[敵を知り己を知れ] -海外掲示板・記事に降臨しよう-

今のご時勢、政治家や他人事にして傍観者してないで、直接言えばいいじゃないの!

[WSJ] South Korea’s Sex Industry Thrives Underground a Decade After Crackdown

2014-11-28 18:30:12 | あしあと(海外投稿記事)
South Korea’s Sex Industry Thrives Underground a Decade After Crackdown
http://blogs.wsj.com/korearealtime/2014/11/28/south-koreas-sex-industry-thrives-underground-a-decade-after-crackdown/

6:30 pm KST Nov 28, 2014
By YEWON KANG
Choi Min-seo has been sitting on display behind a large shop-front window for almost an hour wearing only lingerie. Neon red and blue lights flicker in the narrow alley next to a subway station in eastern Seoul, drawing attention to her and to other scantily-clad women.

But traffic is light in this alley that was once tightly cramped with brothels, in an area known as Cheongnyangni 588. Every other window has gone dark, and clients shopping for sex on a recent night were scarce.

This fall marked the 10th anniversary of a sweeping anti-prostitution law in South Korea, meant to increase penalties for those who buy and sell sex, toughen police crackdowns against brothels and offer help for women seeking a way out of a life of prostitution. Buying or selling sex is illegal in South Korea.

The impact is clear: The free-wheeling red-light districts that once dotted many of South Korea’s major cities have been mostly tamed. Many of the brothels that once operated in those districts have been forced out of business. Those that remain face the threat of police raids.


While most brothels in South Korea have closed since the introduction of a new sex-trade law a decade ago, some remain in Cheongnyangni 588. In this photo, the inside of one of the window displays. Man-chul Kim for The Wall Street Journal
But despite the law’s successes in red-light zones, the country’s sex trade continues to flourish underground, say people who follow the industry.

“Many other girls who used to work here have left for massage parlors or huegaetael,” said Ms. Choi, 36, referring to cheap hotels that are known as places where sex is bought and sold in more discrete way than in the red-light districts of old. Choi Min-seo is a pseudonym.

In order to skirt police crackdowns, prostitution these days is more commonly found in places such as hotels that turn a blind eye to the sex trade and in back rooms of otherwise legitimate businesses like massage parlors and bars, according to people who monitor the industry. In another sign of the times, initial transactions between workers and clients often take place online, they say, further complicating authorities’ efforts to track them.

Kim Yeo-ni, a 26-year-old sex worker whose name is also a pseudonym, is an example of South Korea’s evolving sex trade. She said she sells sex for a living over the Internet, connecting with clients through websites that are disguised as social meetup sites to make deals on the price, type of service and where to meet.


One brothel owner in the Cheongnyangni 588 area estimates two-thirds of roughly 500 prostitutes based in the area a decade ago have moved on. Man-chul Kim for The Wall Street Journal
Ms. Kim says she’s experienced physical violence and verbal abuse by some of her clients. But she still prefers to sell sex over her previous jobs as a restaurant waitress and a bar hostess.

“The autonomy that the job allows is why I choose to stay in this business,” she said, adding that she also prefers to work on her own, instead of in a brothel.

Police say that enforcing the sex-trade law has become more difficult as prostitution has dispersed from the red-light districts, and officers lack the resources they need to broaden their crackdowns.

“We’ve been focusing on targeting what we call mutant businesses that illegally sell sex, especially ones near schools,” said an officer with the National Police Agency. “But it costs a lot to follow through and we just don’t have the manpower,” the officer said.


Sex workers’ rooms in Cheongnyangni 588. Man-chul Kim for The Wall Street Journal
An officer in charge of the area that includes the Cheongnyangni 588 red-light district declined to comment.

Kim Kang-ja, a former senior police officer in Seoul known for leading a crackdown on underage sex trafficking in 2000, agrees that money and manpower allocated for tackling the sex trade has never been sufficient for a systematic approach to the issue.

“The current approach only pushes the industry further underground and makes business owners more guileful,” she said.

About 270,000 Korean women worked in prostitution or 3.5% of all women in their 20s and 30s, according to a 2007 report into the industry by the government’s Ministry of Gender Equality and Family. The size of sex industry, both from openly operating brothels and underground businesses, was estimated at 14 trillion won ($12.7 billion), the report said.


People who follow the industry say South Korea’s sex trade continues to flourish in back rooms of otherwise legitimate businesses like massage parlors and bars. This photo is an aerial view of Cheongnyangni 588. Man-chul Kim for The Wall Street Journal
The ministry conducted another report in 2010 but refused to release the results, saying it had grown difficult to collect reliable data because of the evolving nature of the sex trade.

But there’s little debate in South Korea that prostitution is still widespread. In a high-profile media report in 2012, a major national newspaper reported that it was able to find more than 100 bars and salons in one-kilometer radiuses of the center of the cities of Seoul, Busan, Ulsan and Gwangju that sold sex.

Kim Kweon-young, director of the women’s rights support division in the gender equality ministry said that after the anti- sex trade law was introduced the government added training services to support women exiting prostitution. He declined to elaborate on how effective the exit programs have been.

There are 88 government-run support centers that assist women who decide to leave prostitution, up from 61 in 2004, according to data from the ministry. The government provides an array of assistance for women seeking help, including counseling, training and a monthly stipend of 400,000 won, or about $370.

The number of users of the support centers fell to 8,782 in 2013, the latest data available, from 18,424 in 2005, the ministry said.


A sex worker’s room in the Cheongnyangni 588 district. Man-chul Kim for The Wall Street Journal
According to Jun Kyung-soon, a long-term brothel owner in the Cheongnyangni 588 red-light zone, two-thirds of the roughly 500 prostitutes based in the area a decade ago have moved on.

“There have been rumors that more brothels are going away, so some regular customers stopped coming, assuming we’re closed, too,” said Ms. Choi, the woman who works in the area. “Now I have to work a full month to make the same amount of money I used to make in half a month.” She declined to say how much she earns.

Even so, she said she still prefers to work from the relatively protected confines of a brothel and its owner, compared with other places such as hotels, where she says there are fewer rules and more dangers for sex workers.

“I wouldn’t move there even for better money,” she said.



The WSJ is now on LINE. Scan to follow or click “Add Friends” from your mobile device to add our official account.
------------------------
[jamawns' comment]
------------------------
How can a woman alone in Korean society escape from life-lasting prostitution with 40%-300% interest rate loan, while a Japanese comfort woman during Imperial Japanese annexation era could earn large amount of money enough to buy 5 new houses or to take care of whole families by 3.5 years duty?
Now, you find comfort women were not sex slaves.

[WSJ] China Moves to Bolster Air-Pollution-Control Law

2014-11-26 09:14:16 | あしあと(海外投稿記事)
China Moves to Bolster Air-Pollution-Control Law
Government Adds Amendments Aimed at Increasing Penalties for Heavy Polluters
http://online.wsj.com/articles/china-moves-to-bolster-air-pollution-control-law-1417011241

By BRIAN SPEGELE
Nov. 26, 2014 9:14 a.m. ET
BEIJING—China’s government took a step forward in strengthening its air-pollution-control law, adding new amendments aimed at increasing penalties for heavy polluters and giving local governments greater responsibilities to clean the skies.

The State Council, China’s cabinet, approved the amendments Wednesday. Though they could be changed further and must be deliberated and passed by the legislature before becoming law, the amendments are part of wider efforts under way to battle dangerous pollution levels that have dirtied the air and rendered unfit for use swaths of farmland and portions of the nation’s water supplies.

The strengthening of the existing air pollution control law comes as public awareness grows about the environmental consequences of China’s economic boom.

FURTHER READING

China’s Environmental Goals Won’t be Hard to Hit
The proposed changes include making local governments more responsible for air pollution in their regions, according to experts. That complements moves to incorporate protection of the environment into the criteria used to assess local leaders’ performances.

In announcing the changes, the State Council said those enterprises with excessive emissions or that counterfeit data should be punished. Some environmental experts have previously said enforcement of existing laws has been spotty, and that companies routinely flout pollution regulations.

In addition to strengthening environmental laws, China’s government is undertaking relatively aggressive action to change its energy sources, moving away from coal and relying more on hydropower, natural gas and other lower-emission sources of energy. Leaders have pledged to stem growth in coal consumption as a way to fight pollution and curb carbon emissions.

In April, the legislature amended the country’s environmental-protection law, strengthening the enforcement powers of regulators, among other changes.

