GreenTechSupport GTS 井上創学館 IESSGK

GreenTechSupport News from IESSGK

news20090622BRT

2009-06-22 19:25:16 | Weblog
[Biography of the Day] from [Britannica]
June 22
Meryl Streep
American film actress Meryl Streep, known for her masterly technique, expertise with dialects, subtly expressive face, and record-setting 13th Academy Award nomination in 2003, was born this day in 1949.

[On This Day] from [Britannica]
June 22
1611: Mutiny against Henry Hudson
On this day in 1611, English explorer Henry Hudson—who earlier had tried to discover a short route from Europe to Asia through the Arctic Ocean—was set adrift with his son and seven others in Hudson Bay by mutineers.

1941: Germany violated the German-Soviet Nonaggression Pact of 1939 and attacked the Soviet Union during World War II.

1940: With an invading German force at its door in mid-June 1940, the French government under the leadership of Marshal Philippe Pétain signed an armistice with Germany, thereby creating Vichy France (the “French State”).

1910: Katherine Dunham, an African American dancer, choreographer, and anthropologist noted for her innovative interpretations of primitive, ritualistic, and ethnic dances, was born.

1906: American motion-picture director and producer Billy Wilder was born in Sucha, Austria (now in Poland).

1887: English biologist and philosopher Sir Julian Huxley, who greatly influenced the modern development of embryology, was born in London.

1815: Napoleon abdicated as French emperor for the second time.

168: The Romans defeated the Macedonians under King Perseus at the Battle of Pydna, which marked the end of the Macedonian monarchy and allowed Rome's annexation of Macedonia.


[Today's Word] from [Dr. Kazuo Iwata]
June 22
He had fallen forward and lay on the earth as though sleeping. His face had an expression of calm, as though almost glad the end had come.
Erich Maria Remarque (born this day in 1898)

(彼はのめって倒れ、眠っているように地上に横たわった。
彼の顔には静かな表情があった。終末がきたのをほとんど喜んでいるかのような。)
Kare-ha nomette-taore, nemutte-iruyou-ni chijo-ni-yokotawatta.
kare-no-kao-niha shizukana-hyojo-ga-atta. syumatsu-ga-kita-nowo hotondo-yorokondeiru-kanoyou-ni.)

news20090622JT

2009-06-22 18:58:13 | Weblog
[TODAY'S TOP STORIES] from [The Japan Times]

[NATIONAL NEWS]
Monday, June 22, 2009
Japan left key straits open for U.S. nukes
(核通過優先で5海峡の領海制限)


(Kyodo News) Japan has avoided extending its territorial waters to cover five key straits to avoid political disputes arising from the passage of U.S. warships carrying nuclear weapons, according to accounts of former top Japanese officials.

When the boundaries were set in the late 1970s, it was believed the U.S. would have continued to transport nuclear weapons through the channels regardless of whether they were considered Japanese territorial waters or not.

Japan's territorial waters in the Soya, Tsugaru, Osumi, Tsushima and Korea straits have been set at 3 nautical miles (5.6 km) from shore, instead of the maximum allowable limit of 12 nautical miles (22 km).

U.S. vessels carrying nuclear weapons, including submarines with nuclear missiles, must have passed through the key choke points on their way to the Sea of Japan to act as a deterrent to the former Soviet Union, China and North Korea, according to some former vice foreign ministers. Vice foreign minister is the ministry's top bureaucratic post, while the minister is usually a politician from the Diet.

If the boundaries had been set at 12 nautical miles, there would have been no areas of open sea in some sections, forcing the vessels to cross Japanese waters and thus infringe on Japan's three nonnuclear principles of not possessing, producing or allowing nuclear weapons on its territory, they said.

The government set the boundaries in the five straits at 3 nautical miles under the guise of placing priority on free passage through the key channels, the former vice ministers said.

The arrangements were made when the government was discussing territorial limits for the straits while formulating a law enforced in 1977 to set limits up to 12 nautical miles, they said.

At the time, the government believed that the United States would continue to transport nuclear weapons through the channels even if the territorial waters were set at 12 nautical miles in the straits because Japan had already been turning a blind eye in line with a secret pact struck when the bilateral security treaty was revised in 1960, according to the former officials.

A written question was submitted last week to the Foreign Ministry asking whether the accounts of its former top officials are true, but the ministry said more time was needed before responding. It said an answer would hopefully be formulated this week.

The Soya strait separates the northernmost part of Hokkaido and Russia's Sakhalin Island, the Tsugaru lies between Honshu and Hokkaido, the Osumi is off the southern tip of Kyushu, and the Tsushima and Korea straits separate Kyushu and South Korea.

More ground troops
Japan's five-year defense policy starting in fiscal 2010 will concentrate on increasing ground troops and upgrading equipment in response to North Korea's nuclear tests and China's rise as a major military power, according to a draft of the guidelines.

The central principle of the new National Defense Program Guidelines, to be adopted by the government before the end of this year, is based on reversing cuts in defense spending implemented since 1995 following the end of the Cold War, according to the draft.

The document cites a need to "secure options responsive to changing situations" in international security, alluding to a possible upcoming debate on whether to develop the capability to launch pre-emptive strikes on other nations' bases.

A defense panel of the Liberal Democratic Party proposed May 26 that the new defense guidelines stipulate the need for Japan to develop this ability. The proposal was made a day after North Korea conducted its second nuclear test.

While Japan maintains a defense-only posture under the war-renouncing Constitution, the government takes the view that the country can strike an enemy military base if a missile attack appears certain.

The guidelines could change substantially if the Democratic Party of Japan unseats the LDP in upcoming general election.


[NATIONAL NEWS]
Monday, June 22, 2009
134 so far to stand trial by lay judges
(裁判員制度 134人に適用)


(Kyodo News) Prosecutors nationwide have indicted 134 people so far to be tried under the new lay judge system, with the first two trials scheduled for the first half of August in Tokyo and Saitama, according to a Kyodo News tally.

The most common charge is robbery resulting in injury at 34, followed by murder at 32, drug violations at 17, arson at 10 and injury resulting in death at nine.

As of Friday, 42 district courts and their branches were scheduled to hold lay judge trials.

The first, involving a 72-year-old man charged with murdering a neighbor, is scheduled for Aug. 3 to 6 at the Tokyo District Court.

Katsuyoshi Fujii allegedly stabbed Haruko Bun, 66, a South Korean resident of Japan, to death May 1 on a road in Adachi Ward.

Fujii has allegedly told the police he lost his temper after some plastic bottles filled with water in front of his home were knocked over by a motorcycle owned by Bun's son.

Many people place plastic bottles around their garages, gardens and planters under the false belief that light reflected from them will scare off stray cats.

Before the stabbing, Fujii had already become a public nuisance in the neighborhood, according to some residents in the area. He reportedly was often seen cursing loudly at other residents.

The second case involves a 35-year-old man who works demolishing buildings. He has been indicted for attempted murder. His trial will be held at the Saitama District Court from Aug. 10 to 12.

Shigeyuki Miyake has been charged with seriously injuring a 35-year-old acquaintance with a kitchen knife in a parking lot at a game arcade in Sayama on May 4. According to the prosecutors, Miyake had money trouble with the man.

