew our attention to Nagasaki, asking how it was possible to make that decision to drop the second bomb even after the consequences of the first were known.

Before Hiroshima, it may have been possible to imagine the horror, but it was not known. But (U.S. President Harry S.) Truman knew about Hiroshima, knew what it had done to the people — and yet did not stop the second bomb. This to me is truly horrific. To make that decision to repeat the atomic bombing speaks to the pathologies of war. There is nothing you won't do or justify in the context of war. That single moment, that single weapon, killing tens of thousands of people in an instant.

Do the atomic bombings shape public discourse in Pakistan?

The lessons of Hiroshima and Nagasaki have had too little impact on public discourse in India and Pakistan. In the few days between the 1998 nuclear tests by India and those subsequently conducted by Pakistan, hibakusha visited Pakistan and begged the government not to proceed. A Pakistani filmmaker made a documentary with riveting and horrible images of what happened in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and tried to get viewers to imagine what Pakistan's cities would look like if nuclear weapons were used.

I, too, am trying to bring forward into the present the echoes of this past.

But in Pakistan it is all about India. "They have them so we need them" is the mentality. So there really is no public discourse about the implications of nuclear weapons. In the school curriculum nothing is taught about the consequences of nuclear weapons, and there is no raising of awareness about the effects of radiation.

At the time of the tests in 1998, the state controlled the media so there was no questioning or examining the government's decision. In the English- language media there has been some critical opinion voiced, but there is a consensus supporting the decision to test because India has nuclear weapons. They are viewed as a deterrent and a guarantee that the rest of the world will step in to prevent a war because so much is at stake.

In Pakistan, nuclear weapons are looked on as just a bigger bomb, and in an abstract way people accept the need for it without thinking through the logic of fallout affecting people in both countries. (Abdul Qadeer) Khan is despised by Pakistan's liberal intellgentsia, but seen as a hero by the general public because without his efforts (to develop atomic weapons) they believe Pakistan would be at India's mercy.

Did international sanctions after Pakistan's nuclear tests have much impact?

Sanctions by Japan were not as important as those imposed by the United States. Pakistan is really dependent on the U.S., and the impact was huge, sending the economy into a nosedive. Pakistan was on the verge of bankruptcy. Then 9/11 rescued Pakistan's economy because suddenly it was needed for its geostrategic usefulness.

But the sanctions did not cause people to wonder about whether the nuclear tests were a good idea. Instead they made them feel unfairly persecuted, and made people aware how dependent and vulnerable Pakistan's economy is.

What message are you trying to convey through your writing of five novels to date?

As a novelist, I try to avoid saying there is a single message in my books, because it is about what readers bring to the reading and see in the novel. In "Burnt Shadows," I write about the threat of what nations can do to each other in the name of self-interest and defense.

Do you think the atomic bombings were war crimes?

It is hard to figure out what part of war is not a crime. It's all criminal. War is the absence of morality, what we can get away with. Everyone in war commits war crimes.

I wish the myth of Truman as a great president was challenged. How could he be great when he made the decision to use atomic weapons?

But I don't believe that other nations are any different from the U.S. The difference is that the U.S. was in a position to use them and it did. It is the imperial power of this era, and thus it is more involved in war and the inevitable crimes that entails. But it is too easy to blame the U.S. — nations and people need to look at themselves and their actions and choices.

Can you imagine a nuclear war might happen?

Yes. India and Pakistan were so close to war in 2002. Once you engage in war — and you have this weapon — there is the possibility of using it. The gap between conventional and nuclear war is not as great as people believe. If you are desperate and losing a war, there is no certainty it would not be used with horrific consequences for everyone.

news20090809jt9

2009-08-09 21:06:11 | Weblog
[TODAY'S TOP STORIES] from [The Japan Times]

[LIFE IN JAPAN]
Sunday, Aug. 9, 2009
A-bombings 'were war crimes'
'Mass killing of civilians by indescriminate bombing' condemned by International Peoples' Tribunal


Guilty.

Sixty-two years after the first atomic weapon was tested in New Mexico, international jurors issued a verdict on the atomic bombings, finding U.S. leaders guilty of war crimes and crimes against humanity.

Judgment Of The International Peoples' Tribunal on the Dropping of Atomic Bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki (July 16, 2007)

" . . . the Tribunal finds that the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki violated the principles prohibiting the mass murder of civilians, wanton destruction of cities and villages resulting in excessive death not justified by military necessity. Therefore, these acts constitute War Crimes . . . " The following is the text of an interview with Yuki Tanaka , research professor at the Hiroshima Peace Institute, editor of "Bombing Civilians" (2009) and an organizer of the tribunal.