Write to Brian Spegele at brian.spegele@wsj.com
------------------------
[jamawns' comment]
------------------------
Real solution is that CCP disarms itself and follows international laws.
We can see the Beijing sky next year, then will realize true sense of CCP.
We know the state of the sky a years ago and how worse it became despite CCP's wording. We can actually find seriously polluted river, pond, seashore and so on since over a decade.
Now, CCP illegally started destroying environment and stealing precious natural value such as coral reef garden in Japan.
'APEC Blue' pictures clearly showed that solution against pollution in China is not in technology matter, but moral and governance matter.
[(left)APEC Blue/(right)Before APEC]
http://i.huffpost.com/gadgets/slideshows/381828/slide_381828_4537050_free.jpg
http://i.huffpost.com/gadgets/slideshows/381828/slide_381828_4537054_free.jpg
[4 days after APEC.]
http://livedoor.blogimg.jp/dqnplus/imgs/3/1/310bfd2c-s.jpg
http://livedoor.blogimg.jp/dqnplus/imgs/5/d/5d70ab2a-s.jpg

[WSJ] Tokyo’s Leader Charts His Own Growth Plan as Japan Struggles

2014-11-25 14:07:39 | あしあと(海外投稿記事)
Tokyo’s Leader Charts His Own Growth Plan as Japan Struggles
Yoichi Masuzoe Envisions a Transformed City, Urges Prime Minister Abe to Follow His Lead
http://online.wsj.com/articles/tokyos-leader-charts-his-own-growth-plan-as-japan-struggles-1416973453?tesla=y&mg=reno64-wsj

By ELEANOR WARNOCK
Nov. 25, 2014 10:44 p.m. ET
2 COMMENTS
TOKYO—The head of Tokyo has some advice for Japan’s prime minister: Try harder.

“The government’s pro-growth policies aren’t enough,” said Tokyo Gov. Yoichi Masuzoe in an interview with The Wall Street Journal last week as Prime Minister Shinzo Abe struggled to defend those policies amid steep economic headwinds.

“The Tokyo Metropolitan Government is doing many things ahead of the national government, but if Mr. Abe imitates us, he’ll be fine, to say it jokingly,” he added with a smile.

Citing areas where he thinks Mr. Abe could take a page from his playbook, Mr. Masuzoe notes how the Tokyo Metropolitan Government has a higher percentage of women in management positions—something Mr. Abe has struggled with on the national level. Mr. Masuzoe also notes a broader commitment to attracting foreign investors and cultivating innovation projects, such as the Tokyo Met’s plans to build a new hub for pharmaceutical development funded with foreign capital.

The 65-year-old governor, who took office earlier this year, is attempting to turn the world’s largest city into an incubator for a smaller, more-focused version of Mr. Abe’s pro-growth policies. At the heart of the city’s effort is a financial offensive, with the goal of toppling Hong Kong and Singapore and reinstating Tokyo as Asia’s financial hub.

Mr. Masuzoe’s overhaul plans are the latest sign of how Japanese politicians, once little concerned with stocks and investment, have latched on to finance as a solution to Japan’s woes.

ENLARGE
And just as similar efforts have hit hurdles at the national level, success is far from guaranteed for the Tokyo Metropolitan Government. City officials will have to coax trillions of yen out of savings accounts and dresser drawers to finance innovation and infrastructure projects, and bring back foreign investors who have left.

Despite having the biggest gross domestic product and population of any city in the world, and high rankings in quality-of-life surveys, Tokyo has never been able to take the top rankings as a financial center. Tokyo was No. 6 in Z/Yen Group’s 2014 Global Financial Centers Index, down from No. 5 in 2010 and has never broken the top four since the survey started in 2007.

There are a number of reasons why Tokyo has lost out to Hong Kong and Singapore, financial experts say. Japan’s equity market performance has been low as the economy stagnated; the Dow Jones Industrial Average has more than quadrupled over the past two decades, while the Nikkei Stock Average lost 12%.

Many financial firms have consolidated elsewhere in Asia to avoid high corporate taxes, cut costs during the global financial crisis and because they weren’t making money. In 2009, HSBC moved investment and stock research divisions from Tokyo to Hong Kong to cut costs; Citibank has said this year it will sell its retail-banking operations in Japan.

But Mr. Masuzoe sees a key opportunity on the horizon to boost Tokyo’s economic momentum: the 2020 Olympic Games. “You’ve got to provide business chances” to draw potential investors, he said. “We’ve got the chance of 2020 and if we let that chance go, it won’t come again.”

Even with the Games still several years away, Mr. Masuzoe says that the Olympics have already started to draw capital and attention to Tokyo.

The politician is fresh off a trip to Berlin and London where he visited the U.K. capital’s financial center, to meet with finance industry heads and spoke at Chatham House.

‘I’ve got things that Mr. Abe doesn’t have.’
—Tokyo Gov. Yoichi Masuzoe
Meetings with bankers, fund managers and exchange officials in May and June eventually became the basis for 20 proposals from Mr. Masuzoe and his team to realize the “Tokyo Global Financial Center,” released in July.

Paul Hunter, secretary general at the International Bankers Association of Japan in Tokyo, says that he testified in May’s meeting and stressed that the Tokyo Metropolitan Government should focus on making Tokyo a convenient and comfortable place for expats to live and stressing to potential investors the amount of untapped capital in Japan rather than attempting to outpace New York and London. He added that financial regulations weren’t a barrier in Japan.

“You have very deep domestic markets with a big savings base,” he recalls telling government officials. “Does it matter you’re No. 1 or No. 2 or No. 3? Probably not. You can still be a significant financial center on the back of that.”

Before July, the Tokyo Metropolitan Government had never once compiled a comprehensive set of policy initiatives on financial issues. Tokyo Met employees had to face questions they had never considered before, such as why Japan’s stock market had been weak for so many years and why foreign investment had dropped off.

Mr. Masuzoe’s ideas for attracting more foreign investment include making public-private partnerships that foreign firms could participate in to start badly needed infrastructure projects in Tokyo, such as nursery schools and nursing homes. That way the city’s residents could directly benefit from more foreign investment.

He also wants to put Tokyo residents’ money to work. This month, the Tokyo Met government will put on sale AUD$50 million of five-year Australian-dollar denominated bonds for retail investors, offering 3.57% interest. It’s the first ever foreign-denominated bond offering for retail investors from the Tokyo Met, which has a long history of foreign currency-denominated issues for institutional investors. A five-year Japanese government bond for retail investors offers 0.08%. The national government has never issued a foreign-denominated bond for retail investors.

Now that the nation’s \130 trillion ($1.1 trillion) public pension is shifting into more equity, Mr. Masuzoe, who once oversaw the fund as welfare minister, says that the Tokyo Met government should be allowed under law to invest some of its reserves in stocks.

The Tokyo Metropolitan Government has about \2.8 trillion in public funds that have been earmarked for long-term projects. The current interpretation of the law allows those only to be invested in bank deposits and domestic bonds, but the funds’ investment could be diversified. A special advisory group is discussing the issue.

Other parts of Tokyo Met’s plan include making it easier for foreigners to live in Tokyo, providing more technologies and expertise to developing Asian economies and educating more finance professionals.

Yet bankers, fund managers and consultants say that Tokyo there is only so much Tokyo can do without help from the national government that oversees taxes, financial regulations and labor law.

“I think that what the Tokyo government can do alone is limited,” said Nomura Research Institute’s Sadakazu Osaki, who also serves on the committee discussing how Tokyo’s reserve funds are invested. “I told the Tokyo government that the simplest thing they can do is introduce education about investing in schools, but you have to compete with so many other subjects.”

He added bringing experts in fund management to Tokyo would also be key.

Mr. Masuzoe says Tokyo doesn’t need Mr. Abe’s help.

“I’ve got things that Mr. Abe doesn’t have,” like the Olympics, he said. “If we don’t open our doors and internationalize, the Olympics won’t succeed.”

Write to Eleanor Warnock at eleanor.warnock@wsj.com
------------------------------------
[jamawns' comment]
------------------------------------
Mr. Yoichi Masuzoe has closed public opinion access page on Tokyo government official HP, and censored posted comment on his SNS and showed only comments supporting him. He has fabricated numerous stories not only on this article. It is easy to find him surrounding very Yes-men.
He arbitrarily said that he would give subway management technique for free to Seoul city, 90% of Tokyo citizens liked Korea without no evidence, and Tokyo Olympic must be canceled.
Nobody has allowed him such might.
-----------------------------------
Korea has erased Japan and Taiwan in its PyeongChang Korea Olympic campaign poster.
Mr. Masuzoe is willing to finance for the PyeongChang Olympic in Korea with Japanese money by ignoring Tokyo Olympic plan and citizens' will.
The PyeongChang Olympic is about to be canceled (You can remind Korean Formula 1 Grand Prix incident) so he is willing to destroy Tokyo Olympic in order to undermine Japan by making both countries stay on flat bottom level, as saying "Yes, both you and we failed!"
As long as I know, Japanese people other than left winger dislike him.
http://ks.c.yimg.jp/res/chie-que-14113/14/113/335/704/i320

[WSJ] Japan Voters Choose Opponent of New U.S. Base as Okinawa Governor

2014-11-16 23:21:57 | あしあと(海外投稿記事)
Japan Voters Choose Opponent of New U.S. Base as Okinawa Governor
Victory a Blow to Japan Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, Whose Party Backed the Incumbent
http://online.wsj.com/articles/japan-voters-choose-opponent-of-new-u-s-base-as-okinawa-governor-1416137296

By ALEXANDER MARTIN
Updated Nov. 16, 2014 7:14 a.m. ET
5 COMMENTS
TOKYO—A staunch opponent of a U.S.-Japan plan to build a new American military base on Japan’s southern island of Okinawa was elected governor of the prefecture Sunday, according to multiple Japanese media organizations, complicating the allies’ regional-security strategy to counter a rising China.

