GreenTechSupport GTS 井上創学館 IESSGK

GreenTechSupport News from IESSGK

news20090620BRT

2009-06-20 19:04:20 | Weblog
[Biography of the Day] from [Britannica]
June 20
Howlin' Wolf
American blues singer and composer Howlin' Wolf, one of the principal exponents of the urban blues style of Chicago and noted for his brooding lyrics and his earthy, aggressive stage presence, was born this day in 1910.

[On This Day] from [Britannica]
June 20
1567: Casket Letters found
The Casket Letters—which directly implicated Mary, Queen of Scots, in a plot with James Hepburn, 4th earl of Bothwell, to murder Mary's husband, Henry Stewart, Lord Darnley—were said to have been discovered this day in 1567.

1992: A new constitution went into effect in Paraguay, signaling the end of military rule established in the 1950s by Alfredo Stroessner.

1940: A new government was announced in Latvia following the Soviet Red Army's invasion of the country.

1928: American jazz musician Eric Dolphy was born in Los Angeles.

1905: American playwright and screenwriter Lillian Hellman was born in New Orleans, Louisiana.

1887: German Dada artist and poet Kurt Schwitters was born in Hannover.

1789: Locked out of their meeting hall at Versailles, the deputies of the Third Estate in France congregated on a nearby tennis court and took an oath not to separate until a written constitution had been established—the Tennis Court Oath.


[Today's Word] from [Dr. Kazuo Iwata]
June 20
"Let them eat cake."
Queen Marie Antoinette

(彼らにケーキを食べさせなさい。)
(人民はパンを食べることができません、と言われたとき、こう答えたと言われる。)
(Karera-ni keeki-wo-tabesasenasai.)
(Jinmin-wa pan-wo-taberu-koto-ga-dekimasen, to-iwareta-toki, kou-kotaeta-to-iwareru.)

news20090620JT1

2009-06-20 18:50:27 | Weblog
[TODAY'S TOP STORIES] from [The Japan Times]

[NATIONAL NEWS]
Nishimatsu ex-chief admits Ozawa funds
(西松の前社長 小沢に献金を認める )
State: DPJ boss' 'voice of heaven' decided winner of works projects

By SETSUKO KAMIYA
Staff writer

Former Nishimatsu Construction Co. President Mikio Kunisawa pleaded guilty Friday to charges in connection with a political funding scandal that cost Democratic Party of Japan chief Ichiro Ozawa his job last month.

During his first trial session at the Tokyo District Court, prosecutors demanded 18 months imprisonment for Kunisawa, 70, claiming Ozawa's office acted as "the voice of heaven" in deciding the winners of bids for public works projects in Iwate and Akita prefectures.

Kunisawa admitted he was involved in making illegal donations worth 5 million via two dummy entities to Ozawa's fund management body.

The ex-Nishimatsu head is also charged with bringing into Japan money from an overseas slush fund without reporting it to customs, in violation of the Foreign Exchange and Foreign Trade Law.

Also Friday, prosecutors demanded six months in prison for Keiji Fujimaki, 68, former vice president of Nishimatsu, who, along with Kunisawa, admitted being involved in bringing into Japan 70 million from an overseas slush fund between February 2006 and August 2007.

The attorneys for Kunisawa and Fujimaki asked for suspended terms for their clients. The court plans to issue its ruling July 14.

"I have caused lots of trouble for society," Kunisawa told the court. "Slush funds and political donations had been common practice in the industry, and I had considered them a necessary evil to win the competition.

"But having been indicted, I'm ashamed that I could not think of stopping them. I am deeply sorry," he added.

Prosecutors said the 5 million in illicit donations made around October 2006, for which Kunisawa stands accused, was part of a long-term donation scheme that lasted 12 years between 1995 and 2006 and fed 129 million in total into Ozawa's fund body.

According to the opening statement of the prosecution, Nishimatsu established two political groups, in 1995 and 1998, with the aim of making contributions to politicians.

The firm asked reliable manager-level officials to become members of the groups and padded their salaries. The extra payments to the officials were then paid to the political groups as membership fees, prosecutors said.

The donations by the two groups were decided by Nishimatsu, and the scheme lasted until 2006, when the two groups were dissolved because it became difficult for Nishimatsu to continue making such donations amid the decline in its business, prosecutors said.

During Friday's session, prosecutors said bid-rigging had been an established practice in the Tohoku region and Ozawa's office had significant influence on decisions over local public works projects in Iwate Prefecture, where his electoral constituency is located.

This eventually led Kunisawa, who had been in charge of a division making political donations for some time before he became president of the company, to start donating funds to Ozawa's political fund management body via two political groups with the aim of receiving the "heaven's voice" from Ozawa's office and winning bids, the prosecution said, adding that Ozawa's office was also influential in public works bid-rigging in Akita Prefecture.

Prosecutors said the scheme was pernicious as it tried to hide from the public the donations Nishimatsu was making to Ozawa.

Takanori Okubo, a secretary for Ozawa who was in charge of handling his political fund management body, Rikuzankai, has been charged with taking illegal donations from Nishimatsu's two dummy entities and falsely reporting them as donations from political groups.

Okubo has been released on bail and is reportedly denying the charges. Prosecutors have yet to set his trial date.


[NATIONAL NEWS]
Saturday, June 20, 2009
Antipiracy, gift tax bills enacted
(海賊対処 贈与税改正 等の法案成立)

By MASAMI ITO
Staff writer

The ruling bloc rammed three key bills through the Lower House Friday, including a permanent antipiracy law that lets the Maritime Self-Defense Force protect ships of any nationality and have greater latitude in the use of force, and a relaxed gift tax so parents can give their offspring funds to buy a home.

Although the antipiracy bill, the tax reform bill and a revision of the pension law were all rejected by the opposition-controlled Upper House Friday morning, the Liberal Democratic Party-New Komeito ruling coalition rammed them through a revote in the lower chamber using its two-thirds majority.

With these key bills out of the way, the focus of attention shifts back to Prime Minister Taro Aso to see if and when he will dissolve the House of Representatives and call a snap election.

However, Chief Cabinet Secretary Takeo Kawamura brushed off poll speculation in a news conference Friday.

"It is disappointing that we had to hold a second vote . . . but the result was produced by holding discussions in the Diet and we should consider it an achievement and welcome" the enactments, Kawamura said. "But we don't think there is any connection between the enactments and the dissolution of the Lower House."

The other two bills rammed through Friday are the revision of the National Pension Law, which would increase the government's contribution to the national pension scheme from one-third to one-half in fiscal 2009, and the tax reform bill that would reduce the gift tax for a limited period of time, and thus make it easier, for example, for parents to give their offspring money to buy a house.

The passage of the three bills may be a milestone for the Aso Cabinet, but given its sinking support ratings, it is unclear whether Aso will be in a strong enough position to call an election before the fall.

A dissolution of the Lower House would inevitably affect Diet deliberations on key legislative items, including a bill now in the works to allow inspections of North Korean ships.

In addition, a bill to widen the scope of organ transplants cleared the Lower House Thursday, and political insiders say it will be difficult to dissolve the House of Representatives before its enactment.

The revised organ transplant law recognizes brain death as legal death and scraps the age limit for donors to pave the way for transplants involving children.

During Friday's Lower House plenary session, Democratic Party of Japan lawmaker Hideo Hiraoka criticized the government-sponsored antipiracy bill, reiterating the DPJ position that prior Diet approval must be necessary before the MSDF is deployed on such missions, like the one the navy is currently engaged in.

The bill only requires the prime minister to report an outline of the mission to the Diet after authorizing the dispatch. Details to be reported include why the deployment is necessary, as well as its location and duration.

news20096020JT2

2009-06-20 18:44:09 | Weblog
[TODAY'S TOP STORIES] from [The Japan Times]

[BUSINESS NEWS]
Saturday, June 20, 2009
Q&A
List of goods qualified for Eco-points now out
(エコポイント 交換対象商品を発表)

By KAZUAKI NAGATA
Staff writer

The government revealed a list of products and services Friday that can be exchanged for Eco-points, a type of currency to stimulate consumption and promote use of energy-efficient goods.