Why did you decide to organize the tribunal?

I wanted to place Hiroshima and Nagasaki in the wider history of bombing civilians. They are the worst cases, but we want to establish the principle that mass killing of civilians by indiscriminate bombing is criminal, anywhere.

Also, the atomic bombings were not dealt with at the Tokyo Tribunal (the International Military Tribunal for the Far East, 1946-48). The Allies did not want to be accused of war crimes involving the bombing of civilians because they had engaged in so much of it in Europe as well as Japan.

I worked to establish a tribunal in order to raise the issue of the criminality of the atomic bombings to counter the U.S. argument that they were necessary to end the war.

It is important to focus on the criminality of the acts regardless of the strategic or tactical reasons.

What impact do you hope to have?

When I talk to groups in the United States, they say the atomic bombings were necessary to end the war.

I reply that if I have a sick child requiring expensive medicine I can't afford, and then I rob and kill a neighbor to get the money and buy the drug and save my child's life, the murder is still a crime even if it was to save my child. So a good reason for committing a crime does not justify a criminal act.

Killing 70,000 to 80,000 people in one second . . . isn't this a massacre and crime that clearly violates international law? No matter the reason, a crime is a crime.

The U.S. needs to admit its wrongdoing and apologize for the same reason Japan needs to apologize to the Chinese. It is important to educate people in the U.S. that killing large numbers of civilians is a crime not to be repeated, but it has been continuously repeated in Korea, Vietnam and the Middle East. This is not a problem of the past, it is still a problem in the present. This is educational for Japanese too, because if you want Americans to admit and atone for their crimes, Japan also must do so.

What is your goal?

Our main goal is reconciliation with the U.S. In order to reconcile, the U.S. must first recognize that it committed crimes and apologize. Otherwise there can be no reconciliation. The hibakusha (atomic- bomb survivors) want an apology, and for them this is a necessary condition for reconciliation. If the U.S. did so it would improve the relationship tremendously.

In Prague, U.S. President Barack Obama (in a speech on April 5) became the first president to accept some responsibility for the atomic bombings, saying that the U.S. must accept moral responsibility by abolishing nuclear weapons. This took many Japanese by surprise, but there is still the matter of legal responsibility. Once the criminality of atomic weapons is established it will be easier to abolish them.

So at the government level there already is reconciliation, but not among the victims. The hibakusha are not reconciled, and are still waiting for an apology. Even after they die, the people of Hiroshima and Nagasaki and the descendants of hibakusha will still demand justice and keep the issue alive, just as in Nanjing the Chinese have sustained their campaign for justice. It won't fade away. The past continues to haunt the present.

The U.S. has sought refuge in the concept of collateral damage to justify civilian casualties. It makes it seem that such deaths are an inevitable and unavoidable cost, an inadvertent consequence — whereas they are the main target. Bombings of civilians has been accepted to some extent as normal in war. It is a crime.

People here hope that Obama will visit Hiroshima later this year and make a clear apology and accept legal responsibility, not only moral responsibility, but that is unlikely.

news20090809lat

2009-08-09 20:30:44 | Weblog
[Today's Newspaper] from [Los Angeles Times]

[Top News]
Criminal investigation into CIA treatment of detainees expected
Insiders say Atty. Gen. Eric Holder is close to naming a prosecutor to look into reports of excessive waterboarding and other unauthorized methods. Convictions could be hard to get.

By Greg Miller and Josh Meyer
August 9, 2009

Reporting from Washington -- U.S. Atty. Gen. Eric H. Holder Jr. is poised to appoint a criminal prosecutor to investigate alleged CIA abuses committed during the interrogation of terrorism suspects, current and former U.S. government officials said.

A senior Justice Department official said that Holder envisioned an inquiry that would be narrow in scope, focusing on "whether people went beyond the techniques that were authorized" in Bush administration memos that liberally interpreted anti-torture laws.

Current and former CIA and Justice Department officials who have firsthand knowledge of the interrogation files contend that criminal convictions will be difficult to obtain because the quality of evidence is poor and the legal underpinnings have never been tested.

Some cases have not previously been disclosed, including an instance in which a CIA operative brought a gun into an interrogation booth to force a detainee to talk, officials said.

