GreenTechSupport GTS 井上創学館 IESSGK

GreenTechSupport News from IESSGK

news20090611BRT

2009-06-11 19:55:19 | Weblog
[Biography of the Day] from [Britannica]
Thursday, June 11, 2009
Jacques Cousteau
Born this day in 1910 was French naval officer and ocean explorer Jacques Cousteau, who conducted extensive undersea investigations, invented the Aqua-Lung, and wrote, produced, and appeared in films about the ocean.

[On This Day] from [Britannica]
Thursday, June 11, 2009
2001: Oklahoma City bomber executed
Timothy McVeigh—convicted of the bombing of a federal building in Oklahoma City on April 19, 1995, which killed 168 people in what was then the worst terrorist attack in the U.S.—was executed this day in 2001.

1927: American aviator Charles A. Lindbergh was awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross by U.S. President Calvin Coolidge.

news20090611JT

2009-06-11 18:06:20 | Weblog
[TODAY'S TOP STORIES] from [The Japan Times]

[NATIONAL NEWS]   see also news20090611GDN1 [Carbon Emissions]
Thursday, June 11, 2009
Aso pledges emissions cut of 15% by '20
'The cost of protecting the Earth'

By MASAMI ITO
Staff writer

Japan will try to cut greenhouse gas emissions by 15 percent from 2005 levels as its midterm target for 2020, Prime Minister Taro Aso announced Wednesday, claiming the goal is bolder than those put forward by Europe and the U.S.

Government officials say a 15 percent cut from 2005 is the equivalent of an 8 percent reduction from 1990 levels.

The government had originally aimed for a 14 percent cut, but Aso added a percentage point after Environment Minister Tetsuo Saito pushed for a more aggressive target.

The final figure means Aso has put more weight on global environment concerns than the demands of Japan's industry.

Holding a news conference in the early evening, Aso defended what he called an "ambitious" target.

"We must impose a certain level of burden on the public over this midterm goal," Aso said. "But that is the cost of protecting the Earth. Japan must be prepared to tackle the global warming issue with this firm resolve."

A government study panel proposed six options for the 2020 emissions target ranging from a 4 percent to 30 percent reduction from 2005 levels.

While Saito urged Aso to aim for a 21 percent to 30 percent cut from 2005 levels, Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry Toshihiro Nikai argued that the government should set the target with caution, taking into consideration the financial burden on the nation.

Business and labor leaders had been seeking a mere 4 percent cut, given the prospect that a higher reduction goal will hammer industries already struggling under the recession.

"I took the proposals (from business and labor) seriously," Aso said. "But we must lead the world in the 'low-carbon revolution.' To do this, shouldn't we take a step forward and double our efforts?"

The European Union's reduction goal is 20 percent compared with 1990 levels, which Aso said translates to a 13 percent cut if 2005 were used as the base year. U.S. President Barack Obama said he will aim to bring the greenhouse gas emissions level down to 1990 levels by 2020, which means about a 14 percent cut from 2005 levels, according to Japanese officials.

Aso stressed, however, that he will engage in international negotiations to ensure the target doesn't place Japan at a disadvantage.

"International equity is also important," Aso said. "If stringent obligations are imposed on Japan alone, companies and factories will move to other countries with lighter commitments."

The government already revealed its long-term goal, when Yasuo Fukuda was prime minister, of trying to cut emissions by 60 percent to 80 percent by 2050. On a global level, the Group of Eight leaders agreed last summer to halve emissions by 2050.


[BUSINESS NEWS]
Thursday, June 11, 2009
Producer price fall is fastest since '87

(Bloomberg) Japan's wholesale prices fell at the fastest pace in more than 22 years in May, adding to signs that deflation may again take root.

Producer prices, the costs firms pay for energy and raw materials, fell 5.4 percent from a year earlier, the biggest slide since March 1987, the Bank of Japan said Wednesday.

The median estimate of 29 economists surveyed by Bloomberg News was for a 5.1 percent decline.

Price falls will accelerate this year as demand weakens and oil trades at lower levels than in 2008, central bank policymakers have said. Rio Tinto Group, the world's second-largest iron-ore producer, agreed last month to charge less to Japanese steelmakers, the first reduction in seven years.

"Though we are seeing some signs of an economic recovery, we should assume price declines will worsen in the coming months," said Yoshiki Shinke, a senior economist at Dai-ichi Life Research Institute. "Japan is already in deflation."

The economy's output gap, a measure of the balance between demand and supply, fell 8.5 percent in the three months that ended March 31, the biggest decline since the government started tracking the data in 1980. Weakening demand is forcing some companies to give discounts to attract clients.

Rio Tinto agreed to a 33 percent cut in contract prices with steelmakers, including Nippon Steel Corp., JFE Holdings Inc. and Sumitomo Metal Industries Ltd.

The central bank's overseas commodity index, which shows changes in costs including oil, steel, copper and wheat, slid 43.4 percent in May from a year earlier.

Wholesale prices will probably sag 7.5 percent in the year to next March and 1.8 percent more in the next 12 months, Bank of Japan Policy Board members forecast in April.

Expectations of lower prices ahead may prompt companies and consumers to delay purchases, eroding profits and forcing firms to cut wages. That would threaten an economy that's only now starting to improve as industrial production and exports stabilize after unprecedented declines last quarter.

Consumer prices excluding fresh food, the BOJ's key gauge of inflation, fell for a second month in April and the costs companies pay for services slid for a seventh month.

Hidetoshi Kamezaki, a BOJ Policy Board member, last week said receding expectations of price increases "could lead to a deflationary spiral, which is very dangerous."

He said some companies are starting to narrow profit margins to secure sales and fewer consumers anticipate prices will rise.

Recent gains in oil prices "have a minimal knock-on effect on overall growth and inflation forecasts," said Tetsufumi Yamakawa, chief Japan economist at Goldman Sachs Group Inc.


