GreenTechSupport GTS 井上創学館 IESSGK

GreenTechSupport News from IESSGK

news20090616BRT

2009-06-16 19:20:31 | Weblog
[Biography of the Day] from [Britannica]
June 16
Joyce Carol Oates
American writer Joyce Carol Oates, noted for her vast literary output in a variety of styles and genres and for her particularly effective depictions of violence and evil in modern society, was born this day in 1938.

[On This Day] from [Britannica]
June 16
1963: First woman in space
On this day in 1963, Soviet cosmonaut Valentina V. Tereshkova became the first woman to travel in space, having been launched into orbit aboard the spacecraft Vostok 6, which completed 48 orbits in 71 hours.

1976: South African police fired on a group of Soweto students marching in protest against state plans to impose the Afrikaans language as a medium of instruction in black schools, igniting a massive popular uprising.

1933: The Hundred Days period of U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt came to a close, with the bulk of his New Deal legislation passed.

1933: The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) was created under authority of the Federal Reserve Act of 1933.

1932: The Lausanne Conference, held to liquidate Germany's payment of reparations to the former Allied and Associated powers of World War I, opened.

1917: American publisher Katharine Graham, owner and publisher of The Washington Post and Newsweek magazine, was born in New York City.

1903: The Ford Motor Company was founded by Henry Ford and 11 associate investors.

1874: Arthur Meighen, leader of the Conservative Party and prime minister of Canada (1920–21, 1926), was born.

news20090616JT1

2009-06-16 18:45:43 | Weblog
[TODAY'S TOP STORIES] from [The Japan Times]

[NATIONAL NEWS]
Tuesday, June 16, 2009
Popularity of DPJ double LDP's: poll
(民主の支持率 倍増 電話世論調査)
Japan Post flap hurts Aso's rating


(Kyodo News) A Kyodo News weekend poll released Monday found 38.5 percent of voters voicing support for the Democratic Party of Japan, compared with a record-low 19.8 percent backing Prime Minister Taro Aso's Liberal Democratic Party.

The support rate for the Cabinet was just 17.5 percent, down 8.7 percentage points from last month, according to the weekend survey of 1,039 randomly called voters.

The result is expected to deal a severe blow to the Cabinet and possibly prompt some LDP members to campaign for Aso's ouster as LDP president before the next Lower House election, which must be held by October.

Asked what party they would vote for in the next House of Representatives election's proportional representation blocks, 47.8 percent of the pollees named the DPJ and 18.7 percent said the LDP.

The disapproval rate for the Cabinet was 70.6 percent, up 10.4 points from the poll in May.

Aso effectively dismissed Kunio Hatoyama as internal affairs and communications minister on Friday over a high-profile row concerning the reappointment of Yoshifumi Nishikawa as president of Japan Post Holdings Co. The survey found that only 17.5 percent of the respondents approved of Hatoyama's exit, while 74.8 percent said they disapprove.

The Cabinet's support rate, which had been dwindling since its launch last September, had been recovering in recent months due to a fundraising scandal involving former DPJ leader Ichiro Ozawa.

As for Nishikawa, 75.5 percent of respondents said he should step down, while 17.2 percent said he should stay on as the head of the postal body.

Hatoyama, one of Aso's closest allies, opposed Nishikawa's reappointment. He says Japan Post attempted to sell the Kampo no Yado nationwide resort inn properties at excessively low prices.

In the portion of the poll on who is more suitable as prime minister, DPJ leader Yukio Hatoyama garnered support from 50.4 percent, while Aso was backed by 21.5 percent. The opposition leader is the elder brother of the sacked minister.

A total of 35.9 percent of those surveyed said a DPJ-led coalition would be desirable, while 14.9 percent said they would prefer an LDP-led governing bloc and 14.7 percent said they want to see a coalition between the LDP and DPJ.

Twenty-eight percent said they prefer a new ruling party framework as a result of major political realignment.

Among those who support the Aso Cabinet, 44.3 percent said there is no other choice. Asked why they disapprove of the Cabinet, 23.0 percent cited Aso's lack of leadership.

The DPJ-backed candidate meanwhile was elected mayor of the city of Chiba in a landslide Sunday, giving the largest opposition force further momentum before the national election.

Toshihito Kumagai defeated a candidate also backed by the opposition and a candidate supported by the LDP-New Komeito ruling bloc in the city of some 950,000 people.

The DPJ's victory in Chiba followed mayoral election wins in Nagoya and the city of Saitama.

Kumagai, 31, a former city assembly member who also received backing from the Social Democratic Party, will be the youngest mayor in Japan.

The two other candidates were Kojiro Hayashi, 63, backed by the ruling bloc, and Fusae Yuki, 65, of the Japanese Communist Party.

Voter turnout was 43.50 percent, up 6.30 percentage points from the previous mayoral election.

"I think my will to change the city matched that of many people, and that enabled me to win," Kumagai told supporters at his campaign office after declaring victory. "I'm looking forward to tomorrow as a citizen as well, as I know a new political era will begin."

Kumagai got 170,629 votes, while 117,560 went to Hayashi and 30,933 to Yuki.

The focus now is on whether the ruling bloc can recover from the consecutive losses in mayoral elections in the upcoming Shizuoka gubernatorial race and Tokyo Metropolitan Assembly poll in July.

"We were certain he would win," Kaname Tajima, a DPJ member of the House of Representatives, said at Kumagai's campaign office. "I think it really showed people that the city is actually going to change, and I'm sure they will get the message that this is the dawn of a change of administration."

Supporters at the office cheered the news that Kumagai would achieve a solid victory. He won nearly 30 percent of the votes of LDP supporters.

The campaign that began with Hayashi declaring his candidacy in April took a sudden turn when the incumbent, 69-year-old Keiichi Tsuruoka, was arrested later that month on suspicion of accepting bribes from a construction firm, just months before the end of his second term.

The arrest of Tsuruoka, who resigned May 1, hurt Hayashi, who had served as his deputy mayor and was seen as his successor. It prompted the DPJ, which initially was not expected to field a candidate, to suddenly look for a contender to challenge Hayashi.

The DPJ characterized Kumagai as "young, with no experience in politics and no money," and therefore different from Hayashi.

Yuki, meanwhile, criticized money politics and said the JCP is the only party that has not accepted political donations.

The main issues in the campaign were how to restore public trust in the city government after Tsuruoka's arrest and how to deal with municipal more than 1 billion in city debts.


[NATIONAL NEWS]
Tuesday, June 16, 2009
Welfare ministry probed in fee fraud
(厚生労働省 郵便不正で査察)


(Kyodo News) Prosecutors searched the welfare ministry Monday, a day after a senior ministry official was arrested for alleged involvement in abusing a postage discount system for the disabled.

The special investigation squad of the Osaka District Public Prosecutor's Office entered the ministry to search the office of Atsuko Muraki, 53, director general of the Equal Employment, Children and Families Bureau. Her house in Wako, Saitama Prefecture, was searched earlier in the day.

Muraki was arrested on suspicion of issuing a fabricated certificate to recognize an organization as a group for the disabled, thus enabling it to use the postage discount system.

The group, formerly called Rin-no-kai and now known as Hakusan-kai, does not qualify as an organization for the disabled. It helped several companies send direct mail using the discount system to avoid full postage fees.

It is the second time prosecutors have searched the Health, Labor and Welfare Ministry for evidence of ministry officials' involvement in the case. A ministry section chief was arrested in May.

According to investigative sources, the prosecutors are investigating whether there was pressure from a politician to recognize Hakusan-kai as an organization for the disabled.