Other potentially criminal abuses have already come to light, including the waterboarding of prisoners in excess of Justice Department guidelines, and the deaths of detainees in CIA custody in Afghanistan and Iraq in 2002 and 2003.

Opening a criminal investigation is something Holder "has come reluctantly to consider," the Justice Department official said, emphasizing that Holder had not reached a final decision but noting that, "as attorney general, he has the obligation to follow the law."

Others familiar with Holder's thinking say that such an investigation seems all but certain, and that a prosecutor will probably be selected from a short list that Holder asked subordinates to assemble.

Such a prosecutor would examine cases that are generally at least five years old, and probably some that were previously reviewed by career prosecutors who concluded that they could not be pursued.

"I don't blame them for wanting to look into it," said a former high-ranking Justice Department official familiar with the details of the program. "But if they appoint a special prosecutor, it would ultimately be unsuccessful, and it would go on forever and cause enormous collateral damage on the way to getting that unsuccessful result."

Bracing for the worst, a small number of CIA officials have put off plans to retire or leave the agency so that they can maintain their access to classified files and be in a better position to defend against a Justice investigation.

"Once you're out, it gets a lot harder," said a retired CIA official who said he had spoken recently with former colleagues. The inquiry would probably also target private contractors who worked for the CIA during the interrogations.

Current and former U.S. officials interviewed for this article spoke on condition of anonymity because of the secrecy that still surrounds Holder's deliberations and the details of the interrogation files.

President Obama has repeatedly expressed reluctance to launch a criminal investigation of the interrogation program, but has left room for the prosecution of individuals who may have broken the law.

Obama and Holder have both said that they believe waterboarding constitutes torture. But an investigation would pose thorny political problems for the administration, and probably draw criticism over questions of fairness.

"An investigation that focuses only on low-ranking operators would be, I think, worse than doing nothing at all," said Tom Malinowski, Washington advocacy director for Human Rights Watch.

An inquiry also would probably drive a new wedge between the CIA and the Justice Department, agencies with a fractious history that have struggled to work more closely together since the Sept. 11 attacks.

Holder's interest in appointing a prosecutor to mount an investigation reportedly surged after he recently read a still-classified 2004 report by the CIA's inspector general citing extensive problems and abuses in the agency's interrogation program. The bulk of the report is expected to be released this month.

Former CIA officials said the most disturbing section deals with waterboarding, a technique in which prisoners are made to feel they are drowning.

The Justice Department authorized waterboarding in an August 2002 memo that contained a caveat that could prove crucial to any criminal investigation. Although it allowed the approved methods to be "used more than once," the memo stipulated that "repetition will not be substantial because the techniques generally lose their effectiveness after several repetitions."

One passage of the CIA report declassified this year said that the method had been used "at least 83 times during August 2002" on Abu Zubaydah, the first senior Al Qaeda figure captured by the agency. Waterboarding was then employed "183 times during March 2003" on Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, the self-proclaimed mastermind of the Sept. 11 attacks.

The inspector general also voiced alarm over how much water was being used. Rather than dripping liquid from a canteen, as the 2002 memo envisioned, CIA interrogators "applied large volumes of water," raising questions about whether the method "was either efficacious or medically safe."

Because of such documented discrepancies, Justice Department officials and legal experts regard the waterboarding abuses as cases that hold the most promise for prosecution.

Even so, the cases are hampered by legal and logistical complications.

The U.S. anti-torture statute requires proving that an interrogator "specifically intended to inflict severe physical or mental pain or suffering" -- a daunting legal threshold.

Officials said it wasn't clear that any CIA interrogators were ever informed of the limits laid out in the Justice Department memo.

"A number of people could say honestly, correctly, 'I didn't know what was in it,' " said a former senior U.S. intelligence official familiar with the inner workings of the interrogation program.

The CIA report also cites cases in which interrogators engaged in potentially illegal improvisations. One interrogator brandished a gun, former CIA officials said. Other prisoners were reportedly threatened with bodily harm, including being buried alive.

Agency spokesman Paul Gimigliano said that the CIA cooperated extensively in "referring actions for potential prosecution, and in dealing with career prosecutors who decided if and when specific cases would be pursued in court."

To date, only one case has been. In 2007, a CIA paramilitary contractor, David A. Passaro, was sentenced to eight years in prison after being convicted of using a flashlight to beat an Afghan detainee who later died.