The campaign is boosting replacement demand at electronics retailers as consumers flock to accumulate Eco-points on purchases of so-called green products as designated by the government.

How does the system work and what are the Eco-points worth? Following are some basic questions and answers about the Eco-point system:

How do Eco-points work and how can they be earned?

Eco-points are earned by buying three kinds of government-designated energy-efficient products: air conditioners, refrigerators and TVs.

The points, worth 1 each, can be exchanged for three types of goods: coupons and prepaid cards, energy-efficient products, or products that promote regional economies.

More points can be gained for a small fee by handing over old products for recycling and upgrading to a new appliance.

Eco-points can be accumulated until in March 2010.

What can Eco-points be exchanged for?

The government's list contains 271 products and suppliers of exchangeable articles. Most of the goods are prepaid cards, like East Japan Railway's Suica cards and bitWallet Inc.'s Edy, or gift coupons issued by major department stores. There are also travel tickets from JTB Corp., Kinki Nippon Tourist Co., Japan Airlines and All Nippon Airways.

A total of 109 commerce groups from municipalities across the country have also issued coupons for exchange with Eco-points.

The full list is available at www.env.go.jp/policy/ep_kaden/pdf/090619a-1.pdf but the government plans to release a list of more products or service providers later.

Why are the points being awarded only for air conditioner, refrigerator and TV purchases?

The government is focusing on those appliances because half of total carbon dioxide emissions from households are produced by these three products alone, according to the Environment Ministry.

About 70 percent of the total, including those from the three products, come from home electronic appliances.

Also, the government is planning on ending analog broadcasting by July 2011, so the Eco-point campaign is a good chance to promote televisions compatible with digital terrestrial broadcasting.

How does the government select the products?

Selection is based on government criteria used to rank the gadgets' efficiency.

The rank, based on a scale of one to five stars, is attached to the product with a label, but Eco-points can be gained only by purchasing gadgets with four or more stars.

The label also provides other information, such as the estimated annual cost of running the device.

How many points can be had for one product?

It depends. For instance, 6,000 points can be earned by buying an air conditioner with a cooling capacity of less than 2.2 kw, but 9,000 points can be gained by buying one rated at more than 3.6 kw.

If old air conditioner is recycled when a new one is bought, this translates into an additional 3,000 points.

But TVs earn more points than air conditioners and refrigerators. A TV purchase can fetch anywhere from 7,000 points for 26-inch and smaller sets, to 36,000 points for the big-screen models.

How can I exchange points?

The government will start accepting applications July 1. The form can be downloaded from the Environment Ministry's Web site, but paper versions will also be available at post offices and retailers.

Applicants must attach the original receipt and a copy of the product's warranty to the application form. Those who recycle an old product must attach the recycling ticket, too.

Consumers will be able to try out the application process at the Eco-point Web site (www.eco-points.jp) scheduled to open at the end of the month. But they will still be asked to mail in a hard copy of the documents.

The deadline for applications is next April 30.


[BUSINESS NEWS]
Saturday, June 20, 2009
Nonresident ownership of shares dives 4%
(外国人の株式保有比率 4%と過去最大の低下幅)


(Kyodo News) Nonresident investors owned 23.6 percent of shares traded on stock exchanges in Japan in fiscal 2008, down 4.0 percentage points from the previous year in the largest fall on record, the Tokyo Stock Exchange said Friday.

Foreign ownership of domestic shares declined for the second consecutive year in the face of the economic slowdown, the TSE said.

Shares sold by nonresident investors were partially taken over by Japanese individuals, given the cumulative number of them topped 40 million for the first time.

The TSE analyzed the ownership of companies listed on the Tokyo bourse, as well as the Osaka, Nagoya, Fukuoka and Sapporo stock markets in fiscal 2008, which ended in March. It began compiling data in fiscal 1970.

Nonresident investors sold more shares than they bought by a cumulative ¥4.22 trillion, the TSE said. Foreign ownership of shares fell in all 33 sectors.

Individuals owned 20.1 percent of shares, up 1.9 percentage points for the second straight yearly rise, and scored a buying excess of ¥729.2 billion.

news20090620LAT

2009-06-20 17:53:39 | Weblog
[Today's Newspaper] from [Los Angeles Times]
 
[Top News]
Top Iran leader orders halt to protests; Tehran on edge
Supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei delivers a speech defending vote results. Opposition leaders vow to march today in defiance, setting the stage for a potentially violent clash.

By Ramin Mostaghim and Borzou Daragahi
June 20, 2009

Reporting from Tehran -- Iran's tense capital braced for the possibility of violence after supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei demanded Friday that protesters end their mass demonstrations against alleged vote-rigging and suggested that those who defied him would be responsible for the consequences.

Khamenei, who is Iran's highest spiritual and political leader, ordered protesters off the streets and rejected charges that President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad used fraud to win reelection last week. But the opposition was unbowed, and called on its supporters to return to the streets today.

Plans for a march at Enghelab (Revolution) Square a day after Khamenei's forceful Friday sermon set the stage for a possible confrontation in the heart of the city.

"The way of the law is open," Khamenei told tens of thousands of worshipers who gathered in downtown Tehran and countless others who listened on television and radio. "If people continue to take the other way, I will come back and speak more directly. . . . If they do not end it, then the consequences lie with them.

"Nothing can be changed. The presidential campaign is finished," he declared.

At the sermon's end, Khamenei began lamenting his physical condition and weeping, a gesture that signaled his displeasure and moved the throngs of dignitaries and Basiji militiamen gathered before him to weep in response. Observers said Khamenei's gesture, similar to one he made during the height of 1999 student protests, was a call for loyalists to crack down on the demonstrators as a way of righting a wrong done to their patron.

The huge crowd flowed out of the Tehran University venue and into the main streets outside, roaring, "Our vote is written in blood, and we gave it to the leader."

Ahmadinejad's main challenger, former Prime Minister Mir-Hossein Mousavi, must now decide between his allegiance to his followers or to Iran's unique Islamic system.

A sense of foreboding hung over the city. Shortly after Khamenei spoke, black clouds gathered and unleashed a rare late spring thunderstorm. And as darkness came, residents in many parts of the capital climbed to their rooftops and angrily shouted, "God is great!" and "Death to the dictator!" in what has become a nightly ritual of protest stemming from the widespread belief that the vote was rigged.

"The presence of people in the streets will continue, and I do hope everything will be solved in the favor of . . . [the] Iranian nation," said Elahe Koolai, a prominent reformist and Mousavi supporter.

A text message sent to the cellphones of some people called on them to join in the march today, expected to be attended by Mousavi, reformist former President Mohammad Khatami and Mehdi Karroubi, another presidential candidate.

Analysts were not surprised by Khamenei's tone, which defined further civil disobedience as a direct challenge to the Islamic Republic and its supreme leader, who under the constitution is held to be God's representative on Earth.

In his sermon, Khamenei criticized some of Ahmadinejad's conduct before the June 12 vote, and he condemned the killing of students by pro-government loyalists this week. But he came down explicitly on the side of the hard-line incumbent. He described Ahmadinejad as hard-working, and said the president's views were closer to his than those of other politicians.

Khamenei and Ahmadinejad draw support from the same sources, including Basiji militiamen and the Revolutionary Guard.

"He cannot afford to sacrifice Ahmadinejad," said an analyst in Tehran, who spoke on condition of anonymity. "Over the last years Khamenei has teamed up with the Revolutionary Guard to build his power. For Khamenei and the Revolutionary Guard, Ahmadinejad is the best alternative."

Mousavi has become the head of a diverse movement that is pulling him forward as much as he's leading it. Reformists and moderates said they feared the movement would peter out without his leadership.

"The ball is now in Mousavi's court," said Nader Hashemi, a professor of Middle East studies at the University of Denver. "His leadership will now be tested. Will he stand firm and continue his nonviolent resistance, or will he compromise and sell out the democratic aspirations of millions of Iranians?"

