GreenTechSupport GTS 井上創学館 IESSGK

GreenTechSupport News from IESSGK

news20090623BRT

2009-06-23 19:48:07 | Weblog
[Biography of the Day] from [Britannica]
June 23
Clarence Thomas


[On This Day] from [Britannica]
June 23
1314: Battle of Bannockburn
On this day in 1314 began the Battle of Bannockburn, a decisive engagement in Scottish history whereby the Scots defeated the English, regained their independence, and established Robert the Bruce as Robert I.

1961: The Antarctic Treaty was enacted, reserving the entire continent for free and nonpolitical scientific investigation.

1940: Sprinter Wilma Rudolph, the first American woman to win three track-and-field gold medals in a single Olympics, was born.

1925: An expedition under A.H. MacCarthy and H.F. Lambert became the first to reach the summit of Mount Logan, the second highest mountain in North America.

1865: The Cherokee chief and Confederate general Stand Watie surrendered at the close of the American Civil War—one of the last Confederate commanders to do so.

1817: Popular English actor John Philip Kemble retired after his last performance, in which he played Coriolanus.

1298: German King Adolf of Nassau was deposed in favour of Albert I.


[Today's Word] from [Dr. Kazuo Iwata]
June 23
Men are to stop struggling like a trapped rat, give up the ugly effort to escape; they are to remain where they are and cry what they want to say.
Jean Anouilh (born this day in 1910)

(人間はわなに落ち入ったネズミのようにもがくのをやめ、逃れようという醜い努力もやめるべきである。そうして今いるところにそのままいて、好きなことを叫ぶべきである。)

news20090623JP

2009-06-23 18:33:17 | Weblog
[TODAY'S TOP STORIES] from [The Japan Times]

[NATIONAL NEWS]
Tuesday, June 23, 2009
Witness links two missing girls
Man seen with '90 victim resembles '96 suspect


UTSUNOMIYA, Tochigi Pref. (Kyodo) A woman who saw a man walking with a little girl by a river around the time a 4-year-old vanished in May 1990 has recently told Kyodo News the man's posture resembled that of someone caught on a security camera who may have been involved in the disappearance of another girl in 1996.

The witness, a 52-year-old former fine arts teacher, provided a rough sketch of the man and girl in 1990.

Kindergarten bus driver Toshikazu Sugaya was convicted of the 1990 murder of Mami Matsuda, 4, whose body was found by the Watarase River in Ashikaga, Tochigi Prefecture. After more than 12 hours of interrogation, he confessed that he took her by bicycle to the riverside.

Although investigators looked into the teacher's account, they ultimately focused only on Sugaya after he was arrested, apparently because what the woman saw contradicted what their suspect confessed.

"When the DNA test result (on fluids found on Matsuda's clothes) matched that of Sugaya, everybody believed he was the culprit," said an investigative officer in charge of the case at the time. "No one had any doubt."

With Sugaya behind bars, police did not investigate if the man possibly involved in the 1996 disappearance may have killed Matsuda, who had disappeared from a pachinko parlor parking lot.

After spending more than 17 years in prison, Sugaya was released earlier this month after fresh DNA tests failed to match the bodily fluids found on Matsuda's clothing. He is expected to be acquitted in a retrial.

Although the account provided by the woman may provide a link between the two disappearances, the statute of limitations in the Matsuda slaying has expired.

The other girl, Yukari Yokoyama, 4, disappeared July 7, 1996, also from a pachinko parlor, but in Ota, Gunma Prefecture, which is adjacent to Tochigi.

The video footage from the security camera showed a man wandering around the parlor for about 15 minutes without playing pachinko.

The footage, which was been aired on TV, shows a man around 158 cm tall wearing a black cap and sunglass.

Local police are still trying to locate the man as a material witness, as Yokoyama's case remains unsolved, as it now appears Matsuda's does as well.

The witness said the man she saw walking along the Watarase River with a girl at the time Matsuda disappeared and the man the police are trying to locate in connection with the 1996 case resembled each other in posture and walking style.

The teacher told police that a man aged between 35 and 45 and about 165 cm tall was walking with a girl wearing a red dress. Matsuda was wearing a red dress the day she disappeared.

"It may be possible that the same person was involved in both cases," said Yokoyama's father, Yasuo. "But I don't want to think about it because it means Yukari may be dead."


[NATIONAL NEWS]
Caterer used fake ID to get into prime minister's office
By MASAMI ITO
Staff writer

One would assume the prime minister's office's state-of-the-art security system prevents unregistered individuals from entering the premises.

That isn't necessarily the case, according to Chief Cabinet Secretary Takeo Kawamura.

Kawamura admitted Monday that a hotel caterer slipped into the building using another person's identification card in November 2005 to serve a dinner party hosted by Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi.

Koizumi had invited the president of Yemen to the party held at the prime minister's office in Chiyoda Ward. Akasaka Prince Hotel, now the Grand Prince Hotel Akasaka, catered the event.

According to the Asahi Shimbun, about 20 staff members, a list of which was submitted to the prime minister's office beforehand, working the affair. But one of them was absent at the last minute and a different employee was told by the manager to go using the ID of the absentee. The photo of the employee who went was superimposed on the ID card.

"The media report is by and large true," Kawamura said, noting the hotel reported the incident in 2007.


[BUSINESS NEWS]
Tuesday, June 23, 2009
Corporate confidence heads up

(Bloomberg) Business confidence improved for the first time in three quarters and demand for services rose, adding to signs the recession is easing.

Sentiment among large manufacturers increased to minus 13.2 points compared with a record low of minus 66 three months ago, a government survey showed Monday. The tertiary index of money spent on services ranging from phone calls to dining out climbed 2.2 percent in April from March, the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry said.

A rebound in production as companies replace stockpiles will help the economy expand this quarter for the first time in a year, economists say. Even so, Bank of Japan Gov. Masaaki Shirakawa is concerned that demand may not pick up enough to sustain a recovery once $2.2 trillion in worldwide stimulus measures fades.