Muraki's former boss, whose name is being withheld, has said that a Diet member asked around February 2004 for the issuance of a certificate to designate the group as an organization for disabled people, the sources said.

On Sunday, a fresh warrant was served on Tsutomu Kamimura, 39, the official arrested in May, on suspicion of falsifying documents in connection with the case. Kamimura, a section chief in the ministry's health and welfare planning division for the disabled, was initially arrested on suspicion of falsifying the certificate issued to the group.

Fresh warrants were also served Monday on Kunio Kurasawa, 73, the founder of the group, and Tadashi Kono, 68, a former member. Kurasawa was arrested in April and Kono in May.

The prosecutors suspect Muraki, when she headed a ministry section in charge of measures for the disabled, collaborated with the three others under arrest to falsify the certificate in early June 2004, the investigative sources said. The document was presented to Japan Post that same month, they said.

Muraki has denied any wrongdoing, the sources said. Prior to her arrest, she also told reporters she has no memory of the group's name or issuance of the document.

But Kamimura and Kurasawa have implicated her in the scam. Kamimura has said he handed a certificate forged by him to Muraki while Kurasawa said he received the document directly from her, according to the sources.

Hakusan-kai allegedly tied up with companies that included Osaka-based ad agency Shinsei Kigyo to send direct mail from firms, among them electronics discount chain Best Denki Co., by abusing the discount system to save postage fees.

Under Japan Post's postage discount system for disabled people, charges are discounted to around \8 each per item from the regular \120.

news20090616JT2

2009-06-16 18:37:01 | Weblog
[TODAY'S TOP STORIES] from [The Japan Times]

[NATIONAL NEWS]
Tuesday, June 16, 2009
Hatoyama stays put for now but won't rule out LDP exit
(鳩山氏、今は不動 将来の自民離党否定せず)


(Kyodo News) Kunio Hatoyama, who resigned last week as internal affairs and communications minister, did not rule out the possibility Monday of leaving the ruling Liberal Democratic Party to form a new party.

"I have no intention at the moment either to leave the LDP or to create a new party," Hatoyama told a news conference at the internal affairs ministry. But he also suggested he may do so if circumstances change.

Hatoyama was effectively sacked Friday by Prime Minister Taro Aso after putting Aso in a bind for several weeks over the management of Japan Post Holdings Co., a body set up as a result of postal privatization reform.

Hatoyama, one of Aso's closest allies, insisted that Yoshifumi Nishikawa be removed as head of Japan Post, while reformists and many other lawmakers in the LDP said Nishikawa should stay and press ahead with reforms.

He had said Nishikawa should be held responsible for the firm's recent controversial attempt to sell its Kampo no Yado nationwide resort inns at what Hatoyama considered fire-sale prices.

"I like Prime Minister Aso a lot and trust him . . . and there is no change in that feeling," he said. "But on this particular case, the prime minister made a completely wrong decision."

Noting Aso sent him a letter earlier this year along with a list of possible candidates to replace Nishikawa, Hatoyama said they initially agreed Nishikawa should go, but Aso later changed his mind after listening to other opinions.

The evening after accepting Hatoyama's resignation, Aso told reporters he thinks the government should not interfere with the management of a company that is moving toward privatization.

But Hatoyama retorted, "That view has no validity," adding the law stipulates that the internal affairs minister has ultimate authority in deciding on Japan Post's board members. Japan Post Holdings is still wholly owned by the government.

"The issue of the Kampo property sale is just the tip of the iceberg and I will continue doing my best to protect the common property of citizens," Hatoyama said.

Even before his resignation, it had been rumored that Hatoyama wanted to leave the LDP to form a new party or to tie up with his brother, Yukio, president of the Democratic Party of Japan, amid increasing signs of their closeness.

Meanwhile, newly appointed Internal Affairs and Communications Minister Tsutomu Sato said Monday he will look carefully at whether Nishikawa should remain president of Japan Post, after indicating Friday he should stay.

"I made a little too bold a statement because there were some things I didn't fully comprehend at that point in time," said Sato, who will juggle his new duties with his existing role as National Public Safety Commission chief.

He said the business improvement order the internal affairs ministry issued to Japan Post after the aborted deal for the postal service firm to sell Kampo no Yado inns to leasing firm Orix Corp. will be key in deciding whether Nishikawa should stay on.

"I will carefully make a decision after thoroughly consulting with" Japan Post, Sato said.

Japan Post decided late last year to sell dozens of Kampo no Yado inns and nine housing facilities to Orix for 10.9 billion after a bid was held.

Hatoyama urged a review of the plan, arguing it looked like Japan Post and Orix knew who would win before the bidding process.

Japan Post and Orix subsequently canceled the deal.

Sato is expected to study a report Japan Post will present to the ministry describing how it will clean up its business operations before deciding how to deal with Nishikawa, given that some LDP members share Hatoyama's view, political analysts said.

Nishikawa paid a call on Sato Monday morning and is believed to have briefed the minister about progress made in compiling the report.


[BUSINESS NEWS]
Tuesday, June 16, 2009
Eco-points credited with sales boost
(エコポイントで商戦に波及効果)
Hybrids, solar panels, energy-saving TVs find favor with recession-weary consumers

By YURI KAGEYAMA
The Associated Press

People are snatching up hybrid cars, solar panels and energy-efficient TVs, wooed by government incentives designed to battle a recession while conserving energy.

Tax breaks and rebates on low-emission cars have helped two hybrid vehicles, Toyota's Prius and Honda Motor Co.'s Insight, become the best-selling models in Japan the last two months. Likewise, consumers are buying up environment-friendly electronics products to earn Eco-points that the government has promised can later be converted into products or other deals that have yet to be announced.

The renewed consumption is giving struggling corporations and the sagging economy a much-needed jolt — although some economists wonder if the demand created by the incentives will run out of steam.

Car dealership owner Hiromi Inoue can barely contain his glee over the thousands of Prius orders coming into his Toyota showrooms in Tokyo, now making up more than half their sales.

"What we're seeing is extraordinary," he said.

The automakers could use some help: vehicle sales in Japan dropped to their lowest level in three decades last year, and Toyota Motor Corp. sank into its worst annual loss since its 1937 founding.

Under a new government program, hybrids are now tax-free, delivering savings of about ¥150,000 for a Prius buyer. Other fuel-efficient models qualify for lower savings.

Also helping is a "cash-for-clunkers" program similar to the plan initiated by U.S. President Barack Obama. People who trade in a car 13 years or older get a ¥250,000 rebate for buying a low-emission model. Those without a trade-in get ¥100,000.

Koji Endo, auto analyst with Credit Suisse, expects green incentives to lift annual vehicle sales by 100,000 vehicles or more.

The green boom has also caught on in electronics.

People who buy certain types of energy-saving TVs, refrigerators and air conditioners earn Eco-points that they hope to exchange for other products later.

"Everyone — families, old people, young people — are coming to buy TVs," said Junichi Yajima, a sales clerk at a Bic Camera retail outlet. "Some people don't understand Eco-points, but they've heard about it and see it as a good opportunity."

Yajima says each Eco-point will likely be worth about ¥1, and the points range from 7,000 for a flat TV with a 26-inch screen or smaller to 36,000 points for a 46-inch model or larger.

Electronics sales shot up 50 percent on year during the mid-May week after Eco-points started, according to the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry. Researcher Gfk Marketing Services Japan said sales of flat-panel TVs were up 60 percent from a year earlier.

"We don't know what Eco-points are yet, so we're also looking at features and prices," said 40-year-old housewife Kaori Kawabata, shopping for a flat-panel TV with her husband at a bustling Bic Camera store.

