下面为大家整理一篇优秀的essay代写范文- UK curriculum evaluation,供大家参考学习,这篇论文讨论了英国的课程评价。英国考试类的课程评价方式,在题型安排上,客观题的比重很少,主观题的比重很大,一些课程的试卷甚至完全由主观题构成。这使得学生可以较为全面的展现对于知识点的理解、应用、分析和评估,而不是仅展现对知识点的记忆,提高试卷评价的准确性,引导学生掌握知识点的较高层次。而非考试类的评价方式以课程报告为主,课程研讨、课程讲演为辅,教师根据学生对知识点的掌握层次给分。
Take the finance major of the university of southern Essex in the UK as an example. Among the 15 courses offered for this major, 4 courses are examined in the form of examination, and the examination results account for 30%-50% of the total score. Among them, the assessment of 3 courses adopts the form of all subjective questions. The examination paper is composed of three to four subjective questions, each of which contains multiple small questions. The types of questions include calculation questions, discussion questions and other forms. In addition, the objective questions of one course account for 30-40%, and the other are composed of subjective questions with small questions. The scoring standard of subjective questions is composed of key points, and the score is based on the key points of students' answers, their understanding of the key points, their application, analysis and evaluation.
Other course assessment forms adopted by this major are composed of course report, course discussion and course lecture.
The course report requires students to form a report of 2000-4000 words that meets the format requirements according to the given open questions, combined with the knowledge learned in class, the understanding of knowledge points and certain investigation and research. Teachers grade students according to their understanding and mastery of the knowledge involved in open questions and the depth of investigation and research. A total of 93.3% of the courses are in the form of course reports, among which 46.7% of the courses are fully evaluated in the form of course reports.
The seminar requires students to discuss, divide and study the open questions in groups, and finally form a report to share with other students through PPT. Each student completed part of an open-ended question, scoring each student's part individually, reducing the likelihood that some students "hitchhike" on the team to score points.
The course presentation requires students to use the knowledge they have learned, independently complete the research on the given open questions and form a report, share it with other students in the form of PPT, and grade the students according to the report and PPT.
Compared with memorizing knowledge, British education pays more attention to the cultivation of students' understanding and ability of knowledge at a higher level. Bloom proposed the taxonomy of educational goals in 1956. After his students' improvement, bloom's taxonomy model of educational goals in the field of cognition, which is widely recognized by the British educational circle, is as follows.
Cognitive goals are divided into six levels from low level to high level. Memory as the lowest level of knowledge cognition, performance is to be able to recite knowledge points; Understanding is to be able to use language to re-explain the knowledge points rather than a not bad recitation, can be for example; Application is the ability to apply knowledge to other situations and cases; The analysis shows that it can understand the internal logic of knowledge points and the relationship with other knowledge points, can compare with other knowledge points, and can understand the theoretical basis of knowledge points. The evaluation can evaluate knowledge points and draw conclusions, and make decisions and predictions based on knowledge points. Creating performance is to correct knowledge points.
In the course evaluation method of examination, the proportion of objective questions is very small, while the proportion of subjective questions is very large. Some examination papers of courses are even completely composed of subjective questions. This further reduces the possibility of cheating in exams, and enables students to comprehensively show their understanding, application, analysis and evaluation of knowledge points, instead of just showing their memory of knowledge points, improves the accuracy of examination paper evaluation, and guides students to master higher levels of knowledge points. In structure is not in accordance with the short-answer questions, discusses the way of calculation and composition, but in a given situation and case, in the form of item free combination, this paper form is conducive to a volume according to want to examine the problem of designing knowledge, understanding of knowledge, application and analysis, rather than the memory of knowledge points, guarantee on the investigation to the knowledge comprehensive and accurate.
The evaluation method of non-examination is mainly based on course report, supplemented by course discussion and course lecture. The course report of 2000 to 4000 words also gives students enough space to explain the knowledge principle, give examples, apply, compare and evaluate with other knowledge points. Teachers grade students according to their level of mastery of knowledge points. In general, they only show their understanding and application of knowledge points. In particular, it is difficult to get general and above scores with imprecise understanding and application. In order to achieve excellent and above results, students must have self-taught knowledge in addition to the taught knowledge, innovation of existing knowledge. This fully shows that British education attaches great importance to students' high-level mastery of knowledge points and the concept of cultivating learning habits. Based on the report, students are required to have the ability of teamwork, PPT making, speech and expression, which is in line with the idea that British education attaches importance to the cultivation of students' ability.