[NATIONAL NEWS]
Thursday, June 11, 2009
Freed lifer: Apology is no solace

(Kyodo News) Prosecutors made a rare, but not face-to-face, apology Wednesday to a 62-year-old man freed last week from prison after being convicted of the 1990 murder of a 4-year-old girl in Ashikaga, Tochigi Prefecture, for which they now believe, based on a DNA retest, he did not commit.

"We are very sorry for indicting someone who is unlikely to have been the culprit and making him serve time in prison as a result," Tetsuo Ito, deputy chief of the Supreme Public Prosecutor's Office, said in a press conference.

Toshikazu Sugaya, who spent over 17 years serving a life sentence, was released from prison on June 4 after recent tests indicated his DNA did not match traces found on the murdered girl's clothes, contrary to the initial test results that led to his conviction in the kidnapping and strangulation of Mami Matsuda.

"Police and prosecutors should apologize before my very eyes," Sugaya said after learning of Ito's apology. "I can never forgive them."

Ito said he has instructed the Tokyo High Public Prosecutor's Office to cooperate so Sugaya's retrial can commence soon, the step needed to formally acquit him.

Sugaya has been demanding an apology from investigators and judges since his release, saying he wants his life back.

news20090611LAT

2009-06-11 17:35:08 | Weblog
[Today's Newspaper] from [Los Angeles Times]

[Top News]
Schwarzenegger threatens to shut down state government
The governor says that if a budget deal isn't reached, he won't approve emergency borrowing to tide California over.

By Shane Goldmacher
June 11, 2009

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger vowed Wednesday to let California government come to a "grinding halt" rather than agree to a high-interest loan to keep the state afloat if he and the Legislature do not close the yawning budget gap in coming weeks.

At the same time, the governor reversed himself on a proposal to end health insurance for families of police officers and firefighters who died in the line of duty. Schwarzenegger called the plan, first reported by The Times on Tuesday, a "terrible screw-up" that is being corrected.

The proposed cut was tucked away in a list of regulations that would be suspended if Schwarzenegger's latest budget revisions are adopted. It would have saved the state $1 million in 2009-10.

State finance officials say California coffers will be empty in late July unless the projected $24-billion budget shortfall is resolved quickly. Schwarzenegger said that emergency borrowing would be too expensive and that his threat to block it was necessary to prod lawmakers into swift action.

A loan would only "give them another reason why we don't have to do it now," the governor said. "What we need to do is just to basically cut off all the funding and just let them have a taste of what it is like when the state comes to a shutdown -- grinding halt."

The comments, made in an interview with The Times' editorial board, represent the governor's latest salvo in the battle over California's budget. An emergency loan -- not routine short-term borrowing but a longer-term, higher-interest loan -- would require the governor's approval but not that of the Legislature, unlike his proposed budget solutions. He approved the initial step for such borrowing last year and can revoke it at any time.

In the wide-ranging interview, Schwarzenegger challenged legislative Democrats to resist the influence of special interests fighting the deep program cuts he has proposed to help balance the budget.

Clearly alluding to labor unions that oppose the cuts, the governor said: "Do they want to protect the workers that provide the services, or do they want to protect the people that get those services? The choice is up to them."

Schwarzenegger reiterated his support for a constitutional convention to overhaul state government, calling it "the only hope that I have" for substantive reform. He also took aim at some other elected officials, characterizing them as obstructionists in his quest for change.

Mostly, however, he expressed frustration over the financial crisis that threatens to overshadow the final year and a half of his governorship.

All sides -- legislative Republicans, Democrats and the governor -- have pledged to plug California's deficit by the end of June. The new fiscal year begins July 1.

"We will meet the July 1 deadline," Senate leader Darrell Steinberg (D-Sacramento) said in an e-mail to The Times.

If lawmakers fall short of that goal, as they have many years, Schwarzenegger's refusal to borrow would leave the nation's most populous state with no way to pay its bills.

"Payment deferrals and IOUs -- that's all we would be left with," said Hallye Jordan, a spokeswoman for state Controller John Chiang, who monitors California's cash flow. Chiang reported Wednesday that the state's revenues have fallen $827 million below projections made only weeks ago.

Amid a cash crunch earlier this year, the state deferred some payments, including taxpayer refund checks. But California has not issued IOUs since the early 1990s.

Schwarzenegger has proposed slicing deep into public schools and eliminating college student grants, health insurance for 930,000 poor children and the state's welfare-to-work program. But the Democrats who dominate the Legislature have countered that they will not disassemble California's social safety net.

In the Senate, Democrats have sketched a counter-proposal that would drain the state's reserves and rely on hopes for a rosier economic future to hold off the deepest of the cuts. Their plan would resolve up to $20 billion of the projected $24-billion deficit.

The governor called that approach "hallucinatory" on Tuesday and "irresponsible" on Wednesday. "We have not hit the bottom" of the economic crisis, he told The Times.

Some rank-and-file Democrats are holding out hope of raising taxes to close the deficit. And the state's largest labor group, the Service Employees International Union, launched a $1-million TV advertising campaign Wednesday to press for more taxes on oil, tobacco and liquor.

Eliseo Medina, SEIU's national executive vice president, said the governor "ought to be worrying about trying to maintain services instead of trying to kill the messenger."

Support from some Republican lawmakers, most of whom have said no to further taxes, would be needed for such proposals to pass the Legislature.

Schwarzenegger said the financial crisis should be the impetus for a leaner and more functional state government. But he said he had no confidence in the Legislature to change the status quo and hoped a constitutional convention -- the radical notion of tossing out California's oft-amended legal framework to start from scratch -- would.

One area Schwarzenegger singled out: the array of elected statewide officials -- controller, treasurer, schools superintendent, etc. -- who can hail from different political parties and have different philosophies. The system was intended to create checks and balances, but the governor complained that the others sometimes get in his way.

"I say we should decrease the state employees' salaries, and the controller says, 'Nah, I don't think it's necessary,' " Schwarzenegger said, recalling a legal battle with Chiang that the governor eventually won.

"If I want to . . . create a vision for California, you can't have a team around that's trying to derail you," the governor said.