Under the new trial system, six people randomly selected from eligible voters will sit alongside three professional judges on trials involving serious crimes.

Among crimes subject to lay judge trials are murder, murder-robbery, rape, arson, counterfeiting, selling narcotics and violating gun regulations.


[NATIONAL NEWS]
Monday, June 22, 2009
Japan's oldest man says 'thank you very much' in English
(日本で最高齢の男性 "サンキューベリマッチ" と感謝の意)


KYOTO (Kyodo) Jiroemon Kimura, who at 112 is the oldest man in Japan, says he's glad to have the title.

Kimura took over the national title when Tomoji Tanabe of Miyazaki Prefecture, who was the oldest man in the world, died Friday at age 113.

Worldwide, Henry Allingham of Britain is now the oldest man, Guinness World Records said. Allingham's birthday is June 6, 1896. Kimura was born April 19, 1897.

Appearing before the media at his home in Kyotango, Kyoto Prefecture, over the weekend, Kimura said, "Thank you very much" in English.

While expressing gratitude to his family and other people close to him for their support, Kimura said crisply he believes the key to his longevity is to eat healthy and in small portions.

"Not eating much without likes and dislikes," he remarked.

Watching sumo and Diet sessions on TV are among his hobbies, he said, though he's not happy with recent developments in either field.

"I would like to see more Japanese sumo wrestlers advance," Kimura said. Japan's new longevity yokozuna was also quick to criticize lawmakers. "They should do what makes things better for Japanese people," he said.

Kimura has seven children, 15 grandchildren, 23 great-grandchildren and eight great-great-grandchildren, according to his family.

news20090622LAT

2009-06-22 17:10:23 | Weblog
[Today's Newspaper] from [Los Angeles Times]
 
[World News]
Split deepens between top clerics in Iran
The Guardian Council questions 3 million votes but says they won't change the outcome. Relatives of opposition figure Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani are briefly detained. Western officials say the death toll could be as high as 100.

By Jeffrey Fleishman and Ramin Mostaghim
June 22, 2009

Reporting from Cairo and Tehran -- As the power struggle inside Iran's political class appeared to intensify, with reformist and conservative leaders exchanging sharp statements that blamed each other for last week's deadly street violence, authorities announced irregularities that could affect 3 million votes in 50 cities.

The Guardian Council, which oversees elections, found that "votes collected in 50 cities surpass the number of people eligible to cast ballots in those areas," state-owned Press TV reported. A spokesman for the council said the votes were not enough to reverse the reelection of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

The revelation was announced as opposition leader and presidential challenger Mir-Hossein Mousavi has alleged widespread fraud and has called for the June 12 elections to be annulled. It also came as the divide between Iran's senior clerics over the direction of the country took on a harsh public tone. But there was no repetition of Saturday's bloody battles as a tense calm settled over Tehran.

But Press TV reported that the authorities had detained five relatives of former President Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani -- a senior cleric and an architect of the 1979 Islamic Revolution who is a key backer of reformist opposition candidate Mir-Hossein Mousavi. Among those in custody was Faezeh Hashemi, Rafsanjani's eldest daughter, who was picked up Saturday after she addressed a rally of Mousavi supporters.

All five were later released, according to Press TV and the Associated Press.

The arrests signaled the persistence of rivalries and disputes among Iran's senior clerics. Supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei supports Ahmadinejad, while reformers such as Rafsanjani back the opposition.

Mousavi appeared unwilling to bend, issuing a statement Sunday on his website telling supporters that "protesting against lies and fraud is your right." His words, however, also cautioned against using violence, urging those who have taken to the streets to "continue to show restraint."

His statement came as tension seemed to ease between security forces and protesters after clashes Saturday in which at least 13 people were killed.

Western officials believe the death toll nationwide has reached 100 since the protests began.

Some news agencies reported sporadic gunshots in Tehran neighborhoods Sunday evening. There were no reports of casualties.

A source inside Tehran's Evin Prison said nearly 1,000 people were detained Saturday. Many were released by the morning.

But the aftermath of Saturday's demonstrations was an atmosphere of blame and recrimination as security forces labeled protesters "terrorists," and demonstrators condemned the harsh tactics of government-backed militias. The public nature of the dispute deepened the sense of a struggle at the heart of the Islamic Republic and has led to uncertainty about whether the two sides can recalibrate their strategies to keep the nation from sliding into further chaos.

'Dangerous'

The outcry from reformists continues. Another former president and a moderate leader, Mohammad Khatami, openly blamed the nation's conservative leadership for the days of chaos and violence.

"Preventing people from expressing their demands through civil ways will have dangerous consequences," Khatami, a Mousavi ally, said in a statement, the semiofficial Mehr news agency reported.

Meanwhile, Ali Larijani, the conservative speaker of parliament, who for days had been supporting Khamenei, suggested that Iranians had lost faith in a legal system that validated the disputed June 12 election results that gave Ahmadinejad a wide victory.

"Although the Guardian Council is made up of religious individuals," said Larijani, referring to the board that oversees elections, "I wish certain members would not side with a certain presidential candidate."

Yet authorities continued to make it clear that they were prepared to use force to shut down the brawling protests that have rocked the capital and other cities.

Reuters reported that Iran Police Chief Ismail Ahmadi Moghaddam told opposition leader Mousavi that "bandits are acting in the shadow of the illegal atmosphere created by you." And the Press TV website called the protests "a torrent of illegal rallies."

Meanwhile, Iranian hard-liners continued to accuse the United States and other Western countries of interfering in the country's domestic affairs.

On Sunday, Ahmadinejad reportedly rebuked the West during a meeting of clerics and scholars.

"Definitely, by hasty remarks, you will not be placed in the circle of friendship with the Iranian nation," the president said, according to the Reuters news agency. "Therefore I advise you to correct your interfering stances."

news20090622NYT1

2009-06-22 16:55:38 | Weblog
[Today's Newspaper] from [The New York Times]

[Middle East]
Unrest in Iran Sharply Deepens Rift Among Clerics
Faezeh Hashemi, daughter of the former president, Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, attended a rally for Mir Hussein Moussavi. Iranian state television reported on Sunday that Ms. Hashemi and four other members of the family had been arrested.

By NAZILA FATHI and MICHAEL SLACKMAN
Published: June 21, 2009

TEHRAN — A bitter rift among Iran’s ruling clerics deepened Sunday over the disputed presidential election that has convulsed Tehran in the worst violence in 30 years, with the government trying to link the defiant loser to terrorists and detaining relatives of his powerful backer, a founder of the Islamic republic.

The loser, Mir Hussein Moussavi, the moderate reform candidate who contends that the June 12 election was stolen from him, fired back at his accusers on Sunday night in a posting on his Web site, calling on his own supporters to demonstrate peacefully despite stern warnings from Iran’s top leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, that no protests of the vote would be allowed. “Protesting to lies and fraud is your right,” Mr. Moussavi said in a challenge to Ayatollah Khamenei’s authority.

Earlier, the police detained five relatives of Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, a former president who leads two influential councils and openly supported Mr. Moussavi’s election. The relatives, including Mr. Rafsanjani’s daughter, Faezeh Hashemi, were released after several hours.