In addition to the sweeping 2004 document, former CIA Inspector General John L. Helgerson, who recently retired, also produced a dozen or more follow-up reports that could motivate the Justice Department investigation.

Among them are examinations of other cases that involved prisoners' deaths while in agency custody.

In 2002, an Afghan prisoner died of hypothermia after being stripped, doused with water and left overnight in a frigid CIA lockup near Kabul, the Afghan capital.

One CIA officer faced internal sanctions over the episode, but the undercover operative in charge of the facility was later promoted to chief of station in Baghdad, former CIA officials said.

A year later, an Iraqi prisoner died of asphyxiation after being captured in a raid by Navy SEALS and then having his arms chained behind his back in a CIA interrogation cell at the notorious Abu Ghraib prison outside Baghdad.

The leader of the SEAL team was later acquitted of criminal charges. The CIA interrogator, Mark Swanner, has not faced prosecution.
The two cases are believed to have been among 19 examined by a Justice Department task force set up in Alexandria, Va., in 2004 to investigate possible CIA abuses. The panel did not investigate the use of waterboarding.

Former Justice officials familiar with the effort said that 17 of the cases were rejected by mid-2006. It is not clear what became of the other two. Official cited a host of problems, including difficulty locating witnesses and identifying documents -- such as clinical examinations or autopsies -- that could withstand scrutiny in federal court.

"We wanted to make these cases," said a former Justice official familiar with the matter. "We looked at them as hard as we could, and they just weren't there.

"They weren't there because of the way they were investigated, because of the facts, because of the lack of witnesses and evidence."

news20090809nyt1

2009-08-09 19:59:28 | Weblog
[Today's Newspaper] from [The New York Times]

[Top News]
9 Dead After Copter and Plane Collide Over Hudson
By ROBERT D. McFADDEN
Published: August 8, 2009

A small private plane carrying three people and a New York tourist helicopter with six collided in midair and plunged into the Hudson River off Hoboken, N.J., opposite Manhattan’s West Side, just before noon on Saturday. All on board the two aircraft were killed, the authorities said.

The cause of the accident was under investigation. But what perhaps thousands of people out on a crystalline summer day saw from both sides of the Hudson was a stunning, low-altitude accident in which the plane rolled up and into the helicopter, striking with a crack like thunder as the helicopter’s blades and one of the plane’s wings flew off, and then both aircraft fell and vanished into the river.
As witnesses watched from parks and balconies, three bodies were recovered, one floating in the water and two others from wreckage believed to be that of the helicopter, located by divers on the murky riverbed 30 feet down. The search for the plane was impeded by visibility of only two or three feet at the bottom.

But officials held out no hope of survivors.

“This is not going to have a happy ending,” Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg said at a news conference, contrasting the outcome with the spectacular landing of a US Airways jetliner in the icy Hudson on Jan. 15, when all 155 on board were rescued by ferries and emergency boats.

From all appearances, the mayor said in somber tones, the crash was “not survivable.” He said divers searching for the remaining victims, and then trying to recover the submerged aircraft, would proceed with caution to avoid further loss of life. “This has changed from a rescue to a recovery mission,” he said.

The victims included five Italian tourists and a pilot aboard the helicopter, which had just taken off from the West 30th Street heliport in Manhattan. Aviation authorities identified the pilot and owner of the plane as Steven M. Altman, of Ambler, Pa., and said he carried two passengers; a law enforcement official said one was Mr. Altman’s brother Daniel Altman and the other a teenage boy.

Reached at home, the pilot’s wife, Pamala, said her husband was licensed and had been scheduled to fly his plane on Saturday from Teterboro Airport in northern New Jersey to Ocean City, on the Jersey Shore.

The Italian tourists — a woman, two men and two youths, according to the Italian Embassy — were traveling together in a group of about a dozen relatives and friends. People familiar with their plans said they lived in the Bologna area. Others in the group were taken to a Red Cross center on West 49th Street, where they received counseling.

It was the worst air accident in the New York City area since Nov. 12, 2001, when 265 people were killed in the crash of American Airlines Flight 587 in Belle Harbor, Queens, as it took off from Kennedy International Airport for the Dominican Republic. It was the first fatal crash since Oct. 11, 2006, when a small plane flying over the East River hit a 42-story building on Manhattan’s East Side, killing the Yankees pitcher Cory Lidle and his flight instructor.