"I always get my lessons from sports," he said. "Look at the Lakers, look at all the great teams. When they are together and connected, then they have a better chance of winning."

news20090611NYT

2009-06-11 16:02:14 | Weblog
[Today's Newspaper] from [The New York Times]

[Business]
Treasury to Set Executives’ Pay at 7 Ailing Firms
By STEPHEN LABATON
Published: June 10, 2009

WASHINGTON — The Obama administration’s sweeping new proposal to restrict executive pay is likely to be a humbling exercise for seven of the nation’s largest companies, which have received billions of dollars in federal assistance to survive the economic crisis.

But for most other companies, the plan is expected to have only a marginal effect on pay practices for now.

The Treasury Department on Wednesday appointed a well-known Washington lawyer, Kenneth R. Feinberg, to oversee the compensation of employees at the seven companies — the American International Group, Citigroup, Bank of America, General Motors, Chrysler and the financing arms of the two automakers.

He will have broad discretion to set the salaries and bonuses for their five most senior executives and their 20 most highly paid employees.

The new plan also calls on Congress to adopt legislation that would let shareholders vote on pay levels and require public companies to strengthen the independence of board panels that set executive pay.

But for most companies — both those receiving taxpayer support and those that are not — the proposal is the result of a compromise that largely lets them off the hook. The rules reveal a strong reluctance among some of President Obama’s advisers to intrude more deeply into corporate boardrooms, government officials said.

The 10 large banks that received permission on Tuesday to exit the bank rescue program, for example, will face no mandatory changes to their compensation structures.

There is no such reluctance, however, when it comes to deeply troubled companies. The new rules illustrate the humiliating downfall of the once proud giants, now wards of the state whose leaders’ compensation will be set by a Washington paymaster.

From his nondescript office in Room 1310 of the Treasury building where he will serve with the unwieldy title of special master for compensation, Mr. Feinberg will set the salaries and bonuses of some of the top financiers and industrialists in America.

The list includes Vikram S. Pandit, the head of Citigroup, whose total pay came to $38 million in 2008; Kenneth D. Lewis, the chief executive of Bank of America, who last year received $9 million in total compensation; and Fritz Henderson, the chief executive of G.M., who got $8.7 million last year when he was president of the company.

While there is no salary cap at the seven companies, the plan offers an incentive for companies to adopt a voluntary cap. If they limit executive pay to no more than $500,000, Mr. Feinberg’s approval will be automatic.

Mr. Feinberg will also have the right to review the compensation for the 100 most highly paid employees and any other executives.

For other financial institutions that have received federal assistance, Mr. Feinberg will play an advisory role in establishing the overall compensation structure, but without setting the exact level of pay. The goal is to reduce excessive risk-taking by executives whose compensation is tied to company performance.

Mr. Feinberg will also determine whether it would be in the public interest to force executives at companies receiving assistance who might have been overpaid — for example, if their pay was based on revenue and profit that turned out to be illusory — to return the money.

“This financial crisis had many significant causes, but executive compensation practices were a contributing factor. Incentives for short-term gains overwhelmed the checks and balances meant to mitigate against the risk of excess leverage,” Timothy F. Geithner, the Treasury secretary, said Wednesday.

“By outlining these principles now, we begin the process of bringing compensation practices more tightly in line with the interests of shareholders and reinforcing the stability of firms and the financial system,” he added.

Rather than decide compensation levels at the seven companies himself, Mr. Geithner decided to appoint Mr. Feinberg, a mediator whose last major assignment was putting a financial value on the lives of victims of the Sept. 11 attacks.

Under the new rules, the seven companies will have 60 days to submit the pay packages of the 25 top executives. Mr. Feinberg would then have 60 days to review those plans.

In weighing the appropriateness of the pay, Mr. Feinberg is to consider such criteria as the profitability of the company, the general marketplace for compensation, the ability of the company to repay their taxpayer loan and the extent to which the pay packages encourage excessive risk-taking.

For the smaller institutions that remain in the Troubled Asset Relief Program, executives face some restrictions, but there are loopholes. Many of the new rules, for instance, will not apply to companies that received the relief funds before February — the vast majority of companies in the program.

The compensation and perks of executives at some of the companies receiving aid provoked a political firestorm this year. In revising a February proposal to set pay limits, the Obama administration has decided to leave the success or failure of its effort to tame excessive compensation largely to Mr. Feinberg. (Mr. Feinberg himself will not receive any compensation for his job.)

The latest plan tries to satisfy public demand for controlling excessive pay while not spooking Wall Street, which the administration is relying on to help buy the troubled mortgage-backed assets at weaker banks.

Mr. Geithner told reporters on Tuesday that financial institutions remain worried about “political risks” including more government regulation of compensation, if they participate in the Public-Private Investment Program to buy those assets.

news20090611WP

2009-06-11 15:16:19 | Weblog
[Today's Newspaper] fom [The Washington Post]

[Metro]
SHOOTING AT THE HOLOCAUST MUSEUM
At a Monument of Sorrow, A Burst of Deadly Violence
Guard Killed, Suspect Injured Amid Scene Of Fear, Chaos

By Michael E. Ruane, Paul Duggan and Clarence Williams
Washington Post Staff Writers
Thursday, June 11, 2009

At 12:40 p.m. yesterday a man stepped through the doors of the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum. He took two paces, lowered his rifle at a security guard and, before anyone could react, opened fire in a popular national landmark.

The guard, who did not have time to draw his gun, fell bleeding and fatally wounded to the polished floor. Other guards fired back, cutting down the assailant. Terrified patrons, many of them children, dived for safety. And what moments before had been a bright weekday in June became a tableau of violence.

As described by bystanders and authorities, the attack inside the famed Holocaust museum turned the crowded building and Washington's nearby tourist-thronged Mall into a scene of fear and chaos, with black-clad SWAT teams, hovering helicopters and racing emergency vehicles. Stunned witnesses described a fusillade of gunfire -- five shots or more -- the blood-streaked floor and the screams of frightened visitors inside the museum and on the street.