The developments, coming one day after protests here in the capital and elsewhere were crushed by police officers and militia members using guns, clubs, tear gas and water cannons, suggested that Ayatollah Khamenei was facing entrenched resistance among some members of the elite. Though rivalries have been part of Iranian politics since the 1979 revolution, analysts said that open factional competition amid a major political crisis could hinder Ayatollah Khamenei’s ability to restore order.

There was no verifiable accounting of the death toll from the mayhem on Saturday, partly because the government has imposed severe restrictions on news coverage and warned foreign reporters who remained in the country to stay off the streets.

It also ordered the BBC’s longtime correspondent in Tehran expelled and ordered Newsweek’s correspondent detained.

State television said that 10 people had died in clashes, while radio reports said 19. The news agency ISNA said 457 people had been arrested.

Vowing not to have a repeat of Saturday, the government on Sunday saturated major streets and squares of Tehran with police and Basij militia forces. There were reports of scattered confrontations but no confirmation of any new injuries by evening. But as they had on previous nights, many residents of Tehran clambered to their rooftops and could be heard shouting “Death to the dictator!” and “God is great,” their rallying cries since the crisis began.

It was unclear whether protests, which began after the government declared that the conservative president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, had won re-election in a landslide against Mr. Moussavi, would be sustained in the face of the clampdown.

Amateur video accounts showed at least one large protest gathering, on Shirazi Street, though it was unclear how long it lasted.

But in the network of Internet postings and Twitter messages that has become the opposition’s major tool for organizing and sharing information, a powerful and vivid new image emerged: a video posted on several Web sites that showed a young woman, called Neda, her face covered in blood. Text posted with the video said she had been shot. It was not possible to verify the authenticity of the video.

The Web site of another reformist candidate, Mehdi Karoubi, referred to her as a martyr who did not “have a weapon in her soft hands or a grenade in her pocket but became a victim by thugs who are supported by a horrifying security apparatus.”

Accounts of the election’s aftermath in the state-run press suggested that the government might be laying the groundwork for discrediting and arresting Mr. Moussavi. IRNA, the official news agency, quoted Alireza Zahedi, a member of the Basij militia, as saying Mr. Moussavi had provoked the violence, sought help from outside the country to do so and should be put on trial. The Fars news agency quoted a Tehran University law professor as saying that Mr. Moussavi had acted against “the security of the nation.” State television suggested that at least some of the unrest was instigated by an outlawed terrorist group, the Mujahedeen Khalq, which does not have a strong following in Iran.

Mr. Moussavi was not seen in public on Sunday but showed no sign of yielding. In his Web posting, he urged followers to “avoid violence in your protest and behave as though you are the parents that have to tolerate your children’s misbehavior at the security forces.”

He also warned the government to “avoid mass arrests, which will only create distance between society and the security forces.”

The moves against members of Mr. Rafsanjani’s family were seen as an attempt to pressure him to drop his challenge to Ayatollah Khamenei — pressure that Mr. Rafsanjani’s son, Mehdi Rafsanjani, said he would reject.

“My father was in jail for five years when we were young. We don’t care if they keep her even for a year,” Mehdi Rafsanjani said in an interview, referring to his sister, Ms. Hashemi.

Mr. Rafsanjani was deeply critical of Mr. Ahmadinejad during the presidential campaign, and is thought to have had a strained relationship with Ayatollah Khamenei for many years.

But he remains a major establishment figure, and the detention of his daughter, albeit briefly, was a surprise. In Ayatollah Khamenei’s sermon on Friday, in which he backed Mr. Ahmadinejad and threatened a crackdown on further protests, he praised Mr. Rafsanjani as a pillar of the revolution while acknowledging that the two have had “many differences of opinion.”

Last week, state television showed images of Ms. Hashemi, 46, speaking to hundreds of people to rally support for Mr. Moussavi. After her appearance, state radio said, students who support Mr. Ahmadinejad gathered outside the Tehran prosecutor’s office and demanded that she be arrested for treason.

Mr. Rafsanjani, 75, heads two powerful institutions. One, the Assembly of Experts, is a body of clerics that has the authority to oversee and theoretically replace the country’s supreme leader. He also runs the Expediency Council, empowered to settle disagreements between the elected Parliament and the unelected Guardian Council.

The Assembly of Experts has never publicly exercised its power over Ayatollah Khamenei since he succeeded the Islamic Revolution’s founder, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, in 1989. But the increasingly bitter confrontation between Ayatollah Khamenei and Mr. Rafsanjani has raised the prospect of a contest of political wills between the two revolutionary veterans.

In a sign that the crisis in Iran threatened to spill far beyond the nation’s borders, the speaker of Parliament, Ali Larijani, on Sunday called for reconsidering relations with Britain, France and Germany after their “shameful” statements about the election.

State radio reported that Mr. Larijani, who has his own aspirations to one day become president, made his comments in a speech to the full Parliament. Mr. Larijani’s position, which reflects the anti-Western orientation of the hard-liners in charge, could further undermine President Obama’s efforts to reach out to Iran and begin a diplomatic dialogue. The United States severed ties with Iran 30 years ago.

In Washington, Mr. Obama resisted pressure from Republicans who have called his response to the Iranian crackdown too timid. On Saturday, Mr. Obama stepped up his criticism of Iran’s government, calling it “violent and unjust,” and said that the world was watching its behavior.

Mr. Obama has argued that a more aggressive White House stance against the Iranian government crackdown would be used by Tehran as anti-American propaganda. “The last thing that I want to do is to have the United States be a foil for those forces inside Iran who would love nothing better than to make this an argument about the United States,” Mr. Obama said in an interview with Harry Smith of CBS News broadcast Friday. “We shouldn’t be playing into that.”

In an interview broadcast Sunday on Iranian television, Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki said that officials were examining the charge of voting fraud and expected to issue their findings by the end of the week. But like Ayatollah Khamenei, Mr. Mottaki appeared to have already judged the vote as clean and fair. He said the “possibility of organized and comprehensive disruption and irregularities in the election is almost close to zero,” according to Iran’s English-language Press TV.

At the same time, serious new questions about the vote’s integrity were raised outside of Iran. Chatham House, a London-based research organization, released a study done with the University of St. Andrews challenging the Iranian government’s declared results, based on a comparison with the 2005 elections as well as Iran’s own census data.

The study showed, for example, that in two provinces where Mr. Ahmadinejad won a week ago, a turnout of more than 100 percent was recorded.

The study also showed that in a third of all provinces, the official results, if true, would have required that Mr. Ahmadinejad win not only all conservative voters and all former centrist voters and all new voters, but up to 44 percent of formerly reformist voters.

CONTINUED ON news20090622NYT2

news20090622NYT2

2009-06-22 16:47:32 | Weblog
[Today's Newspaper] from [The New York Times]

[Middle East]
Unrest in Iran Sharply Deepens Rift Among Clerics
Faezeh Hashemi, daughter of the former president, Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, attended a rally for Mir Hussein Moussavi. Iranian state television reported on Sunday that Ms. Hashemi and four other members of the family had been arrested.

By NAZILA FATHI and MICHAEL SLACKMAN
Published: June 21, 2009

CONTINUED FROM news20090622NYT1

With the police on the streets demonstrating a willingness to injure and even kill, one question political analysts and opposition members were beginning to ask was whether it was time to shift strategies, from street protests to some kind of national strike.