Government incentives like Eco-points highlight this export-reliant nation's efforts to lift domestic consumer spending.

The top electronics makers, including Sony Corp. and Panasonic Corp., rake in much of their profits from overseas sales, which have been hammered by the global slump.

Household spending has been lagging for months, as the unemployment rate surged to a six-year high of 5 percent and companies slash summer bonuses.

Another area the government hopes to nurture is solar energy. Japan is home to leading solar panel makers, including Sharp Corp., Kyocera Corp. and Sanyo Electric Co.

The government wants to lift the global market share of Japanese makers to a third by 2020 from a quarter at present, with hopes of adding 110,000 jobs and growth worth 10 trillion to the economy.

Since January, the government has been offering 70,000 per kilowatt, which delivers about a 10 percent savings for panel installment costs. Some 33,700 homes have applied for the solar subsidies.

Separately, the Diet is hammering out a law to give more money to households for buying back electricity from solar-powered homes.

Hiroshi Watanabe, an economist at Daiwa Institute of Research, said such incentives help keep some spending going in a troubled economy, but they may not have a lasting impact. As long as incomes don't improve, they aren't real fixes.

"Whenever there is a major rise in demand like this, there is sure to be a backlash in plunging demand later on because demand was just moved up in time," he said.

Watanabe also said the frantic bargain-hunting merely shows people are pinching pennies because they're worried about the economy.

Sadami Nakamura, 64, who works for an insurer, was standing in a long line at a Tokyo ward office to get rebate coupons, part of a new regional government program to stimulate spending, which will give her a 10 percent discount at some stores.

"I don't agree with this kind of program," she said, dismissing it as "a handout." "But since they're offering it, I'm going to take it."

news20090616LAT

2009-06-16 17:13:24 | Weblog
[Today's Newspaper] from [Los Angeles Times]

[World]
Hundreds of thousands in Iran protest vote result
The supreme leader orders the hard-line Guardian Council to examine challenger Mir-Hossein Mousavi's claims of fraud in the vote reelecting President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Seven protesters are killed.

By Borzou Daragahi and Ramin Mostaghim
June 16, 2009

Reporting from Tehran -- Hundreds of thousands of Iranian protesters defied authorities Monday and marched to Tehran's Freedom Square, as the Islamic Republic's supreme leader ordered an investigation into allegations of vote fraud, a move the opposition described as little more than an attempt to dampen anger over the reelection of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, ordered the Guardian Council, which is filled with his own appointees and led by a hard-line cleric close to Ahmadinejad, to examine challenger Mir-Hossein Mousavi's claims of vote fraud. Khamenei's order came hours before the march, amid a days-long buildup of tension.

Days after Khamenei blessed the election of Ahmadinejad and urged Iranians to rally behind the president, the spokesman of the Guardian Council urged Mousavi's supporters to wait for the "final results" of Friday's election until after the fraud investigation, which will begin today.

"My request to the dear candidates and their supporters, who are trying to voice their objections while respecting the law and ethics, is to bear with us," council spokesman Abbas-Ali Kadkhodai said in a live round-table discussion on television Monday night. "We will investigate and announce the result. The final result will be the one announced by the Guardian Council, which everyone should hopefully accept."

This morning the pro-Ahmadinejad newspaper Iran announced a 4 p.m. rally at Vali Asr Square, site of an opposition rally that is set to begin at 5 p.m. That set the stage for a possible violent confrontation; government supporters frequently come armed with clubs and chains. Mousavi supporters also called for a general strike today.

Khamenei's call for patience Monday came as gunfire from a pro-government militia base adjacent to the demonstration erupted. State radio announced today that seven people had been killed after trying to "attack a military site," a reference to the clash between semiofficial pro-government militiamen and protesters as the demonstration petered out.

This morning, Al-Alam TV aired an urgent screen caption reading: "Iranian police: Main instigators of riots have been arrested. They were carrying explosives and arms." No details were given.

Monday's crowd -- estimates of which ranged to more than 1 million -- defied Interior Ministry warnings broadcast on state television and radio that anyone showing up would be beaten or worse, and even ignored Mousavi's last-minute call to cancel the event.

The protesters found out about the rally despite a media clampdown that brought the shuttering of numerous opposition websites, including those linked to Mousavi, the jamming of satellite news channels and the shutdown of text messaging systems.

In an attempt to help keep information flowing, a Twitter co-founder wrote in a blog Monday that the company had delayed an important maintenance operation.

Pro-Ahmadinejad demonstrators hurled eggs at the French Embassy on Monday, attempting to link the West to the unrest surrounding the election results.

President Obama said his administration would continue to seek to negotiate with Iran's leaders.

"I am deeply troubled by the violence that I've been seeing on television," Obama said in Washington. "I can't state definitively one way or another what happened with respect to the election. But what I can say is that there appears to be a sense on the part of people who were so hopeful and so engaged and so committed to democracy who now feel betrayed."

Khamenei has for years tried to put his religious ultraconservative faction in charge of all branches of government. He marginalized not only the nation's secularists but reformist and pragmatist leaders who were pillars of the Islamic Revolution, risking a backlash by barring huge swaths of people from political power.

The massive, diverse gathering refuted the charge by Ahmadinejad supporters and some Western analysts that Mousavi's support was drawn from the wealthy and educated in northern Tehran.

In the crowd, women in flowing black chadors mingled with factory owners. College students wearing headbands and ribbons of green, the color of the Mousavi campaign, walked side by side next to government employees with salt-and-pepper hair. Bazaar laborers in black T-shirts and motorcycle deliverymen with grime on their fingers waved their hands in the air alongside elegantly coiffed women sporting designer sunglasses.

They came tentatively at first, worried that security forces would crack down harshly. Authorities shut down the local cellphone network.

As demonstrators arrived, they called friends and relatives from pay phones to drive to nearby streets, park and join the gathering.

"I am fed up with the rigging of votes," said Nargess Hassanpour, a 24-year-old architect. "I had never voted until last Friday. I am here and I march toward Azadi [Freedom] Square as far as I can reach, and let come what may."

From adjacent office buildings, supporters waved and cheered, holding up pictures of Mousavi, as passing cars, taxis and minibus drivers honked in support.

The pro-government Basiji militiamen stood along the sidelines, appearing stunned by the magnitude of the crowd. They have become the scourge of the Mousavi supporters after fighting demonstrators for two nights and storming Tehran University on Sunday night, injuring dozens of students.

University activists alleged that the Basiji killed five students as they stormed the campus to quell a demonstration. The school's chancellor confirmed the attack but did not mention the deaths.

By 5 p.m., a continuous flood of people surged from west to east toward the expansive Freedom Square, nearly filling the roadway as well as the surrounding green space, with more demonstrators pouring in from all directions.

"Rockets, tanks, Basiji no longer have any effect on us!" they chanted, updating a popular slogan from the 1979 Islamic Revolution. They came in non-stop swarms along the miles-long stretch leading from Revolution Square into Freedom Square, and from other streets, blocking traffic along nearby highways, where people in stopped cars began waving.

"Mousavi! Mousavi! Get our votes back!" they chanted in support of the 67-year-old former prime minister who showed up at the rally, along with other prominent reformist figures.

"If I died today it would be perfect," said Hossein, a 60-year-old retired schoolteacher in the crowd who didn't want to be further identified. "The nation of Iran has woken up."

There were unconfirmed reports of large-scale protests in Shiraz and Esfahan, in central Iran, and Tabriz and Orumieh, in the mostly ethnic Azeri northwest, which is Mousavi's birthplace.