"It's like a scene from a movie," said Edward Bhopa, 54.

"A horror movie," added his son Andy, 28.

The suspect, identified by law enforcement sources as James W. von Brunn, 88, of Annapolis, was said to be a longtime, "hard-core" supremacist whose Internet writings contain extensive, poisonous ravings against Jews and African Americans.

The slain guard, Stephen T. Johns, 39, of Temple Hills, worked for the Wackenhut security company and had been employed at the museum for six years, the museum said.

Officials at George Washington University Hospital, where von Brunn, Johns and an unidentified victim with less serious injuries were taken, said Johns suffered a gunshot wound to the chest and died there. Von Brunn was shot in the face, and the bullet exited his neck, according to a high-ranking police source. He underwent surgery and was in critical condition last night.

Police recovered a notebook in the suspect's possession that apparently contained a list of District locations, including Washington National Cathedral. Police bomb squads were sent to at least 10 sites.

"There are no words to express our grief and shock over today's events," the museum said in a statement. "Our thoughts and prayers go out to Officer Johns's family." The museum plans to close today and fly its flags at half-staff in his memory.

The museum, which has about 400 employees and 300 volunteers, gets about 2 million visitors a year.

Several people caught glimpses of the attack.

"We heard a really loud bang, and we saw a guy with a silver length of a gun walking through" the door, said Shannon Clark, a tourist from Iowa who was walking on the mezzanine at the time of the shooting.

Former defense secretary William Cohen was standing in the exit area when he saw a car that had stopped just outside the driveway. "I noticed an older man, but I didn't pay that much attention," he said.

Then Cohen heard shots.

"I've been around a lot of gunfire over the years, and it was real clear that's what it was," he said.

Maria Hernandez of Bristow was leaving an exhibit when she heard shots. "I saw a security guard pull out his gun," she said.

Visitor Liliane Willens was heading into a basement auditorium to listen to a Holocaust survivor talk about her wartime experiences when she heard a noise that sounded like a roof falling in.

The audience in the crowded auditorium was told to stay put and that there had been a shooting but that people were safe where they were, she said.

Eventually, the Holocaust survivor went on with her presentation.

"It was quite ironic, because here was somebody talking about a tragedy in World War II, and here was this tragedy going on outside," Willens said.

After about an hour and a half, the audience was directed to a cafeteria, and police let the group out one by one after taking contact information, Willens said.

The shooting was reminiscent of one in 1998 in which a man stormed into the U.S. Capitol and killed two police officers.

Von Brunn is said to have been a leading writer in the white supremacist fringe for many years. He also appears to be the author of a recent Internet posting suggesting that President Obama's background is being hidden from the public.

His online book, "Kill the Best Gentiles," contains hundreds of pages of conspiracy theories that include Holocaust denial, the ancient hoax of the "Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion" and wild webs of fantasy about Jewish plotting against white people.

"This is a longtime white supremacist and anti-Semite approaching the end of his life who may have decided to go out shooting," said Mark Potok, director of the Southern Poverty Law Center, a nonprofit group in Alabama that tracks right-wing extremists.

On a rambling, racist and bitterly anti-Semitic Web site, a man who identifies himself as James W. von Brunn says he is a former World War II PT boat captain who was decorated for his conduct in battle and was an advertising executive and film producer in New York.

He says he is a member of Mensa, "the high-IQ society," and acknowledges being convicted in D.C. Superior Court for a 1981 attempted attack on a government building. He was "convicted by a Negro jury, Jew/Negro attorneys, and sentenced to prison for eleven years by a Jew judge. A Jew/Negro/White Court of Appeals denied his appeal," the site says.

He describes himself as an artist and author. Neighbors in Annapolis, who asked not to be identified, said that they recently invited the suspect to their home for a drink and that he unexpectedly brought up his belief that the Holocaust did not occur. "It was just off the wall," said one of the neighbors.

"Truthfully, it scares me, because I never imagined someone like that living right next to me," said another neighbor, Joshua Shyman, 16, who said he is Jewish.

Von Brunn refers on his Web site to "Marxist/Liberal/Jews bankers" and provides this information in a long, aggrieved biographical entry:

"Over my years of adversity, it became clear to me that a JEW strategy had emerged: 'Kill the Best Gentiles!' The tactics were WAR & DEBT . . . I was chased from one job to another for not genuflecting before God's Chosen."

In 1968, Von Brunn was sentenced to six months in jail for punching a Dorchester County, Md., sheriff during a fight at the county jail. He had been arrested earlier on a charge of drunken driving after a brawl at a local restaurant.

In 1981, he was arrested for entering the building where the Federal Reserve Board meets, at 20th Street and Constitution Avenue NW, with a revolver, which he pointed at the stomach of a security guard. The guard called for help, and the gun was taken from von Brunn. When he was arrested, police also found a 12-gauge shotgun that he had concealed under his coat. According to the records, von Brunn had made it to the second floor when guards stopped him, and he surrendered his weapons.

He told police, according to charging files, that his actions were "politically motivated" and that he intended to take Paul A. Volcker, then chairman of the Federal Reserve Board, and other members hostage so that he could be allowed to voice his opinions through the news media.

news20090611GDN1

2009-06-11 14:55:06 | Weblog
[Environment] from [The Guardian]

[Renewable Energy]
China launches green power revolution to catch up on west
• Plan to hit 20% renewable target by 2020
• $30bn for low-carbon projects


Julian Borger and Jonathan Watts in Beijing
The Guardian, Wednesday 10 June 2009
Article history

China is planning a vast increase in its use of wind and solar power over the next ­decade and believes it can match Europe by 2020, producing a fifth of its energy needs from renewable sources, a senior Chinese official said yesterday.

Zhang Xiaoqiang, vice-chairman of China's national development and reform commission, told the Guardian that Beijing would easily surpass current 2020 targets for the use of wind and solar power and was now contemplating targets that were more than three times higher.