It was unclear if the opposition had the support or organization, especially within the middle class, to carry out such a measure, but a strike would be immune to the heavy hand of the state and could wield leverage by crippling the already stumbling economy, analysts said.

news20090622WP

2009-06-22 15:25:06 | Weblog
[Today's Newspaper] fom [The Washington Post]

[Middle East > Iran]
A Tense Calm on Streets of Tehran
Iranian State Media Intensify Criticism of Mousavi, ProtestersBy Thomas Erdbrink

Washington Post Foreign Service
Monday, June 22, 2009

TEHRAN, June 21 -- The Iranian government and opposition leader Mir Hossein Mousavi stepped up their war of words Sunday after at least 10 people were killed in clashes on Saturday, while an uneasy calm prevailed on the streets of Tehran on Sunday for the first time since Iran's worst political crisis in 30 years began a week ago.

Government media lashed out Sunday at Mousavi, suggesting that some of his actions were illegal and blaming "terrorists" for Saturday's violence, in which at least 100 people were injured. The semiofficial Fars News Agency, which has strong ties to the government of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, quoted a law professor at Tehran University as saying that Mousavi's actions were criminal.

"Through uncivil and illegal means, he created an environment for unrest and hooliganism," Firouz Aslani told Fars News. "Contrary to his claims of lawfulness, he acted against the security of the nation and the interests of the system."

Some analysts in Tehran said those comments and others carried in the state-run news media questioning the legality of Mousavi's actions could be the government's way of preparing the ground for his arrest.

Mousavi, 67, a former prime minister who has alleged that the June 12 election officially won by Ahmadinejad was riddled with fraud, made no public appearances Sunday. But he responded to statements against him by condemning the government's use of force against protesters and urging his supporters to stay calm.

"The heart-rending news of the martyrdom of yet another group of protesters to the recent fraud in the elections put our nation in shock and sorrow," Mousavi, who has become the face of a broad and deep protest movement that has drawn hundreds of thousands of people into the streets, argued in a posting on his banned newspaper's Web site.

"Shooting at the people, militarizing the city, scaring the people, provoking them, and displaying power are all the result of the unlawfulness we're witnessing today," he wrote, arguing that Iranians have the right to peaceful protest.

In Washington, President Obama made no public statements on the Iran unrest Sunday; on Saturday, he had made his most forceful comments to date on the issue, calling on the government in Tehran to stop its "violence and unjust" crackdown. On Sunday television talk shows, several Republican lawmakers criticized Obama's response to the situation.

"I appreciate what the president said yesterday, but he's been timid and passive more than I would like, and I hope he will continue to speak truth to power," Sen. Lindsey O. Graham (S.C.) said on ABC's "This Week." "Anytime America stands up for freedom, we're better off. When we try to prop up dictators or remain silent, it comes back to bite us."

"If America stands for democracy and all of these demonstrations are going on in Tehran and other cities over there, and people don't think that we really care, then obviously they're going to question: Do we really believe in our principles?" Sen. Charles E. Grassley (Iowa) said on CNN's "State of the Union."

Administration officials have said Obama has been careful in his response to avoid giving the Iranian government an excuse to portray the protesters as U.S.-backed pawns.

Although Tehran was quieter Sunday, eyewitnesses reported gunshots and sirens in the central neighborhood of Abbas Abad. A large column of black smoke could be seen rising from the area. Eyewitnesses also reported unrest in central Haft-e Tir Square.

Few senior aides to Mousavi could be reached for comment. Several have been arrested, are not answering their phones or are turning their backs on Mousavi after Friday's warning by Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Iran's supreme leader, that protesters faced bloodshed if they continued their mass demonstrations.

"Nothing is certain now," said Hassan Baghernejad, a senior Mousavi campaign official. "Some people have accepted the definitive response by the supreme leader; others haven't. We must wait and see."

As Mousavi's supporters consider their options, the government media offensive is accelerating. The official Islamic Republic News Agency carried a lengthy article on Mousavi and quoted Alireza Zahedi, a member of the pro-government Basij militia, as saying that Mousavi instigated the unrest "because he didn't have a following among the people."

Authorities appeared to be seeking to blame the violence on radicals. Iranian state television charged that "the presence of terrorists . . . was tangible" at Saturday's events. It asked viewers to send video recordings of protesters to help authorities make arrests.

State television reported that 10 people died Saturday when clashes broke out between security forces and Mousavi supporters assembling for a rally that authorities had banned. First reports said that as many as 13 people had died, but the toll was later reduced to 10. Foreign journalists have been banned from covering the protests.

Iranian police officials said 457 people were arrested -- some with the help of local residents -- during the protests Saturday, according to Mehr News, a semiofficial Iranian news agency. The agency also reported that 40 policemen were injured, 34 state buildings were damaged, and three buses and four private cars were set on fire during the violence.

Saturday's death toll, which brought the number of fatalities in a week of protests to at least 17, added a potentially catalyzing element to the unrest. During the revolution that overthrew the shah of Iran in 1979, ushering in an Islamic republic, a cycle of protests, violent repression and more demonstrations to mourn the victims helped sustain and fortify the opposition.

Mousavi referred to those protests in his statement Sunday.

"Should the revolutionary people, who with similar gatherings and protests freed us from the forgotten history of oppression of the shah, be beaten and frightened and be challenged to a power struggle?" Mousavi asked.

He also complained that the names of those killed, wounded and arrested were not released. "It only further stirs feelings," he said.

Another statement on one of Mousavi's campaign Web sites denied news reports that he had said he was ready for "martyrdom" in the name of the protesters' cause.

Scenes from Saturday's violent protests were shown frequently on Iranian state television, and in a special broadcast the rioters were said to be members of the Paris-based Mujaheddin-e Khalq, an Islamist Marxist group that the United States has labeled a terrorist organization. The group, which sided with Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein during the Iran-Iraq war of the 1980s and conducted a series of terrorist attacks, has little support among most Iranians.

Audio clips were played of alleged recordings of telephone calls in which people said to be members of the organization urged others to pass on information about the protests to Western news organizations. But the group's involvement seems highly unlikely because its supporters are rare in Iran.

Also Sunday, state-run news media reported the arrest of the eldest daughter and four other relatives of former president Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, a Shiite Muslim cleric who heads two powerful groups in Iran's theocratic governing system. Rafsanjani has emerged as a strong critic of Ahmadinejad.

Rafsanjani's whereabouts were unknown. Members of the Basij are asking for his daughter, Faezeh, who used to run a magazine promoting women's rights and who has supported Mousavi, and other family members to be put on trial on corruption charges.

The unrest has focused attention on the political maneuvering inside Iran's normally opaque power circle, especially between Rafsanjani and Khamenei, who announced Friday that he supported Ahmadinejad. In a rare show of criticism, the speaker of Iran's parliament, Ali Larijani, said the Guardian Council, the elite group charged with certifying elections, should not side with one candidate. Larijani is known for his loyalty to Khamenei.

"Although the Guardian Council is made up of religious individuals, I wish certain members would not side with a certain presidential candidate," said Larijani, according to a Web site affiliated with him.