As night fell, people ascended to their rooftops and chanted "God is Great!" in what is becoming a nightly ritual of protest against Ahmadinejad's reelection.

Most Iran experts do not expect the ultraconservative Guardian Council to revoke the results.

The council has the power to vet laws and candidates for fealty to Islamic principles. Led by the conservative 83-year-old Ayatollah Ahmad Jannati, it's the same powerful body of jurists that barred thousands of moderate candidates from running in 2004 parliamentary elections and allegedly refused to grant permission to thousands of election observers from the campaigns of reformist candidates from monitoring voting stations in last week's election.

Khamenei's decision to review the vote followed a late-night meeting with Mousavi, who is a cousin, in what observers described as a tactical measure to buy time in the hopes that Mousavi and his supporters would cool down.

"The way people came out today after he announced this, nobody believes it's in good faith, because they have lost trust in him," said Ziba Mir-Hosseini, a professor of Middle East studies at the University of London.

Analysts said they assumed the protest would serve as a bracing shock to the country's Islamic establishment.

For years Khamenei and commanders of the Revolutionary Guard have openly warned of the West trying to use Iran's budding constellation of civil society groups to foment a "velvet revolution" of the style that swept away authoritarian regimes in Eastern Europe.

The intensified outpouring of anger followed Ahmadinejad's triumphant speech and news conference Sunday in which he labeled his opponents weeds and likened them to angry soccer fans leaving a stadium. Many protesters said the insults were the last straw.

news20090616NYT

2009-06-16 16:20:51 | Weblog
[Today's Newspaper] from [The New York Times]

[Middle East]
Defiance Grows as Iran’s Leader Sets Vote Review
By ROBERT F. WORTH and NAZILA FATHI
Published: June 15, 2009

TEHRAN — Hundreds of thousands of people marched in silence through central Tehran on Monday to protest Iran’s disputed presidential election in an extraordinary show of defiance from a broad cross section of society, even as the nation’s supreme leader called for a formal review of results he had endorsed two days earlier.

Having mustered the largest antigovernment demonstrations since the 1979 revolution, and defying an official ban, protesters began to sense the prospect — however slight at the moment — that the leadership’s firm backing of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad had wavered.

The massive outpouring was mostly peaceful. But violence erupted after dark when protesters surrounded and attempted to set fire to the headquarters of the Basij volunteer militia, which is associated with the Revolutionary Guards, according to news agency reports. At least one man was killed, and several others were injured in that confrontation.

On Tuesday, Radio Payam, a state-owned station, reported that seven people were killed and others were wounded Monday night when “several thugs” tried to attack a military post and vandalize public property in the same area as the demonstration earlier in the day, according to Agence France-Presse.

In his first public comment on the situation in Iran, President Obama said Monday that he was deeply troubled by the postelection violence and he called on Iranian leaders to respect free speech and the democratic process. He told reporters he would continue pursuing a direct dialogue with Tehran, but he urged that any Iranian investigation of election irregularities be conducted without bloodshed.

The protests showed how the government’s assertion that Mr. Ahmadinejad had won re-election by a ratio of almost two to one further cleaved Iranian society into rival camps.

On one side are the most powerful arms of the Islamic system of government: the supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei; the military; the paramilitary; and the Guardian Council. On the other is a diverse coalition that has grown emboldened by the day, with some clerics joining two former presidents and Mir Hussein Moussavi, the former prime minister and main opposition candidate, who addressed the crowd from the roof of a car near Freedom Square in downtown Tehran.

Protesters were especially enraged that Mr. Ahmadinejad on Sunday dismissed them as nothing more than soccer fans who had just lost a game and as “dust.” One demonstrator fired off a Twitter message, one of thousands of brief electronic dispatches that kept the outside world up-to-the-minute on the protests, proclaiming, “Ahmadinejad called us Dust, we showed him a sandstorm.”

Earlier Monday, Ayatollah Khamenei stepped in to try to calm a growing backlash, forcing him into a public role he generally seeks to avoid as the country’s top religious authority. Under Iran’s dual system of government, with civil and religious institutions, the supreme leader can usually operate in the shadows while elected officials serve as the public face of governance and policy.

He called for the Guardian Council to conduct an inquiry into the opposition’s claims that the election was rigged and then had that announcement repeated every 15 minutes on Iranian state radio throughout the day. It was a rare reversal.

Ayatollah Khamenei announced Saturday that the election results showing a landslide victory for Mr. Ahmadinejad were fair. But on Sunday he met with Mr. Moussavi, a moderate, to listen to his concerns. And on Monday, he promised the inquiry into the results.

Nevertheless, his announcement could not calm the anger of the people. There was so much distrust that some people said they believed the leader was just trying to buy time and to calm the crowds, rather than attempting to really investigate the outcome.

Hours later, a broad river of people in Tehran — young and old, dressed in traditional Islamic gowns and the latest Western fashions — marched slowly from Revolution Square to Freedom Square for more than three hours, many of them wearing the signature bright green ribbons of Mr. Moussavi’s campaign and holding up their hands in victory signs.

The silent march was a deliberate and striking contrast to the chaos of the past few days, when riot police officers sprayed tear gas and wielded clubs to disperse scattered bands of angry and frightened young people. When the occasional shout or chant went up, the crowd quickly hushed it, and some held up signs with the word silence.

“These people are not seeking a revolution,” said Ali Reza, a young actor in a brown T-shirt who stood for a moment watching on the rally’s sidelines. “We don’t want this regime to fall. We want our votes to be counted, because we want reforms, we want kindness, we want friendship with the world.”

Mr. Moussavi, who had called for the rally on Sunday but never received official permission for it, joined the crowd, as did Mohammad Khatami, the reformist former president. But the crowd was so vast, and communications had been so sporadic — the authorities have cut off phone and text-messaging services repeatedly in recent days — that many marchers seemed unaware they were there.

“We don’t really have a leader,” said Mahdiye, a 20-year-old student, who like many protesters declined to give a last name because of fears of repercussions. “Moussavi wants to do something, but they won’t let him. It is dangerous for him, and we don’t want to lose him. We don’t know how far this will go.”

The protesters said they would continue, with another major rally planned for Tuesday. But it was too soon to tell whether Ayatollah Khamenei’s decision to launch an inquiry, or the government’s decision to let the silent rally proceed, would change the election results. Many in the crowd said they believed that officials expected the protests to dissipate, as smaller protest movements did in 1999 and 2003.

Later on Monday, Mr. Moussavi said on his Web site that he was not optimistic that the authorities would overturn the election results. Demonstrators, though, expressed hopes that the tide had turned in their favor.

“Anything is possible,” said Hamid, a 50-year-old financial adviser. “If the people insist on this movement, if it continues here and in other parts of Iran, the pressure will build and maybe Ahmadinejad will be forced to resign.”

The police mostly stood on the sidelines on Monday. But after sunset, violence erupted after members of the Basij militia opened fire, leaving one dead and several others injured.

In Isfahan, south of Tehran, more violence broke out on Monday, with the police attacking a crowd of several thousand opposition protesters and rioters setting fires in parts of the city.

In Washington, a State Department spokesman, Ian C. Kelly, said that the United States was “deeply troubled” by the unrest in Iran and was concerned about allegations of ballot fraud. But he stopped short of condemning Iran’s security forces for cracking down on demonstrators and said that Washington did not know whether the allegations of fraud were, in fact, true.

In Moscow, meanwhile, an official at the Iranian Embassy said that Mr. Ahmadinejad had delayed a visit to Russia that was to have started Monday. The meeting, in Yekaterinburg, is of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, which includes Russia, China and four Central Asian countries. Reuters reported that he arrived on Tuesday.