In the current development plan, the goal for wind energy is 30 gigawatts. Zhang said the new goal could be 100GW by 2020.

"Similarly, by 2020 the total installed capacity for solar power will be at least three times that of the original target [3GW]," Zhang said in an interview in London. China generates only 120 megawatts of its electricity from solar power, so the goal represents a 75-fold expansion in just over a decade.

"We are now formulating a plan for development of renewable energy. We can be sure we will exceed the 15% target. We will at least reach 18%. Personally I think we could reach the target of having renewables provide 20% of total energy consumption."

That matches the European goal, and would represent a direct challenge to Europe's claims to world leadership in the field, despite China's relative poverty. Some experts have cast doubt on whether Britain will be able to reach 20%. On another front, China has the ambitious plan of installing 100m energy-efficient lightbulbs this year alone.

Beijing seeks to achieve these goals by directing a significant share of China's $590bn economic stimulus package to low-carbon investment. Of that total, more than $30bn will be spent directly on environmental projects and the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions.

But the indirect green share in the stimulus, in the form of investment in carbon-efficient transport and electricity transmission systems, would be far larger.

HSBC Global Research estimated the total green share could be over a third of the total package.

China also believes the price reforms that will take place in its economic recovery programme will lead to more efficient use of resources and an increased demand for renewable energy.

"Due to the impact of global financial crisis, people are all talking about green and sustainable development," Zhang added. "Enterprises and government at all levels are showing more enthusiasm for the development of solar for power generation, and the Chinese government is now considering rolling out more stimulus policies for the development of solar power."

He said the government would also plough money into the expansion of solar heating systems. He said the country was already a world leader, with 130m square metres of solar heating arrays already installed, and was planning to invest more. The US goal for solar heating by 2020 is 200m square metres.

Zhang was speaking in London on a day China came under increased pressure from Washington to do more cut its emissions.

David Sandalow, the US assistant secretary of energy, said the continuation of business as usual in China would result in a 2.7C rise in temperatures even if every other country slashed greenhouse gas emissions by 80%.

"China can and will need to do much more if the world is going to have any hope of containing climate change," said Sandalow, who is in Beijing as part of a senior negotiating team aiming to find common ground ahead of the crucial Copenhagen summit at the end of this year.

"No effective deal will be possible without the US and China, which together account for almost half of the planet's carbon emissions."

Zhang said China was pursuing "a constructive and a positive role" in negotiations aimed at agreeing a deal in Copenhagen. As part of that agreement, he said developing countries would have to pursue "a sustainable development path", and said Beijing was open to the idea of limits on the carbon intensity of its economy (the emissions per unit of output).

"We have taken note of some expert suggestions on carbon intensity with a view to have some quantified targets in this regard. We are carrying out a serious study of those suggestions," Zhang said.

Zhang told the all-party parliamentary China group in Westminster yesterday that Beijing's stimulus package was already showing signs of re-energising the Chinese economy. He said it grew by 6.1% in the first quarter of this year, and growth in the second quarter would be stronger than the first. He predicted that China would meet its target of 8% growth this year.


[Carbon Emissions]
Japan's 15% target to cut emissions condemned as 'disaster'
Target is 'weakest any country has pledged so far' and threatens agreement in Copenhagen, say critics


David Adam, environment correspondent
guardian.co.uk, Wednesday 10 June 2009 16.15 BST
Article history

Japan's target to cut its greenhouse gas emissions by 15% by 2020 was immediately condemned by environmentalists as "appalling" and unambitious after it was announced today. The Japanese government defended the target as comparable to European efforts because it does not permit offset schemes such as carbon trading, which allow cuts to be bought from other countries.

Taro Aso, Japan's prime minister, announced the target in Tokyo while UN talks on a draft climate agreement are continuing in Bonn. The talks, which finish on Friday, aim to lay foundations for a a meeting in Copenhagen in December when a new global treaty on global warming to succeed the Kyoto protocol will be agreed.

Observers said Japan's target was only slightly more ambitious than already required under Kyoto - a cut of 6% on 1990 levels by 2012. Japan's emissions have actually risen 7% since 1990. Its new 15% reduction commitment uses a 2005 baseline, equating to a 8% cut on 1990 levels by 2020.

Japan will have to do more to help keep global warming below dangerous levels, said the European environment commissioner Stavros Dimas: "The EU believes that we must be fundamentally guided by science."

Japan's target represents "the weakest target any country has pledged so far", said Kristian Tangen, at analysts Point Carbon

The UN climate panel says developed countries should reduce their emissions by 25% to 40% below 1990 levels by 2020 to keep temperature increases to within 2C of pre-industrial temperatures.

Paul Cook, director of advocacy at development charity Tearfund, said: "This is a disaster. The level of ambition among developed countries is already incredibly weak – way below the 40% emissions reductions needed. . Japan's decision risks creating a race to the bottom among other developed countries looking for an excuse to evade tough targets."

The group said Japan's decision would make it difficult for EU countries to increase their target of a 20% reduction by 2020 to 30% – which they say they will only do if other developed countries make a similar effort to cut emissions.

The Obama administration has talked of cutting emissions by 17% on 2005 levels by 2020, about 4% relative to 1990 levels. But the target has yet to be approved and may be weakened to help it pass into law.

Cook said: "It is difficult to see how a fair, science-based deal can be achieved [at] Copenhagen if developed countries so utterly fail to do what is necessary to prevent a catastrophe for poor people and for the planet. Japan should be condemned for its failure of leadership and ambition."

Japan argues its target is ambitious given that its economy is already relatively energy and carbon efficient. It already has made a long-term pledge to cut emissions 60-80% by 2050.

Kim Carstensen of WWF said: "It is true that Japan's energy efficiency improved in the 1980s, during the oil crisis. Unfortunately, since 1990 most of the sector's energy efficiency either stagnated or declined."