Former Naha Mayor Takeshi Onaga ousted the government-backed incumbent after campaigning against the planned relocation of a U.S. Marine Corps air station from an urban center to the prefecture’s less-populated northeastern coast. It comes as the island, long dependent on the U.S. military to prop up its economy, has developed a booming tourist industry, giving residents greater confidence to challenge the American presence.

Mr. Onaga’s victory could set back Japan’s efforts to bolster defense ties with the U.S. amid a territorial dispute with China. It also creates a new political headache for Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, whose ruling party backed the incumbent, Hirokazu Nakaima.

It is the second big loss in a regional gubernatorial election for Mr. Abe in recent months. A poll released Nov. 10 by public broadcaster NHK showed national support for Mr. Abe’s cabinet down 8% from the previous month, and now at 44%, dragged down by scandals in his administration and voter anxiety over economic weakness after a spring tax increase.

Mr. Abe, who has been in office for two years, is expected to decide this week to call a snap election for mid-December, seeking a fresh mandate from the voters.

Mr. Onaga’s victory also calls into question whether the government can proceed with the long-stalled plan to move the Futenma Marine base from the densely populated city of Ginowan to the rural Henoko district in the city of Nago.

“I will do everything possible to prevent the construction of a new base in Henoko. Futenma needs to be moved out of the nation and out of the prefecture,” Mr. Onaga said after his victory became likely.

Futenma has long been a sore point between Tokyo and Washington. Local residents complain of noise pollution and occasional air accidents related to the base and have demanded the facility shut down or be moved outside Okinawa. The U.S., which returned Okinawa to Japan in 1972 after a long postwar occupation, agreed in 1996 to relocate Futenma after three American servicemen raped a 12-year-old Okinawan girl in 1995, triggering widespread anti-base protests.

The U.S. and Japanese governments created the relocation plan in the hope that moving the base to a more isolated region would diminish local opposition to hosting Marines on the island. But the plan has been bogged down for nearly two decades over local opposition in the community designated to host the new base. Mr. Abe had pledged to break that long logjam when he took office in 2012, and had appeared to be making progress—until Sunday’s vote.

Mr. Onaga wants to halt the Futenma base without any replacement, and demands the marines there move off Okinawa Island. “Out of Okinawa, out of Japan,” was his campaign slogan.

Mr. Onaga’s predecessor, Mr. Nakaima, approved a crucial landfill project off Henoko’s coast in December. He did so, despite initially telling voters he was against the plan.

Washington praised the decision at the time. Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel issued a statement saying Mr. Nakaima’s move would aid the Pentagon’s “ability to maintain a geographically distributed, operationally resilient, and politically sustainable force posture in the region.”

A former trade-ministry bureaucrat, Mr. Nakaima, 75, served two terms as Okinawa governor. However, his approval of the landfill drew strong protests from those blaming him of bowing to Tokyo, fueling the successful campaign of Mr. Onaga, who is 64 years old, over Mr. Nakaima and two other candidates.

“We cannot postpone the Futenma issue any longer,” Mr. Nakaima said during a campaign rally Saturday night, as he defended his stance on the issue, saying the relocation to Henoko was the only realistic option in removing potential dangers from the air base.

Okinawa has been key to the U.S. defense strategy in the Asia-Pacific since Japan’s defeat in World War II and has been host to three-quarters of American bases in the nation. But Okinawans have resented the disproportionate concentration of bases on their island and have been asking for a reduced U.S. military footprint.

During a recent interview with The Wall Street Journal, Mr. Onaga said he would review paperwork related to the landfill project once he was elected, and would seek nullification of the earlier approval should there be any legal problems. But he hasn’t promised concretely to revoke the permits, which has drawn some criticism from hard-core base opponents, and given some hope to base supporters.

Mr. Onaga, said a new base in Henoko could be devastating to the area’s potential as a future tourist destination at a time when increasing numbers of visitors are coming to Okinawa.

Revenue related to hosting U.S. bases, which accounted for 15.5% of Okinawa’s economy in 1972, now accounts for about 5%, according to the prefecture.

“Okinawa has the human resources and capital, what we don’t have is enough land,” Mr. Onaga said. “Bases occupy 18.4% of Okinawa’s main island—there won’t be economic development unless this land is returned.”

Write to Alexander Martin at alexander.martin@wsj.com
---------------------------------------------------------
[jamawns' comment]
---------------------------------------------------------
Floating vote had made results. All the mass media in Okinawa biased against the U.S. strongly influenced on the floating people.
Building environment for logical and ethical thinking is required in Okinawa, by showing CCP'S purge, corruption and betray social system.
People in other prefecture need to stay with Okinawa to pursue Okinawa's happiness and Japan's future, because the road to profit center in ASIA for Okinawa may be exist.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B2j5VIFCMAAH9zq.jpg
Away from biased Okinawa media, people must know that crime ratio of population of U.S. Military in Okinawa is much lower than that of citizens in Okinawa.
http://goo.gl/eJwJ8X

When it comes to Okinawa governor election, the number of ILLEGAL posters, flags, banners, campaign cars and stickers on poles consisted of 70% from ONAGA group, 20% from SHIMOJI group, and 10% from NAKAIMA group. We can easily guess that Mr. ONAGA will deeply make numerous political corruptions as CCP had done.
http://goo.gl/a7llA4

[WSJ] China Reverses Opposition to G-20 Anticorruption Plan

2014-11-16 22:34:40 | あしあと(海外投稿記事)
China Reverses Opposition to G-20 Anticorruption Plan
China Backs Measures Designed to Reveal Owners of Shell Companies and Trusts
http://online.wsj.com/articles/china-reverses-opposition-to-g-20-anticorruption-plan-1416135168?tesla=y&mg=reno64-wsj#livefyre-comment

By DANIEL STACEY And ROB TAYLOR
Nov. 16, 2014 5:52 a.m. ET

BRISBANE, Australia—China reversed its position on a major anticorruption initiative at a meeting of the Group of 20 here, agreeing to support transparency measures that will help reveal the beneficial owners of companies and trusts around the world.

The set of principles, which were included in a final G-20 communiqué released Sunday, had been championed by anticorruption groups, but were previously resisted by China, which claimed the reform agenda was moving on too tight a deadline. The measures call for countries to share information between law-enforcement agencies about the true owners of shell companies and trusts that can be used by wealthy individuals to evade taxes, launder money, and hide corruption.

“It was a difficult internal point for them, but they managed to clear that and so we have a strong paragraph on this,” one European Union official said of the negotiations with China. “It was very welcome, people are very happy.”

The unexpected agreement formed part of a broad crackdown on corruption and tax avoidance at the G-20 summit, which also saw leaders endorse Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development recommendations to close legal loopholes that have helped multinational corporations shift profits across country borders to avoid taxes.

MORE ON G-20

Ukraine Crisis Casts Shadow Over G-20
Russia President Vladimir Putin Leaves G-20 Summit Early
U.S., Japan, Australia Cement Ties
Juncker Defends Tax Policies From Tenure as Luxembourg Leader
Ebola Could Hit Global Economy, Leaders Warn
Obama Seeks to Reassure Asia Allies on Pivot
China’s switch in favor of the proposals follows a recent clamp down on corruption by the world’s second largest economy, with Beijing announcing in July it plans to “hunt” hundreds of individuals, including party officials, which it claims have moved billions in stolen funds to places such as the U.S. and Australia. The anticorruption drive, dubbed Operation Fox Hunt by officials, ramps up ongoing efforts to tackle graft that Chinese state media and court records claim saw more than 700 citizens returned to China on charges of corruption in 2013, with more than 10 billion yuan ($ 1.63 billion) in illegally obtained funds confiscated.

China’s support for transparency on beneficial ownership may be motivated by a desire to clamp down even further on corruption, with the measures likely to help Beijing investigate individuals trying to hide their investments through complex shell companies and cross ownership structures, a G-20 official said. China’s embassy didn't immediately respond to a request for comment.

Maggie Murphy, a senior representative of Transparency International at the G-20, said the agreement was a welcome surprise, coming only a year after G-8 countries hammered out a similar deal.

“The G-20 is a diverse group of nations who do not always see eye to eye—but on this issue they are now speaking with one voice,” she said.

The agreement will make it “easier to track down corrupt and tax-evading individuals,” Ms. Murphy said.