Mousavi did not immediately respond to Khamenei's challenge.

The prime minister-turned-scholar remains under close supervision of authorities, has been denied access to state broadcasting facilities, and has seen his newspaper shut down.

"The positive aspect of this movement is that for the first time it's everyone," said an analyst in Tehran, who spoke on condition he not be named. "The election and the campaign [were] just an excuse to express all their problems. But on the other hand, the weakness of the movement is that it's disorganized. The main problem is that they crystallized all their anger around Mousavi. He became a hero. But in many ways the movement is ahead of Mousavi."

Other prominent opposition figures made calls for protesters to defy the authorities.

"We call on all the supporters of reform and change to have an overwhelming presence so that their cries are a protest at cheating and lying and backing for it at the highest levels of the system," said a statement on Karroubi's website.

"May the massive crowd make all officials -- who do not attach the slightest value to the people's votes -- tremble," the statement said.

The scene for Khamenei's highly anticipated Friday sermon suggested that moderate figures in the Iranian establishment had been further marginalized in political infighting. Not only was Mousavi absent; so too were prominent moderates such as Ayatollah Hashemi Rafsanjani, Khatami and former Tehran Mayor Gholamhossein Karbaschi.

Ahmadinejad sat in the front row next to parliamentary speaker Ali Larijani, a conservative who is often highly critical of the president.


Mashallah Shamsolvaezin, a reformist writer and human rights activist, said Khamenei had made a political misstep by so openly allying with Ahmadinejad, and predicted that people would come out in even greater numbers because of the speech.

"If taking people into the streets is wrong, and the leader today called it strong-arming, then what is his mobilizing of people during Friday prayers?" he said. "I think the presence of the people will continue in the streets, and intimidating people is no way to solve the disputes."

Among the young green-clad men and women who make up the heart of the movement, there was fear mixed with resilience.

The fear of bloodshed has failed to stop previous rallies. According to a count taken by a Western embassy in Tehran, at least 33 people in the capital and as many as 100 nationwide have been killed in violence between protesters and club-wielding Basiji and Ansar-e Hezbollah militiamen over the last week, including students killed in their sleep. One analyst said that protests in the cities of Tabriz, Esfahan, Shiraz and Kermanshah had already been crushed.

Amnesty International issued a bulletin describing Khamenei's speech as giving "a green light to security forces to violently handle protesters exercising their right to demonstrate and express their views."

One 29-year-old woman, sobbing with dismay at Khamenei's tone, said she would nevertheless gather her courage and attend the march.

"This is how countries that have freedom and democracy get it," said the woman, who asked that her name not be published. "They have to fight and die for it."

news20090620NYT1

2009-06-20 16:54:59 | Weblog
[Today's Newspaper] from [The New York Times]

[Middle East]
Iran’s Top Leader Dashes Hopes for a Compromise
By NAZILA FATHI
Published: June 19, 2009

TEHRAN — Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, sternly cut off any compromise over the nation’s disputed elections on Friday. In a long and hard-line sermon, he declared the elections valid and warned of violence if demonstrators continue, as they have pledged, to flood the streets in defiance of the government.

Opposition leaders who failed to halt the protests, he said, “would be responsible for bloodshed and chaos.” The tough words seemed to dash hopes for a peaceful solution to what defeated candidates and protesters call a fraudulent election last week, plunging Iran into its gravest crisis since the Islamic Revolution in 1979.

“Flexing muscles on the streets after the election is not right,” he said, before tens of thousands of angry supporters at Tehran University. “It means challenging the elections and democracy. If they don’t stop, the consequences of the chaos would be their responsibility.”

But opposition leaders, who stayed home Friday, called for yet another huge rally on Saturday afternoon, setting the stage for a possible showdown between protesters and security forces, perhaps a violent one.

The sermon put Ayatollah Khamenei, who prefers to govern quietly and from behind the scenes, at the forefront of a confrontation not only among factions of the government but among Iranians themselves.

It also presents Mir Hussein Moussavi, whom the opposition says was the real winner of last Friday’s elections, with an excruciating choice. The former prime minister and long-time insider must decide whether to escalate his challenge to Iran’s supreme leader and risk a bloody showdown, or abandon his support for a popular uprising that his candidacy inspired.

During the tough sermon, Ayatollah Khamenei tried to tamp down factional disputes among the elite, at one point even chastising pro-government militias and President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad for their role in the crisis. But he hardened his stance on the election results. On Monday, a crowd that the mayor of Tehran estimated at three million rallied for the first of four days, and Ayatollah Khamenei ordered an investigation into the election results, which declared Mr. Ahmadinejad the winner, with 63 percent to Mr. Moussavi’s 34 percent. Then on Wednesday, the government invited Mr. Moussavi and the other two presidential candidates to meet with the Guardian Council, the powerful body that oversees the elections.

But the ayatollah said Friday that there was nothing to discuss, as he again endorsed the victory of Mr. Ahmadinejad, seated in the audience, and called the elections “an epic moment that has become a historic moment.” He dismissed allegations of fraud.

“Perhaps 100,000 votes, or 500,000, but how can anyone tamper with 11 million votes?” he asked as the crowd burst into laughter. “If the political elite ignore the law — whether they want it or not — they would be responsible for the bloodshed and chaos,” he said.

He added that foreign agents were behind the street unrests and that there were efforts to stage a “velvet revolution.”

“They thought Iran is Georgia,” he said, adding, “Their problem is that they don’t know this great nation yet.”

Tens of thousands of Mr. Ahmadinejad’s supporters gathered for the sermon. Television showed the streets filled with people near Tehran University.

Newspapers said Thursday that a group of members of Parliament reported that the paramilitary forces of Basij were responsible for the attack on a dormitory in Tehran and a housing complex called Sobhan this week. Students said that five students — two women and three men — were killed in the attack.

In his sermon, Ayatollah Khamenei criticized those who carried out the attack. “Have you calculated the impact of going to the dormitories in the name of the leader?” he asked. “Muscle-flexing after elections is not right. Put an end to this.”

The nation’s complex politics and maneuvering were on display in the sermon when he defended an influential politician and former president, Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, a bitter rival of Ayatollah Khamenei’s who many Iranians say is a major force in challenging the election.

Ayatollah Khamenei criticized Mr. Ahmadinejad for accusing Mr. Rafsanjani, his children and a former speaker of Parliament, Ali Akbar Nateq Nouri, of corruption during a televised debate, saying that both had risked their lives for the revolution.

“No one had accused them of corruption,” he said. But he did not remove the cloud of suspicion from Mr. Rafsanjani’s children, noting that there had been accusations, unproven, against them.

There was no immediate reaction from Mehdi Karroubi, another presidential candidate who accused the government of fraud. Many analysts and aides to Mr. Moussavi have been arrested and were not available for comments. But the human rights group Amnesty International warned that Ayatollah Khamenei’s speech indicated that the authorities were willing to conduct a violent crackdown.

“We are extremely disturbed at statements made by Ayatollah Khamenei which seem to give the green light to security forces to violently handle protesters exercising their right to demonstrate and express their views,” the group said in a statement.

In a letter on Friday, Mr. Karroubi urged the Guardian Council to nullify the elections. “This is not the demand of an individual, it is the demand of the people,” he wrote in a letter posted on his Web site. “I warn you that insulting people would only intensify their rage.”

The council is expected to meet with the three presidential candidates on Saturday.

Web sites associated with both Mr. Moussavi and Mr. Karroubi said that the large rally scheduled for Saturday was still on.

In Paris, a friend of Mr. Moussavi’s who said he was acting as his spokesman said Friday that Ayatollah Khamenei’s statements would be met by large demonstrations.

“What happened is beyond cheating,” the friend, Mohsen Makhmalbaf, a film director, said in a hastily organized news conference in Paris. “Since Friday, a 30-year-old page was turned. We’ve fallen into dictatorship. For the first time in 30 years there have been grass-roots demonstrations with millions of people, and these demonstrations stand as a proof that people want democracy.”