Saturday’s crash raised questions about the scores of virtually unregulated low-altitude flights every day in a busy corridor over the Hudson. Helicopters and small planes may fly over the river under a 1,100-foot ceiling, well below a 5,000-foot minimum altitude in airspace reserved for airliners. Mayor Bloomberg, asked about federal rules for the corridor, said he did not favor changes in the rules, citing the city’s interests in tourism.

As investigators for the National Transportation Safety Board began an inquiry that was expected to take weeks or months, the convergence of the doomed aircraft seemed wildly improbable in retrospect. Federal Aviation Administration officials, citing radar tracks, said the airplane took off from Teterboro at 11:50 a.m., after stopping there for a half-hour and picking up a passenger. The plane arrived over the Hudson at 11:52 and turned south.

The helicopter, a European-made craft owned by a Liberty Helicopters, took off from the West 30th Street heliport at almost the same time for a sightseeing tour. The helicopter took off, headed out over the river, turned south and climbed to between 500 and 1,000 feet.

On a sun-drenched Saturday that beckoned many out of doors, there were countless witnesses to the dramatic denouement — joggers, bikers, strollers, people lunching in restaurants and lounging in high-rise apartments lining the Hudson — but many got only glimpses of what happened, looking out over the milewide river when they heard what sounded like distant thunder in a mostly clear sky.

Many said the small airplane, a white-and-red, single-engine Piper PA-32R, came up behind and under the helicopter. A Liberty pilot watching from the heliport radioed to warn the copter, said Deborah A. P. Hersman, chairwoman of the safety board.

“You have a fixed wing behind you,” he said. But he got no response.

The plane suddenly went into a left-turning roll, banking steeply, as if its pilot was unaware of impending danger, and at 11:56 a.m. rammed the rear underside of the copter not far off the Hoboken shoreline.

The aircraft appeared to break apart in midair — the plane’s left wing tumbling, the detached rotor blades of the helicopter spinning away like a child’s toy, witnesses said. The fuselages parted in a puff of dark smoke and fell away into the choppy blue-gray Hudson. It took only seconds, and the two craft were gone in the eerie silence that followed.

Colin Rich, 26, of Brooklyn, saw the crash from a river park in Manhattan: “Both appeared to be heading south, and the plane rolled into the side of the helicopter. Right before that, it appeared very suspect because I saw them getting so close to each other.”

Yvonne Morrow and Henry Strouss, both 70, were giving a tour for Friends of Hudson River Park to a score of people. “We heard this pop and the small plane and the helicopter were breaking up into pieces, and they were falling into the river very fast,” Ms. Morrow said. “It took only about three seconds for everything to disappear out of the sky.”

A passing Circle Line boat quickly diverted to the scene, followed by water taxis and other river craft, and within minutes police and fire boats and Coast Guard teams were headed for the crash site, but it was too late for rescues.

Air traffic controllers at Newark Liberty International Airport said the airplane had disappeared from its radar screens. Almost at the same time, two pilots in planes near the scene called in reports of an aircraft apparently in distress over the water, on the river’s western edge between the Lincoln and Holland Tunnels.

Moments later, the New York Police Department began receiving a flood of 911 calls, reporting that the plane and the helicopter had collided and gone down.

The search for bodies and the wreckage was suspended as night fell, although police boats remained in the water, the remnants of what had been a flotilla from local police and fire departments and the Coast Guard, a coordinated effort that drew praise from public officials on both sides of the Hudson. The search was to resume on Sunday.

Liberty Helicopters, which runs sightseeing excursions over the Hudson and New York Harbor, taking in the Statue of Liberty, Ellis Island and Manhattan, charges $130 for individual trips and up to $1,000 for charters.

Its record is not unblemished. In July 2007, a Liberty helicopter went down in the Hudson between Midtown Manhattan and Weehawken, N.J., but landed on inflated emergency pontoons. Eight people on board — seven tourists and the pilot — were rescued, uninjured. In 1997, a rotor on one of Liberty’s sightseeing helicopters clipped a Manhattan building, forcing an emergency landing, but no one was seriously injured.

In a statement on Saturday, Liberty offered condolences to victims’ families and said it would cooperate with investigators.