Write to Rob Taylor at rob.taylor@wsj.com

-------------------------------------------
[jamawns' comment]
-------------------------------------------
Anticorruption Plan? ROC tried to rob SENKAKU and thieved precious coral leaves in Ogasawara, Japan.
A: What is the coral leaves with you?
X: I don't know.
A: Show me now!
X: I do not know.
http://goo.gl/RAjcVP
-------------------------------------------
Besides communism system always bears strong corruption motivation not only in ROC, mentality and value is fundamental and essential against anticorruption. Thus, anticorruption education at every school from primary to university is required. How about honor code?
How much level PM2.5 has reduced since last year?
Known as 'APEC Blue' by stopping factories and cars.
http://goo.gl/Ax0LcZ
After 4 days, same as usual.
http://goo.gl/G5Liwg
--------------------------------------------------
@Alan Miao
Exactly! How smart you are! ( *‘∀‘ )ノ
Correct: PRC
Wrong: ROC
---------------------------------------------------
@Justin Zhou
I guess you are ESP...('・ω_・` )

[WSJ] Okinawa’s Reinvention Enters Next Phase

2014-11-13 15:24:12 | あしあと(海外投稿記事)
Okinawa’s Reinvention Enters Next Phase
Prefecture Seeks to Exploit Location in New Ways and Move Beyond Military Bases
http://online.wsj.com/articles/okinawas-reinvention-enters-next-phase-1415912139

By ALEXANDER MARTIN
Updated Nov. 13, 2014 8:26 p.m. ET

As Okinawa develops its economy, not only does it depend less on the U.S. military bases there, those bases are "the greatest hindrance" to further growth, says Takeshi Onaga, the frontrunner in the prefecture's gubernatorial election. Photo: AP
NAHA, Japan—When Carmen Yuen and her friends were planning a shopping holiday, instead of Bangkok or Tokyo they chose Okinawa, a short flight from their homes in Hong Kong.

“We weren’t interested in visiting big cities like Tokyo. We’re here to shop and relax,” she said, standing amid the stores, restaurants and bars in central Naha, the island prefecture’s capital city.

While tourists have long been important to Okinawa’s economy, their numbers are surging, helping the prefecture grow at a faster rate than any other in Japan. In recent years, Okinawa has also begun to move beyond tourism, taking advantage of its location in the East China Sea—which makes it so strategically important as a U.S. military hub—to develop itself as a regional logistics center.

Now, as Okinawans prepare to elect a governor Sunday, the island depends less than ever on the U.S. military bases that have been a source of income—and tensions—for decades. Both of the two leading candidates—one who backs the Abe government on a key base issue and one who doesn’t—envision an Okinawa that is more self-sufficient, regardless of the fate of the bases.

“In a sense, we’re no longer economically dependent on U.S. bases,” said former Naha Mayor Takeshi Onaga, a populist candidate with a clear lead in opinion polls.

In fact, he called the bases a hindrance to the prefecture’s further development. “Okinawa’s economy can develop so much more by using” the land occupied by the bases, particularly Marine Corps Air Station Futenma, which is in the center of densely populated Ginowan, a city of around 100,000 people.

ENLARGE
A victory for Mr. Onaga would create a headache for Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe. Mr. Onaga opposes a plan to build a new base in a rural part of Okinawa as the site of a relocated Futenma. The plan is supported by Mr. Onaga’s opponent, incumbent Gov. Hirokazu Nakaima, who has the backing of the Abe administration.

Mr. Abe wants to proceed with the long-stalled plan and strengthen Japan’s security ties to the U.S. as a counter to China’s territorial assertions in waters near Okinawa. The U.S., which returned Okinawa to Japan in 1972 after a long postwar occupation, agreed in 1996 to relocate Futenma to a new site in the north of the main island.

People on the island, which is home to 1.4 million and hosts three-quarters of the U.S. bases in Japan, have long complained about noise, accidents and crimes involving troops.

The bases were critical to Okinawa in the past, accounting for 15.5% of its economy in 1972. Tokyo funded infrastructure projects and provided trillions of yen in subsidies to compensate the island for hosting the bases, yet Okinawa struggled to catch up with the rest of Japan. While it boasts the country’s youngest and fastest-growing population, its jobless rate remains the highest and its average income among the lowest of the nation’s prefectures.

Things are looking up, though. Tourism, still the primary driver of Okinawa’s economy, is growing. A record 6.58 million tourists visited in Japan’s 2013 fiscal year, an 11% increase from the previous year, generating \448 billion ($3.87 billion) in income. The number of overseas visitors has soared as the yen has slumped over the past two years. Arrivals from overseas jumped 64% last year to 630,000. Most came from Taiwan, South Korea, mainland China and Hong Kong.

Space China, a Naha-based Chinese-language school, recently began providing concierge services for Chinese tourists. Demand is also rising for Chinese-speaking tour guides, and many of the school’s graduates work at hotels eager to cater to Chinese visitors, Space China President Mikumo Sato said.

RELATED

Ex-Naha Mayor Vows to Block Base Relocation if Elected
David Feith: The Battle of Okinawa Rages On
Okinawa is also making headway in efforts to become a logistics hub. In 2009, it opened an international cargo hub at Naha airport in partnership with All Nippon Airways , which operates 120 cargo flights a week, connecting Japan with eight major cities in Asia, including Hong Kong and Shanghai. ANA Cargo President Akira Okada said the airline plans to add routes, possibly to India or Vietnam. In fact, ANA joined hands in 2012 with Yamato Holdings Co. , which started a new overnight delivery service to major cities throughout Asia using the cargo hub on Okinawa.

Meanwhile, companies including International Business Machines, Oracle and Citibank have set up shop on the island, taking advantage of special tax breaks and other incentives to open call centers and other operations, including IT consulting and software development. Nearly 25,000 jobs have been created by around 300 companies, many of them at call centers like the one run by Dinos Cecile Communications Co., which is based in Uruma City, an hour north of Naha.

“Companies were attracted by subsidies, low labor costs and the abundant workforce,” Dinos Cecile President Takehide Kinjo said.

The Japan Center for Economic Research, an independent think tank, has forecast Okinawa’s real economic growth rate between 2007 and 2020 will rank as the highest among all Japan’s prefectures.

As the economy has grown, the bases’ contribution has declined, to 4.9% in 2011, according to the prefecture’s data. Still, complete self-reliance wouldn’t come without some pain.

“It may only account for 5% of the economy, but we also can’t ignore that 5%,” said Susumu Matayoshi, head of Mr. Nakaima’s executive office.

Write to Alexander Martin at alexander.martin@wsj.com
-------------------------
[jamawns' comment]
-------------------------
Managing director of Nago Fisheries cooperative in Okinawa has voiced
"People in Okinawa support HENOKO base. Mass Media in Okinawa lies.
Please don't be fooled! "
http://identalclinicokinawa.ti-da.net/e6956891.html

9 out of 11 mayors in Okinawa support Mr. NAKAIMA who supports HENOKO base.
http://img05.ti-da.net/usr/r/y/u/ryutomo/__741874-s.JPG

When it comes to Okinawa governor election,
the number of ILLEGAL posters, flags, banners, campaign cars and stickers on poles consisted of 70% from ONAGA group, 20% from SHIMOJI group, and 10% from NAKAIMA group.
We can easily guess that if Mr. ONAGA were elected, he would deeply make numerous political corruptions as CCP had done.
http://goo.gl/a7llA4
------------------------
I would like to introduce some fabrications by mass media in Okinawa and anti-U.S. agitators. They have said anything negatives such as 'U.S. Military in Okinawa crimes a lot', 'Osprey is unsafe', and 'Osprey is noisy.'
Now, I show a few evidences which prove 'They are lairs'.

Crime ratio of population of U.S. Military in Okinawa is much lower than that of citizens in Okinawa.
http://goo.gl/eJwJ8X

Osprey squadron in Okinawa receives Chief of Naval Operations Safety Award on October 10, 2014.
http://goo.gl/zci8Z8
http://www.okinawa.usmc.mil/News/141016-osprey.html

Noise level of MV-22 (osprey) is lower than that of CH-46 (conventional).
(MOD pamphlet. Please see page 12)
http://www.mod.go.jp/j/approach/anpo/osprey/mv22_pamphlet.pdf
-------------------------
Floating vote had made results. All the mass media in Okinawa biased against the U.S. strongly influenced on the floating people.
Anyways, building environment for logical and ethical thinking is required in Okinawa, by showing CCP'S purge, corruption and betray social system.
People in other prefecture need to stay with Okinawa to pursue Okinawa's happiness and Japan's future, because the road to profit center in ASIA for Okinawa may be exist as this article said.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B2j5VIFCMAAH9zq.jpg

[Historical view from Greater East Asia Conference away from Tokyo Trials]

2014-11-12 12:56:00 | 決まり文句
[Historical view from Greater East Asia Conference away from Tokyo Trials]
30% of Britain’s GNP had been exploitation from India, 60% of Holland’s GNP from Indonesia.

Imperial Japan fought against the colonizing countries such as America in Philippine, Britain in Burma and India, China in Korea, Dutch in Indonesia, and negotiated with France in Vietnam, but not against colonized countries such as Philippine, Burma, India, Korea, Indonesia, and Vietnam.

When Imperial Japan occupied these areas, she had never made them her colonies but built native military, built schools and educated people and political leaders, then permitted them become independent. (Korea and Taiwan were annexed and treated equally as Japan mainland. Korean prince married Japanese princess. If colony, such marriage had never happen.)

The 2nd Greater EastAsia-Pacific war started in 1945. Native military with JPN arm and leaders trained by Imperial Japan became national military and government officers in each country.
They defended independence against re-invader, Imperial Nations.

[WSJ] Chill Lingers as China, Japan Leaders Meet

2014-11-10 20:26:42 | あしあと(海外投稿記事)
Chill Lingers as China, Japan Leaders Meet
Xi, Abe Agree to Resume Dialogue on Regional Issues, But Cool Tone Underscores Their Differences
http://online.wsj.com/articles/in-xi-abe-meeting-chilly-tone-suggests-a-slow-thaw-1415634427

By YUKA HAYASHI
Updated Nov. 10, 2014 1:57 p.m. ET
85 COMMENTS
BEIJING—The chilly handshake with which Chinese President Xi Jinping and Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe started a potential thaw in their countries’ ties said much about the challenges Asia’s two largest economies face as they vie for a decisive leadership role in the region.