As concern about the vote spread among Western governments, the European Union’s 27 member states planned to issue a joint call on Iran to clarify the election outcome, Reuters reported. The French government summoned the Iranian ambassador to register concern about the fairness of the vote, and Germany planned to follow suit.

The Guardian Council, which will have 10 days to review the results, is closely aligned with the supreme leader and with Mr. Ahmadinejad. It also has the full support of the Revolutionary Guards and the Basij militia. Until now, there have been no signs of that unity fraying. Political analysts said that the coalition of hard-line thinkers had hoped to finish off the reform movement and its leaders with this election.

However, at least for the moment, they have inadvertently empowered them.

“People feel really insulted, and nothing is worse than that,” said Azi, a 48-year-old woman in a yellow headscarf who participated in the massive rally on Monday. “We won’t let the regime buy time, we will hold another march tomorrow.”

At nightfall, large numbers of people in Tehran took to their roofs for a second night, chanting “God is great!” and “Death to the dictator!” in neighborhoods across the city. The Associated Press, quoting residents, also reported that shooting was also heard in three districts of wealthy northern Tehran.

news20090616WP

2009-06-16 15:28:19 | Weblog
[Today's Newspaper] fom [The Washington Post]

[Asia/Pacific]
Seeking Truth and Trust in Pakistan
Envoy Tries to Convince Refugees That U.S. Is on Their Side

By Karen DeYoung
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, June 16, 2009

SHAIKH SHAHZAID CAMP, Pakistan -- U.S. envoy Richard C. Holbrooke, red-faced and sweaty, sat on the dirt floor of a stifling tent as Aslam Khan, a 38-year-old laborer, spoke haltingly of his family's panicked flight from a Pakistani army offensive against Taliban forces in their mountain village, three hours north of here.

Holbrooke asked some questions about the Taliban but got few answers. "Are these all your children?" he asked with a smile. Yes, Khan said, he had nine.

"Your daughter is beautiful," Holbrooke continued, nodding toward a young woman who sat quietly at the edge of the family. Her head was covered in a royal-blue scarf that revealed only her stunningly dark eyes.

"That's not my daughter," Khan said abruptly. After an awkward silence, the woman explained that she was a Pakistani police officer. It was unclear whether she was there to protect Holbrooke from the refugees, or to monitor what they told him.

In the conflict between Pakistan and Islamist extremists, a fight that has drawn in the United States, trust is in short supply. Holbrooke's visit to this refugee camp and another earlier this month was an attempt to build confidence on all sides, and to seek some ground truth for the administration in a situation where it is sometimes as scarce as good faith. In the end, his presence boosted America's image in Pakistan but brought the refugees no closer to home.

Pakistani authorities appear distrustful of the refugees, wary of their loyalties and of the possibility of Taliban infiltrators. The government and military, while ostentatiously grateful for U.S. aid and concern, continue to mistrust American motives and staying power.

The Obama administration says it is pleased with the Pakistani army's progress but suspects that the government will not follow through on its pledges to quickly rebuild and protect the communities shattered by its six-week-old anti-Taliban offensive in the Swat Valley region. Without a plan to bring more than 2 million war-displaced Pakistanis safely home and a comprehensive strategy to push the offensive into al-Qaeda and Taliban sanctuaries near the Afghan border, administration officials openly fret that the war both here and in Afghanistan will be lost.

The refugees seem to trust no one -- not their government, which had left a vacuum of security and services in the northwest mountains that the Taliban filled; not the Taliban, which brutalized them and destroyed their schools; and certainly not the United States, seen by many of them as the instigator of the war and a threat to Pakistan's sovereignty.

As part of its new strategy for the region, the administration considers Afghanistan and Pakistan a single theater of war and diplomacy. Yet circumstances in the two countries are vastly different. In Afghanistan, tens of thousands of U.S. troops, under new commander Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal, are fighting the Taliban directly, and there are hundreds of American diplomatic and aid personnel to directly deliver U.S. assistance and expertise.

But Pakistan -- a nuclear power where the anti-extremist battle is far more complicated and critical -- is an arms-length operation. U.S. ground troops are not allowed, and the senior American military official in Pakistan, Rear Adm. Michael A. Lefevre, is largely restricted to the U.S. Embassy in Islamabad.

Holbrooke's foray into the camp was an attempt to convince the refugees that the United States was on their side but had no larger designs on their country.

"They do not have enough international assistance, by a long shot," he told a local journalist trailing him through the camps. "The United States is providing more than half the aid. That's not right. Where are the Europeans? Where is the OIC?" he said, referring to the Organization of the Islamic Conference. The United States would give all it could in monetary and material aid, he told the refugees, but would send no troops. "It's up to the Pakistani army to give you security," he said. "It's not our job."

In interviews and at news conferences with the Pakistani media, Holbrooke parried questions about U.S. Predator drone attacks -- he said he would not discuss them or Pakistan's nuclear weapons program -- and Osama bin Laden's charge of U.S. responsibility for destruction and deaths in Swat. "He's living in a cave," Holbrooke retorted, "so maybe he hasn't seen the damage he's done."

In meetings with Pakistan's government, military, judiciary and political opposition leaders, he pressed the message that getting the refugees back home safely was as crucial, and perhaps even more immediately important, as the ongoing military offensive. Temporary refugee camps tend quickly to become permanent, he argued. They are breeding grounds for public dissatisfaction and recruitment centers for extremists; getting people out of them is key to building confidence in the government.

"This has got to happen," he told a senior U.S. official in an aside at a dinner for international relief workers during the trip. "Figure out whatever we need to do. Don't worry about how much it costs."

Holbrooke is no stranger to refugee camps. He toured them in Southeast Asia, where he began his career as a junior Foreign Service officer in South Vietnam. In the 1990s, as chief U.S. negotiator for the Dayton peace accords, he walked the camps in Bosnia. As United Nations ambassador in the Clinton administration, and an activist official and board member for nongovernmental organizations during the George W. Bush years, he saw refugee squalor across Africa.

The Pakistani refugees, from their tent cities on the hot, dry plain west of the Indus River, can see the high mountain ridge to the north, the gateway to their homes in the Swat Valley and the neighboring districts of Buner and Dir. If they are still here when the summer monsoons arrive next month, the camps will become muddy swamps.

For now, the parching heat and the absence of refugee possessions gives the canvas settlement a veneer of tidiness. There is little inside the tents, other than a bare light bulb, a plastic bucket, a few blankets and those who live there. Outside, there is no shade or vegetation; the white cloth, the hard ground and the people are all covered in the same monochromatic dust.

No one appeared to be starving or seriously ill, but no one had anything to do but wait. "I've seen better, I've seen worse," Holbrooke said as he stalked the orderly tent rows with a bottle of water in his hand, leaving heavily armed police commandos and shouting Pakistani journalists in his wake.

Facing a group of unsmiling, tired-looking men gathered under a communal meeting tent, he prodded for information to take home to U.S. intelligence analysts and White House policymakers. "The Taliban who came to you, were they people you knew? . . . Why do people join the Taliban? . . . Who was protecting you before the Taliban came? The army? The police? The Frontier Corps? . . . Why did all of this happen, in your opinion?"

A young, cleanshaven man answered warily. Many people welcomed the Taliban "for justice, to decide the cases" that languished, ignored, in government courts, he said. It was "mostly weak people in the community" who joined the extremists. "They were unemployed, and the Taliban paid them." The others nodded.

But the refugees had more immediate concerns. They all wanted to go home, the men agreed, but it was not safe. Crops were ready for harvest, but there were still reports of fighting; there was no electricity, no water and much destruction in their villages. Local police and officials had fled; government threats to fire anyone who did not return to work had gone unheeded.