Each course is scored independently by two teachers according to students' understanding of knowledge, practical application, overall degree, innovation and independent in-depth research. The final score shall be approved by two teachers at the same time to improve the objectivity and accuracy of the course score. At the end of each student's marking, the marking instructions should be filled in, the reasons for each question should be detailed, and finally the grading instructions should be fed back to the students, so as to improve the transparency of the course scoring and enable the students to understand their own shortcomings for correction and improvement.
Evaluation methods of all courses are determined by the teachers, approved by the academic committee, and uploaded to the electronic system. All authorized teachers and students can view the course evaluation methods, specific topics and requirements in the electronic system, so as to improve the openness of course evaluation.
From paying attention to students' ability of memorizing and reproducing knowledge in the past, economic higher vocational education is accelerating to pay attention to students' understanding of knowledge, comprehensive quality and cultivation of vocational skills. The reform of curriculum evaluation system can not only reflect the new educational concept, but also play a guiding role in guiding students and teachers to pay attention to the understanding of knowledge, the cultivation of comprehensive quality and vocational skills, and the implementation of educational concept. Continuing to follow the traditional curriculum evaluation system under the traditional education concept will lead to the disunity of students and teachers who still pay attention to the knowledge memory in the practical learning method and teaching method even if they accept the new education concept.
By increasing the proportion of open subjective questions, students can comprehensively show their understanding and application ability of knowledge points, reduce the necessity of students' recitation and standard answers, and guide them to increase their understanding of knowledge points instead of memorizing them. Open subjective questions enable students to show their understanding of knowledge beyond textbooks and further develop their self-learning ability.
However, increasing the proportion of open subjective questions may increase the difficulty of the exam and make it difficult for students to adapt to the new test questions. On the one hand, the reform can be carried out step by step, gradually increasing the proportion of open subjective questions. On the other hand, students are no longer required to memorize book knowledge points, but to focus on the understanding of knowledge points may reduce the requirement of memory ability in exams.
Based on the characteristics of the existing curriculum and the number of students taught, a reasonable and diversified curriculum evaluation method is designed according to the curriculum specification. The course report, course discussion and lecture are in line with the process assessment concept of paying attention to knowledge understanding and ability cultivation, which can reflect the students' learning situation objectively and completely, promote the "knowledge + ability" training mode, reduce the score theory of "one examination paper decides the outcome", and increase the accuracy of the course evaluation method.
However, in the form of course reports, seminars and speeches, there may be some problems such as students' irregular citation and duplication of papers and literature, and teachers' workload increase. In problem design, setting up unique scenarios, cases and specific problems of a given research can greatly reduce the number of references that can be copied directly and reduce students' such behaviors. At the same time, the school provides paper checking system to increase the standardization of course report. In view of the increase of teachers' workload, teachers' enthusiasm to reform the curriculum evaluation system can be improved by improving logistics support and performance incentive.
Diversified course evaluation system, especially non-exam course evaluation method, may increase the arbitrariness of grading. In order to ensure the objective accuracy of course evaluation, the higher vocational education in the UK adopts the dual-teacher grading system, and each teacher shall fill in the grading instructions after grading each student, which greatly reduces the arbitrariness and irregularity of grading. In curriculum evaluation system reform, the improvement of the rules and regulations can reduce and avoid the reform lead to a drop in the quality of grading and randomness, upgrading of hardware and software facilities, such as establishing public including course evaluation method and the specific requirements of electronic system, can improve the score of openness and transparency, to ensure the effective implementation of the rules and regulations.
想要了解更多英国留学资讯或者需要英国代写,请关注51Due英国论文代写平台,51Due是一家专业的论文代写机构,专业辅导海外留学生的英文论文写作,主要业务有essay代写、paper代写、assignment代写。在这里,51Due致力于为留学生朋友提供高效优质的留学教育辅导服务,为广大留学生提升写作水平,帮助他们达成学业目标。如果您有essay代写需求,可以咨询我们的客服QQ:800020041。
51Due网站原创范文除特殊说明外一切图文著作权归51Due所有;未经51Due官方授权谢绝任何用途转载或刊发于媒体。如发生侵犯著作权现象,51Due保留一切法律追诉权。