"It's becoming clearer that the economy has already hit bottom," said Junko Nishioka, chief Japan economist at RBS Securities Japan Ltd. "But the rebound will probably be lackluster in the absence of a solid recovery in profits, capital spending and consumption."

The gain in sentiment at large manufacturers was the biggest since the Cabinet Office and Finance Ministry began the survey in 2004. Confidence at all big companies improved to minus 22.4 from minus 51.3. A negative reading means pessimists outnumber optimists.

The report offers a hint of the results likely in the BOJ's "tankan" survey due July 1. The nation's most closely watched gauge of corporate confidence will show sentiment among large manufacturers improving to minus 43 points from March's record low of minus 58, according to the median estimate of 18 economists.

China's 4 trillion yuan ($586 billion) in government spending is boosting demand for Japanese heavy equipment and cars. Nissan Motor Co.'s sales to China rose 37 percent in April from a year earlier, buoyed by a government subsidy that halves the consumption tax on vehicles with smaller engines.

Domestic stimulus measures — \25 trillion pledged since October — have helped lift consumer confidence to a 14-month high. Sales of electronics are by up 18 percent since the government introduced a program last month to encourage consumers to buy environmentally friendly products, according to research firm Gfk Marketing Service Japan Ltd.

Industrial production rose at its fastest pace in 56 years in April as companies replenished stockpiles they managed to run down during the worst of the export collapse. The rebound prompted the BOJ and the government to raise their assessments of the economy in each of the past two months.

Gross domestic product will grow an annualized 1.5 percent this quarter, according to the median estimate of 11 economists. GDP contracted a record 14.2 percent in the previous period.

Shirakawa said last week he is "cautious" about the economic outlook because the pickup in demand may be temporary.

Exports and production, while improving on a month-on-month basis, are about a third lower than last year's levels.

That is putting pressure on managers to cut jobs and slash investment, spending that would normally trickle down to the smaller businesses that make up 70 percent of the economy. Companies plan to cut capital spending by an unprecedented 15.9 percent this business year, according to a survey published this month by the Nikkei newspaper.

Eco-'tankan' planned

(Kyodo News) The government will start conducting a business sentiment survey in the growing environment industry to help compile policies, Environment Minister Tetsuo Saito said Monday.

The Environment Ministry's survey, to be equivalent to the Bank of Japan's "tankan" business sentiment survey, will cover new business fields, including production and sales of energy-saving home appliances and environmentally friendly vehicles, Saito said.

The survey will be introduced on a trial basis this fiscal year and is scheduled to be formally introduced after April.

news20090623LAT

2009-06-23 17:03:41 | Weblog
[Today's Newspaper] from [Los Angeles Times]

[World News]
Iran authorities say disputed vote count will stand
Guardian Council says it can find no evidence of 'major' irregularities in the presidential election. Meanwhile, a special court is being set up to try 'plotters and hooligans' involved in protests.

By Ramin Mostaghim and Borzou Daragahi
June 23, 2009

Reporting from Tehran -- Iran's Guardian Council today ruled out the possibility of nullifying the country's disputed presidential election that returned hard-liner Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to power, saying it could find no evidence of any "major" irregularities, according to a report carried by the website of the state-owned English-language Press TV satellite news channel.

"Fortunately, in the recent presidential election we found no witness of major fraud or breach in the election," said Abbas-Ali Kadkhodai, the council's spokesman, according to the report. "Therefore, there is no possibility of an annulment taking place."

He said most of the irregularities alleged by the defeated reformist candidate Mir-Hossein Mousavi occurred before the election, which he suggested were outside the scope of the Guardian Council's authority.

Mousavi sent the council a lengthy and detailed letter last week detailing election day irregularities as well as alleged abuses of power by Ahmadinejad before the vote. Kadkhodai did not address Mousavi's allegation that ballot boxes were taken to military bases at one point on election day, where they were beyond the view of poll observers.

The rejection of a new vote came as government authorities stepped up their crackdown on protesters. Officials announced plans to set up a special court and warned that anyone who encouraged more demonstrations -- including Mousavi -- is subject to arrest.

In some of its sternest remarks yet, the Revolutionary Guard announced that anyone who continued to confront the security forces "will be considered a threat" to the system, the official Islamic Republic News Agency reported.

"The guardians of the Islamic Revolution and the courageous Basiji," a pro-government militia, "are determined to act strongly to return peace and tranquillity to society . . . and to clean the country of these plotters and hooligans," said the statement, according to the agency.

Despite the warnings, Mousavi called on his supporters Monday to gather their strength and continue peaceful protests, sharpening his conflict with the government.

"The protest against vote-rigging and untruth is your right," he said in a statement carried on a news website affiliated with his presidential campaign. "In your protest keep avoiding violence and be like kind, brokenhearted parents to poorly behaving children in the law enforcement forces."

Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, ordered the protesters to halt their marches and ridiculed the vote-fraud allegations as he stood strongly behind Ahmadinejad in his Friday prayer sermon.

But the Guardian Council, whose members are appointed directly or indirectly by Khamenei, had earlier indicated that the vote count was indeed problematic. An initial probe showed that the number of ballots cast exceeded the number of registered voters in 50 locales, a discrepancy affecting 3 million votes or more.

Chatham House, a British think tank, published a study over the weekend in which it found irregularities by comparing Iranian presidential voting in 2009 and 2005 against the 2006 census published by the official Statistical Center of Iran. The report finds that two conservative provinces reported turnouts of more than 100% and that in a third of all provinces, this year's official results would have meant Ahmadinejad won not only all the conservative voters from 2005, but also the centrist voters from then and all new voters -- as well as 44% of reformist voters.

Iran, under pressure from the West for its pursuit of advanced nuclear technology and support of Arab militant groups opposed to Israel, continues to reel from days of protests that culminated in chaotic fighting Saturday between security forces and demonstrators.

The fighting came after Khamenei ordered demonstrators off the streets in a prayer sermon interpreted as a call to semiofficial pro-government vigilantes to crack down on the rallies.