"The Guardian Council should use every possible means to build trust and convince the protesters that their complaints will be thoroughly looked into," he added.

Larijani, who for two years led Iran's negotiations on its nuclear program, also acknowledged the scale of the protests. "A majority of people are of the opinion that the actual election results are different than what was officially announced," he said. "The opinion of this majority should be respected and a line should be drawn between them and rioters and miscreants."

He also criticized the state broadcasting service, which he formerly led, saying that Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting "should not act in a way that provokes people." The authorities should provide an atmosphere in which people feel free to express themselves, Larijani said.

news20090622GDN1

2009-06-22 14:57:10 | Weblog
[Environment] from [guardian.co.uk]

[Kingsnorth]
Greenpeace activists board coal ship bound for Kingsnorth power station
Police arrest six as four others make it aboard ship, saying they have enough supplies to last several days

Staff and agencies
guardian.co.uk, Monday 22 June 2009 10.26 BST
Article history

Six people were arrested today after climate change campaigners boarded a coal freighter and tried to stop it unloading its cargo at a power station. Four protesters are still on board.

Greenpeace said nine activists climbed on board just after midnight as the ship travelled along the river Medway to the Kingsnorth power station in Kent, using rigid inflatable speedboats to pull up alongside and attaching climbing ladders to scale the 15-metre hull.

Some of the group managed to scale the ship's funnel and foremast, while others were hanging off the side, a spokesman said, adding that the group had enough food and water to allow them to remain on the vessel for several days.

There were reports of three protesters swimming in the river in front of the vessel to try to prevent it docking outside the power station.

A Greenpeace spokesman said the protesters on board would try to hold their position for as long as possible to try to prevent the coal from being unloaded.

Kent police described it as a "difficult and potentially dangerous situation".

Assistant Chief Constable Gary Beautridge said the six were being held on charges of conspiring to commit criminal damage and having an unauthorised presence on a ship, under Section 104 of the Merchant Seaman Act.

"Four other protesters are in the crow's nest in the bow of the vessel. The situation is contained there and police officers are on board the ship."

One of the campaigners who scaled the foremast said they were protesting against plans by energy giant E.ON to build a new coal-fired power plant at Kingsnorth.

Speaking earlier this morning, one of the activists, Sarah Shoraka, 31, said: "There are nine of us on the ship. We have split into three teams of three, with one team on foremast, another on the funnel and the third hanging off the side.

"We are using walkie-talkies to stay in contact with each other and have enough food and water to last several days. We will stay as long as we can to stop the coal being unloaded."

Shoraka, who works for Greenpeace, said: "Scientists are telling us we can't beat climate change if we keep burning coal, and yet [the energy and climate change secretary] Ed Miliband's new policies would still allow E.ON to build the dirtiest new power station in Britain for 30 years.

"The experts say we have the technologies we need to slash emissions and power Britain with renewable energy and more efficient use of cleaner fuels, it just needs the politicians to give them the green light. New coal plants that emit huge amounts of carbon can never be the answer."

The arrests came as two women lodged a complaint to the IPCC over their arrest and detention during protests at Kingsnorth last year. Video footage shows Val Swain and Emily Apple being bundled to the ground by police after challenging officers for not displaying their badge numbers.


[Fishing]
Rapid growth in European cod farming prompts fears from green groups
Norway, which accounts for around 80% of the world's farmed cod production, increased its national production by 59% in 2008

Gwladys Fouché in Oslo
guardian.co.uk, Monday 22 June 2009 13.05 BST
Article history

Conservationists have expressed dismay at the rapid growth in European cod farming following new figures released last week.

Norway, which accounts for around 80% of the world's farmed cod production, increased its national production by 59% from 10,375 tonnes in 2007 to 16,523 tonnes in 2008. The figures, from the country's Directorate of Fisheries confirm the rapid growth in the cod farming industry, but they have prompted fears from green groups that the expansion will lead to more escapes from farms and contamination of the gene pool of wild populations.

"We are very concerned at the current levels of cod farming," said Nina Jensen, head of conservation at WWF Norway. "No environmental impact studies of cod farms have been done, there are no restrictions on location, there are no restrictions on the protection of spawning grounds and there are lots of fish that escape."

Around 228,000 cod escaped from Norwegian farms last year, compared with around 100,000-odd salmon – even though the salmon farming industry is 60 times bigger than cod farming. Cod are more exploratory by nature and so are better at finding their way out of nets. When they escape, farmed cod may breed with their wild cousins and pass on disease.

"Farmed fish are more prone to diseases and parasites than wild fish. So when cod escape from the farms, they could infect the wild populations," said Dr Geir Lasse Taranger, a scientist at the Norwegian Institute of Marine Research.

Interbreeding could also reduce the wild gene pool. "We need genetic variety to ensure the long-term survival of the species and we are losing genetic variety all the time," he said. "The growth in the cod industry should be chilled down until all the problems are sorted."

The new figures confirm the booming growth of the commercial cod farming. In Norway alone, it went from 248 tonnes in 2002 to 1,685 tonnes in 2004 and 5,519 tonnes in 2005 – overall, an increase of more than 6500% in seven years. Current world production, which takes place also in the US, Canada, Iceland and Denmark, is estimated at about 20,000 tonnes.

Defenders of cod farming, however, say the industry is one way to meet the growing demand for fish at a time when wild stocks are in decline around the world. "Cod farming is definitely part of the solution," said Henrik Vikjær Andersen, market director of Codfarmers, one of the world's largest cod farming companies, based in Norway. "We have exhausted pretty much all the possibilities for food production on land, so the opportunities to increase protein production definitely come from the sea and from aquaculture."

"We provide stability and regularity because we can deliver 365 days a year, unlike wild cod, which depends on catches," he said. "It is also ultra-fresh because it is packed no more than four hours after it was taken out from the sea."

Despite its phenomenal growth, cod farming is still a modest industry – the Norwegian salmon farming produced 742,000 tonnes of fish in 2008. And there have been many hiccups along the way. Last year Shetland's Johnson Seafarms, the world's first organic cod farm, went into administration with debts of £40m, partly because the production costs were too high. Codfarmers has yet to make a profit and a major player in aquaculture, Marine Harvest, pulled out recently of cod farming.

One problem is the decrease in the price of wild cod, which makes farmed cod less attractive. It has also proved difficult to develop a cod breed resistant enough to lice and disease or the fact that a high proportion of the cod cannot be grown to a big enough size to be sold.

Despite these problems, the industry hopes that cod farming can in future become as big as salmon farming is today. "Twenty years ago I heard a researcher say that the Norwegian salmon industry could never produce more than 10,000 tonnes," said Andersen. "And now we are at more than 700,000 tonnes." In the next two to three years, Norway alone is hoping to increase its production to between 15,000 and 30,000 tonnes.

news20090622GDN2

2009-06-22 14:48:48 | Weblog
[Environment] from [guardian.co.uk]

[Deforestation]
Supermarket suppliers 'helping destroy Amazon rainforest'
• Meat companies sued over Amazon deforestation
• Accused firms supplying Tesco, Asda and M&S

David Adam, environment correspondent guardian.co.uk, Sunday 21 June 2009 18.32 BST Article history

Brazilian authorities investigating illegal deforestation have accused the suppliers of several UK supermarkets of selling meat linked to massive destruction of the Amazon rainforest. Brazilian firms that supply Tesco, Asda and Marks & Spencer are among dozens of companies named by prosecutors, who are seeking hundreds of millions of pounds in compensation.