The meeting Monday raised hopes for improvements in the relationship, which has veered close to open conflict in the past two years over a set of disputed islands in the East China Sea.

The two leaders agreed to start preparing a crisis-management system to prevent accidents at sea—a step long called for by Japanese and U.S. officials after several incidents when ships and fighter jets from the two countries have come dangerously close to each other around the East China Sea.

They also agreed to resume dialogue gradually on bilateral and regional issues. “The long-term reality is that Japan and China, and the U.S. and China, have a strategic rivalry that has to be managed so that it doesn’t lead to conflict and war,” said Gerald Curtis, a Columbia University political scientist specializing in Japanese politics. “But you can’t manage it if you don’t talk to each other.”

But the signs of strain were palpable. The meeting at Beijing’s Great Hall of the People lasted less than 30 minutes, and footage of it contained no evidence of warmth or even diplomatic chitchat, showing the two leaders shaking hands with stiff expressions.

READ MORE

After Meeting Xi, Abe Chats With Park at Dinner
Obama Seeks Trade-Pact Progress
China Sees Itself at Center of New Asian Order
China, South Korea Agree on Trade-Deal Outline
Putin Gives Xi a Russian YotaPhone 2
Frosty Handshake Hardly Heralds Long-Awaited Détente
China’s World: Japan-China Deal Template for Other Spats?
Even as Mr. Abe touted the need for a new vision for the relationship, Mr. Xi repeatedly touched upon historical issues, urging Mr. Abe to be mindful of Chinese sensitivities about Japan’s wartime past and the link to his current defense policies, according to a Chinese foreign-ministry account of the meeting. “Historical issues concern the feelings of 1.3 billion Chinese and bears upon regional peace, stability and development,” the ministry quoted Mr. Xi as saying. It said he also expressed hope for Japan to do “more things to benefit and enhance mutual trust among neighbors.”

Mr. Abe, a conservative, has exhibited discomfort with some of the apologies over Japan’s wartime behavior expressed by his predecessors. On Monday, he pledged that Japan would continue on the path of a peaceful nation, and assured Mr. Xi that his administration adheres to the views of the history shared by generations of Japanese leaders.

The Chinese government signaled it will be watching Mr. Abe closely. “The onus is primarily on Abe,” the official Xinhua News Agency said in a commentary. “It is Tokyo that cast the ice spell on China-Japan relations; it is also Tokyo that called for the Xi-Abe meeting. Now that Abe has talked the talk, he now needs to walk the walk.”

That the encounter was a proper meeting—rather than a mere exchange of greetings—could boost the credentials of both leaders. Mr. Abe has long sought a meeting with Mr. Xi. His failure to engage the leaders of China and South Korea, two close neighbors with significant economic ties, has been criticized as a weakness in his otherwise largely successful diplomatic policy.

Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, left, and Chinese President Xi Jinping, in Beijing on Monday. ENLARGE
Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, left, and Chinese President Xi Jinping, in Beijing on Monday. GETTY IMAGES
SEA OF ANGER: TIMELINE OF TENSIONS OVER DISPUTED ISLANDS

Sep. 7, 2010: A Chinese fishing trawler rams into Japanese coast guard boats near the islands, known as the Senkaku in Japan and the Diaoyu in China. The incident arouses concern in Japan over the islands.
Sept. 10, 2012: Japan says it will buy some of the islands from a private owner, despite objections from Beijing. China sees the move as violating a status quo in which both sides laid claim to them.
Sept. 15, 2012: Protesters swarm in front of the Japanese Embassy in Beijing, and elsewhere in China rioters damage Japanese-owned stores and cars. Some companies temporarily close their factories, while Japanese auto makers begin to see market-share decline.
Dec. 13, 2012: Japan scrambles fighter jets after Chinese propeller plane enters the airspace over the islands. Such air incursions then become increasingly common.
Feb. 5, 2013: Japan accuses Chinese naval forces of locking weapons-guiding radar on its forces. No shots are fired.
Nov. 23, 2013: China announces an air-defense zone over the islands, in which foreign aircraft must follow instructions from the Chinese military.
Nov. 25, 2013: The U.S. sends two B-52 bombers into the Chinese air-defense zone without incident.
Dec. 26, 2013: Japanese Prime Minister Abe visits the Yasukuni Shrine war memorial in Tokyo, angering Beijing, which sees it as a glorification of Japan’s World War II-era occupation of China.
May 25, 2014: China and Japan blame each other for close fighter-jet encounters that Japanese officials say were as close as 30 meters apart.
Oct. 29, 2014: Former Japanese Prime Minister Yasuo Fukuda meets Xi Jinping in Beijing, raising hopes of an easing of tensions.
Nov. 7, 2014: China and Japan agree to take steps for meetings of their top leaders and to re-establish political and security dialogues.
Nov. 10, 2014: Meeting in Beijing, Messrs. Abe and Xi begin a potential thaw in relations between the two countries and agree to resume dialogue gradually on bilateral and regional issues.
Meanwhile, agreeing to the meeting, which China said came at Japan’s request, allowed Mr. Xi to appear magnanimous at an event attended by leaders including U.S. President Barack Obama and Russia’s Vladimir Putin that diplomats say is meant to highlight China’s pre-eminent position in the region.

But the lack of warmth, especially from Mr. Xi toward his rival, illustrated dynamics between the two countries, characterized by China’s rapid economic rise and military buildup and Japan’s struggle to maintain its influence even as its economic power declines. Mr. Abe proposed that the two nations promote mutual understanding between their people, further develop economic ties, cooperate in the East China Sea and stabilize the security environment in East Asia, according to Katsunobu Kato, a close Abe aide.

Mr. Abe told Mr. Xi of his recent viewing in Japan of the performance of a Chinese ballet on the theme of the crested ibis, a rare bird species that symbolizes the friendship between the two countries. Mr. Kato said Mr. Xi responded with a smile. Mr. Kato said the meeting was conducted in a “gentlemanly” atmosphere as the two sides sat along a horse-shoe-shaped arrangement, with the two leaders at the top of the table.

The encounter followed a surprise announcement from the two governments on Friday that they will gradually resume political, diplomatic and security dialogues.

“Although this meeting didn’t help resolve the discord in any practical way, its main significance is stopping the slide in China-Japan relations and pave the way for a possible improvement in bilateral ties,” said Liang Yunxiang, a professor of international politics and expert on Sino-Japanese relations at Peking University. “After all, this was just a short meeting and the differences between the two sides weren’t dealt with at a practical level.”

Both Messrs. Xi and Abe are seen as more forceful than their respective predecessors. In the two years since they took power, Mr. Xi has launched a nationalistic campaign for China’s rejuvenation. Mr. Abe has charted a more assertive foreign policy, in part to counter China.

“The relationship will remain unpredictable and one cannot be too optimistic,” said Koji Murata, president of Doshisha University in Kyoto and an expert on international politics. Mr. Murata said concern remains over hundreds of Chinese ships that Japan says have been illegally poaching precious corals in Japanese waters in recent weeks, as well as over the disputed East China Sea islands.

“It won’t be easy to improve overall bilateral relations significantly,” he said.

—Chun Han Wong and George Nishiyama contributed to this article.

Write to Yuka Hayashi at yuka.hayashi@wsj.com

--------------------
[jamawns' comment]
--------------------
Pres. Xi said to P.M. Abe, 'While strangers at the first meet, friends at the second meet', in the meeting of the APEC Business Advisory Council (ABAC) after Japan-China summit meeting on Nov 10 2014.
http://www.sankei.com/politics/news/141111/plt1411110052-n1.html
-------------------------
@DEBBIE CHENG @rian davis
Sina had lots of bandits and Imperial Japan intervened and subdued them (You can imagine ISIS.).  When Japan-Sina war started on October 1937, Holy father Pius PP. XI announced to Catholic believers all over the world to support Imperial Japan, “The action of Japanese troops was not to invade, but to protect China. They are fighting to get rid of communism there. As long as communism is in the world,all Catholic believers should cooperate with Japan without hesitation.”
----------------------
@DEBBIE CHENG @Chikamori Mukai @rian davis
Manchuria had lots of Chinese refugees rushing from Sina because of no bandits due to Japanese protection. Don't you know that? Is this historical fact a secret of PRC?
Have you ever learned Chinese bandits who burned All, killed ALL, and looted ALL?
----------------------
@DEBBIE CHENG @rian davis
The Gettysburg Times on Dec 8 1941 said “Japan's reply to US is delivered 12 minutes before bombing of Honolulu.” (I think it’s enough sudden attack, though.)
http://goo.gl/d0OGxt
------------------------
@DEBBIE CHENG @Chikamori Mukai @rian davis
You seemed to stop thinking when facing on the real fact.
Study hard, Bless you.
-----------------------
@DEBBIE CHENG @rian davis
30% of Britain's GNP had been exploitation from India, 60% of Holland's GNP from Indonesia. Imperial Japan fought against the colonizing countries such as America in Philippine, Britain in Burma and India, China in Korea, Dutch in Indonesia, France in Vietnam, but not against colonized countries such as Philippine, Burma, India, Korea, Indonesia, and Vietnam.
When Imperial Japan occupied these areas, she had never made them her colonies but built native military, built schools and educated people and political leaders, then permitted them become independent. (Korea and Taiwan were annexed and treated equally as Japan mainland. Korean prince married Japanese princess. If colony, such marriage had never happen.) The 2nd Greater EastAsia-Pasific war started in 1945. Native military with JPN arm and leaders trained by Imperial Japan became national military and government officers in each country. They defended independence against re-invader, Imperial Nations.
------------------------
@DEBBIE CHENG
CCP frequently fabricates and edits Wikipedia. It's world common sense.
All you need is to show Japan CLEAR evidences such as primary sources.
(FYI)
Primary sources are original materials that have not been altered or distorted in any way. Example of non-primary source is such as wiki and information from the person who knows the sister of the friend of her aunt of the witness.