They were given meals in a communal dining tent, but they wanted to cook their own food. They had no pots and pans. The U.N. World Food Program supplied only wheat and oil -- what could they make with that? Why were some families given electric fans and others not?

"Where is our government stipend?" one man shouted, referring to the 25,000 Pakistani rupees (about $300) the government has promised each displaced family.

"Where are our leaders?" asked another man. "Why aren't they here?"

Holbrooke, his shirt sodden and a U.S. Agency for International Development cap on his head, waited patiently. "Thank you for being so honest and open," he said. "We come from the United States. President Obama has sent us to see how we can help you.

"The most important thing is for you to go home. . . . I talked to your president yesterday. I will see him tonight. I will tell him what you said. . . . I wish we could do more."

news20090616GDN1

2009-06-16 14:47:46 | Weblog
[Environment] from [guardian.co.uk]

[Guardian Environment Network]
HFCs: Ozone-saving gas targeted for climate effect
The use of hydrofluorocarbons in cooling systems may save the ozone layer – but it will harm the climate.

From ClimateChangeCorp, part of the Guardian Environment Network
guardian.co.uk, Monday 15 June 2009 14.52 BST
Article history

The Montreal Protocol, set in action in 1987, forced the phase-out of ozone-depleting gases chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) and later hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs). But the hydrofluorocarbons (HFC) that are replacing them could have an equally negative impact on climate change.

HFCs are used as refrigerants and foam-blowing agents and emitted as leakage from air conditioning and refrigeration systems. They have a global warming potential similar to that of HCFCs and hundreds to thousands of times greater than carbon dioxide.

Unless action is taken, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) predicted that emissions of HFCs will triple from 0.4 billion tons carbon dioxide equivalence in 2002, to 1.2 billion tons in 2015. The Environmental Investigation Agency (EIA) expects HFC emissions to be considerably higher in light of the accelerated phase-out of HCFCs agreed by the Montreal Protocol in September 2007.

The biggest emitters of HFCs are mobile air conditioning (MAC) systems in cars (66% of all HFC emissions according to 2002 data from US EPA and ADEME); followed by commercial refrigeration, and particularly supermarket refrigeration (23%); and finally stationery air conditioning systems (6%) such as found in retail units and offices.

Cooling cars

In 2006, the European Union's MAC Directive banned the use of mobile air conditioning refrigerants with a GWP over 150 in new model cars by 2011 and in all cars by 2017. Since then, there has been a flurry of activity by manufacturers looking for alternatives.

The two contenders are the chemical HFO-1234yf and carbon dioxide, known as R744 as a refrigerant. According to the Alliance for CO2 Solutions, a grouping of organisations that support the use of CO2 Technology in car air conditioning, there is an estimated $14.5 billion global market for car air conditioning to fight for.

On one side are chemical giants DuPont and Honeywell, that have jointly developed HFO-1234yf. Its selling point to car manufactures is that it is a near drop-in replacement to HFC-134a and doesn't require a complete MAC system redesign.

CO2, on the other hand, operates at higher pressure so requires a new system with new components and tooling. New technology will spell unwanted costs and hassle for car makers.

But costs will come down once mass volumes are achieved, say CO2 manufacturers. Frank Wolf, CEO of Obrist Engineering that develops R744/ CO2 technology for MAC systems, says a R744 MAC system will add just 20 euros to the cost of a car on a run of one million. CO2 itself is cheap and readily available.

R744 manufacturers also argue that, unlike HFO-1234yf, CO2 is proven, safe, natural and sustainable. In a letter to German OEMs in May, Greenpeace Germany raises concerns over the chemical's flammability, stating that "the claim that 1234yf will be an alternative is not only wrong but also life threatening; the legal consequences not calculable".

HFO-1234yf is "mildly flammable", says Taner Eryilmaz, DuPont global marketing manager, but adds that all risk assessments undertaken by the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) International Cooperative Research Program, and additional tests by OEMs, have concluded that 1234yf is safe in mobile air conditioning. "They have gone to extreme, unrealistic conditions just to see what it takes to ignite 1234yf and their conclusion remains the same," he says (opponents question the independence of tests.)

As the debate rumbles on, car manufacturers are not placing orders. As a result, it is looking increasingly likely the 2011 deadline for the MAC directive will be delayed.

Without the politics to battle with, the commercial refrigeration industry is making faster progress towards climate-friendly alternatives.

Fridges

Refrigerants, Naturally! is a corporate alliance of Coca-Cola, McDonalds, Unilever, Carlsberg, Ikea, and the PepsiCo, with support from Greenpeace and the United Nations Environment Programme, to replace HFC technology in favour of natural refrigerants.

Coca Cola plans to install 100,000 cold drink coolers and vending machines using CO2 as refrigerant by the end of 2010. (Coca Cola has 10 million coolers in operation.) "CO2 works. It's more efficient, and importantly, it is safe. It is the future, and now we are taking steps to making it a reality" Neville Isdell, Coca-Cola chairman and CEO at a speech in Beijing last year.

By early 2009, Unilever had 400,000 hydrocarbon freezer cabinets in use, and plans to double this figure by 2010 to generate 80,000 tonnes GHG emissions savings per year, according to calculations from Refrigerants, Naturally!

US restrictions against the use of hydrocarbon (which is flammable) in the US are holding back progress. But in 2008, Ben & Jerry's, part of Unilever, received federal permission to install and test the first hydrocarbon-based freezers in the United States.

Drink coolers are just the beginning. Much greater emissions savings can be achieved by switching supermarket fridges and freezers over to climate-friendly alternatives. Research from EIA has revealed that supermarkets are the biggest source of HFC emissions in the UK. And refrigerants account for around a quarter of a supermarket's GHG emissions (20% in the case of Tesco for 2008/09).

But supermarkets are lagging. In a survey carried out by EIA in summer 2008, it found that none of the UK's seven largest supermarket chains had more than four stores using HFC alternatives.

But there are signs of progress. From 2010, Marks & Spencer has pledged to only install climate-friendly CO2 systems. It is also trialling a new HFC with lower global warming impact that, if successful, will replace all existing HFC systems by 2012.

Cool air

The move to climate-friendly alternatives in stationery air conditioning has been slower. Hydrocarbon and ammonia systems exist, but only in "dozens" of buildings in the UK, says Nick Cox, MD of environmentally-friendly air conditioning supplier Earthcare Products. "But there is enough out there to prove the technology," he adds.

Earthcare's hydrocarbon systems are being used by companies and government departments "that implement their environmental policies rather than ignore them," he says. Enquiries are also coming in from supermarkets that are already using natural refrigerants in fridges.

But Cox says it will take regulation to prompt a wholesale move away from HFCs in stationery air conditioning.

A credible goal?

Cost is the major barrier. Most companies are only using HFC-free solutions in new equipment rather than replace existing. But the cost of doing this is still high.

The cost of the natural refrigerants themselves is low, sometimes lower than HFC. But because the technology is newer, the costs tends to be higher, says Daniel Colbourne from the Refrigerants, Naturally! Secretariat. He estimates that a CO2 point-of-sale chiller could cost around twice as much as an HFC equivalent.

But as Cox says, "if we were able to achieve the same volumes [as existing mass produced systems], the equipment wouldn't cost any more. It is all volume driven."

Cost is not the only factor. "The whole industry needs to change," says Bob Arthur, refrigeration technology specialist at Marks & Spencer. "The refrigeration industry needs to be able to support the alternative fluids in terms of equipment availability, quality trained operatives, and understanding of the alternatives' application."