His daughter Samira, also a filmmaker, said, “Until Friday we had 80 percent dictatorship and 20 percent democracy, and since Friday we have 100 percent dictatorship.”

news20090620NYT2

2009-06-20 16:48:45 | Weblog
[Today's Newspaper] from [The New York Times]

[Middle East]
Iran Police Said to Disperse Protesters
By NAZILA FATHI and SHARON OTTERMAN
Published: June 20, 2009

TEHRAN — One day after Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei warned of bloodshed if street protests continued over the nation’s disputed elections, witnesses, quoted by news services, said that thousands of demonstrators had attempted to gather for a scheduled opposition protest on Saturday, but that riot police, using tear gas and water cannons, had dispersed them.

Witnesses reported that the black-clad security forces lined the streets of two squares in central Tehran as the city braced itself for a violent crackdown. State television, meanwhile, reported that two people had been wounded at a bomb blast at the Tehran shrine of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini. The report could not be independently confirmed.

There had been varying reports in the hours leading up to the rally about whether it would be called off in the face of the state’s threatened crackdown. State television reported that the leading opposition candidate, Mir Hussein Moussavi, had called off the protest, but some of his supporters, posting on social networking sites, urged demonstrators to gather.

State television had reported that a reformist group called the Combatant Clerics Assembly had called off the rally, saying that “permission was asked to hold a rally, but since it has not been issued, there will be no rally held.”

Initial reports seemed to indicate that fewer than the hundreds of thousands that had appeared for other protests this week, because of heavy intimidation. Journalists were banned from leaving their offices to report on the protests: A reporter from an American news organization said she had been called by a member of the paramilitary Basij militia warning her not to go to the venue for the Saturday rally because the situation would be dangerous and there could be fatalities.

The authorities were also reported to have renewed an offer of a partial recount of the ballots in the disputed election — an offer that the opposition has previously rejected.

In a long and hard-line sermon on Friday, Ayatollah Khamenei declared the June 12 election of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad valid and warned that demonstration leaders “would be responsible for bloodshed and chaos” if protesters continue, as they have pledged, to flood the streets in defiance of the government.

The tough words seemed to dash hopes for a peaceful solution to what defeated candidates and protesters call a fraudulent election last week, plunging Iran into its gravest crisis since the Islamic Revolution in 1979.

Iran’s National Security Council reinforced the warning Saturday, Iran’s Labor News Agency, or ILNA, and other state media reported, telling Mr. Moussavi to “refrain from provoking illegal rallies.”

The demand came in a letter from the head of the council, Abbas Mohtaj, after a formal complaint by Mr. Moussavi that law enforcement agencies had failed to protect protesters.

“It is your duty not to incite and invite the public to illegal gatherings; otherwise, you will be responsible for its consequences," the letter said, according to state media.

Ahmad Reza Radan, a senior police officer, warned on state television that the police “will act with determination against all illegal demonstrations and protests.”

Regional analysts said that, by calling for an end to the demonstrations, Ayatollah Khamenei had raised the stakes significantly, invoking his own prestige and that of Iran’s clerical regime.

In a measure of the scale of the opposition’s complaints, one losing candidate in the June 12 election, Mohsen Rezai, a conservative former commander of the Revolutionary Guards, claimed to have won between 3.5 and 7 million votes compared to the 250,000 accorded to him in the first announcement of results a week ago, state-run Press TV reported Saturday.

And, in a sign of mixed signals emerging from the authorities, the English-language network also reported Saturday that Ibrahim Yazdi, a former foreign minister who leads an organization called Freedom Movement, had been released after being detained in a hospital earlier in the week. Several opposition figures, journalists and analysts were detained during a week of defiance that brought forth an array of official measures — part conciliatory, part repressive — to try to stem the protests.

On Saturday, the authorities also invited the three opposition candidates to attend a meeting with the 12-member Guardian Council, an authoritative panel of clerics which oversees and certifies election results. But only one candidate — Mr. Rezai — attended, Press TV said.

The panel has been presented with 646 complaints of electoral irregularities, the authorities have said.

Mr. Moussavi has expressed mistrust of the panel, accusing some of its members of campaigning before the election for Mr. Ahmadinejad.

Press TV quoted Abbas Ali Kadkhodaei, the Council’s spokesman, as saying the body was investigating complaints including shortages and delays in the supply of ballot papers, the denial of access to polling stations by candidates’ representatives and intimidation and bribery of voters.

Press TV also quoted Mr. Kadkhodaei as saying the council was ready to recount a randomly-chosen 10 percent of the ballot in the presence of the candidates — an offer, initially made earlier in the week, that falls far short of the protesters’ demands for new elections.

“Although the Guardian Council is not legally obliged,” Mr. Kadkhodaei was quoted as saying, “we are ready to recount 10 percent of the ballot boxes randomly in the presence of representatives of the candidates.”

But if other officials were trying to sound conciliatory, there was no such note in Ayatollah Khamenei’s sermon Friday.

“Although the Guardian Council is not legally obliged,” Mr. Kadkhodaei was quoted as saying, “we are ready to recount 10 percent of the ballot boxes randomly in the presence of representatives of the candidates.”

But if other officials were trying to sound conciliatory, there was no such note in Ayatollah Khamenei’s sermon Friday.

“Flexing muscles on the streets after the election is not right,” he said, before tens of thousands of angry supporters at Tehran University. “It means challenging the elections and democracy. If they don’t stop, the consequences of the chaos would be their responsibility.”

The sermon put Ayatollah Khamenei, who prefers to govern quietly and from behind the scenes, at the forefront of a confrontation not only among factions of the government but among Iranians themselves.

It also presents Mr. Moussavi, whom the opposition says was the real winner of last Friday’s elections, with a fateful choice. The former prime minister and long-time insider must decide whether to escalate his challenge to Iran’s supreme leader and risk a bloody showdown, or abandon his support for a popular uprising that his candidacy inspired.

Ayatollah Khamenei also used his sermon to try to tamp down factional disputes among the elite, at one point even chastising pro-government militias and President Ahmadinejad for their role in the crisis.

On Monday, a crowd that the mayor of Tehran estimated at three million rallied for the first of four days, and Ayatollah Khamenei ordered an investigation into the election results, which declared Mr. Ahmadinejad the winner, with 63 percent to Mr. Moussavi’s 34 percent.

But the ayatollah said Friday that there was nothing to discuss, as he again endorsed the victory of Mr. Ahmadinejad, seated in the audience, and called the elections “an epic moment that has become a historic moment.” He dismissed allegations of fraud.

“Perhaps 100,000 votes, or 500,000, but how can anyone tamper with 11 million votes?” he asked as the crowd burst into laughter. “If the political elite ignore the law — whether they want it or not — they would be responsible for the bloodshed and chaos,” he said.

He added that foreign agents were behind the street unrests and that there were efforts to stage a “velvet revolution.”

“They thought Iran is Georgia,” he said, adding, “Their problem is that they don’t know this great nation yet.”

news20090620WP1

2009-06-20 15:58:58 | Weblog
[Today's Newspaper] fom [The Washington Post]

[Middle East > Iran]
Iran's Top Leader Endorses Election
Opposition Is Warned It Will Be Held Liable for Bloodshed From Protests

By Thomas Erdbrink and William Branigin
Washington Post Foreign Service
Saturday, June 20, 2009

TEHRAN, June 19 -- Iran's supreme leader on Friday put his full authority behind the reelection of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, rejecting allegations of vote fraud and declaring that foreign "enemies," including the United States, were behind a week of massive street demonstrations.

By placing his personal seal of approval on the election's official result, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei significantly raised the stakes for Iran's political opposition, which must now either concede the election or be seen as challenging the supreme leader himself. So far, opposition presidential candidate Mir Hossein Mousavi and his supporters have questioned the validity of the June 12 election but not the country's theocratic system of governance.

In a dramatic speech before thousands of worshipers at a Friday prayer service, Khamenei warned that the leaders of the protests will be held "directly responsible" for any bloodshed that results from continued demonstrations.