Hidefumi Kurasaka, professor of environmental policies at Chiba University, Japan, said: "The target is not strong enough to convince developing nations to sign up for a new climate change pact. Japan's population is falling, so that means it has an advantage over the United States. The fact that Japan can commit to only an 8% cut from 1990 levels, even as its population falls, will lead to doubts over its seriousness to fight climate change."

news20090611GDN2

2009-06-11 14:46:51 | Weblog
[Environment] from [The Guardian]

[Wind Power]
Green collar job creation 'outstripped traditional sectors in US'
Report on US job figures up to 2007 also says wind and solar sectors resisting recession better than traditional manufacturing


Suzanne Goldenberg
guardian.co.uk, Wednesday 10 June 2009 17.59 BST
Article history

America's emerging clean energy economy produced new jobs at more than twice the rate of more traditional industries in the years leading up to the economic downturn, a new study released today claimed.

The report by the Pew Charitable Trusts provides the first hard evidence of jobs created by the rising demand for environmentally friendly services, and in the new clean energy sectors like wind and solar.

It said such jobs grew at a rate of 9.1% from 1998-2007, easily outstripping job growth in traditional areas of the economy, which was 3.7%.

The study stopped before the economic downturn, which has caused steep job losses in the traditional economy. Some 347,000 Americans were put out of work in May alone.

However, its authors also noted that the rapid growth came at a time when there was little or no federal government support for clean energy – unlike today when Barack Obama has committed to greening the economy.

They also said that wind farms, solar projects, and battery factories had fared better than traditional manufacturing as the job market has contracted.

"This is a sector poised for explosive growth," said Lori Grange, the interim deputy director of Pew. "Our report points to trends that show a very promising future for the green energy economy."

The report helps bolster Obama's claims that his $787 billion economic recovery plan could create millions of new jobs. The package contains about $85 billion in green investment, and the administration has repeatedly touted its efforts at creating new clean energy jobs.

The Pew report said the new jobs were created across 38 states, and not restricted to specific regions.

By 2007, more than 68,200 businesses accounted for about 770,000 green jobs. That is not hugely below the numbers of jobs in fossil-fuel industries, including oil and gas extraction and coal mining, which employed 1.27 million people in 2007, the report said.

California created the most green jobs: 125,390, while Wyoming had the fewest, just 1,419. Pay scales among the new jobs ranged from $21,000 to $111,000 a year, Pew said.


[Oil]
US green agenda delivered blow as ban on drilling off Florida overturned
Senate committee vote runs counter to Obama's push to steer clean energy laws through Congress


Suzanne Goldenberg, US environment correspondent
guardian.co.uk, Wednesday 10 June 2009 12.44 BST
Article history

A Senate committee delivered a rebuff to Barack Obama's clean energy agenda yesterday by voting to overturn a ban on oil and gas drilling off the Florida coast.

The 13-10 vote in the Senate's energy and natural resources committee to lift the drilling ban off Florida's coast runs counter to the push by the White House and Democrats in Congress to steer clean energy laws through Congress.

Democratic leaders in the House of Representatives are pushing for a vote on the first US bill to cut carbon emissions by the end of this month. Meanwhile, a Senate committee is close to approving a bill to encourage the use of renewable energy.

Tuesday's drilling measure was brought as an amendment to that bill — already criticised by environmentalists by setting low targets for renewable energy development.

The vote would put oil and gas rigs within 10 miles of the Florida panhandle, and within 45 miles of Tampa.

Congress allowed a 25-year ban on offshore drilling along much of the Atlantic and Pacific coasts to lapse last year. But the ban remained in force in Florida, restricting exploration to within 125 miles of the Florida coast, and 235 miles from Tampa.

Senators voted down a proposal to allow oil companies to tap into Alaska's wildlife refuge.

Florida's Democratic Senator, Bill Nelson, said he would block the measure. "We are simply not going to let this happen," he told reporters.

The measure is likely to remain in the final version of the bill. The entire energy package will clear the committee as early as Thursday.

But although the amendment gained the support of eight Democrats on the committee – including the chairman Jeff Bingaman – it faces serious opposition elsewhere in the Senate and in the House that could stop it becoming law.


[Endangered Species]
Poachers wiping out Zimbabwe's rhinos as demand surges
• Animals' horns sold on lucrative Chinese market
• Gangs taking advantage


David Smith in Harare
guardian.co.uk, Tuesday 9 June 2009 19.18 BST
Article history

Zimbabwe's rhinos are being wiped out amid a surge in poaching driven by Chinese demand for the animals' horns, a wildlife conservation group warned today.

Around 120 rhinos have been killed since last March to feed the lucrative Chinese black market, said Johnny Rodrigues, chairman of the independent Zimbabwe Conservation Task Force.

Since last year economic collapse and the breakdown of law and order have contributed to a rapid escalation in poaching by organised gangs. "In the past 15 months we've lost 120 rhinos, and we're still losing two to four per month," Rodrigues said. "We used to have 1,000 in this country."

The exact size of Zimbabwe's current rhino population is debated. Save the Rhino, a British-based charity, puts the total at above 700. Rodrigues says it is about 400. Both agree the situation represents a crisis.

Rodrigues said that Zimbabwe's trade links with China, where the rhino horn is highly prized as medicinal, are a driving factor. "We're now down to about 400 rhinos, black and white, since the opening of the Chinese market. Normally the first thing the Chinese ask when they come here is, 'Have you got rhino? Have you got rhino?'"

He added: "It's all linked to the top. All those corrupt ministers are trying to cream off as much as possible before the next election. But if the carnage continues over the next two years we'll have nothing left. The devastation taking place is not sustainable."

A rhino horn can sell for thousands of pounds on the black market. Along with Chinese medicine, the horns are used for ornamental dagger handles in some Middle Eastern countries.

Rodrigues said gangs were now using a Chinese-made version of a tranquillising agent that can be fired noiselessly from a dartgun to avoid drawing attention. The gangs then chop off the horn and leave the unconscious animal for dead. "They don't reverse the tranquilliser, so the rhino overheats and dies," Rodrigues said. "Anyone who then finds it can't eat the meat – you will die if you do.