Iranian authorities have blamed the West for stirring up the unrest. In public statements and television broadcasts, they have particularly targeted Britain, which launched the popular BBC Persian-language news channel this year.

Following threats and the expulsion of the BBC Tehran bureau chief, the British Embassy ordered the families of its expatriate staff out of the country Monday.

"CNN and the BBC have set up a psychological war room," Hasan Qashqavi, spokesman for the Foreign Ministry, told reporters at a news conference broadcast on state television.

"As for BBC Persian and the VOA [Voice of America], their case is obvious," he said. "Their objectives are, A, to weaken national solidarity and, B, to threaten Iran's territorial integrity and divide Iran. This is the approved agenda that was promulgated to the VOA and BBC Persian, after their budgets were approved by the British Parliament and the U.S. Congress."

But the eruption of violence and popular discontent over the election also illustrate a huge rift at the highest echelons of the country's clerical leadership, between Khamenei and Ayatollah Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, the head of a council that oversees the supreme leader.

Politicians and clergy have been huddling for days in intense discussions over ways to resolve the crisis, which has proved as divisive in the corridors of power as on the street.

On Monday, heavy contingents of anti-riot police safeguarded key downtown squares, including Haft Tir, where police using tear gas chased off a group of 200 or so demonstrators.

Black-clad anti-riot police could be seen dragging off two young men who were distributing political tracts downtown. Basiji militiamen in Haft Tir Square could be seen beating and carting off a young woman who refused to allow them to inspect her handbag.

There were signs elsewhere that the protesters' enthusiasm was tapering off. Near Tehran University, police dragged off a young man in a green shirt, the official color of the Mousavi campaign, without raising the hackles of pedestrians, who erupted in anger during similar encounters in previous days.

Ebrahim Raisi, a top official in Iran's judiciary branch, said tribunals will be set up after a preliminary investigation to process hundreds of "rioters" and "thugs" caught in security sweeps during the unrest.

"The judiciary will set up special courts for those cases which are passed on to the judiciary," he said in comments broadcast on state television. "Hopefully, they will receive their legal punishments and our dear people will be informed of their punishments."

In a pointed warning to leaders of the protest movement, he added that "any comment, any writing or any move that might provoke or encourage people to create insecurity will be considered crimes."

One Ahmadinejad supporter in parliament called for Mousavi's arrest. "Mousavi's viewpoints and his illegal statements, which have encouraged and provoked public opinion [against the system], are considered to be a crime," lawmaker Ali Shahrokhi, chair of the judiciary committee, told the Fars news agency. "This criminal action, which is against security and is religiously illegal, should be dealt with firmly."

The Tehran prosecutor's office said it had arrested at least 457 people in Saturday's unrest, but a source inside Evin Prison said nearly 1,000 had been brought in. Among those arrested in an ongoing sweep of opposition figures was Ardeshir Amir Arjomand, Mousavi's legal advisor.

Mousavi called on authorities to exercise restraint and transparency in dealing with his jailed supporters. "I expect the law enforcement forces to release the names of martyrs, wounded and arrested," he said in his statement. "Otherwise they make the gap between themselves and the people wider."

news20090623NYT

2009-06-23 16:12:22 | Weblog
[Today's Newspaper] from [The New York Times]

[Middle East]
Top Clerical Council in Iran Rejects Plea to Annul Vote
By MICHAEL SLACKMAN
Published: June 23, 2009

CAIRO — Iran’s most powerful oversight council has refused to nullify the contested presidential election just one day after it announced that the number of votes recorded in 50 cities exceeded the number of eligible voters there by three million, further tarnishing a presidential election that has set off the most sustained challenge to Iran’s leadership in 30 years, Iranian state television said Tuesday.

On Press TV, the English-language state television satellite broadcaster, Abbas-Ali Kadkhodaei, the spokesman for the Guardian Council, declared: “If a major breach occurs in an election, the Guardian Council may annul the votes that come out of a particular affected ballot box, polling station, district, or city.”

“Fortunately, in the recent presidential election we found no witness of major fraud or breach in the election,” he said.

“Therefore, there is no possibility of an annulment taking place.” He was speaking late on Monday in Tehran and his remarks were posted early Tuesday, Tehran time.

The Guardian Council — a 12-member panel of clerics entrusted with overseeing and validating elections —has until Wednesday to certify the election as valid. The spokesman’s remarks seem to make that certification even more of a certainty. Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Iran’s supreme leader, pronounced the vote fair in a major sermon last Friday.

For the opposition, whose followers have demonstrated and confronted a violent crackdown, Mr. Kadkhodaei’s comments seem likely to be taken as further evidence that the process of certification has been as flawed as opponents claim the ballot itself was.

The vote gave a lopsided victory to President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, leaving three opposition candidates complaining that the vote had been stolen. The main reformist opposition candidate, former Prime Minister Mir Hussein Moussavi, has led demands that the vote be annulled as his followers took to the streets in mass demonstrations that brought a bloody crackdown by the authorities over the weekend.

On Monday, the Guardian Council insisted that the overall vote was valid, even as security forces stepped up their threats to treat demonstrators as criminals seeking to destabilize the country.

A group of as many as a thousand demonstrators at Haft-e-tir Square in central Tehran was quickly overwhelmed Monday by baton-wielding riot police and tear gas shortly after the Revolutionary Guards issued an ominous warning on their Web site saying that protesters would face “revolutionary confrontation.” Opposition leaders said the next move may be civil disobedience or a general strike.

The legitimacy of the vote remains at the core of the dispute.

The Guardian Council said on Monday irregularities were not enough to overturn the landslide election margin that the government had announced for Mr. Ahmadinejad. But the recognition of a broad discrepancy between the number of recorded votes and registered voters in some districts only fueled suspicions that the election — and the Guardian Council’s arbitration of it — was unfair.

“I don’t think they actually counted the votes, though that’s hard to prove,” said Ali Ansari, a professor at the Institute of Iranian Studies at the University of St. Andrews in Scotland and one of the authors of a study of the election results issued by Chatham House, a London-based research group.