The prospect of a violent crackdown poses a quandary not only for the Iranian opposition but also for the Obama administration. U.S. officials said Khamenei's speech would not change President Obama's hands-off approach toward Iran's internal turmoil or his policy of seeking dialogue with Iran on its nuclear program and other critical issues. But they said that violent repression could force a reevaluation of Obama's overtures to Tehran.

Iran's government should "recognize that the world is watching," Obama said Friday in an interview with CBS News. How Iranian leaders "deal with people who are, through peaceful means, trying to be heard" will signal "what Iran is and is not," he said, adding that he was concerned by the "tenor and tone" of the supreme leader's speech.

Both the House of Representatives and the Senate overwhelmingly passed nonbinding resolutions expressing support for the rights of the Iranian demonstrators. Republicans sought to portray the votes as criticism of the president's response to the events in Iran, but the administration publicly welcomed the congressional action. "It's consistent with what the president has said," White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said.

Gibbs added, however, that the United States will continue to try to avoid entanglement in the Iranian debate.

"We're not going to be used as political foils and political footballs in a debate that's happening by Iranians in Iran," he said. "There are many people in the leadership that would love us to get involved, and would love to trot out the same old foils they have for many years. That's not what we're going to do.

"Our interests remain the same," Gibbs continued. "We're concerned about the Islamic republic living up to its responsibilities, as it relates to nuclear weapons."

In a sign hours after Khamenei's remarks that at least some Tehran residents rejected his warnings, people took to their rooftops after dark across the city and chanted slogans such as "Death to the dictator" and "Allahu akbar," or "God is great." Their chants were similar to those at rallies this week against Ahmadinejad and in favor of Mousavi. And the rooftop tactic recalled a method that was used to voice anti-government sentiment three decades ago, during the opposition movement that ultimately succeeded in ousting the shah of Iran.

Mousavi, who appeared at a massive demonstration in South Tehran on Thursday to back his demands that the election be annulled, has called for another march Saturday in downtown Tehran. The 67-year-old former prime minister did not attend Khamenei's speech and did not immediately react to it publicly.

Pro-Mousavi Web sites were not updated, leaving it unclear whether the demonstration would be canceled or go ahead as planned, setting up a potential confrontation if security forces are ordered to intervene.

But another opposition presidential candidate, Mehdi Karroubi, implicitly defied Khamenei's stand, publicly supporting Mousavi's position by calling on Iran's powerful Guardian Council on Friday to nullify the election and order another one. In an open letter to the council, which is charged with confirming the election results, Karroubi urged its members to "accept the will of the nation" and throw out results announced by the Interior Ministry showing a landslide win for Ahmadinejad. The council has said it would investigate irregularities supported by evidence, but it has ruled out annulling the election.

Khamenei, 69, a Shiite Muslim cleric who holds ultimate political and religious authority under Iran's theocratic system, emphatically backed that view Friday. He told tens of thousands of people who spilled out of a covered pavilion at Tehran University that the election is over, and he expressed confidence in the vote tallies.

"Some of our enemies in different parts of the world intended to depict this absolute victory, this definitive victory, as a doubtful victory," he said. "It is your victory. They cannot manipulate it.

"The competition is over," he declared in response to calls for nullification. "Over 40 million people voted; they voted for the Islamic republic.

"The margin between the candidates is 11 million votes," Khamenei continued. "If it is 500,000, maybe fraud could be of influence. But for 11 million, how can you do that?"

He said the protests would not change the Iranian system.

In a warning to protest organizers, the supreme leader said, "If the elite breaks laws, they will be held responsible for violence and bloodshed."

He warned Iranians not to cause problems, because "Iran is at a sensitive juncture." And he asserted that foreign governments, especially the United States and Britain, were encouraging the opposition.

"American officials' remarks about human rights and limitations on people are not acceptable because they have no idea about human rights after what they have done in Afghanistan and Iraq and other parts of the world," Khamenei said. "We do not need advice over human rights from them."

Khamenei said the Guardian Council is looking into complaints of voting fraud. The council, a 12-member panel of senior Islamic clergy and jurists, has invited the four presidential candidates to a meeting Saturday to discuss their concerns about the balloting.

But Khamenei's comments rejecting significant irregularities appeared to preempt the council's probe. As Khamenei arrived to lead the Friday prayers, a sea of fists punched the air, and thousands of supporters roared their greetings: "Our blood in our veins is for you, O Leader!" Khamenei smiled, raising his hand, which was resting on the barrel of a gun, to calm the audience.

High officials sat cross-legged on a green carpet in a cordoned-off area in front of the stage. A choir of young men in suits sang a cappella. The rows quickly filled up with turbaned clerics, members of Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps and influential politicians.

The crowd cheered as Ahmadinejad came in, late. Khamenei nodded at him as the president bowed forward with his hand on his chest. Ahmadinejad occupied a place of honor, sitting just behind the spot where Khamenei would lead the prayers.

Banners hanging from the pavilion roof bore messages such as "Don't speak to us with the tongue of old imperialism, BBC" and "Westerners get away from us."

In Washington, a senior administration figure called Khamenei's speech "a significant statement," adding, "The question is what becomes of it." He said that the protest movement has "taken on a life of its own" but that where it goes next remains unclear.

Another official dismissed criticism of Obama from U.S. conservatives who want him to publicly endorse the demonstrations. "I don't think we feel a lot of pressure to go a different way," the official said. "We're trying to promote a foreign policy that advances our interests, not that makes us feel good about ourselves."

A third official said the events in Iran were part of regional changes, noting the opposition's movement from preelection concerns about the Iranian economy to what could become a challenge to the country's theocratic system. "I think something bigger is going on," the official said, citing the recent defeat of the Hezbollah-led coalition in Lebanese elections and the sight of "people bravely speaking their minds in Iran."

The administration officials all emphasized that they want to keep the United States out of the Iranian debate. But, as one noted, "the United States has an important place in their historical narrative."

Obama has repeatedly denied that the United States is "meddling" in Iranian politics. But in an interview with CNBC on Tuesday, Obama said he hoped "the regime responds not with violence, but with a recognition that the universal principles of peaceful expression and democracy are ones that should be affirmed."

Khamenei on Friday compared Obama's comments about Iran to the tragic conclusion of the Branch Davidian standoff with federal agents in Waco, Tex., during President Bill Clinton's administration. The leader of that group, David Koresh, and at least 74 supporters died in a fire at their compound. A federal probe concluded that the Davidians committed suicide, but survivors said it was started by tear gas rounds fired by government agents into the buildings.

CONTINUED ON 20090620WP2

news20090620WP2

2009-06-20 15:40:13 | Weblog
[Today's Newspaper] fom [The Washington Post]

[Middle East > Iran]
Iran's Top Leader Endorses Election
Opposition Is Warned It Will Be Held Liable for Bloodshed From Protests

By Thomas Erdbrink and William Branigin
Washington Post Foreign Service
Saturday, June 20, 2009

CONTINUED FROM news20090620WP1

"People affiliated with the Davidians were burned alive," Khamenei said. "You were responsible -- the Democrats. The administration was angered and 80 were burned. And do you know the true meaning of human rights? The Islamic Republic of Iran is the flag-bearer of human rights. We defend the oppressed."

news20090620GDN

2009-06-20 14:30:16 | Weblog
[Environment] from [guardian.co.uk]

[Whaling]
Europe to hunt more whales than Japan, figures show
(クジラの捕獲量 ヨーロッパ 日本より多いことが判明)
Europeans are killing whales in increasing numbers as Norway, Denmark and Iceland propose to hunt 1,478 whales compared to Japan's 1,280 in 2009

John Vidal, environment editor
guardian.co.uk, Friday 19 June 2009 15.49 BST
Article history

Europe plans to hunt more whales than Japan for the first time in many years, dividing EU countries and dismaying conservationists who say that whaling is escalating in response to the worldwide recession.