"The removal of the horn is very harsh. They use an axe and disfigure the rhino's face. The humane thing to do is put a bullet through its head and burn the carcass."

Rodrigues is preparing to hand a dossier to the prime minister, Morgan Tsvangirai, in the hope that the country's unity government will take tougher action.

Government vets have made attempts to de-horn rhinos so they no longer have value for poachers, but the process must be repeated because the horns regrow. The army and police have been called in to conservation areas and national parks to defend the animals, but it is alleged that some soldiers turn poachers themselves.

Poachers have little to fear. Even those who are caught are usually freed on minimum bail because there is often no fuel to bring them to court.

Zimbabwe's Parks and Wildlife Management Authority challenged Rodrigues' claims, but refused to give a figure for the rhino population.

"We definitely have more than 400," said Vitalis Chadenga, director of conservation. "But it's true we're facing an upsurge in the poaching of rhinos. This has taken place mostly on private farms, though parks have also suffered losses.

He insisted: "The government takes it very seriously. We have de-horned some rhinos and relocated some to safer areas where we can afford them maximum protection … if you come here in 10 years' time you will still see the rhino. They are safe but they are under threat. There is not a soft touch in terms of law enforcement."

The Convention on International Trade on Endangered Species has said it will discuss the threat to Zimbabwe's rhinos at its next meeting in July.

The government has said tourism is one of its best opportunities for quick economic revival. But Rodrigues warned: "We were the jewel of Africa, but we've gone back 15 or 20 years. The wildlife has been decimated to such a stage that there'll be nothing left for tourists when they come back to the country."

news20090611GDN3

2009-06-11 14:13:56 | Weblog
[Environment] from [The Guardian]

[Renewable Energy]
EU power lines 'too old to deliver 2020 renewables target'
Ageing grid cannot transfer energy over the long distances demanded by renewable power stations, say academics


Alok Jha
guardian.co.uk, Thursday 11 June 2009 11.45 BST
Article history

Europe's electricity grid needs a radical overhaul if it is to distribute the renewable energy capacity that governments have committed to building by 2020, according to Europe's leading science academies. They argue that the continent's ageing grid infrastructure is incapable of transferring energy over the long distances demanded by renewable power stations, which are often built in remote locations, far from population centres.

In a report for the European Commission, published today by the the European Academies Science Advisory Council (Easac), experts called on national governments to co-ordinate their grids and invest in new technologies such as high-voltage direct current (HVDC) transmission lines to better prepare Europe for a future of green electricity.

"The whole transmission and distribution system needs redesigning," said Mike Sterling, an electrical engineer and fellow of the Royal Academy of Engineering in the UK, who chaired the electricity grid working group on behalf of Easac.

The EU has committed to sourcing 20% of its energy from renewable sources by 2020 but experts said this generating capacity will be wasted unless it can be distributed properly.


"The change in the generating sources is well known and, unless we can get clean coal or nuclear back up again, there will be a dramatic change in the distribution of the energy sources," said Sterling. Renewable energy for the UK, he said, might come from remote locations in the North Sea or off the west coast of Scotland and the power sector needs to work out how to bring that power to the places it is needed.

"We must make major changes to the current delivery systems in the EU and become more co-ordinated if we are to meet these targets," said John Holmes, secretary to the Easac working group, "This report gives the EU Directorate General a blueprint for a brighter, greener future in Europe."

Upgrading the grids in individual countries should be done to common standards, said the report, and eventually the movement of electricity across Europe might even be managed centrally. Any extensions to the grid could incorporate HVDC transmission lines so that electricity could be moved from, say, solar plants in the Sahara to northern Europe whenever there is no wind. These lines are preferred because they lose less of their energy during long-distance transmission compared to standard AC cables, but they are also more expensive to build.

Scandinavian countries potentially have excess capacity in hydroelectric plants that could, ideally, be sold to places such as Germany. If agreements can be made with north African countries, solar power collected in the Sahara desert could be transported up into southern Europe. "In order to do that, you need to design the transmission system so it can cope with the large power flows through existing countries' networks [but] Italy's transmission system is not designed for that, nor is Spain's."

Electricity companies warned a committee of MPs in April that the government was in danger of missing its target on renewables without substantial investment in a new national energy grid.

Last year, EU scientists also proposed a plan for a Europe-wide supergrid that could share Europe's renewable energy resources across the continent. They said the grid could allow countries such as the UK and Denmark ultimately to export wind energy at times of surplus supply, as well as import from other green sources such as geothermal power in Iceland.

The scientists working on the project envisaged that, by 2050, solar power plants in north Africa could produce 100 GW, more than the combined electricity output from all sources in the UK, with an investment of around €450bn. But they also said this could not be transferred to northern Europe without a major restructuring of grid infrastructure in the transfer countries such as Italy and Spain or Greece or Turkey.

news20090611SLT

2009-06-11 09:02:51 | Weblog
[Today's Paper] from [Slate Magazine]

Known Supremacist Attacks Holocaust Museum
By Daniel Politi
Posted Thursday, June 11, 2009, at 6:40 AM ET

The Washington Post (WP) and the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) 's world-wide newbox lead with the gunman who opened fire at the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington, D.C., yesterday. The 88-year-old white supremacist killed a security guard before he was shot. Police identified the suspect as James W. von Brunn, a man well-known to groups that keep tabs on extremists. "This is a longtime white supremacist and anti-Semite approaching the end of his life who may have decided to go out shooting," said the director of the Southern Poverty Law Center. Brunn is now in critical condition. USA Today (USAT) leads with federal data that show almost 20 million children now receive free or reduced-price lunches in their schools, a record. California is one of the states that has seen demand skyrocket as enrollment in free lunch programs has increased almost 17 percent. Schools don't get fully reimbursed for each free lunch, so they must make up the shortfall at a time when budgets across the country are already stretched thin.