You too, Best luck. Our purpose must be 'Peace'.
------------------------
@Shuhong Zhang
Yasukuni Shrine is perfectly Japanese domestic matter. If China hope good relationship with Japan, China should be respectfully mind her language toward Yasukuni as Japanese domestic matter.

Now that you said Nazis so I would like to honorably explain alleged Japanese A-class war criminals.

A-class war criminals in Japan stood strong against Nazis German “Crime” meaning ethnic erasing or genocide, even though Japan and Nazis German were the axis against the united ally, with Shinto and Bushido backgrounds.

Hideki Tojo,
executed in a dishonorable form as an A-class war criminal,
ordered to moderately save Jewish refugees escaping to Manchuria, and rejected the protest from Nazis Germany.

Yousuke Matsuoka,
executed in a dishonorable form as an A-class war criminal,
arranged trains for the Jewish refugees in front of death from cold,
and arranged facilities for the Jewish refugees who came to Kobe.
-----------------------------
@Shuhong Zhang

Sadao Araki,
executed in a dishonorable form as an A-class war criminal,
refused the request from Nazis Germany
asking to banish a Jewish Japan resident teacher,
when minister of Education showing disagreement against ethnic discrimination,

Shigeniri Togo,
executed in a dishonorable form as an A-class war criminal,
rescued an exile Jewish doctor's fiancé.
The doctor who felt indebted became a family doctor of Tojo, and died in Japan.

Hirotake Hirota,
executed in a dishonorable form as an A-class war criminal,
respected by Chiune Sugihara issuing Visas for Life to Jewish,
became a guarantor of an exile Jewish musician.

Seishiro Itagaki
executed in a dishonorable form as an A-class war criminal,
claimed that Jewish should also be treated impartially
in a five minister meeting among Prime, Army, Navy, Finance, and Foreign Affairs.
As a result, it became a national policy of Japan to treat Jewish impartially.
----------------------------
@Shuhong Zhang

(FYI)
1.
An independent country stood. In 1938, when officers in Manchuria,
HIDEKI TOJO with Kiichiro Higuchi and Norihiro Yasue saved 20,000 Jewish Refugees.
(You can find the two follower's name on 'Golden Book' or Golden Monument in Jerusalem).
They said and followed the word
'Manchuria is an independent country.
Manchuria is not a dependency to Japan.
Japan is not a dependency to Nazis Germany.'

2.
The papal Mass in St. Peter’s, VATICAN, for 1618 victims of A-class, B/C-class Japanese war criminals on 22 May, 1980.
All 1618 Buddhism Mortuary tablets including Hideki Tojo's name are NOW there.
http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/speeches/1980/february/documents/hf_jp-ii_spe_19800220_giapponesi_en.html

3.
Vatican is the greatest supporter of Yasukuni Shrine.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BdqxfgaCQAAb9Qu.png

4.
Countries who made an Official visit to Yasukuni shrine.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BdzmLZxCYAAdG3v.png
-----------------------------
@Ray D. Chang @Roberto Alba-Bustamante
I give you simple answer.
You can see what happen in Hong Kong and Uighur.
---------------------------
@THOMAS W @Roberto Alba-Bustamante
Politicians in Japan hope to die in Japan as those in the U.S. do in the U.S.
However, politicians in China hope to live in overseas. Their families have already escaped from China with 'dirty' CASH as much as possible, right?
----------------------------
@Domingo Trassens @Robert Scheppy
Just a seeing and shaking hands can greatly reduce tensions. That's why P.M. Abe has wanted to meet him.
We know problem exists and also find both leaders trying to
move toward peace.

You can recall South Korean Pres. Park, too.
Pres. Xi and Pres Park respectively did not smile when they met P.M. Abe because of Chinese/S.Korean domestic political reasons.
Both two country have implemented anti-Japan policy/education.
---------------------------
@Ray D. Chang @Robert Scheppy
Can you answer following VERY BASIC questions?
Even if a large number of forged photos and evidences of UFO,
you can still say you believe UFO, and may hardly deny the existence of U.F.O.

[Nanjing incident]
Imperial Japan had occupied Nanjing on Dec.13, 1937.
[Q1]Why did the population increase within a month between the incident
from 200,000 (Nov.28 1937, Dec.18 1937, Dec.21 1937)
to 250,000 (Jan.14 1938)?
[Q2]Where were the killed 300,000 innocent Chinese dead bodies?
[Q3]Why did many Chinese citizens come back to Nanjing after Imperial Japan occupied the city?
[Q4] Were the 572 crime cases really committed by Japanese?
Security Committee reported 572 crime cases(murder 94, rape 243, plunder 201, arson 34) of Japanese soldiers, but only one Chinese crime case(sneak thief) for a month from Nanjing-fall to the time when Nanjing Police Agency was organized. But, for a month from then Police Agency arrested about 500 Chinese crime cases.
------------------------------------
@Ray D. Chang @Robert Scheppy
[Q5] Why did KMT NOT condemn Japanese army about it at all?
KMT held about 300 press conferences in Hangkow for a year from Nanjing fall.
But why didn't correspondents ask any questions about the massacre at all?
[Q6]Why did China paid money to Harold John Timperley, an Australian, for writing the Japan’s atrocity story to a book,according to Tseng Hsu-pai’s autobiography?
[Q7]Why could China NOT prove the murder of 340,000 when the Tokyo Trial was opened?
[Q8]Why did Mao NOT mention any of them at the international media conferences from 1937 to 1938?
[Q9]Why did CCP NOT write anything about the massacre on textbooks till 1981 at all?
[Q10]Why did China fabricate 143 pictures in the Nanjing Museum?
-------------------------
@Ray D. Chang @Robert Scheppy
(FYI)
"Three ALLs policy" or "Burned All, killed ALL, and looted ALL" were implemented by Chinese military rather than by JPN military, as New York Times reported.
On the other hand, about 40,000 POWs rather than citizens were killed by JPN military.
(1937-12-08 New York Times by Tillman Durdin)
http://www.ne.jp/asahi/unko/tamezou/nankin/1937-12-08-NewYorkTimesTillmanDurdin.html
(1937-12-09 New York Times by Hallett Abend)
http://www.ne.jp/asahi/unko/tamezou/nankin/1937-12-09-NewYorkTimesHallettAbend.html

You can read thorough reports saying not only death toll but also
“Most citizens gathered here, no-fire and peaceful in the safety zone” researched by U.S. professor.(On the contrary, John Rabe, so called Oskar Schindler of China, said fires and rapes happened every day in the safety zone. Fire seemed to occur only near Rabe’s house.)
“War damage in the Nanking area Dec. 1937-March 1938” by Dr. L.S.C. Smythe
http://www.history.gr.jp/~nanking/LSCSmythe.pdf
-------------------------------
@Robert Scheppy @Peter Tsao
Recognizing the FACT is the fundamental, whatever people interpreting.
The facts below are frequently hidden by Chinese and Korean due to their DOMESYIC policy. Hope the world and Japan together can go forward to the future from our generation rather than only focus on back-mirror of political reasons.