Indeed, the Guardian Council has so far appeared to prejudge the race as fair and legitimate.

“Statistics provided by the candidates, who claim more than 100 percent of those eligible have cast their ballot in 80 to 170 cities are not accurate — the incident has happened in only 50 cities,” said Mr. Kadkhodaei said Monday. He said this outcome could occur because people may vote anywhere they choose, not necessarily only in their district of registration.

But many districts where the excess votes were recorded are small, remote places rarely visited by business travelers or tourists, analysts said, raising questions about how so many extra votes could have been counted in so many different areas.

The extra votes add to a list of complaints leveled against the election by Mr. Moussavi and other challengers inside and outside Iran. Among them:

How did the government manage to count enough of the 40 million paper ballots to be able to announce results within two hours of the polls closing? How is it that Mr. Ahmadinejad’s margin of victory remained constant throughout the ballot count? Why did the government order polls closed at 10 p.m. when they often stay open until midnight for presidential races? Why were some ballot boxes sealed before candidates’ inspectors could validate they were empty? Why were votes counted centrally, by the Interior Ministry, instead of locally, as in the past? Why did some polling places lock their doors at 6 p.m. after running out of ballots?

Mr. Kadkhodaei denied that polling stations had closed before all voters could cast their ballots and said voting had continued up to three-and-a-half-hours past the official 10 p.m. deadline, Press TV said.

The Guardian Council had offered a random 10 percent recount of the ballot but the opposition rejected it, saying it wanted a new election.

Mr. Kadkhodaei said the council had received reports from provincial panels appointed to investigate complaints of illegal campaigning, including the expulsion of candidates’ representatives from polling stations and bribery. Those reports showed, Mr. Kadkhodaei was quoted by Press TV as saying, that no “series of violations had occurred.”

In specific terms, analysts who have scrutinized the election results available in Persian and English said that for Mr. Ahmadinejad to have won 63 percent to Mr. Moussavi’s 34 percent, he would have had to have won over most people who four years ago supported the liberal reform candidate, Mehdi Karroubi, a former speaker of the Parliament who ran again this year.

They said the president also would have had to have garnered the votes in that 2005 race that went to Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, a bitter opponent of Mr. Ahmadinejad who backed Mr. Moussavi this time.

The review of voting statistics released this week by St. Andrews University and Chatham House reached a similar conclusion.

“The plausibility of Mr. Ahmadinejad’s claimed victory is called into question by figures that show that in several provinces he would have had to attract the votes of all new voters, all the votes of his former centrist opponent, and up to 44 percent of those who voted for reformist candidates in 2005,” said Thomas Rintoul, one of the study’s authors.

Ayatollah Khamenei, the country’s supreme leader, said that Mr. Ahmadinejad’s margin of victory was so great — 11 million votes — that there could be no doubt it was legitimate. He never addressed any of the specific charges of fraud.

“Sometimes the difference is 100,000, 500,000 or even 1 million,” Ayatollah Khamenei said in his speech to the nation Friday . “In that case, one could say that there might have been vote-rigging. But how can they rig 11 million votes?”

To vote, all citizens must show their shenasnameh, a wallet-sized folder holding all important documents, including birth certificates and proofs of marriage and divorce. Iranians can visit any polling site they choose to with their shenasnameh, which is why some districts end up with more ballots cast than eligible voters. People with summer or weekend houses, for example, often do not go home to vote.

Even the conservative speaker of Iran’s Parliament, Ali Larijani, who has sided with the supreme leader in support of Mr. Ahmadinejad, acknowledged that skepticism about the vote was wide and deep, unlikely to be dispelled by continued claims of a landslide victory for the president.

news20090623WP1

2009-06-23 15:58:18 | Weblog
[Today's Newspaper] fom [The Washington Post]

[Transportation]
THE PROBE: Experts Suspect Failure Of Signal System, Operator Error
By Lyndsey Layton
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, June 23, 2009

Experts familiar with Metro's operations focused last night on a failure of the signal system and operator error as likely causes of yesterday's fatal Red Line crash.

Metro was designed with a fail-safe computerized signal system that is supposed to prevent trains from colliding. The agency's trains are run by onboard computers that control speed and braking. Another electronic system detects the position of trains to maintain a safe distance between them. If they get too close, the computers automatically apply the brakes, stopping the trains.

These systems were supposed to make yesterday's crash impossible.

But four years ago, in an episode eerily similar to yesterday's, the signal system briefly failed in the tunnel between Foggy Bottom and Rosslyn, forcing two quick-thinking operators to stop their trains manually to avoid a crash.

In the June 2005 incident, the operator of one train noticed that he was getting too close to the train ahead. The signal system was telling him the track was clear, but he hit the brakes. The operator of a third train on the line hit the emergency brakes on time, too.

Metro officials were stunned by the events, which they said at the time had not happened before, and launched an investigation. It was unclear last night whether they ever found a cause.

In yesterday's crash, it appeared that the operator of the train that crashed did not apply the emergency brakes, also known as the "mushroom." Experts said the train appeared to be traveling fast before impact because the force pushed the first car of the train on top of the train ahead. Witnesses on the train that crashed also reported that the train did not brake before impact.

There was no reason to think that the operator did not spot the train ahead of her yesterday. The weather was clear, and the trains were not in a tunnel.

"It doesn't look like she hit the brakes," said a train safety expert, who asked not to be identified because the crash is under investigation. "That's why you have an operator in the cab. She should have been able to take action. That's what they're there for."

Other possible factors in the crash include a medical emergency that incapacitated the operator or a catastrophic failure of the braking system.

The trains in yesterday's crash were supposed to be in automatic operation, which means the operators would have been relying on the computerized system to run the trains. The only function required of a train operator during automatic operation is to close the doors after a station stop. Some safety experts said operators can "zone out" during computerized operation because they don't have to pay as close attention as when they manually run trains.