The New York Times (NYT) leads with the White House appointing Kenneth Feinberg, "a well-known Washington lawyer," to determine compensation of senior executives at the seven firms that have received billions of dollars in bailout funds. For other companies, including others that have received federal assistance, the Obama administration didn't impose any specific rules but said it would push lawmakers to pass legislation that would give shareholders more of a say in how much executives get paid and strengthen the independence of board committees that set compensation. The Los Angeles Times (LAT) leads with Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger telling the paper's editorial board that he would rather see California's government come to a "grinding halt" than take out a high-interest loan if lawmakers can't agree on what to cut to get rid of the state's massive budget gap. "What we need to do is just to basically cut off all the funding and just let them have a taste of what it is like when the state comes to a shutdown," he said.

When von Brunn opened fire at the Holocaust Museum yesterday, it wasn't the first time he decided to act on his extremist views. He had previously spent several years in prison for attempting to kidnap members of the Federal Reserve Board in 1981. "We've been tracking this guy since the late 1970s," said the research director of the Southern Poverty Law Center. "He has an extremely long history with neo-Nazis and white supremacists, and is extremely hard-core." Von Buren was in their radar partly due to his status as one of the leading writers among white supremacists and for keeping "a rambling, racist and bitterly anti-Semitic Web site," as the Post describes it. On his site, von Buren acknowledges he was sentenced to prison more than 20 years ago and wrote that he was "convicted by a Negro jury, Jew/Negro attorneys, and sentenced to prison for eleven years by a Jew judge. A Jew/Negro/White Court of Appeals denied his appeal."

In a separate front-page look at von Brunn, the Post says that "even admirers considered him a loner, a hothead and a man consumed with hatred." In his Web site, von Brunn writes about the time he served as a PT boat captain in the Navy during World War II, but those who knew him say he sometimes bemoaned that he had fought for the wrong side. His ex-wife said the couple divorced more than 30 years ago in large part because of his extremist views.

From the could-be-funny-if-it-weren't-so-sad department: "The responsible white separatist community condemns this," an acquaintance of von Brunn tells the Post. "It makes us look bad."

The WSJ is alone in even mentioning that federal law enforcement officials had previously warned about the potential rise in violence from right-wing extremists. The FBI and the Department of Homeland Security were both "sharply criticized" for these efforts.

The administration's new "pay czar" will have broad authority to set the compensation of executives at the firms that the government says received "exceptional assistance," including American International Group, Bank of America, Citigroup, General Motors, and Chrysler. As expected, the guidelines that the government issued for other companies are voluntary. Yesterday's announcement was "somewhat weaker than what many on Wall Street had feared, given the heated rhetoric surrounding pay earlier this year," notes the WSJ. But the NYT highlights that for the seven firms that won't be able to appeal Feinberg's decisions, the "new rules illustrate the humiliating downfall of the once proud giants, now wards of the state whose leaders' compensation will be set by a Washington paymaster."

The WSJ hears word that Yemen and the United States may be close to reaching an agreement that would allow "a considerable portion" of the almost 100 Yemenis currently being held in Guantanamo to be sent to Saudi Arabia. Finding a home for the Yemenis has presented a considerable challenge for the administration, which is reluctant to send them back to Yemen because it fears the country won't be able to keep proper track of them. Yemen had been demanding that they be returned to their country, but it seems they're easing their stance a bit. "What's crucial is how many the Saudis will take," one official said.

Most of the papers have stories about the final day of campaigning in Iran as citizens prepare to vote in Friday's contested presidential elections. The WSJ focuses on how for the first time, the candidates are actually campaigning to get women on their side. In the past, candidates mostly ignored them, but now the challengers to President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad are making a point of mentioning them to set themselves apart from the man who has cracked down on women's rights activists. Ahmadinejad's main opponent, Mir Hossein Mousavi, even campaigned with his wife, whom the media have characterized as Iran's Michelle Obama.

The NYT fronts a look at how the man whom Ahmadinejad beat in 2005 is now running an intense campaign to unseat him. Ahmadinejad has seized on Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani's public actions to associate his challengers to the unpopular former president who is widely seen as corrupt. The harsh exchanges between the two men illustrate "the surprising vigor of Iran's limited democracy." Although it's a given that each candidate first has to be approved by Iran's theocratic rulers, "within those confines, the races are hard-fought and unpredictable." The LAT's Borzou Daragahi paints the best picture of how the heated contest has animated the population in a front-page first-person account. "These are strange, magical days in Iran," writes Daragah. The campaign "has opened up the country's political and public spaces to an extent not seen since the 1979 Islamic Revolution. Students have called the president a liar to his face. Carnival-like demonstrations erupt on the streets. Ordinary people engage in lively political debates with strangers on street corners."

In the LAT's op-ed page, Laurel Fletcher and Eric Stover write about how they interviewed 62 released Guantanamo detainees from nine countries and found that the vast majority are having difficulty adjusting to normal life. Most can't find permanent jobs and continue to suffer psychological problems. It's imperative that the United States plans to help former detainees adjust to their new lives, if not for humanitarian reasons then at least because it's in the country's national security interests. Right now, "former detainees often find themselves destitute, which puts them at risk of drifting to radical mosques where, in addition to receiving food and a place to sleep, they listen to anti-American diatribes."

The LAT reports that a porn actress in Southern California has tested positive for HIV. It marks the first time that a performer in Southern California's porn industry has been publicly confirmed to have HIV since 2004, when production was shut down for four weeks after an actor spread the virus to three actresses. So far, all of the people who have performed with the woman have tested negative, but public health officials used the opportunity to once again highlight their ongoing fight with the industry over condoms. "You wouldn't send someone to work on a high-rise building without a hard-hat," the health officer for Los Angeles County said, "so why are we allowing these performers to perform without condoms?"

Yesterday, in an article about how Michael Douglas will receive the American Film Institute Life Achievement Award tonight, the LAT quoted the actor-producer saying he didn't attend the ceremony when his father received the same award 18 years ago. "I don't know where I was at the time," Douglas said. In a correction today, the LAT makes clear that not only did Douglas attend the 1991 ceremony, he was also the host.