朝日記230616 Humeanism ヒューム主義哲学（その４）

朝日記230616  Humeanism　ヒューム主義哲学（その４）

朝日記230616  Humeanism　ヒューム主義哲学 （その１）

続き

1. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d Wilson, George; Shpall, Samuel; Piñeros Glasscock, Juan S. (2016). "Action". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.
2. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f g h} Hubin, Donald C. (1999). "What's Special About Humeanism". Noûs. 33 (1): 30–45. doi:10.1111/0029-4624.00141.
3. ^ Schlosser, Markus (2019). "Agency: 3.3 Disappearing agents, naturalism, and dual standpoint theory". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Retrieved 18 May 2021.
4. ^ Stuchlik, Joshua (2013). "From Volitionalism to the Dual Aspect Theory of Action". Philosophia. 41 (3): 867–886. doi:10.1007/s11406-013-9414-9. S2CID 144779235.
5. ^ Malpas, Jeff (2019). "Donald Davidson: 2.1 Reasons as Causes". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Retrieved 1 March 2021.
6. ^ Honderich, Ted (2005). "Action". The Oxford Companion to Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
7. ^ Jump up to:^a b Craig, Edward (1996). "Action". Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Routledge.
8. ^ Latham, Noa (2016). "Meditation and Self-Control". Philosophical Studies. 173 (7): 1779–1798. doi:10.1007/s11098-015-0578-y. S2CID 170959501.
9. ^ Audi, Robert (1999). The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
10. ^ Enç, Berent (2004). "Causal Theories of Intentional Behavior and Wayward Causal Chains". Behavior and Philosophy. 32 (1): 149–166.
11. ^ Stoecker, Ralf (2003). "Climbers, Pigs and Wiggled Ears-The Problem of Waywardness in Action Theory". Physicalism and Mental Causation. Imprint Academic. pp. 296–322.
12. ^ Shope, Robert K. (1991). "Non-Deviant Causal Chains". Journal of Philosophical Research. 16: 251–291. doi:10.5840/jpr_1991_35.
13. ^ "means-ends reasoning". Oxford Reference. Retrieved 18 May 2021.
14. ^ Grant, Robert (1995). "Values, Means and Ends". Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement. 38: 177–188. doi:10.1017/S1358246100007359. S2CID 149862676.
15. ^ Schroeder, Tim (2020). "Desire". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Retrieved 18 May 2021.
16. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d Audi, Robert (1991). "Autonomy, Reason, and Desire". Pacific Philosophical Quarterly. 72 (4): 247–271. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0114.1991.tb00320.x.
17. ^ Audi, Robert (2001). "4 The Sources of Practical Reasons". The Architecture of Reason: The Structure and Substance of Rationality. Oxford University Press.
18. ^ Audi, Robert (2001). "5 Desires, Intentions, and Reasons for Action". The Architecture of Reason: The Structure and Substance of Rationality. Oxford University Press.
19. ^ Finlay, Stephen; Schroeder, Mark (2017). "Reasons for Action: Internal vs. External". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Retrieved 19 May 2021.
20. ^ Botros, Sophie (22 September 2006). "Hume, Reason and Morality: A Legacy of Contradiction". Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews. Retrieved 19 May 2021.
21. ^ Alvarez, Maria (2017). "Reasons for Action: Justification, Motivation, Explanation". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Retrieved 19 May 2021.
22. ^ Miller, Christian (2008). "Motivation in Agents". Noûs. 42 (2): 222–266. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0068.2008.00679.x.
23. ^ D'Oro, Giuseppina (2004). "Collingwood, Psychologism and Internalism". European Journal of Philosophy. 12 (2): 163–177. doi:10.1111/j.0966-8373.2004.00205.x. ISSN 0966-8373.
24. ^ Baier, Kurt (1982). "The Conceptual Link between Morality and Rationality". Noûs. 16 (1): 78–88. doi:10.2307/2215415. ISSN 0029-4624. JSTOR 2215415.
25. ^ Jump up to:^a b Pollock, Ryan. "David Hume: Moral Philosophy: 1d. Hume and Contemporary Metaethics". Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved 21 May 2021.
26. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Cohon, Rachel (2018). "Hume's Moral Philosophy: 5. Is and ought". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Retrieved 21 May 2021.
27. ^ Jump up to:^a b Cohon, Rachel (2008). "1. Our Common Reading of Hume's Metaethics". Hume's Morality: Feeling and Fabrication. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-170856-5.
28. ^ Bloomfield, P. (2007). "Two Dogmas of Metaethics". Philosophical Studies. 132 (3): 439–466. doi:10.1007/s11098-005-2509-9. S2CID 170556071.
29. ^ Craig, Edward (1996). "Value, ontological status of". Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Routledge.
30. ^ van Roojen, Mark (2018). "Moral Cognitivism vs. Non-Cognitivism". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Retrieved 10 December 2020.
31. ^ Carson, Thomas L. (2006). "Metaethics". Macmillan Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2nd Edition. Macmillan.
32. ^ Finlay, Stephen (2006). "Emotive theory of ethics". Macmillan Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2nd Edition. Macmillan.
33. ^ Sayre-McCord, Geoff (2020). "Moral Realism". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Retrieved 21 May 2021.
34. ^ Joyce, Richard (2016). "Moral Anti-Realism". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Retrieved 21 May 2021.
35. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Craig, Edward (1996). "Mind, bundle theory of". Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Routledge.
36. ^ Jump up to:^a b "Bundle theory". Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 20 May 2021.
37. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d Benovsky, Jiri (2009). "The Self : A Humean Bundle and/or a Cartesian Substance ?". European Journal of Analytic Philosophy. 5 (1): 7–19.
38. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Pike, Nelson (1967). "Hume's Bundle Theory of the Self: A Limited Defense". American Philosophical Quarterly. 4 (2): 159–165.
39. ^ Jump up to:^a b Strawson, Galen (2009). "7.6 Thin subjects: James and Hume". Selves: An Essay in Revisionary Metaphysics. Oxford University Press.
40. ^ Korfmacher, Carsten. "Personal Identity". Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved 20 May 2021.
41. ^ Olson, Eric T. (2021). "Personal Identity: 4. Psychological-Continuity Views". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Retrieved 20 May 2021.