Regulatory horizon

Challenging or not, this isn't something companies dare ignore with global regulation for HFCs on the horizon. EIA is calling for a global HFC phase out that would cover all sectors. It believes the Montreal Protocol is a good mechanism to co-ordinate this.

With the Obama administration recently expressing support for a clamp down on HFCs, and with HFCs being formally discussed at the climate meeting in Bonn this week, Fionnuala Walravens, EIA global environment campaigner, thinks a global phase could be on the cards. "So much has happened in the last six months that it looks like it could become a political reality. Some sort of agreement on HFCs would be a positive outcome at Copenhagen."

Natural refrigerants

* Carbon dioxide (R744) – used as a refrigerant before the discovery of CFCs. Global warming potential (GWP) of 1, non-ozone depleting, non-toxic, non-flammable. CO2 operates at a higher pressure than HFCs, which means it requires new system design and components.
* Hydrocarbon (isobutane (R600a) and propane (R290)) – negligible GWP, non-ozone depleting, non-toxic, flammable. US and Canada places restrictions on the use this flammable gas. But it is used in over 300 million household fridges across Europe, Japan, Russia and China. Unlikely to be appropriate for use in large applications such as supermarket fridges as a result of its flammability.
* Ammonia – No GWP and non-ozone depleting. It is a hazardous substance, but used safely around the world in large-scale industrial cooling systems such as food processing and building air conditioning.

CONTINUED ON 20090616GDN2

news20090616GDN2

2009-06-16 14:33:57 | Weblog
[Environment] from [guardian.co.uk]

[Guardian Environment Network]
HFCs: Ozone-saving gas targeted for climate effect
The use of hydrofluorocarbons in cooling systems may save the ozone layer – but it will harm the climate.

From ClimateChangeCorp, part of the Guardian Environment Network
guardian.co.uk, Monday 15 June 2009 14.52 BST
Article history

CONTINUED FROM 20090616GDN1

Fluorocarbons (F-gases)

* CFCs and HCFCs - Chloroflourocarbons and hydrochlorofluorocarbons are ozone layer-depleting substances (as well as potent greenhouse gases) regulated by the Montreal Protocol.
* HFCs – Hydroflourocarbons are non ozone-depleting and were developed as replacements for CFCs. But they are strong greenhouse gases and are regulated by the Kyoto Protocol. HFC-134a , that accounts for the bulk of HFCs used, has a GWP of 1,430 over a 100-year lifetime.


[Wildlife]
Police raid Scottish grouse moor after poisoned red kite is found dead
Three injured hunting dogs seized in raid of six properties, including gamekeepers' homes, on an estate near Edinburgh

By Severin Carrell, Scotland correspondent
guardian.co.uk, Monday 15 June 2009 14.38 BST
Article history

A sporting estate near Edinburgh has been raided by police after a poisoned red kite and several alleged baits were found earlier this month.

Estate vehicles and six properties, including gamekeepers' homes, were searched on Raeshaw estate, a well-known grouse moor in the Moorfoot hills near Peebles, after the red kite was found dead close by on a neighbouring estate.

It is understood that one bait believed to be laced with pesticide was found on Raeshaw during Wednesday's raid, but no-one was arrested.

Three injured hunting dogs were also seized by the Scottish Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (SSPCA), on suspicion of involvement with badger baiting. The SSPCA has legal powers to investigate alleged animal cruelty cases in parallel with the police, and report their findings to prosecutors.

The search, by Lothian and Borders police, officials from the Scottish government's rural payments division, the SSPCA, and the RSPB came after several dead buzzards and poisoned baits were found in the area earlier this year.

The police appealed for information, and said: "On Tuesday 2 June a red kite was found dead in the Scottish Borders, having been poisoned. As a result, a number of house searches have been carried out in the area."

Mike Flynn, the SSPCA's chief superintendent, said: "Our special investigations unit assisted the police in a search of an estate in the Borders in relation to an incident involving a poisoned red kite.

"As a result of that search the SSPCA subsequently seized several injured dogs. The SSPCA will be submitting a report to the procurator fiscal."

The estate had no comment to make about the recent police operation.

Raeshaw was also raided five years ago after nine birds of prey, including five barn owls, two buzzards, a kestrel, and a tawny owl, had been found on the estate poisoned and shot.

Government scientists found the illegal pesticide carbofuran had been used, and said mink and rabbit were used as poisoned baits. There were no prosecutions.

news20090616NTR

2009-06-16 11:46:20 | Weblog
[naturenews] from [nature.com]

Published online 16 June 2009 | Nature | doi:10.1038/news.2009.572
News
Feather growth limits size of flying birds
Time required for moulting may be a more important factor than weight.

By Dan Jones

The size of flighted birds is limited by the demands of keeping their feathers in good condition, and not simply by the effort needed to keep them up in the air.

Birds' feathers can be damaged by the physical rigours of flight, parasititic and bacterial infections, and exposure to ultraviolet light. It's crucial for birds to periodically replace damaged feathers, but this requires time and energy that could otherwise be used to find mates, rear chicks or migrate.

Sievert Rohwer at the University of Washington in Seattle and his colleagues studied 43 species of bird to assess the relationship between a bird's size, the length of its flight feathers and the time it takes to grow new feathers. They report their findings in PLoS Biology1.

The team showed that the length of a bird's flight feathers is proportional to its body mass raised to the one-third power, so that feather length roughly doubles with a tenfold increase in the bird's weight. But feather growth rate is proportional to body mass raised only to the one-sixth power.

"So as birds get bigger, the rate of feather growth fails to keep up with the increase in flight-feather length, forcing larger birds to spend disproportionately more time growing their flight feathers," says Rohwer.

Most small birds regrow all of their primary flight feathers at least once a year, replacing the 9 or 10 primary feathers per wing sequentially. Rohwer and his co-workers suggest that the trade-offs involved in regrowing feathers place an upper limit of about 3 kilograms on birds that moult in this way.

Above 3 kilograms, the time required to grow new feathers makes this strategy too time-consuming, having a detrimental effect on breeding and migration.

Many larger birds, such as albatrosses, get around this by stretching the moult over two to three years. This ensures that a smaller fraction of each year is spent moulting. Other species replace several feathers at the same time, or replace them all simultaneously and temporarily forgo flight.

But each alternative imposes a cost. Replacing more than one flight feather at a time reduces the aerodynamic efficiency of flight; replacing them all at once leaves birds temporarily flightless, making feeding and escaping predators more difficult.

These tradeoffs also raise questions about how the largest flying bird ever discovered — Argentavis magnificens, which lived around 6 million years ago and weighed roughly 70 kg — could have coped with feather replacement. Rohwer and his colleagues speculate that A. magnificens solved the problem of replacing large, slow-growing feathers by fattening up and then going in for one big, long moult, as geese and swans do today.

Size is still an important factor, points out Anders Hedenström of Lund University in Sweden. Aerodynamics suggests an upper weight limit of about 15 kilograms for birds whose flight is powered principally by flapping their wings. Soaring birds can achieve a much greater mass — for instance, some bustards weigh as much as 20 kilograms. A. magnificens was probably such a bird.

Yet many birds do not achieve the maximum size permitted by their mode of flight, says Rohwer, probably because of the time demands of feather replacement.