Figures seen by the Guardian before a meeting of more than 80 countries next week, show that Norway, Denmark and Iceland propose to hunt 1,478 whales compared to Japan's 1,280 in 2009. This would be an increase of nearly 20% by Europe on last year.

"Europe likes to point the finger at Japan as a rogue whaling nation but Europeans are killing whales in increasing numbers in their own waters. Europe has become whale enemy number one", said Kate O'Connell, campaigner for the Whale and Dolphin Conservation Society (WDCS).

Iceland – which today began its 2009 hunt by killing the first two of 150 fin whales – and Norway, are the only two countries to hunt whales commercially. This breaches a 23-year-old worldwide moratorium introduced to preserve critically endangered whale populations.

This year, Norway proposes to kill 885 minke whales, and Iceland 350 whales in total. Denmark will apply to hunt 245 on behalf of indigenous Inuit hunters in its semi-autonomous territory Greenland. Most of the whale meat caught in European waters will be sold to Japan.

Japan, which practises thinly disguised commercial whaling under the guise of scientific research, plans to kill 850 whales in Antarctic waters this season, as well as more than 400 in the Pacific. It wants to kill fewer whales than last year but is seeking permission to hunt more in its coastal waters.

Britain today increased diplomatic pressure on Iceland to stop its whaling, warning that it intended to make it a condition of the country's expected application to join the EU that it abandon commercial whaling. Fisheries minister Huw Irranca-Davies said: "If Iceland were to join Europe then Britain would expect they would be obliged to end their whaling operation. We would urge renegotiation."

A spokesman for the new Iceland government said: "The government has said it will honour this year's quota but will reassess the whaling situation by the end of the year. A study is being done by the economic institute of the University of Iceland. Whaling will obviously be part of the talks when Iceland negotiates its entry to the EU."

An independent economic report commissioned by conservation groups WWF and WDCS released today in advance of the International whaling commission (IWC) summit in Madeira, concludes that whaling is no longer economically viable.

Japan, it claimed, has spent $164m (£100m) backing its whaling industry since 1988, and Norwegian subsidies equal almost half of the gross value of all whale-meat landings. Sales of whale meat, blubber, and other whale products in Japan "have made financial losses for most of the last 20 years", it said.

The research says that killing more whales will only hurt the growing whale-watching industry, and damage the international image of Norway and Japan. "Norway and Japan are hurting tourism, a potential growth industry in both countries in order to spend millions of dollars obtaining whale meat, the sale of which makes no profit. How much longer are they going to keep wasting their taxpayer's money?" said a spokeswoman for WWF.

Earlier this year more than 115,000 people pledged to visit Iceland as soon as the government announced an end to whaling.

The number of pro- and anti-whaling countries are finely balanced within the IWC, with both sides continuing to recruit as many countries as possible to boost their positions. Japan in the past has offered many small countries development aid to vote with them, but Britain and other countries have also leaned on eastern European countries to join.

Australia and New Zealand said this week that they would mount a non-lethal whale research expedition to the Antarctic, as a direct challenge to Japan's research programme, which maintains it must kill whales to study them. The six-week expedition aims to prove that whales needn't be killed for study, the two governments said in a joint statement.

The IWC meeting is being held amidst are fears that environment groups are stepping up campaigns to stop whaling. A previously unknown Norwegian group called Agenda 21 attacked a whaling ship in April, bringing to six the number of whaling boats sabotaged in Norway.

Sea Shepherd, a radical California-based group which has admitted sabotaging whalers in Iceland and elsewhere, has also threatened to return to Europe.

Today , the Icelandic whaling ship Hvalur 9 returned to the Hvalfjord whaling station to process its first catch.

FLASHPOINTS

GREENLAND: The semi-autonomous Danish territory wants to hunt 50 endangered fin whales for indigenous consumption, but most of the meat will be sold to Japan

RUSSIA: Oil companies on the Sakhalin peninsular in the far east of Russia threaten feeding grounds of critically endangered whales

NORWAY: The Lofoten islands are the centre of Norwegian whaling, but also target of anti-whaling groups

ANTARCTICA: The entire sea around Antarctica has been declared a whale sanctuary but Japan regularly hunts whales there

ICELAND: Government may be forced to stop whaling if it wants to joins EU


[Renewable Energy]
Denmark to power electric cars by wind in vehicle-to-grid experiment
(デンマーク V2Gで風力の電力を電気自動車に充電)
The project will use electric car batteries to store excess energy and feed electricity back into the grid when the weather is calm

Duncan Graham-Rowe
guardian.co.uk, Friday 19 June 2009 16.33 BST
Article history

Cars could be the solution to the intermittent nature of wind power if a multimillion European project beginning on a Danish island proves successful.

The project on the holiday island of Bornholm will use the batteries of parked electric cars to store excess energy when the wind blows hard, and then feed electricity back into the grid when the weather is calm.

The concept, known as vehicle-to-grid (V2G) is widely cited among greens as a key step towards a low-carbon future, but has never been demonstrated. Now, the 40,000 inhabitants of Bornholm are being recruited into the experiment. Denmark is already a world leader in wind energy and has schemes to replace 10% of all its vehicles with electric cars, but the goal on the island is to replace all petrol cars.

Currently 20% of the island's electricity comes from wind, even though it has enough turbines installed to meet 40% of its needs. The reason it cannot use the entire capacity is the intermittency of the wind: many turbines are needed to harness sufficient power in breezes, but when gales blow the grid would overload, so some turbines are disconnected.

So the aim of the awkwardly named Electric Vehicles in a Distributed and Integrated Market using Sustainable Energy and Open Networks Project – Edison for short – is to use V2G to allow more turbines to be built and provide up to 50% of the island's supply without making the grid crash.

Each electric vehicle will have battery capacity reserved to store wind power for the island rather than for travelling. This means it acts like a buffer, says Dieter Gantenbein, a researcher at IBM's Zurich Research Laboratory. IBM is developing the software needed for the island's smart grid, and will showcase its work next week. When the cars are plugged in and charging their batteries, they will absorb any additional load the grid cannot cope with and then feed it back to power homes when needed, he says.

"It's never been tried at this scale," says Hermione Crease of Cambridge-based Sentec, which develops smart grid software. There are plenty of smart grid trials already under way, usually involving the use of software to monitor and manage supply and demand, for example, by temporarily switching off industrial cooling units during periods of peak load, she says. But unlike these so-called "negawatt" approaches, proving that cars can be used as part of the grid has yet to attempted.

Andrew Howe of RLTec in London, another smart grid technology firm, says many important questions need answers. It is not clear, for example, how the cost and lifetime of batteries will influence the economics of such a system.

These are the kinds of issue the project seeks to shed light on, says the project manager Jørgen Christensen of the Danish Energy Association, which with technology companies Siemens and Dong and the government are running the scheme.

news20090620SAM

2009-06-20 12:27:32 | Weblog
[Environment] from [Scientific American Magazine]

[Automotive Technology]
June 19, 2009 | 1 comments
Diesel Trucks and Buses Get Cleaner
(ディーゼルトラック、バスのクリーン化進む)
Particulates drop sharply, nitrogen oxides next to improve

By Robin Bravender

Manufacturers of heavy-duty diesel engines have slashed emissions from new engines by more than 90 percent for most pollutants, according to a study released yesterday.

New pollution control technologies that were developed in response to U.S. EPA regulations have led to the steep declines in pollution, according to the study [pdf]. For several major pollutants, emissions were reduced even more steeply than federal law required.

"The important message is to see how clean these diesel engines are," said Joe Suchecki, a spokesman for the Engine Manufacturers Association. The technologies that have been developed "are just working tremendously well, and they're very effective in reducing the [particulate matter] and all the hydrocarbons and the air toxics to near zero levels," he said.

The report is the first phase of a five-year study directed by the Health Effects Institute and conducted by the Coordinating Research Council. The study was sponsored by a range of groups, including the Energy Department, EPA, the Engine Manufacturers Association and the American Petroleum Institute.