The move follows a three-year investigation by Greenpeace into the trade in cattle products such as meat and leather traced to illegal farms across the Amazon region. The Greenpeace report, revealed in the Guardian earlier this month, showed that a handful of major Brazilian processors exported products linked to Amazon destruction to dozens of blue-chip companies across the world. Daniel Cesar Avelino, the public prosecutor handling the cases, brought by Brazil's Federal Public Prosecution Office (MPF), said: "We know that the single biggest driver of deforestation in the Amazon is cattle. We want all companies who are part of this destructive economic chain to be responsible for their economic crimes."

The MPF has started legal action against 21 farms and slaughterhouse companies, including Bertin, which supplies Tesco and Princes Food with processed beef. The MPF said the investigated Brazilian companies could be to blame for illegal deforestation across 150,000 hectares. It is seeking £630m compensation for "environmental crimes against Brazilian society". The accused farms include the Espirito Santo farm in Para state, which the Guardian visited in an undercover investigation with Greenpeace last month. Bertin said it was "analysing the content of the [legal] action to respond later". The MPF has also warned a further 69 firms for buying products associated with illegal deforestation, including JBS, which supplies Princes Foods, Asda and Marks and Spencer.

Bertin and JBS, the Greenpeace report said, source cattle from illegal farms, and ship the beef and hides to facilities in the south of Brazil for export. Greenpeace claims records show that cattle from hundreds of farms across the Amazon are mixed and processed in this way, making it currently impossible to trace the origins of products.

"In effect, criminal or 'dirty' supplies of cattle are 'laundered' through the supply chain." JBS would not comment. Several supermarkets in Brazil, including ­Wal-Mart, have already banned beef from deforested areas. The Brazilian Association of Supermarkets said it would cancel supply contracts with accused farms. John Sauven, executive director of Greenpeace, said: "Major supermarkets in Brazil have promised action to remove Amazon beef and leather from their stores, and now it's time that UK companies did the same … we need to see British firms cancelling contracts with suppliers who are implicated in Amazon deforestation."

The UK supermarkets said the beef did not come from the Amazon. Tesco and Marks and Spencer said they had received assurances from their suppliers. Asda said it was sending people to Brazil to audit the supply line.

Princes Foods said: "We have contacted both suppliers to discuss the claims in detail, and they are liaising directly with Greenpeace. We will monitor the outcome of these discussions closely."

In a separate move, the World Bank said it will withdraw a $90m (£54.47m) loan to Bertin from its private lending arm, which Greenpeace says was used to expand activities in the Amazon. Bertin supplies several companies with leather for shoes, including Nike and Timberland.

A Timberland spokesman said it was "actively engaged with Bertin to better understand this very complex issue". Nike said it was meeting its tannery suppliers and investigating the supply chain. Greenpeace wants companies to refuse to buy products sourced from farms that have carried out illegal deforestation. It wants consumers to pressure supermarkets and high-street brands identified in the report to clean up supply chains.

Clearing tropical forests for agriculture is estimated to produce 17% of the world's greenhouse gas emissions – more than the global transport system. Cattle farming is now the biggest threat to the remaining Amazon rainforest, a fifth of which has been lost since 1970. The Greenpeace report compiles government records, company documents and trade data from Brazil, China, Europe, Vietnam and the US to piece together the global movement of meat, leather and cosmetics ingredients made from Brazilian cattle.


[Wildlife]
Great white sharks can behave like serial killers, study finds
Researchers discover common traits including hunting strategically and learning from previous attempts

Associated Press
guardian.co.uk, Monday 22 June 2009 10.04 BST
Article history

Great white sharks and serial killers have common behavioural traits including stalking specific victims, a new study has found.

The sharks lurk out of sight to observe their prey, hunting strategically and learning from previous attempts, the research, published in the Journal of Zoology, found.

Researchers used a method of profiling serial killers to work out how the great white shark hunts.

"There's some strategy going on," the study's co-author, Neil Hammerschlag, said. Hammerschlag, a shark researcher at the University of Miami, observed 340 great white shark attacks on seals off an island in South Africa.

He said the sharks could have waited where the seals congregated if they were random, opportunistic killers, but instead had a distinct mode of operation.

"It's more than sharks lurking at the water waiting to go after them," he added.

Research found the creatures were focused, stalking from a base of operations around 90 metres from their victims.

The location was close enough for them to see their prey but not close enough for them to be observed.

They attacked when light was low and preferred their victims to be young and alone, trying to strike when no competing sharks were nearby.

Researchers said the difference between great whites and serial killers was that the sharks killed to survive rather than for thrills.

"They both have the same objective, which is to find a target or prey or victim," co-author D. Kim Rossmo, a professor of criminal justice at Texas State University-San Marcos, said.

"They have to lurk. They want to be efficient in their search," Rossmo, who was a police officer in Canada for more than 21 years, said.

Research linking sharks and serial killers began when the late Canadian shark scientist R Aidan Martin read about geographic profiling, which tries to find criminals by looking for patterns in where they strike.

He contacted Rossmo, a pioneer in that field of investigation, and they applied the methods of tracking down criminals to researching shark strategy.

In the latest study, Martin and Hammerschlag watched sharks from sunrise to sunset, applied geographic profiling and found patterns of stalking, Hammerschlag said.

They also found older sharks fared better and were more stealthy than younger, smaller sharks, demonstrating that learning was taking place.

Although the study focused on only one location, the same principles were likely to be applicable to other hunting grounds.

George Burgess, a shark attack researcher at the University of Florida who did not take part in the study, said: "Sharks are like many other predators that have developed patterns to their attacking that are obviously beneficial as a species."

news20090622GDN3

2009-06-22 14:31:28 | Weblog
[Environment] from [guardian.co.uk]

[Nuclear Power]
Revealed: catalogue of atomic leaks
In a secret health and safety report, the chief nuclear inspector admits Britain's watchdog force is short of experienced staff

Terry Macalister and Rob Edwards
The Observer, Sunday 21 June 2009
Article history

The scale of safety problems inside Britain's nuclear power stations has been revealed for the first time in a secret report obtained by the Observer that shows more than 1,750 leaks, breakdowns or other "events" over the past seven years.

The damning document, written by the government's chief nuclear inspector, Mike Weightman, and released under the Freedom of Information Act, raises serious questions about the dangers of expanding the industry with a new generation of atomic plants. And it came as the managers of the UK's biggest plant, Sellafield, admitted they had finally halted a radioactive leak many believe has been going on for 50 years.

The report discloses that between 2001-08 there were 1,767 safety incidents across Britain's nuclear plants. About half were subsequently judged by inspectors as serious enough "to have had the potential to challenge a nuclear safety system". They were "across all areas of existing nuclear plant", including Sellafield in Cumbria and Aldermaston and Burghfield in Berkshire, says Weightman, chief inspector of the Nuclear Installations Inspectorate (NII).

In an accident at Sizewell A in Suffolk in January 2007, cooling water leaked from a pond containing highly radioactive spent fuel. The operator was not prosecuted for breaching safety rules, according to the NII's official investigation, partly because NII resources were "stretched".