During the past decade, Metro has struggled with troublesome communications relays. The agency tore out all 20,000 trackside relays in 1999 after discovering that a small portion designed to last 70 years were failing after 25. They sent erroneous instructions to trains on several occasions. One train was told to travel 45 mph on a stretch of track with a 15-mph speed limit; another was directed to travel at zero mph when it should have been ordered to move at 15 mph.

The manufacturer, Alstom Signaling, agreed to replace the relays. The company could not be reached for comment last night.

In May 2000, the Federal Railroad Administration issued a safety warning to all railroads and transit systems, saying relays manufactured between 1960 and 1985 by General Railway Signal had a tendency to stick or fail.

Alstom, which bought General Railway Signal in 1998, estimated that 2 million of the relays in question are used by railroads around the world. Federal officials said the sticking of the relays has caused the railroad administration serious concern. They said railroads using the Alstom relays should inspect and test them, but they stopped short of requiring immediate repair or replacement.

news20090623WP2

2009-06-23 15:40:39 | Weblog
[Today's Newspaper] fom [The Washington Post]

[Transportation]
At Least Seven Killed in Red Line Crash
By Lena H. Sun and Maria Glod
Washington Post Staff Writers
Tuesday, June 23, 2009; 7:54 AM

One Metro train slammed into the back of another on the Red Line at the height of the evening rush yesterday, killing at least seven people and injuring more than 70 others in the deadliest accident in Metrorail's 33-year-history.

There were conflicting reports about how much the death toll had risen from the six people originally reported killed in the crash. Media reports quoted D.C. fire department officials as saying three more bodies were pulled from the wreckage overnight, and a Metro official confirmed that number to The Washington Post early this morning.

But the Metro official said at 7:45 a.m. that the number of confirmed dead had been scaled back to seven. D.C. Mayor Adrian M. Fenty (D) said the information would be updated at a news briefing scheduled for 8 a.m.

Scores of victims were taken to area hospitals, some in critical condition.

The impact of the crash was so powerful that the trailing train was left atop the first train. Witnesses told stories of rescues and people helping others amid the chaos. Firefighters had to use heavy rescue equipment to cut open the cars to reach people trapped inside.

The investigation will continue today, shutting down some parts of the Red Line and MARC commuter rail's Brunswick line. Officials advised the public to brace for a difficult commute, and those who boarded Red Line trains early today said they were traveling at a maximum speed of 35 miles per hour, significantly slower than usual.

One of the dead was Jeanice McMillan, 42, of Springfield, the operator of the train that rear-ended another stopped in front of it just outside the Fort Totten station in Northeast Washington, Metro officials said.

No one answered the phone last night at McMillan's home.

Names of the others killed in the collision have not been released. Metro and rescue officials gave no details about the operator or the other fatalities. The crash occurred just after 5 p.m., and traffic on the train lines and highways was severely affected.

Metro, like all transit agencies, is supposed to have numerous safety systems in place to prevent crashes, and it was not clear what caused yesterday's accident. The National Transportation Safety Board is investigating the crash and has assigned a railroad investigator and two specialists from its office of transportation disaster assistance. The Metro board is scheduled to hold a special meeting at 2 p.m. today.

Although the investigation is just beginning, certain systems are designed to prevent an accident like yesterday's. During morning and afternoon rush hours, all trains except longer eight-car trains typically operate in automatic mode, meaning their movements are controlled by computerized systems and the central Operations Control Center. Both trains in yesterday's crash were six-car trains. But officials would not say whether the trains were in automatic mode or being operated manually.

Investigators will probably focus on a possible failure of Metro's computerized signal system, which is designed to prevent trains from coming close enough to collide, as well as operator error, according to former Metro officials. A Metro source said McMillan was relatively inexperienced, ranking 18th from the bottom on the seniority list of 523 train operators. She had been a Metro employee since January 2007, officials said. Train operators must first operate a bus for a year before they can apply to operate the train. They then receive about 12 weeks of training.

The computerized system should work whether trains are being operated manually or by computer.

But even if the signal system failed to stop the train, the operator should have intervened and applied emergency brakes, safety experts familiar with Metro's operations say. The position of the second train after the crash -- the fact that its first car came to rest atop the other train -- indicates that the second train was traveling at high speed. In the section of track where the accident occurred, the maximum speed is supposed to be 58 mph. Metro officials would not say how fast the trains were going because of the ongoing NTSB investigation.

There was no maintenance work scheduled in the relatively long, flat section of track between the stations. For many weeks, trains were slowed because of a weakness in the track bed that Metro said it repaired in spring.

This is the third serious Metrorail crash since 1996. The last fatal train crash occurred 13 years ago, when a Red Line train overshot the Shady Grove platform on an icy night and plowed into another train. The operator died. In November 2004, a Red Line train rolled backward down a steep stretch of track and smashed into another train at the Woodley Park Station. Twenty people were injured, but there were no fatalities.

The deadliest accident in the system's history before yesterday occurred in 1982, when a six-car Orange Line train bound for New Carrollton derailed near the Federal Triangle Station when an improperly aligned switch caused it to enter the wrong track. Three passengers were killed.

In yesterday's crash, both six-car trains were headed toward downtown Washington. The first train, No. 214, stopped because a third train in front had stopped at the Fort Totten platform, said Metro General Manager John B. Catoe Jr. The second train, No. 112, came up behind it and "for reasons we do not know, plowed into that train," Catoe said. The stopped train was made up of mostly 5000 series rail cars, a group that has had numerous problems with doors and wheels. The striking train was made up of mostly 1000 series cars -- at more than 30 years old, the fleet's oldest.


Riders described chaos when the crash occurred. In the train that was struck, passengers said the train had stopped three times in the moments before the crash. After the impact, many passengers had to jump from the side of the train to the ground. Other riders helped lift passengers down safely.

Tom Baker, 47, a District resident, was in the first car of the second train. There were eight to 10 passengers in his car. As they pulled out of Takoma on the way to Fort Totten, the female operator said the train was holding because there was a train in front of them. Shortly thereafter, the train started moving again, and there was soon an "enormous crashing jolt," he said.