EPA's 2001 highway diesel rule required manufacturers to steeply cut engine emissions of soot- and smog-forming pollutants for engines sold after January 2007. The rules apply to heavy-duty highway engines, such as those used in trucks and buses.

Researchers found that emissions of fine particulate matter, or soot, were about 99 percent lower than soot emissions allowed from engines manufactured in 2004. Soot emissions were also 90 percent lower than the new 2007 standard requires. Pollution from carbon monoxide, hydrocarbons and a number of air toxics had also declined by more than 90 percent since 2004 levels and was significantly lower than required levels, the report says.

"The manufacturers outdid themselves in over-complying with the standards for carbon monoxide, hydrocarbons and particulate matter," said Dan Greenbaum, president of the Health Effects Institute, an independent research organization funded jointly by EPA and industry.

NOx emissions were about 70 percent lower than past levels and 10 percent below the EPA requirement. Manufacturers will be required to slash NOx output by another 80 percent for engines sold after Jan. 1, 2010.

"Obviously we have work to do on the NOx standard, which is coming up at the end of this year, and engine manufacturers are in the process of getting that technology developed and available," Suchecki said.

Reprinted from Greenwire with permission from Environment & Energy Publishing, LLC. www.eenews.net, 202-628-6500


[Technology]
June 19, 2009 | 0 comments

Human-Powered Subs Start Your 'Engines'
(人力による潜水艦 若人のエンジン作動開始)
Student submariners gather at the Naval Surface Warfare Center in Maryland to compete in a race that tests their engineering skills—and ability to pedal under water

By Larry Greenemeier

A group of budding engineers will be diving, splashing and swimming in the pool next week for the first time this summer. The difference between them and a lot of other high school and college students is the pool: an in-ground, freshwater basin that is about 3,000 feet (914.4 meters) long, 51 feet (15.5 meters) wide, and 22 feet (6.7 meters) deep at the Naval Surface Warfare Center in Bethesda, Md. The occasion is this year's International Human-Powered Submarine Race.

Twenty-one teams from around the world compete to see whose submarine can cut through the water fastest using a hull and propulsion system designed and built by the students. Each sub will have one or two pilots onboard who use pedals or some other propulsion system to guide their vessel across the 328-foot (100-meter) submerged racecourse the fastest. (Only one sub races the course at a time.)

"I'll have 300 kids there," says Claude Brancart, the competition's head judge and chairman of the Foundation for Underwater Research and Education (FURE), the Brunswick, Maine-based not-for-profit that organizes the competition and promotes marine science education. "I want to give an award for someone who breaks the 10-knot [11.5 miles per hour] barrier."

The fastest speed so far in the competition's 20-year history came during the 2007 competition, when a University of Quebec team reached 8.035 knots with its Omer 5 sub.

More than accolades, the competition teaches students about the challenges and rewards of engineering. One of the most important lessons the students can learn is the importance of the design, says Chris Land, engineering technology teacher at Sussex County Technical School, a high school in Sparta, N.J. He says he will give students "two extra months to design something if it means [they will] get it right the first time."

Land is also the project mentor for the Sussex Technical team, which has competed in each race since 2003 (the races are held every other year). Land's students use the preparation for the race as their senior-year project, and he has been impressed with their commitment to designing a sub that one or more of the students will pilot in an actual competition against college-age students. Sussex Technical is one of the few high schools that competes. Student pilots and support divers must become scuba certified in order to compete. Land himself is a certified diver and former submariner with the U.S. Navy.

Although the school won first place in the 2007 competition's innovation category for a linear drive propulsion system that converted back and forth motion of the pilot's arms and legs into continuous rotary motion to propel the sub, it was not a very efficient system and the vessel topped out at less than 1.7 knots.

"The only thing that's not new this year is the shape of the hull," Land says. "Last year, we had a lot of mechanical difficulties and couldn't get the hull up to speed."

This time around, the propulsion system relies on tried-and-true bicycle-style pedals. They power a blade in the water that the pilot can adjust to reduce drag. "It's a variable-pitch propeller, which is like having gears on a bike," Land says. In addition, all of the controls (including the rudder) are enabled by electronically controlled servos—much like a remote control car that can be controlled by a joystick.

Many of Land's students have gone on to study engineering, and one of the things he is most proud of is that most of those students do not change majors during their college careers. "If college is averaging $35,000 per year," he says, "what's it worth for a student to know what they want to do and not change their mind in the middle of it?"

As usual, Land's kids will face a tough field that includes entries from major U.S. universities from and international teams from Canada, England, Mexico and Venezuela.

news20090620NTR

2009-06-20 11:46:19 | Weblog
[naturenews] from [nature.com]

[naturenews]
Published online 19 June 2009 | Nature | doi:10.1038/news.2009.583
News: Q&A
The virus spy
Yan Li talks about spotting the novel swine flu virus at Canada's National Microbiology Laboratory.

Hannah Hoag

On 17 April, Canada's National Microbiology Laboratory in Winnipeg, Manitoba, was called in to help diagnose a cluster of cases of serious respiratory illness of unknown cause in Mexico. This was molecular virologist Yan Li's forte; his team was the first to identify and report the SARS coronavirus in Canada during the 2003 outbreak. Hannah Hoag talks to Li and to the laboratory's scientific director Frank Plummer about being the first to identify the Mexican virus as influenza, and about the laboratory's research into swine flu.

When you were first told about the disease outbreak in Mexico, what did you think you might be dealing with? Were you concerned that it might be another SARS?

Yan Li: Initially, it seemed that it wasn't influenza. The Mexicans were testing for it and not finding it. We thought that it might be another new pathogen, or even SARS. We are prepared to detect every possible respiratory pathogen, including influenza. First, we confirmed it was influenza using molecular diagnostic tests. But if it hadn't been, we could have tested for more than 20 other respiratory pathogens.

Frank Plummer: Our unknown pathogen protocol uses genetics, culture, microscopy and metagenomic approaches. But Yan's PCR, which targets the highly conserved matrix gene of the influenza virus, came up positive very quickly. By then we knew about the issue in the United States, and the matrix gene sequence was similar to what was being reported in California.

At what point did you realize that you were dealing with an influenza virus with pandemic potential?

Li: We had 51 samples, and 17 were positive for influenza A. I think that was when we started to worry. We've been talking about pandemic planning for years. We have been preparing laboratories for diagnosis and to identify any unknown or novel pandemic strains. It's our job. In this case, we initially thought it was an unknown respiratory pathogen, but then the samples were positive for influenza. We were excited, and we also felt that our work had paid off — we were prepared. We had been working for 10 years to be prepared. In the flu lab we had about 14 people including myself working around the clock.

Plummer: There was some dread too. We had been through this with SARS and that was exhausting. You're excited, but you have to be careful what you wish for.

Do you believe the World Health Organization acted appropriately in declaring pandemic phase 6 when it did?

Plummer: I think they did it appropriately. It probably met the technical definition of a pandemic sometime before. There is debate about whether severity needs to be included or not.

What additional influenza research is the laboratory doing now?

Plummer: One of the key questions here is the severity. Can the virus or host genetics account for that? We're genotyping the virus, looking for polymorphisms and correlating the genome sequences with the clinical outcomes. There's nothing new to report yet. Getting the data from Mexico has been a challenge because it is spread around different databases, but we'll get there. We're also starting to do some studies on the more severe cases we're seeing in Manitoba now [including those in First Nations communities].

Li: We are also performing animal studies to look at the pathogenicity of the virus. With time, we are closely monitoring antiviral susceptibility and the antigenic/genetic changes of the novel viral isolates,

One worry is that the virus will pick up genes from other influenzas and become more resistant to drugs or develop other dangerous features. Have you seen signs of reassortment with seasonal influenza or H5N1?

Li: Nothing yet. [The National Microbiology Laboratory receives about 10% of the isolates — the unusual ones — tested in Canada's provincial laboratories.] We are looking for antiviral resistance using genetic analysis, the most important assay to pick up any new mutations.