In May 2007 a manhole at Dounreay in northern Scotland was found to be contaminated with plutonium. A series of other incidents occurred at Sellafield, including a fault with a trap door meant to provide protection from highly radioactive waste in September 2008, and the contamination of five workers at a plutonium fuel plant in January 2007.

A spokesman for Sellafield confirmed last night it had successfully halted the seeping of liquid from a crack in one of four waste tanks that used to process effluent before it was discharged into the Irish Sea. Some local residents say it started half a century ago.

In January, Weightman sent a 37-page report to the Health and Safety Executive (HSE). Marked "restricted", it lays bare the crisis afflicting the regulation of the British nuclear industry.

The NII has had to oversee such problems despite an acute shortage of experienced staff. It admits to being 26 inspectors short of the 192 it needs to regulate existing facilities, and its ratio of inspectors to nuclear plant is a third of the international average and far below that of Mexico, Spain or South Korea.

To assess new reactor designs, Weightman says he needs a further 36 inspectors, to bring the complement up to 228 by 2011. But he has "struggled" to recruit new staff and the "lack of build-up of resources to date" could jeopardise the government's target date of 2017 for deploying new reactors.

Weightman says the NII faces "major challenges" to ensure old nuclear plants are run or dismantled safely at the same time as checking new plants are safe to build because of staff shortages. He proposes possible collaboration with China on assessing new reactor designs, hiring French inspectors on secondment and greater use of third-party contractors.

The HSE wants to streamline the assessment of new reactor designs by waiving certain aspects through a series of "exclusions". A recent consultation document circulated by Kevin Allars, director of new nuclear build generic design assessment at the HSE, suggests allowing reactor designs to be agreed with certain "exclusions" and "conditions" that could be revisited later.

Emma Gibson, senior climate and energy campaigner at Greenpeace, has rejected this course of action. In a letter to Allars, she writes: "We do not agree that a regulator should, even in an informal voluntary process, approve any part of the design, 'excluding' features which may be vital to its safety. The risk is that this will bypass or emasculate essential stages in the regulatory process."

The HSE said last night that the NII was continuing to "fulfil its regulatory duties" and was upping the number of inspectors and bringing in appropriately experienced technical support contractors to increase regulatory resources.

"The UK approach to nuclear safety regulation is different to most countries. Rather than employing large numbers of staff to set regulations for the industry to comply with, NII sets general targets for the industry (reducing risks as low as reasonably practicable) which it then regulates through ... issuing licences with strict safety conditions attached."

It said the proposed use of exclusions was no different from the proportionate approach NII had always taken with its regulation of new projects.

But it is not only environmentalists who have expressed concerns. "Britain's nuclear inspectors are facing serious problems with serious implications," said an independent nuclear engineer, John Large. "Some of these incidents were potentially disastrous. We already have evidence that their staffing crisis is compromising their regulation of nuclear safety. Without a strong and effective regulator, the risk of a large release of radioactivity increases."

But John McNamara, the spokesman for the 175-member Nuclear Industry Association, still argues that the industry's safety record is "second to none". There was a "highly professional and transparent regulatory approach", he said. "A thorough review into nuclear regulatory resourcing as part of the government's policy on delivering new nuclear build is under way."

news20090622GRD

2009-06-22 14:19:22 | Weblog
[Environment] from [guardian.co.uk]

[Flooding]
One in six UK homes 'at risk of flooding'
£20bn needs to be invested in flood defences to protect properties from rising sea levels and severe rainstorms, Environment Agency warns

Press Association
guardian.co.uk, Friday 19 June 2009 12.44 BST
Article history

One in six homes in England is at risk of flooding, the Environment Agency warned today.

And with climate change likely to raise the risk of flooding through rising sea levels and more rainstorms, £20bn needs to be invested in flood defences to protect properties in the next 25 years, the agency said.

As many as 5.2m properties are already at risk of flooding, with 2.4m threatened by rivers and the sea, and a further 2.8 million at risk from surface water flooding from overflowing drains.

Thousands of health centres and doctors' surgeries, schools and miles of railways and roads are also at risk, according to the agency's Flooding In England report.

Almost half a million homes, offices, factories and warehouses are at a significant risk of flooding from rivers or sea, with a greater than one in 75 chance of being flooded in any year.

The highest number of properties at significant risk are in the south-east of England, where 111,356 are threatened with flooding.

Boston, Lincolnshire, has the greatest number of properties at high risk – 23,700 – of any local authority.

According to the latest analysis of the impacts of climate change on the UK released this week, the risk of flooding is set to increase due to rising sea levels, more rapid coastal erosion and increasingly severe and frequent rainstorms.

Without an increase in investment in flood defences, an extra 350,000 properties, including 280,000 more homes, will face a significant risk of flooding by 2035, bringing the total to 840,000 under threat, the EA said.

Funding for maintaining and constructing defences will need to double from £570m in 2010/11 to more than £1bn in 2035 to safeguard the same number of properties as are currently protected, the Environment Agency said.

Approximately £150m each year will be needed just to address the risk of surface water flooding, which caused some of the problems in the devastating 2007 floods, the agency said.

In the floods two years ago, which hit parts of Yorkshire, the Midlands and the south-west of England, 13 adults died as well as two premature twins, while 55,000 properties were flooded and thousands had to be rescued from the flood waters.

Without increasing funding for defences, the annual cost of damage to residential and commercial properties could rise from £2.5bn to £4bn, the agency warned as it released its long-term investment strategy for England.

The Environment Agency's chairman Lord Chris Smith said: "The latest climate change data shows that the risk of flooding and coastal erosion will continue to increase in the future due to rising sea levels and more frequent and heavy storms.The Environment Agency has completed 90 flood defence schemes in the past two years, providing increased protection to over 58,000 properties."

The Environment Agency said more than 430,000 people in flood risk areas had signed up to its free warning service, which provides alerts by text message, telephone or email, and urged those who have not subscribed to join.

The environment secretary, Hilary Benn, said: "We have invested record levels of funding in recent years but, as the UK climate projections we published yesterday make clear, climate change means all of us will need to do much more in the future to adapt and manage the risks of flooding and erosion."

The shadow environment secretary, Nick Herbert, said: "The Environment Agency's call for more investment in flood defence brings home the reality of climate change, and there will need to be a debate on the priorities, but the public must be protected.

"When a staggering one in six homes in England are at risk, it is essential that flood defence schemes are cost-effective and delivered on time, and that no unnecessary development takes place in areas that are susceptible to flooding."

In April, the Environment Agency and Met Office opened a new £10m Flood Forecasting Centre to provide earlier and more accurate flood warnings.