"You could hear all this crashing and glass breaking," Baker said. "I didn't hear any brakes at all." He said he couldn't gauge how fast the train was moving but said it was traveling at moderate speed. He saw the train lift into the air, he said. "When the dust settled, the entire front of the train was gone," and riders could see down to the train below them.

Garrett Dorsey, 44, of the District was in the train that was rear-ended. The operator said the train had to stop because of some kind of difficulty, and then "there was just a boom like an explosion," he said. Seats flew up.

Martin Griffith, a civilian employee at the Pentagon, was inside the train that was struck. Afterward, he said, "I looked out the window. I looked up. I could see the wreckage hanging over the door. There was a woman there, too, trying to hang on."

He hit the emergency release and opened the door out onto the track. "That's when I realized people had been ejected out. They were lying on the ground next to the car," Griffith said.

He said he helped one woman who had fallen near an electrified third rail, collecting other passenger's T-shirts to stanch her bleeding.

After the power to the live rail was turned off and rescuers reached her, Griffith said, he found another young woman. He said it wasn't clear whether she had been ejected from the train that hit his or had climbed out on her own. Her legs looked broken, Griffith said, and he sat with her while firefighters used the jaws of life to open the doors on a nearby train so she could be taken to an ambulance.

"She said, 'Tell my boyfriend . . . ' " Griffith said, and then he cut her off. "You tell him yourself. You're breathing. You can see me. You don't need to give me any last messages."

He then used her cellphone to call her mother. Ernice Beasly picked up: the injured girl was her daughter Lanice, 14. Later, she said that her daughter was at the hospital, unconscious and badly cut but alive. She said of Griffith: "Thank the Lord for him."

Griffith then walked to the Fort Totten station and took the Metro home to Northern Virginia, still wearing the black pants and white dress shirt he'd had on at the crash scene.

"People were looking at me strange," he said. "I had blood all over me, none of it my own."

news20090623GDN1

2009-06-23 14:53:14 | Weblog
[Environment] from [guardian.co.uk]

[Electric Cars]
UK powers up plans for world's largest electric car trial
UK government's £25m scheme to slash emissions from transport will allow public to take part in long-term trials of a range of electric cars

Alok Jha, green technology correspondent
guardian.co.uk, Tuesday 23 June 2009 00.05 BST
Article history

The UK government will today unveil the world's largest ever coordinated trial of environmentally friendly vehicles. The £25m scheme, which is designed to accelerate the introduction of electric cars to the UK will allow people to take part in long-term trials of everything from electric Minis and Smart city cars to sports cars and electric vans.

From the end of this year, around 340 of the vehicles will be available to qualifying members of the public in eight different locations around the country including Oxford, London, Glasgow, Birmingham and the north-east. Power companies, regional development agencies and universities will also be involved in coordinating the experiments, building infrastructure such as charging points and analysing the way the cars are used.

"Here's an opportunity to position the UK as a world leader in the adoption of this technology by supporting the largest ever trial of such vehicles," said Paul Drayson, the science minister. "That encourages companies working in this field to do their research and development here. That knowledge generated by the trial then gets fed back to the follow-on systems that come through."

Around 22% of the UK's carbon emissions come from transport, with 13% of these from private cars. According to a study for the Department for Transport (DfT), widespread adoption of electric vehicles capable of a range of 50km or more could cut road transport carbon emissions in half.

"We have about 33m cars on the road at the moment and it's going to go up by another 4-5m in the next 10 years," said David Bott of the Technology Strategy Board (TSB), the government-backed agency that promotes the development of new technologies and is coordinating the national demonstration project. "There's a lot of people buying new cars anyway so the question is how quickly can we get credible alternatives out there?"

Moving the UK's drivers onto cleaner forms of road transport would not be addressed by a single piece of technology, said Bott, and so the demonstration project had been designed to try out different cars in different places. "We get to find out what we can't do and we get a whole bunch of new problems that are real. We get confidence that we're on the right path or the knowledge that we need to change."

One branch of the trial will involve around 40 of BMW's Mini E available to those living in Oxford and south-east England. The 12-month project will evaluate the technical and social aspects of living with an all-electric vehicle and scientists at Oxford Brookes University will keep track of the drivers.

Anyone interested in taking part will need to meet certain criteria. "You'll have to have a garage, for example, and you'll have to have a fairly modern electrical wiring system," said Emma Lowndes of Mini UK. "A conventional cable on a normal socket would take over 10 hours to charge the Mini's battery. We're talking with Scottish and Southern Energy about putting in a 32 amp box into homes which would mean a charging time of just over 4 hours."

The cost of the Mini E has not been finalised but, in a similar scheme in the United States, the company charged customers around $850 (£520) per month to lease the car, a cost that included maintenance and insurance.

In Glasgow, 40 battery-powered cars will be made available by Peugeot, the local council and in partnership with the battery company Axeon. Scottish Power will provide 40 charging points around Glasgow and, during the year-long trial, the cars will be monitored using GPS to record the number and length of individual journeys. That data will be analysed by researchers at Strathclyde University.

Mercedes-Benz will make 100 of its latest electric Smart cars available in the west Midlands and in London."We're asking the public to come forward and apply to be one of the drivers of these vehicles," said Dermot Kelly, managing director of Mercedes-Benz cars.

"What we want is a diverse group who are commuting to work every day, who have the ability to charge their cars at home. The power supply companies will be supplying smart metering to work out when people would charge their cars up and when they would use them."

Kelly said he wanted to know how people used electric cars. "What we're hoping to learn is ... what we need to do to make the car as friendly and adaptable as possible to people's lifestyle."

For those who want their environmentally friendly cars with a bit more power, the EEMS Accelerate consortium — a group of small independent manufacturers — are making 21 electric sports cars available. These will include models from the Lightning car company, Westfield and Delta Motorsport. In addition, wind energy company Ecotricity will build and test an electric sports car that it claims will be the world's first charged only using energy from wind turbines.