For many who witnessed the crash, the images were hard to shake off. Leah Kelley, 22, who was at Chelsea Piers, saw the plane corkscrewing into the river. “It hit the water head-on — a big wave came up, and the plane was completely submerged,” she said. “I spent a good long time freaking out and crying.”

news20090809nyt2

2009-08-09 19:40:47 | Weblog
[Today's Newspaper] from [The New York Times]

[Environment]
Climate Change Seen as Threat to U.S. Security
By JOHN M. BRODER
Published: August 8, 2009

WASHINGTON — The changing global climate will pose profound strategic challenges to the United States in coming decades, raising the prospect of military intervention to deal with the effects of violent storms, drought, mass migration and pandemics, military and intelligence analysts say.

Such climate-induced crises could topple governments, feed terrorist movements or destabilize entire regions, say the analysts, experts at the Pentagon and intelligence agencies who for the first time are taking a serious look at the national security implications of climate change.

Recent war games and intelligence studies conclude that over the next 20 to 30 years, vulnerable regions, particularly sub-Saharan Africa, the Middle East and South and Southeast Asia, will face the prospect of food shortages, water crises and catastrophic flooding driven by climate change that could demand an American humanitarian relief or military response.

An exercise last December at the National Defense University, an educational institute that is overseen by the military, explored the potential impact of a destructive flood in Bangladesh that sent hundreds of thousands of refugees streaming into neighboring India, touching off religious conflict, the spread of contagious diseases and vast damage to infrastructure. “It gets real complicated real quickly,” said Amanda J. Dory, the deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy, who is working with a Pentagon group assigned to incorporate climate change into national security strategy planning.

Much of the public and political debate on global warming has focused on finding substitutes for fossil fuels, reducing emissions that contribute to greenhouse gases and furthering negotiations toward an international climate treaty — not potential security challenges.

But a growing number of policy makers say that the world’s rising temperatures, surging seas and melting glaciers are a direct threat to the national interest.

If the United States does not lead the world in reducing fossil-fuel consumption and thus emissions of global warming gases, proponents of this view say, a series of global environmental, social, political and possibly military crises loom that the nation will urgently have to address.

This argument could prove a fulcrum for debate in the Senate next month when it takes up climate and energy legislation passed in June by the House.

Lawmakers leading the debate before Congress are only now beginning to make the national security argument for approving the legislation.

Senator John Kerry, the Massachusetts Democrat who is the chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee and a leading advocate for the climate legislation, said he hoped to sway Senate skeptics by pressing that issue to pass a meaningful bill.

Mr. Kerry said he did not know whether he would succeed but had spoken with 30 undecided senators on the matter.

He did not identify those senators, but the list of undecided includes many from coal and manufacturing states and from the South and Southeast, which will face the sharpest energy price increases from any carbon emissions control program.

“I’ve been making this argument for a number of years,” Mr. Kerry said, “but it has not been a focus because a lot of people had not connected the dots.” He said he had urged President Obama to make the case, too.

Mr. Kerry said the continuing conflict in southern Sudan, which has killed and displaced tens of thousands of people, is a result of drought and expansion of deserts in the north. “That is going to be repeated many times over and on a much larger scale,” he said.

The Department of Defense’s assessment of the security issue came about after prodding by Congress to include climate issues in its strategic plans — specifically, in 2008 budget authorizations by Hillary Rodham Clinton and John W. Warner, then senators. The department’s climate modeling is based on sophisticated Navy and Air Force weather programs and other government climate research programs at NASA and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

The Pentagon and the State Department have studied issues arising from dependence on foreign sources of energy for years but are only now considering the effects of global warming in their long-term planning documents. The Pentagon will include a climate section in the Quadrennial Defense Review, due in February; the State Department will address the issue in its new Quadrennial Diplomacy and Development Review.

“The sense that climate change poses security and geopolitical challenges is central to the thinking of the State Department and the climate office,” said Peter Ogden, chief of staff to Todd Stern, the State Department’s top climate negotiator.

Although military and intelligence planners have been aware of the challenge posed by climate changes for some years, the Obama administration has made it a central policy focus.

A changing climate presents a range of challenges for the military. Many of its critical installations are vulnerable to rising seas and storm surges. In Florida, Homestead Air Force Base was essentially destroyed by Hurricane Andrew in 1992, and Hurricane Ivan badly damaged Naval Air Station Pensacola in 2004. Military planners are studying ways to protect the major naval stations in Norfolk, Va., and San Diego from climate-induced rising seas and severe storms.

Another vulnerable installation is Diego Garcia, an atoll in the Indian Ocean that serves as a logistics hub for American and British forces in the Middle East and sits a few feet above sea level.