Japanese Official Apologies for WW2 (just a part of them).
(1)1972/9/29 Kakuei Tanaka (Prime Minister), (2)1982/8/24 Zenko Suzuki (Prime Minister), (3)1982/8/26 Kiichi Miyazawa (Chief Cabinet Secretary), (4)1984/9/6 Hirohito (Emperor Showa), (5)1984/9/7 Yasuhiro Nakasone (Prime Minister), (6)1990/4/18 Taro Nakayama (Minister of Foreign Affairs), (7)1990/5/24 Akihito (Emperor Heisei), (8)1990/5/25 Toshiki Kaifu (Prime Minister), (9)1992/1/16 Kiichi Miyazawa (Prime Minister), (10)1992/1/17 Kiichi Miyazawa (Prime Minister), (11)1992/7/6 Koichi Kato (Chief Cabinet Secretary), (12)1993/8/4 Yohei Kono (Chief Cabinet Secretary) (Known as Kono Speech),
----------------------
@Robert Scheppy @Peter Tsao
(13)1993/8/23 Morihiro Hosokawa (Prime Minister), (14)1993/9/24 Morihiro Hosokawa (Prime Minister), (15)1994/8/31 Tomiichi Murayama (Prime Minister), (16)1995/6/9 The House of Representatives, (17)1995/7 Tomiichi Murayama (Prime Minister), (18)1995/8/15 Tomiichi Murayama (Known as Murayama Speech), (19)1996/6/23 Ryutaro Hashimoto (Prime Minister), (20)1996/10/8 Akihito (Emperor Heisei) (21)1997/8/28 Ryutaro Hashimoto (Prime Minister), (22)1997/9/6 Ryutaro Hashimoto (Prime Minister), (23)1998/7/15 Ryutaro Hashimoto (Prime Minister),
------------------------
@Robert Scheppy @Peter Tsao
(24)1998/10/8 Keizo Obuchi (Prime Minister), (25)1998/11/26 Keizo Obuchi (Prime Minister), (26)2000/8/17 Ryuichi Yamazaki (Director-General for Press and Public Relations), (27)2000/8/30 Yohei Kono (Minister of Foreign Affairs), (28)2001/4/3 Yasuo Fukuda (Chief Cabinet Secretary), (29)2001/9/8 Makiko Tanaka (Minister of Foreign Affairs), (30)2001/10/15
Junichiro Koizumi (Prime Minister), (31)2001 Junichiro Koizumi (Prime Minister)
(Known as Letter to comfort women), (32)2002/9/17 Junichiro Koizumi (Prime Minister), (33)2003/8/15 Junichiro Koizumi (Prime Minister), (34)2005/4/22 Junichiro
Koizumi (Prime Minister), (35)2005/8/15 Junichiro Koizumi (Prime Minister), (36)2007/4/26 Shinzo Abe (Prime Minister), (37)2010/8/10 Naoto Kan (Prime Minister)
http://bit.ly/1e7ZHX9 (1)-(35),(37)
http://bit.ly/1e83KTq (36)
Latest link: http://goo.gl/r19j
---------------------------
@Robert Scheppy @Justin Zhou
PRC has transferred their crimes against their citizens such as Three ALL Policy during Japan-Sina war, death toll of Great Reap Forward and Cultural Revolution toward Japan.

"Three ALLs policy" or "Burned All, killed ALL, and looted ALL" were implemented by Chinese military rather than by Japanese military, as New York Times reported.
(1937-12-08 New York Times by Tillman Durdin)
http://www.ne.jp/asahi/unko/tamezou/nankin/1937-12-08-NewYorkTimesTillmanDurdin.html
(1937-12-09 New York Times by Hallett Abend)
http://www.ne.jp/asahi/unko/tamezou/nankin/1937-12-09-NewYorkTimesHallettAbend.html
-----------------------------
@Justin Zhou
Chinese biggest social media ITSELF widespread this picture.
Don't you know that?
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B2EDnQFCUAABfEU.jpg

As P.M. Abe had wanted to meet Pres. Xi in order to ease tension, Japanese hoped this meeting contribute to world peace. On the other hand, as Pres. Xi had escaped from meeting without advantageous conditions, Chinese complained and became offensive even on WSJ.
Such Chinese citizens' mentality had made Pres. Xi's face cold due to domestic policy.

[WSJ] Chinese President Xi, Japan PM Abe Meet in Beijing

2014-11-10 17:13:43 | あしあと(海外投稿記事)
Chinese President Xi, Japan PM Abe Meet in Beijing
Meeting Signals Potential Thaw in Relationship Between Asia’s Two Biggest Economies

By YUKA HAYASHI
Updated Nov. 10, 2014 12:16 a.m. ET

BEIJING—Chinese President Xi Jinping and Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe held their first face-to-face discussions since both took power two years ago, a potential thaw in the relationship that has been frozen and veered close to open conflict in the past two years.

Speaking to reporters shortly after the meeting, Mr. Abe said, “I believe Japan and China took the first step toward improving our relationship as we go back to the principle of mutually beneficial strategic relations.”

The meeting, in Beijing’s Great Hall of the People, lasted just short of 30 minutes. It followed weeks of intense, behind-the-scenes negotiations, as officials from Asia’s two biggest economies sought to arrange for Messrs. Abe and Xi to get together on the sidelines of the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation forum.

That the encounter was a proper meeting—rather than a mere handshake or exchange of greetings—is likely to be seen as a diplomatic victory for Mr. Abe, who has long sought a meeting with Mr. Xi.

“We had continued quiet efforts to use the opportunity of the APEC summit to start a dialogue between the two leaders,” Mr. Abe said. “That led to the realization of my meeting with President Xi Jinping.”

China’s official Xinhua News Agency confirmed the meeting and said it was convened “at the request of the Japanese side.” It said Mr. Xi told Mr. Abe that China hopes “Japan continues to follow the path of peaceful development and adopt prudent military and security policies.”

The encounter follows a surprise announcement from the two governments on Friday that they will gradually resume political, diplomatic and security dialogues, with an aim to moving their relations forward after the prolonged chill.

The standoff between the two neighbors over wartime history and competing claims to a group of East China Sea islands has raised concerns about violent clashes and hurt trade and investments between the two nations.

Mr. Abe also said the two sides will set up an emergency mechanism to prevent maritime accidents. Tokyo has repeatedly called on China to set up a system to prevent the escalation of tensions at sea.

“I believe we will be starting practical and administrative work to implement such a system,” Mr. Abe said.

“I am aware that our neighbors in Asia and many countries beyond had been hoping to see dialogue between Japanese and Chinese leaders,” Mr. Abe said. “We were able to respond to such wishes and begin taking steps toward repairing our ties.”

The occasion marked the first bilateral summit meeting between China and Japan since December 2011 when Wen Jiabao and Yoshihiko Noda met in Beijing.

For China, the meeting could prevent the dispute from overshadowing the APEC, which gathers leaders from 21 regional economies in the Chinese capital.

Diplomats have said that Mr. Xi wants to use the event, which is being attended by U.S. President Barack Obama and Russia’s Vladimir Putin , among others, to showcase China’s pre-eminent position in the region.

Both Messrs. Xi and Abe are seen as more forceful leaders than their predecessors. In the two years since they took power, Mr. Xi has initiated a nationalistic campaign for China’s rejuvenation, and Mr. Abe has charted a more assertive foreign policy, in part to counter China.

Write to Yuka Hayashi at yuka.hayashi@wsj.com
----------------------------------------------------------
[jamawns' comment]
----------------------------------------------------------
This is the first step to make CCP obey international laws.
While P.M. Abe has been truly honorable peace loving attitude such as greetings in Chinese language, CCP has widespread this picture due to domestic policy lol.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B2EDnQFCUAABfEU.jpg
We, Japanese, are proud of P.M. Abe's coherent attitude that "the door to dialogue is always open on Japan's side."
----------------------------------------------------------
@Howard WANG
Besides your biased view, according to the latest poll of 2,144 in ASEAN 7, the most credible country among 11 is Japan 33% (c.f. China 5%).
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B1C2icuCUAE8h0U.png:large
(FYI: ASEAN survey 2014 (Mofa in Japan)
http://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/files/000036036.PDF)
----------------------------------------------------------
@Justin Zhou @Howard WANG
When Japan-Sina war started on October 1937, Holy father Pius PP. XI announced to Catholic believers all over the world to support Imperial Japan, “The action of Japanese troops was not to invade, but to protect China. They are fighting to get rid of communism there. As long as communism is in the world,all Catholic believers should cooperate with Japan without hesitation.”
---------------------------------------------------------
@Justin Zhou
Holy father Pius PP. XI was passed away on Feb 10 1939.
You had seemed to make fabrication.
You should know what shame is.
---------------------------------------------------------
@Robert Scheppy
Whether you believe or not, Sina had lots of bandits and Imperial Japan intervened and subdued them (You can imagine ISIS.). In 1964 Mao showed thanking Japanese Military to Kouzou Sasaki, Chairperson of Social party in Japan.
When Japan-Sina war started on October 1937, Holy father Pius PP. XI announced to Catholic believers all over the world to support Imperial Japan, “The action of Japanese troops was not to invade, but to protect China. They are fighting to get rid of communism there. As long as communism is in the world,all Catholic believers should cooperate with Japan without hesitation.”
----------------------------------------------------------
@David Corwin @Robert Scheppy
Do you thank Mao?
China consists of one-party rule, inflicts cruel and inhuman treatments on opponents such as Falún Gong and 64 Tiananmen massacres, plans and implements ethnic cleansing such as in Tibet, Uyghur, and so on. My dictionary says such behaviors are so called “Fascism”.
Mao Zedong is the much more murder than Adolf Hitler.
Decorating Mao’s Picture on Tiananmen gate is the same as Hitler’s on Brandenburger Tor gate.
This is easy example for you to image whole picture.
http://livedoor.blogimg.jp/kaikaihanno/imgs/9/c/9c6e02a8.jpg
-----------------------------------------------------------
@Robert Scheppy @Jiaxi Long
In order to avoid crisis, we can not learn war but pre-war for war happening process. Chinese behavior today is the same as that before Asia-Pacific war. Such is known by Japanese as common sense but U.S. citizens just do not want to know and not to believe so.
As person who has never been to China can never imagine real Chinese business style or actual legal/social system, the contents of the book will be beyond imagination for the U.S. citizens creating public opinion who are easily affected Chinese propaganda unless the citizens do not pursue the fact.
-----------------------------------------------------------
@Robert Scheppy @Jiaxi Long
For the common example in the past and present,
1.In the international conference, Chinese makes obvious false statements, because no one can point out the lies in such situation due to diplomatic etiquette.
2.Despite huge development assistance and donations from the U.S. to China, Chinese is hostile and criticizes the U.S.'s lack-of-efforts, and most money for assistance disappear due to corruption.
3.At the deadline of the payment for loan, Chinese claims anything and makes anything happen to tear up the contract in order not to make payment.