Friends of the Earth's transport campaigner Tony Bosworth welcomed the new scheme, but said: "Ministers must boost the UK's flagging renewable energy industry because electric vehicles are only as green as the power they run on. Low-carbon vehicles are certainly needed, but we need broader changes to make the necessary cuts in transport emissions. Urgent action is needed to get people out of their cars by making public transport, cycling and walking more attractive options."

The government's demonstration project will also examine people's attitudes and behaviour around owning electric cars. Some people might hesitate to buy a typical electric car that might only have a range of 100 miles on a full charge, said Bott, but their attitudes might change if they tried the cars in question or realised that 95% of all UK journeys tend to be under 25 miles.

The demonstrations announced today are part of the government's wider £250m electric car strategy, unveiled in April, which includes potential incentives of up to £5,000 for consumers to buy electric cars. London's mayor, Boris Johnson, has also announced his intent to make the city the electric car capital of Europe. He wants to introduce 100,000 electric cars to the capital's streets and build an infrastructure of 25,000 charging points in public streets, car parks and shops.

Electric car top trumps

"Mini E"
Top speed: 95mph
Range: 150 miles
Charging time: Around 12 hours on a standard household socket
Cost: unknown but around $850 per month in the US
Good points: It's a Mini
Bad points: The back seats are taken up with a whopping battery
Cool factor: 5 out of 5

"Smart Electric Drive"
Top speed: 60mph
Range: 50-70 miles
Charging time: Full recharge from flat in 8 hours on a standard household socket
Good points: Nippy, perfect for cities
Bad points: Still looks like a toy car
Cool factor: 3 out of 5

"Lightning"
Top speed: 130mph
Range: 180 miles
Charging time: 4.5 hours on standard household socket
Good points: sat nav, MP3 player, DAB digital radio and digital engine sound
Bad points: We don't know the cost but it doesn't look as though it'll be cheap
Cool factor: 4 out of 5

"Peugeot eExpert Teepee"
Top speed: 70mph
Range: up to 100 miles
Charging time: Unknown
Good points: carries eight adults
Bad points: It's a box on wheels. Not the most stylish thing
Cool factor: 2 out of 5

news20090623GDN2

2009-06-23 14:44:31 | Weblog
[Environment] from [guardian.co.uk]

[Travel and Transport]
Haulage lobby plans to force 'megatrucks' on to Britain's road
Larger trucks reduce congestion and pollution, industry claims, as EU considers introduction of 'road trains' across Europe

John Vidal, environment editor
guardian.co.uk, Tuesday 23 June 2009 09.00 BST
Article history

The powerful European road lobby plans to force Britain and other countries to accept some of the world's biggest trucks on the grounds that they will reduce traffic congestion and be less polluting.

The "megatrucks" would be more than 80ft (25.2m) long and weigh 60 tonnes, nearly a third longer and heavier than any vehicle allowed on British roads at present. The trucks would probably tow several trailers and effectively be "road trains".

Details are contained in a new research paper for the European commission (EC), which is expected to lead to proposals for a binding European directive in 2010.

Megatrucks, which can have as many as 10 axles and weigh more than a Boeing 737, are only allowed in the sparsely populated and flat nations of Finland and Sweden and are not permitted to travel across borders. But the Netherlands, Belgium and Denmark are running tests and France is keen to begin trials.

Former transport secretary Ruth Kelly rejected the trucks last year after a study which concluded that they were unsuitable for British roads. "Not only are there clear environmental drawbacks, but such vehicles would be unsuitable for many roads and junctions, while providing the infrastructure to accommodate them would require substantial investment," she said.

But a commission source confirmed to the Guardian that a transport directive was being planned which would eventually lead to their introduction across Europe. "The EC is moving in this direction. Many states want them. There is pressure for a new directive. The intention is to study the issue further and move towards a directive next year," he said.

The European road lobby, led by haulage companies in the Netherlands, is strongly pressing for them to be introduced because studies show they are 15-30% cheaper to run than normal HGV trucks per unit of freight. The lobby is eager to claw back cargo that has been diverted to railways and argues that megatrucks are more environmentally friendly than rail.

"Megatrucks could significantly reduce the number of trucks on roads. Standard trucks emit more than three times as much carbon dioxide and about 2.9 times as much nitrogen oxide per unit of freight as an average freight train," says the research paper. It added that one third of all articulated lorry trips could be suitable for megatrucks.

Studies have been divided over the costs and benefits of megatrucks. One Dutch report predicted lower fuel consumption and CO2 emissions, as well as a fall in fatal accidents. But other research suggests the opposite. There is little doubt, however, that the lower cost would move freight off railways and that large investments would be needed to strengthen roads and bridges. Increased noise pollution would also occur, partly due to the greater number of axles.

Opponents of megatrucks are supported by the UK transport research laboratory and the German environmental agency which both concluded last year that they would be environmentally damaging. "On the whole, megatrucks do not contribute towards sustainable development of freight transport. Their use relieves neither the environment nor road infrastructure. On the contrary, additional risks to road safety have to be expected as well as the environmentally unfavourable shifting of freight transport to the road," the German agency concluded.

"We're very concerned about mega-trucks," said Tony Armstrong, the chief executive of Living Streets, formerly the Pedestrians' Association. "This proposal could have a huge negative impact on road safety . These monsters will cause alarm to residents. Any proposals to bring these trucks to the UK should be strongly resisted".

Even motoring organisations expressed concern: "British drivers feel intimidated by large lorries. They will not be welcome on UK roads. One problem is that they may obscure signs," said Paul Watters, AA head of roads policy.