Arctic melting also presents new problems for the military. The shrinking of the ice cap, which is proceeding faster than anticipated only a few years ago, opens a shipping channel that must be defended and undersea resources that are already the focus of international competition.

Ms. Dory, who has held senior Pentagon posts since the Clinton administration, said she had seen a “sea change” in the military’s thinking about climate change in the past year. “These issues now have to be included and wrestled with” in drafting national security strategy, she said.

The National Intelligence Council, which produces government-wide intelligence analyses, finished the first assessment of the national security implications of climate change just last year.

It concluded that climate change by itself would have significant geopolitical impacts around the world and would contribute to a host of problems, including poverty, environmental degradation and the weakening of national governments.

The assessment warned that the storms, droughts and food shortages that might result from a warming planet in coming decades would create numerous relief emergencies.

“The demands of these potential humanitarian responses may significantly tax U.S. military transportation and support force structures, resulting in a strained readiness posture and decreased strategic depth for combat operations,” the report said.

The intelligence community is preparing a series of reports on the impacts of climate change on individual countries like China and India, a study of alternative fuels and a look at how major power relations could be strained by a changing climate.

“We will pay for this one way or another,” Gen. Anthony C. Zinni, a retired Marine and the former head of the Central Command, wrote recently in a report he prepared as a member of a military advisory board on energy and climate at CNA, a private group that does research for the Navy. “We will pay to reduce greenhouse gas emissions today, and we’ll have to take an economic hit of some kind.

“Or we will pay the price later in military terms,” he warned. “And that will involve human lives.”

news20090809nyt3

2009-08-09 19:36:16 | Weblog
[Today's Newspaper] from [The New York Times]

[Environment]
Global Warming

On Feb. 2, 2007, the United Nations scientific panel studying climate change declared that the evidence of a warming trend is "unequivocal," and that human activity has "very likely" been the driving force in that change over the last 50 years. The last report by the group, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, in 2001, had found that humanity had "likely" played a role.

The addition of that single word "very" did more than reflect mounting scientific evidence that the release of carbon dioxide and other heat-trapping gases from smokestacks, tailpipes and burning forests has played a central role in raising the average surface temperature of the earth by more than 1 degree Fahrenheit since 1900. It also added new momentum to a debate that now seems centered less over whether humans are warming the planet, but instead over what to do about it. In recent months, business groups have banded together to make unprecedented calls for federal regulation of greenhouse gases. The subject had a red-carpet moment when former Vice President Al Gore's documentary, "An Inconvenient Truth," was awarded an Oscar; and the Supreme Court made its first global warming-related decision, ruling 5 to 4 that the Environmental Protection Agency had not justified its position that it was not authorized to regulate carbon dioxide.

The greenhouse effect has been part of the earth's workings since its earliest days. Gases like carbon dioxide and methane allow sunlight to reach the earth, but prevent some of the resulting heat from radiating back out into space. Without the greenhouse effect, the planet would never have warmed enough to allow life to form. But as ever larger amounts of carbon dioxide have been released along with the development of industrial economies, the atmosphere has grown warmer at an accelerating rate: Since 1970, temperatures have gone up at nearly three times the average for the 20th century.

The latest report from the climate panel predicted that the global climate is likely to rise between 3.5 and 8 degrees Fahrenheit if the carbon dioxide concentration in the atmosphere reaches twice the level of 1750. By 2100, sea levels are likely to rise between 7 to 23 inches, it said, and the changes now underway will continue for centuries to come.

news20090809wp

2009-08-09 18:05:37 | Weblog
[Today's Newspaper] fom [The Washington Post]

[Transportation]
Metro Safety System Failed in Near Miss Before June Crash
By Joe Stephens and Lena H. Sun
Washington Post Staff Writers
Sunday, August 9, 2009

The crash-avoidance system suspected of failing in the recent deadly accident on Metro's Red Line malfunctioned three months earlier, when a rush-hour train on Capitol Hill came "dangerously close" to another train and halted only after the operator hit the emergency brake, newly obtained records show.

At the time of the March 2 incident, the train operator and control-center supervisors did not know that anything serious was wrong, the records indicate. The operator applied the brake because he realized that the train was not slowing fast enough and would overrun the station platform, a fairly common occurrence. About a week later, while reviewing computer logs, officials determined that there was a problem with the Automatic Train Protection system and that the train had stopped just 500 feet behind another.

Despite repeated promises of greater openness about safety, Metro officials did not make public the near miss at the Potomac Avenue Station, and federal investigators said Metro did not tell them about it after the Red Line crash, which killed nine people and injured 80.