English regions ranked in order of the number of properties at significant risk of flooding:

South-east England: 111,356

South-west: 86,178

East Midlands: 81,096

Yorkshire and Humber: 65,380

Greater London: 40,412

East of England: 33,050

North-west: 28,941

West Midlands: 19,173

North-east: 19,167

Total: 484,753

Top 10 local authorities with the highest number of properties in areas with a significant chance of flooding:

Boston district: 23,700

North Somerset: 20,415

East Lindsey district: 14,949

Windsor and Maidenhead: 11,477

Kingston upon Hull: 9,825

Shepway district: 9,065

Sedgemoor district: 8,092

East Riding of Yorkshire: 7,513

Runnymede district: 7,007

Warrington: 6,533

news20090622SLT

2009-06-22 09:04:13 | Weblog
[Today's Paper] from [Slate Magazine]

Iranian Clerics Draw Up Battle Lines
By Daniel Politi
Posted Monday, June 22, 2009, at 6:36 AM ET

A day after bloody battles played out in Tehran's streets on Saturday, Iranian security forces swarmed the streets as the divisions between some of the country's ruling clerics seemed to be intensifying. Although there were scattered reports of clashes, the Washington Post (WP) and Los Angeles Times (LAT) both say there was "an uneasy calm" on the streets of Tehran yesterday, while the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) calls it a "relative and tenuous calm." Government supporters labeled the protesters "terrorists," while opposition leader Mir Hossein Mousavi called on supporters to continue demonstrating peacefully. In one of the day's most important developments, the police briefly detained five family members of Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, a former president who is one of the country's most powerful clerics. The New York Times (NYT) notes that the move suggested Ayatollah Ali Khamenei "was facing entrenched resistance among some members of the elite."

USA Today (USAT) leads with a look at how some lawmakers and business groups want to expand the tax credit for first-time home buyers. The credit, scheduled to expire in the fall, is credited with helping increase sales in a down market. It currently has an $8,000 limit, but some say it should be increased to $15,000 and apply to anyone, not just first-time buyers, in order to help boost sales and stabilize the market.

There is still no verifiable death toll from Saturday's clashes in Iran, with the state media saying that 10 people had died, while radio reports put the number of dead at 19. More than 450 people were arrested. The LAT reports that western officials believe 100 people across the country have been killed since the protests began. The WSJ reports that yesterday afternoon, "hundreds" of family members of victims from Saturday's clashes tried to hold a sit-in but were forced to move by security forces. Meanwhile, Mousavi told protesters that regardless of what Ayatollah Khamenei said, "Protesting to lies and fraud is your right." But it is unclear whether large numbers of demonstrators will be willing to take to the streets again.

The state-run news media carried a comment from a law professor calling Mousavi's actions criminal in a move that the WP says "could be the government's way of preparing the ground for his arrest." Iranian state television said that "the presence of terrorists … was tangible" in Saturday's clashes, and asked for the public's help in arresting the perpetrators. The government also continued its crackdown on journalists, ordering the BBC's Tehran correspondent to leave the county within 24 hours and arresting Newsweek's correspondent. According to local media, 24 journalists and bloggers have been arrested since the election.

While the clashes on Saturday played out on the street, yesterday the big drama was inside Iran's complicated power structure as the divisions between some of the country's senior clerics "took on a harsh public tone," as the LAT puts it. The NYT points out that while political rivalries are nothing new in post-revolution Iran, "open factional competition amid a major political crisis could hinder Ayatollah Khamanei's ability to restore order." Rafsanjani, whose eldest daughter was arrested for a few hours yesterday along with four other relatives, is the head of two influential organizations. One of them, the Assembly of Experts, theoretically has the power to replace Khamenei, the country's supreme leader. In a piece inside that takes a deeper look at Rafsanjani, the NYT declares that the division now evident within Iran's political elite "threatens to paralyze the state and undermine the legitimacy it has tried to construct since the 1979 revolution."

The WSJ says Mousavi called for a general strike. It's not clear whether there would be enough support for such a measure, "but a strike would be immune to the heavy hand of the state and could wield leverage by crippling the already stumbling economy," notes the NYT.

The NYT points out that amid the flurry of images and Twitter messages from Iran, the video of a young woman, called Neda, dying in the street after purportedly being shot by security forces has emerged as "a powerful and vivid new image." The Web site for one of the reformist candidates referred to Neda as a martyr who "became a victim by thugs who are supported by a horrifying security apparatus." The WSJ fronts a large screengrab of the video above the fold, noting that Neda has "become an iconic image." Watch the disturbing video here.

In an analysis piece inside, the NYT points out that both sides of the struggle "are deploying religious symbols and parables to portray themselves as pursuing the ideal of a just Islamic state." Previous student uprisings were easier to defeat because those protesters were seeking a complete change in the system. But now, demonstrators argue that all they want is justice. Some analysts suggest that if the government steps up the level of violence against the opposition this week, more senior clerics are likely to speak up against its actions, prompting more people to side with Mousavi.

In a front-page piece, the WSJ looks into how, with the help of European telecommunications companies, the Iranian government has created "one of the world's most sophisticated mechanisms for controlling and censoring the Internet." Besides simply blocking sites and cutting down connections, the government appears to be monitoring the transmissions and collecting information about users. The technology even enables authorities to make changes to transmissions to disseminate disinformation. This may help to explain why Iran hasn't chosen simply to cut the Internet and also why the Internet has been running so slowly lately: The so-called "deep packet inspection" delays data transmission. "This looks like a step beyond what any other country is doing, including China," one expert tells the paper. At least part of this monitoring capability was provided by a joint venture of Siemens and Nokia in late 2008 that built a "monitoring center" for the government.

The NYT fronts the new U.S. commander in Afghanistan curtailing the use of airstrikes to try to decrease the number of civilian casualties. Gen. Stanley McChrystal said airstrikes would only be used when American or NATO forces are at imminent risk, and even then, its use would be limited if the battle is taking place in populated areas. "Air power contains the seeds of our own destruction if we do not use it responsibly," McChrystal told senior officers last week.

The NYT goes inside with a look at how a North Korean ship that appears headed to Burma "could pose the first test" of how far the United States and its allies are willing to go in order to enforce a United Nations resolution. An American Navy destroyer has been following the ship, as officials suspect it is carrying forbidden cargo. Burma's military junta has long been considered a buyer of North Korean weapons. According to a U.N. resolution, North Korean ships can be boarded if there are suspicions that they are carrying banned cargo. But North Korea has warned that intercepting any of its ships would be considered an act of war and vowed swift retaliation against South Korea.

The WSJ fronts a look at how welfare rolls are increasing for the first time since President Bill Clinton approved welfare reform. A total of 23 of the 30 largest states have seen the number of people on welfare increase compared with last year. Some think this is a good sign and say it proves that welfare is working as it should, since it is helping people at a time of great need. But some states with high unemployment are still seeing a decrease in welfare caseloads. Some say this shows there are too many requirements to receive assistance, and the income limits to be eligible are set so low that even someone who has a low-wage part-time job can't qualify.

The NYT publishes more details about how David Rohde and an Afghan journalist managed to escape the Taliban after being held captive for more than seven months. The NYT's Rohde and Tahir Ludin had been planning their escape for weeks, taking every opportunity to survey their surroundings. On Friday evening, they made sure their captors were sleeping soundly before using a rope to climb down a 20-foot wall. They were able to slip away undetected largely thanks to a noisy air conditioner.

The WP reports on new research that seems to show repeating positive statements doesn't help people with low self-esteem and may even make them feel worse. While many self-help books have advocated saying positive things to oneself in order to increase self-esteem, researchers found that those with an already low self esteem ended up feeling worse after repeating positive self-statements, such as "I am a lovable person."