References
1. Rohwer, S. , Ricklefs, R. E. , Rohwer, V. G. & Copple, M. M. PLoS Biol. 7, e1000132 (2009).

news20090616SLT1

2009-06-16 09:37:07 | Weblog
[Today's Paper] from [Slate Magazine]

A Bloody Monday in Tehran
By Daniel Politi
Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009, at 6:38 AM ET

The papers continue to give top billing to Iran, where hundreds of thousands of protesters ignored a ban and marched through central Tehran to protest the result of Friday's presidential election. It was the largest unofficial demonstration since the 1979 Islamic revolution and came mere hours after the country's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, ordered an investigation into allegations of fraud in the voting process. While most of the protests were largely peaceful, the day ended in bloodshed when members of a pro-government militia fired into a crowd. The Los Angeles Times (LAT) catches late-breaking news that Iran's state radio reported today that seven people were killed after protesters tried to "attack a military site." The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) notes unconfirmed reports from "a student-run news service" that five students were killed Sunday night in raids at Tehran University carried out by pro-government militias. The New York Times (NYT) and LAT front breathtaking pictures of the "broad river of people" (NYT) that took to the streets yesterday and marched slowly from Revolution Square to Freedom Square. The Washington Post (WP) points out that there were reports of protests and clashes with police in other cities besides Tehran.

USA Today (USAT) goes with a photograph from Iran at the top of its front page, but dedicates its lead spot to President Obama's speech before the American Medical Association to garner support for his efforts to overhaul the nation's health system. Obama took aim at those who say he wants the government to take over health care by saying that they "are not telling the truth." He made sure to emphasize that a public coverage plan would not be "a Trojan horse for a single-payer system."

In addition to calling for an investigation of the alleged electoral fraud, Ayatollah Khamenei also tried to calm protesters by meeting with Mir Hossein Mousavi, the main opposition candidate. But opposition supporters weren't buying it and saw Khamenei's moves as simply an effort to buy time and hope the protests die down naturally. Mousavi's wife had told supporters that the march had been canceled because they expected swift repression from government forces. But people gathered anyway, and many more quickly joined when it became clear the police weren't going to get involved. Mousavi made a brief appearance and told the crowd he didn't have much faith in the independence of the Guardian Council's investigation into the voting.

It seems the NYT and WP reporters may have been at different sides of the huge march. While the NYT takes pains to emphasize that the "people marched in silence" and "the crowd quickly hushed" anyone who belted out an occasional shout or chant, the WP describes it as a rowdy affair, with "ecstatic" crowds, and lots of chanting and clapping. Regardless, the "diverse gathering refuted the charge … that Mousavi's support was drawn from the wealthy and educated in northern Tehran," notes the LAT. The marchers were from different generations and social classes, and there were even some families with children.

Deadly violence erupted after dark when members of the Basij, a pro-government militia group, fired onto a crowd from a rooftop. The WP says it's not clear whether the shooting began after the crowd threatened to storm Basij's headquarters. But after the shooting, protesters set fire to part of the building and several motorcycles. A spokesman for the Guardian Council urged Iranians to be patient while they investigated the claims of election fraud. More trouble could be in store today. Mousavi's supporters have called for a general strike today, and the LAT notes that a pro-government rally was announced for 4 p.m. today at the same site where an opposition rally is set to begin an hour later. Early morning wire stories report that the spokesman for the Guardian Council announced it will re-count some ballot boxes from the election.

President Obama, in his first public comments on the situation, said he was "deeply troubled" by the violence in Iran. "I can't state definitively one way or another what happened with respect to the election," Obama said. "But what I can say is that there appears to be a sense on the part of people who were so hopeful and so engaged and so committed to democracy who now feel betrayed."

In a front-page analysis, the NYT states that Khamenei's move to quickly declare President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad the winner of the election involved "a rare break from a long history of cautious moves." Although there seems little doubt that the Council of Guardians will simply uphold Ahmadinejad's victory, by calling for the investigation Khamenei "has opened a serious fissure in the face of Islamic rule and one that may prove impossible to patch over." Khamenei is often described as careful but "now faces a nearly impossible choice," says the NYT. "If he lets the demonstrations swell, it could well change the system of clerical rule. If he uses violence to stamp them out, the myth of a popular mandate for the Islamic revolution will die."

So, what about the results? Any chance Ahmadinejad actually won the election? The Post looks into this question and says that while there are "many signs of manipulation or outright fraud" in the election results, "the case for a rigged outcome is far from ironclad." The ballots were certainly counted very quickly, and at several polling places representatives of opposition candidates weren't allowed to oversee the initial counting. "There are suspicious elements here, but there's no solid evidence of fraud," one expert said.

As Obama tried to get the American Medical Association on his side, it also became clear that the plans for health care currently being discussed would not only cost a lot of money but might not even solve the problem of the uninsured. In a front-page piece, the NYT notes that a plan that was presented by Democratic leaders in Congress would cost at least $1 trillion over 10 years and only reduce the number of uninsured by 16 million people, leaving around 36 million people uninsured. Lawmakers are trying to figure out how to pay for this, and some think there's no option but to increase taxes. House Democrats are considering a tax on soft drinks, and the long-discussed idea of creating a value-added tax is also apparently on the table.

The LAT fronts new documents made public yesterday that reveal Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, the self-proclaimed Sept. 11 mastermind, said during hearings at Guantanamo that he gave the CIA false information just so they would stop applying harsh interrogation techniques. "I make up stories," Mohammed said as he described how interrogators asked him about Osama bin Laden's location. "Where is he? I don't know. Then, he torture me," Mohammed recounted. "Then I said, 'Yes, he is in this area.' " In his statements, Mohammed also gives the impression that he said some people belonged to al-Qaida even though he didn't know, just to avoid abusive interrogation sessions. Of course, there's no way to corroborate anything Mohammed said, but he is one of the detainees who we now know was repeatedly subjected to waterboarding.

Meanwhile, the WP highlights that another detainee who was repeatedly subjected to waterboarding, Abu Zubaida, apparently had to endure abusive interrogations because the CIA thought he was someone else. In transcripts from a 2007 hearing, Abu Zubaida said his jailers told him they thought he was al-Qaida's No. 3 but later realized he was a glorified nobody. "They told me, 'Sorry, we discover that you are not Number 3, not a partner, not even a fighter,' " Abu Zubaida said. Although he was described as "al-Qaida's chief of operations" in 2002, officials later came to the conclusion that he was just a "fixer" and wasn't even a member of al-Qaida. Abu Zubaida said he had to go through "months of suffering and torture" based on that false assumption. He was waterboarded 83 times.

The NYT hears word that the Obama administration will order the Navy to inspect North Korean ships that are suspected of carrying forbidden materials. The Navy won't be boarding the ships by force, but if permission is refused, the ship would be reported to the Security Council and the Navy would track the ship to its next port and continue pressuring for inspectors to be allowed on board. North Korea has previously said that any forced inspections would be seen as an act of war. If the administration carries out this plan, it "would amount to the most confrontational approach taken by the United States in dealing with North Korea in years," notes the NYT.

news20090616SLT2

2009-06-16 09:19:52 | Weblog
[Today's Paper] from [Slate Magazine]

A Bloody Monday in Tehran
By Daniel Politi
Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009, at 6:38 AM ET

CONTINUED FROM 20090616SLT1

While it has essentially become conventional wisdom that moderate drinking is good for people's health, some scientists aren't quite convinced, notes the NYT. Critics of this view say there has yet to be a study that actually shows moderate drinking leads to a lower risk of death. Some think it could be possible that healthy people just tend to be moderate drinkers. Experts say that the question won't be settled until there's a long-term, randomized, controlled clinical trial, but there are many ethical and practical implications that could make it difficult to carry it out. "The moderate drinkers tend to do everything right—they exercise, they don't smoke, they eat right and they drink moderately," one expert said. "It's very hard to disentangle all of that, and that's a real problem."