The National Transportation Safety Board, which is investigating the June 22 crash, learned of the March incident last week when notified by the little-known Tri-State Oversight Committee, said NTSB spokeswoman Bridget Serchak. Metro officials did not immediately respond to questions about why they did not notify the NTSB.

The Washington Post discovered the incident while reviewing documents obtained through a public records request filed with the oversight committee, which was created 12 years ago to monitor Metro.

In an April 29 letter to Metro's chief safety officer, committee chairman Eric Madison asked Metro to conduct an investigation and submit a report about the Potomac Avenue incident, citing the "potentially catastrophic" nature of it. He said the train "violated a block," meaning it improperly shared a section of track with another train, and "came dangerously close to the leading train." Madison, a planner for the D.C. Transportation Department, wrote that it was only by "coincidence" that a Metro employee later noticed the incident in computer records.

Metro has yet to formally respond to the committee, which is empowered to oversee safety issues and make suggestions but cannot direct Metro to take action.

Metro spokeswoman Lisa Farbstein said Friday that although both incidents might have involved the failure of the protection system, they appear linked to different components and so would be unconnected.

"If a part goes down on the car, it's not necessarily related to the part that's on the track," said Farbstein, who described the March and June incidents as "very, very different."

Farbstein said the March incident, which took place at 4 p.m. on a Monday as a train on the Orange Line headed toward Vienna, was caused by a single failed relay on a subway car that has been fixed. The car was a 1000 series model, the same kind of car on the striking train in the June crash. The June crash is suspected of being caused by a faulty track circuit. Either problem could lead to a temporary failure of the Automatic Train Protection, a fail-safe system that monitors train locations and is supposed to automatically stop a train if it senses it is too close to another.

Farbstein said that because the car component was flawed, the six-car train at Potomac Avenue did not receive a stop command.

"The train operator did use the [emergency brake] when he realized he wasn't slowing down," she said. The train overshot the platform by about 75 feet, the length of a rail car, and halted about 500 feet from the train in front of it, she said. No one was injured, and the train was taken out of service.

Rail experts who reviewed the information questioned whether an operator, apparently unaware that he was gaining on another train, would have hit the emergency brake as quickly had he not been at a station. Rail experts also said the Potomac Avenue incident could be evidence of a significant problem.

"It is shockingly serious," said Ron Tolmei, an electrical engineer and former manager of research and development for San Francisco's subway system. "This sounds strikingly similar to what's a potential cause of the June accident."

Farbstein said that in response to the March event, Metro examined relays on its entire fleet of more than 1,000 rail cars and identified only "one relay that could be tied to the incident."

After the June crash, Metro officials said that the malfunctioning track circuit at the accident site was "a freak occurrence" and that they were unaware of other incidents, including near misses, that stemmed from failures in the safety system.

Metro General Manager John B. Catoe Jr. has promised repeatedly to keep riders better informed after the agency was criticized for failing to promptly tell them about problems with track circuits on other parts of the system. Farbstein said she did not learn of the March incident until Friday, when asked about it by The Post.

NTSB investigators have not pinpointed the cause of the June accident, in which one train rammed another between the Takoma and Fort Totten stations. But the NTSB says it appears that Metro's control system failed to detect a stopped train and that an approaching one did not receive a command to stop. The agency concluded last month that Metro's train protection system was inadequate and urged the addition of a real-time continuous backup.

Federal officials have said the track circuit at the crash site had been "flickering" for as long as 18 months.

The March incident throws a rare light on the Tri-State Oversight Committee, which was created in 1997 under an agreement signed by Maryland, Virginia and the District. The three jurisdictions jointly fund and control the six-member committee, formed as part of a national effort to improve oversight of subway systems, which are not subject to federal regulation. Each jurisdiction has two committee seats.

Minutes from the committee's April meeting said Metro was trying to "recreate" the train protection failure "but has been unable to do so." All related hardware was replaced, but Metro decided to bring in "external resources to assess the hazard," according to the minutes.

Minutes for the May committee meeting said Metro's "assessment of this hazard is ongoing."

The Red Line crash occurred a few weeks after that meeting. The minutes for July 8 indicate that at that point, the panel still had not received a response to its April 29 letter to Metro. Later in the meeting, the panel discussed a June 3 letter in which a Metro worker alleged "that the ATP system was unreliable." Metro declined to comment on the reference.