But the Road Haulage Association said that the move to longer, heavier vehicles was already happening in Europe. "They are part of the future. In the meantime, longer trailers would make a big difference," said a spokewoman.

news20090623SLT

2009-06-23 09:51:21 | Weblog
[Today's Paper] from [Slate Magazine]

Iran's Guardian Council: Election Was Kosher
By Daniel Politi
Posted Tuesday, June 23, 2009, at 6:33 AM ET

The New York Times (NYT) leads with Iran's powerful Guardian Council announcing that it found some irregularities in the June 12 polls. The council said that the number of votes in 50 districts was greater than the number of eligible voters by 3 million, not enough to overturn the supposed landslide victory of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. The Los Angeles Times (LAT) catches late-breaking news that the council rejected demands that the vote be annulled, saying it found no evidence of "major" irregularities. "Fortunately, in the recent presidential election we found no witness of major fraud or breach in the election," said the council's spokesman. The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) leads its world-wide newsbox with security forces quickly breaking up protests in Tehran yesterday, which were much smaller than recent demonstrations.

The Washington Post (WP) leads with the collision between two Metro subway trains that killed six people—authorities have since increased the death toll to nine—during rush hour yesterday. One Red Line train crashed into the back of another between the Takoma and Fort Totten stations. The impact was so powerful that one subway car was fully on top of the other train. It was the deadliest accident in Metrorail's history. USA Today (USAT) leads with numbers that show the foreclosure crisis is spreading. According to the paper's analysis, the "foreclosure rates in 40 of the nation's counties that have the most households have already doubled from last year." This latest increase in foreclosures is due more to the recession and increasing unemployment than to subprime mortgages. The LAT leads with Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa's announcement that he will not be competing in the 2010 race for California governor.

A group of around 1,000 demonstrators—some, including the LAT, put the number at "200 or so"—gathered in central Tehran yesterday but were easily dispersed by security forces that were present in large numbers. Earlier in the day, the Revolutionary Guards posted a message on their Web site, warning that protesters would face "revolutionary confrontation." Officials also announced they would set up a special court to deal with the protesters. But opposition leader Mir Hossein Mousavi encouraged supporters to keep protesting. The NYT notes that opposition leaders think their next move is likely to be civil disobedience or a general strike.

The WSJ talks to Iranians who feel the stakes are higher now and are questioning whether to go back to the streets. "It's now crossed the line, if you come out it means you are ready to become a martyr and I'm not so sure I want to die yet," a 33-year-old woman said. The LAT also catches signs that "the protesters' enthusiasm was tapering off," reporting that when police grabbed a man who was wearing green close to Tehran University, none of the nearby pedestrians said anything. While officials publicly state they arrested 457 people on Saturday, the LAT has a source inside the notorious Evin Prison that says the real figure is closer to 1,000.

Even though the Guardian Council recognized that the number of votes in 50 districts exceeded the number of voters, it said that was possible because Iranians can vote anywhere they choose. But analysts immediately raised doubts about this theory, noting that many of the places that recorded irregularities aren't exactly popular among business travelers or tourists. Regardless, with today's announcement by the council that it had found "no major fraud" in the election, it seems any hopes that a compromise could be reached are now out the window.

Security forces in Iran blocked a memorial service scheduled yesterday afternoon for Neda Agha-Soltan, the young woman killed Saturday who has become a symbol of the opposition's struggle after her death was captured on video. The NYT and LAT both front separate stories on Neda, which means voice in Persian. Her friends and family are mostly afraid to speak to the media. The only person who spoke on the record was her friend and music teacher who was next to her when she was shot. The government ordered the family to bury Neda immediately and forbade them from holding a memorial service. The LAT has the most details about the young woman, who loved music and traveling. Everyone emphasizes that she was far from a political activist and only attended the protest because she was upset about the election results. The NYT points out that "[f]unerals have long served as a political rallying point in Iran, since it is customary to have a week of mourning and a large memorial service 40 days after a death," a cycle that was particularly important during the 1979 revolution.

Neda may be the most famous victim from Saturday's clashes, but she was hardly the only one. The WSJ's Farnaz Fassihi talks to one family whose 19-year-old son was shot in the head on Saturday as he returned from acting classes. Kaveh Alipour's wedding was scheduled for the following week. Family and friends say they suspect he was caught in the crossfire since he hadn't participated in any of the protests that had taken place all week. Once he discovered his son's fate, Alipour's father was told that he had to pay a $3,000 "bullet fee" before he was allowed to take his body. He was finally allowed to take the body without paying as long as the family promised not to hold a funeral or burial in Tehran.

In a front-page piece, the WP takes a look at how Republicans have been criticizing President Obama for failing to give more direct encouragement to the protesters in Tehran. The unrest in Iran has put on display the differences between how the Obama administration and Republicans "view the nature of American power and the president's role in speaking to political dissent" around the world. Republicans have been quick to seize on Cold War imagery, but the administration says that comparing the Iranian protesters with Communist bloc dissidents is an oversimplification that doesn't take into account how the world has changed since the fall of the Soviet Union. "We're trying to promote a foreign policy that advances our interests, not that makes us feel good about ourselves," said a senior administration official.

The NYT, LAT, and WP front the Supreme Court's decision to not strike down a key provision in the Voting Rights Act of 1965. The 8-1 decision was surprising because many had expected the court to rule that Section 5 of the voting rights law is unconstitutional. The provision requires several state and local governments, mostly in the South, to seek federal approval for any changes in election laws or voting procedures. Instead, the justices decided that certain municipalities could ask to be exempt from the provision. Still, many think it's only a matter of time before the justices take a broader stance. "I tend to think the Voting Rights Act is living on borrowed time," said one law professor.

The LAT and WP report news that singer Chris Brown pleaded guilty to assaulting pop star Rihanna. Brown's plea deal allowed him to avoid a maximum of five years in prison and was reached a few hours before Rihanna was going to testify about how Brown hit her in February before the Grammy Awards. Instead, he will be on probation for five years and complete six months of "community labor." Experts said the deal was consistent with similar cases, particularly for someone without a prior criminal record. But others were quick to say he received favorable treatment for being a celebrity. "Paris Hilton got more jail time than Chris Brown did for beating a woman to a pulp," said the president of the National Organization for Women. "How could he not spend one day in jail?"