For more of Nature's swine flu coverage, see www.nature.com/swineflu

[naturenews]
Published online 18 June 2009 | Nature | doi:10.1038/news.2009.580
News
Drug quells anxiety in early trials
Angst-fighting compound lacks side effects of current treatments.

Heidi Ledford

A compound that stimulates the production of certain steroids in the brain may one day soothe the troubled nerves of people with anxiety disorders, according to results from a small clinical trial.

The compound boosts the activity of a 'translocator' protein inside cells that helps transport cholesterol molecules and allows some to be turned into steroids that act in the brain. These 'neurosteroids' regulate the effect of a relaxation-promoting molecule called GABA, and are associated with reduced anxiety. Levels of the neurosteroids plummet during panic attacks.

The compound has so far been tested only in a small clinical trial, but if it survives further testing, it could fill a need for better anxiety treatments. Patients with anxiety disorders have a range of symptoms, from recurrent and debilitating panic attacks to a more general sense of social anxiety. And some people use medication to quell acute phobias, such as a fear of flying or of public speaking.

"It's not that we don't have treatments, but the available treatments suffer from undesirable adverse effects," says Jerrold Rosenbaum, chief of psychiatry at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston. One class of drugs, called benzodiazepines, act quickly and are highly effective, but can cause drowsiness. Some users also develop a tolerance to them, and the withdrawal symptoms can be worse than the disorder itself, explains Rosenbaum. "A drug that worked nearly as well as the benzodiazepines without their unwanted side effects would be quite a big winner."

Antidepressants called selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors are also used to treat anxiety but must be taken for several weeks before they have an effect. These, too, have unwanted side effects such as weight gain and sexual dysfunction and they work in only around a third of patients, Rosenbaum says. In some people, they can actually worsen anxiety.

High anxiety

Psychiatrist Rainer Rupprecht of the Ludwig Maximilians University in Munich, Germany, and his colleagues decided to try a different approach. They knew that compounds that bind to and activate the translocator protein can soothe anxiety in rodents. So they tested one such compound, called XBD173, and found that rats that received the drug were less anxious than those that received a placebo and did not become tolerant.

Rupprecht and his colleagues then enrolled 71 healthy men in a clinical trial of the drug. The volunteers were treated for one week with either a placebo, various doses of XBD173, or the clinically approved anti-anxiety drug alprazolam. To test responses to panic, the volunteers were then treated with a peptide that induces a short-term feeling of panic, complete with the pounding heart and soaring blood pressure associated with panic attacks. Those who received alprazolam and the highest dose of XBD173 reported less anxiety than those who received the placebo and XBD173 also caused less drowsiness and fewer withdrawal symptoms than alprazolam. The results are reported in Science1.

Although this approach has been used before to test anti-anxiety drugs, Rupprecht says that there is no guarantee that XBD173 will work against naturally occurring panic attacks in humans.The drug-induced anxiety lasts only for a few minutes, and neurosteroid changes after treatment with the peptide do not always mimic those that occur during natural panic attacks.

Rosenbaum, meanwhile, cautions that although the results are promising, many drugs that perform well in early clinical trials go on to produce unexpected adverse side effects when tested in longer treatment regimens or at higher doses. "Over the past twenty years, we have had a variety of molecules emerge in the literature with this kind of promise, but on further review they failed to live up to that promise," he says. "It's still premature to celebrate a victory."

The compound may have other uses, too. The translocator protein to which it binds has been implicated in other processes, such as reducing inflammation in the brain and promoting neural repair after injury, notes Tomas Guilarte of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health in Baltimore, Maryland.

"In the past few years there has been increased interest in developing ligands that bind to this receptor and activate neurosteroid synthesis," says Guilarte. "Researchers in other groups would be very interested in getting hold of this compound to test for effects other than treatment of anxiety."

References
1. Rupprecht, R. et al. Science advance online publication doi:10.1126/Science.1175055 (2009).

news20090620SLT

2009-06-20 09:34:48 | Weblog
[Today's Paper] from [Slate Magazine]

Ayatollah Khameini Affirms Election, Warns Demonstrators
By David Sessions
Posted Saturday, June 20, 2009, at 5:25 AM ET

Battle lines are drawn for another intense, potentially bloody day in Tehran, Iran, where protests against alleged government vote-rigging have raged all week. All of the U.S. newspapers lead with yesterday's "final word" from Ayatollah Ali Khameini, Iran's supreme leader, who told a throng at Friday prayer that the election result is final and that the opposition will be held "directly responsible" for the violence the regime will unleash on any further demonstrations. Khameini condemned killings by pro-government loyalists this week but made it clear that he supports the re-election of incumbent Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

The crowd "burst into laughter," the New York Times (NYT) reports, when the Ayatollah insisted in his "hard-line" speech that the huge margin between President Ahmadinejad and opposition candidate Mir Hussein Mousavi was too large for foul play. "Perhaps 100,000 votes, or 500,000, but how can anyone tamper with 11 million votes?" The Washington Post (WP) calls Khameini's sermon "dramatic," and the story's lede focuses on his declaration that the protests are the work of Western nations, including the United States and Britain. The Los Angeles Times (LAT) fills in the strange happenings at the end of the speech, when the Ayatollah "began lamenting his physical condition and weeping," apparently a sort of signal to loyalists to crack down on demonstrators. The Basij, the government's plainclothes volunteer militia, has "already been deployed to the streets," the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) adds.

Plans for a Saturday protest seem to be going forward, though the WP notes many opposition Web sites weren't updated yesterday afternoon, and no one knows whether Mousavi will attend. The WSJ calls the situation a "test of the opposition's resolve"; whether to continue calling for demonstrations is a difficult decision for Mousavi since the regime has promised violence to any of his supporters it catches in the streets. But whether or not their candidate shows up, many of the "green army" will be there. One 29-year-old woman, who the LAT saw sobbing through Khameini's speech, said she would be marching no matter the cost: "This is how countries that have freedom and democracy get it. They have to fight and die for it."

The Ayatollah's speech had reverberations in Washington, where both houses of Congress "overwhelmingly" passed resolutions condemning the Iranian government's violence toward the demonstrators. Republicans used the votes to "press the White House to take sides"—Sen. John McCain said the demonstrators are waiting for a show of U.S. support—but President Obama had no official comment on the speech. "We're not going to be used as political foils and political footballs in a debate that's happening by Iranians in Iran," press secretary Robert Gibbs said. But administration officials said events this weekend—namely whether or not Iran carries out its violent threats—would determine whether the president joins European leaders in a harsher condemnation.

Front-page stories in the WP and LAT report on high unemployment numbers. At above 10 percent, the District of Columbia is at its highest unemployment rate since 1983; at 11.5 percent, the state of California is at its highest rate since record-keeping began. Government jobs in D.C. typically keep its population insulated from economic downturns, but the District has a high number of low-income, low-skilled workers who aren't qualified for most of the new D.C. jobs created under the new administration. (Those positions go to more educated residents of bordering Virginia and Maryland.) California's unemployment is hitting men especially hard: Three out of four people who have lost their jobs since December 2007 are men, a phenomenon unnamed experts awkwardly call a "mancession."

Republican Sen. John Ensign is accusing his former mistress's husband of making "exorbitant demands for cash and other financial benefits," a story you'll find only in today's WP. Ensign's office said the senator's revelation of his affair with Cynthia Hampton had nothing to do with her husband's cash demands but came after Doug Hampton detailed his wife's affair with Ensign in a letter to Fox News anchor Megyn Kelly.

We finally know what was wrong with Apple CEO Steve Jobs: He got a liver transplant in Tennessee a couple of months ago, is recovering well, and is expected to return to work at the end of June, a WSJ front-pager reveals. Jobs, 54, will likely work part-time for a period before resuming his full duties.

NYT film critic A.O. Scott reviews some choice examples of Iran's "historically rich movie culture," which has continued to flourish even under the hard-line Mahmoud Ahmadinejad: "You see class divisions, the cruelty of the state, the oppression of women and their ways of resisting it, traditions of generosity and hospitality, and above all a passion for argument."