Ways That Are Dark: the Truth About China (Ralph Townsend 1933)
http://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015003467712 (University of Michigan)

Behind the news in China( Frederic Vincent Williams 1938)
http://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=uc1.b4518375;view=1up;seq=100 (University of California)
-----------------------------------------------------------
@David Corwin @Marshall Dillon
Shall we review the War Crimes?
1. Japan declared war an hour after attacking on Pearl Harbor.
2. U.S. used two atomic bombs and air-raided to kill innocent citizens.
3. U.S.S.R. one-sidedly broke Soviet–Japanese Neutrality Pact.
-------------------------------------------------------------
@David Corwin @Marshall Dillon
1. The Gettysburg Times on Dec 8 1941 said “Japan's reply to US is delivered 12 minutes BEFORE bombing of Honolulu.” (I think it’s enough sudden attack, though.)
http://goo.gl/d0OGxt
General Douglas MacArthur, the man who had been entrusted by the leaders of the Allied Powers with establishing the Tokyo Trials and had had the Charter for the Trials drawn up, virtually denied its conclusion. On May 3, 1951, at a meeting of the joint Senate Committee on Foreign Relations and Military Affairs ― that is, in a public forum ―he completely dismissed the alleged evidence of the Tokyo Trials. Of the Japanese, he
said: “Their purpose, therefore, in going to war was largely dictated by security.”
In other words, the Japanese war was a war of self-defense, not a war of aggression
http://goo.gl/sI2gyw
------------------------------------------------------------
@David Corwin @Marshall Dillon
2. At the Tokyo trial U.S. lawyers for the accused Japanese at the Tokyo Trial strongly required legal fairness to the court, but the request was dismissed without reasons by the chief judge. Then, the court was established. Even General MacArthur criticized the Tokyo trial to President Truman in 1950.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uyZLaL_9DSgPM
----------------------------------------------------------
@David Corwin @Marshall Dillon
3. Stalin decided war against Japan at Yalta Conference on February in 1945 and sent message on April in 1945 to Japan ‘NOT extending the Soviet-Japan Neutrality Pact’ which would be expired on April in 1946 and still valid for a year until on April in 1946 if one signatory nation denounce one-sidedly. Stalin planned to start war late August in 1945. When Stalin knew U.S. had succeeded atomic bomb development, he decided war starting on August 15 then on August 11, and knew U.S. had dropped in Hiroshima, he declared war on August 8 then started invading on August 9 1945 though the Soviet-Japan Neutrality Pact was valid. Even after Japan accepted Potsdam Declaration in August 14 and disarmed on August 17, U.S.S.R. continued invading until September 2 1945.
----------------------------------------------------------
@Partha Sarkar
Japan will pursue solving various tasks with countries who commonly own universal values such as Freedom, Democracy, Fundamental human rights , the rule of law, and the market economy. The Japanese policy is known as "the arc of freedom and prosperity".
-------------------------------------------
@PING CHOW
(1)You said the number '20 million' so would you show me any evidence unless no numbers from the beginning?
(2)Can you answer following VERY BASIC questions?
I appreciate your answers and understandings in advance.
Nanjing incident:
Imperial Japan had occupied Nanjing on Dec.13, 1937.
[Q1]Why did the population increase within a month between the incident
from 200,000 (Nov.28 1937, Dec.18 1937, Dec.21 1937)
to 250,000 (Jan.14 1938)?
[Q2]Where were the killed 300,000 innocent Chinese dead bodies?
[Q3]Why did many Chinese citizens come back to Nanjing after Imperial Japan occupied the city?
[Q4] Were the 572 crime cases really committed by Japanese?
Security Committee reported 572 crime cases(murder 94, rape 243, plunder 201, arson 34) of Japanese soldiers, but only one Chinese crime case(sneak thief) for a month from Nanjing-fall to the time when Nanjing Police Agency was organized. But, for a month from then Police Agency arrested about 500 Chinese crime cases.
---------------------------------------
@PING CHOW
[Q5] Why did KMT NOT condemn Japanese army about it at all?
KMT held about 300 press conferences in Hangkow for a year from Nanjing fall.
But why didn't correspondents ask any questions about the massacre at all?
[Q6]Why did China paid money to Harold John Timperley, an Australian, for writing the Japan’s atrocity story to a book,according to Tseng Hsu-pai’s autobiography?
[Q7]Why could China NOT prove the murder of 340,000 when the Tokyo Trial was opened?
[Q8]Why did Mao NOT mention any of them at the international media conferences from 1937 to 1938?
[Q9]Why did CCP NOT write anything about the massacre on textbooks till 1981 at all?
[Q10]Why did China fabricate 143 pictures in the Nanjing Museum?

Even if a large number of forged photos and evidences of UFO,
you can still say you believe UFO, and may hardly deny the existence of U.F.O.
--------------------------------------
@PING CHOW
(FYI)
"Three ALLs policy" or "Burned All, killed ALL, and looted ALL" were implemented by Chinese military rather than by Japanese military, as New York Times reported.
On the other hand, about 40,000 prisoners of war (POWs) rather than citizens were killed by JPN military.
(1937-12-08 New York Times by Tillman Durdin)
http://www.ne.jp/asahi/unko/tamezou/nankin/1937-12-08-NewYorkTimesTillmanDurdin.html
(1937-12-09 New York Times by Hallett Abend)
http://www.ne.jp/asahi/unko/tamezou/nankin/1937-12-09-NewYorkTimesHallettAbend.html

You can read thorough reports saying not only death toll but also
“Most citizens gathered here, no-fire and peaceful in the safety zone” researched by U.S. professor.(On the contrary, John Rabe, so called Oskar Schindler of China, said fires and rapes happened every day in the safety zone. Fire seemed to occur only near Rabe’s house.)
“War damage in the Nanking area Dec. 1937-March 1938” by Dr. L.S.C. Smythe
http://www.history.gr.jp/~nanking/LSCSmythe.pdf
-------------------------------------
@David Corwin
Japanese focus on the fact not denying but accepting.
I'm not neo-fascist but patriot. I don't deny war crime, of course.
Please remember, Japan signed San Francisco Peace Treaty and settled issues completely and finally. Japan had successfully, perfectly and legally fulfilled its obligations.
(1) Sure as aggression, though you made false assumption 'unprovoked'. The fact was provoked.
(2) Sure as occupation, though you made false assumption 'the most brutal'. The fact was 'the most capital injection'.
(3) Sure as concerned in war. Whole picture is showing here.
http://livedoor.blogimg.jp/kaikaihanno/imgs/9/c/9c6e02a8.jpg
(4) Sure as execution of POWs including guerrilla POWs.
(5) Sure as long as not more than fact.
(6) Japan researched to protect citizens in Manchuria against chem and bio weapons by China and USSR.
Japan did NOT used, while China used.
U.S. National archives.
http://www.archives.gov/press/press-releases/2007/nr07-47.html
--------------------------------------
@Ray D. Chang
I appreciate your challenging questions.
Unfortunately, you failed lots of facts from any 'primary sources' for BASIC questions. After you read any history of primary source, we can discuss objectively.
(FYI)
KMT used biological weapon, Cholera, in Shanghai in 1937.
KMT collapsed embankment of the Yellow River on June 1938.
USSR also implemented 'Scorched earth' policy against Nazis Germany during Moscow battle in 1941.

[WSJ] America Needs Shinzo Abe

2014-11-10 16:02:29 | あしあと(海外投稿記事)
America Needs Shinzo Abe
Building a relationship with Japan’s prime minister would do more than just strengthen the U.S.-Japan strategic alliance.
http://online.wsj.com/articles/america-needs-shinzo-abe-1415641980?tesla=y&mg=reno64-wsj

By ARTHUR HERMAN
Nov. 10, 2014 12:53 p.m. ET

The Obama administration excels at annoying U.S. allies. A senior official’s recent labeling of Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as a form of avian excrement was only the latest misstep. Besides aggravating Israel and Saudi Arabia over how to check Iran’s Middle East ambitions, Canada has been left waiting for years on the Keystone XL pipeline, and Britain still remembers the 2012 debate over whether a bust of Winston Churchill belonged in the Oval Office.

This week’s Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit in Beijing presents President Barack Obama with an opportunity to break that cycle by bolstering his relationship with Japan’s Prime Minister Shinzo Abe. Despite differing political perspectives—Mr. Abe sits right of center while Mr. Obama leans to the left—and Mr. Abe’s slumping popularity at home, the prime minister has put his reputation on the line to strengthen the U.S.-Japan alliance. Were Mr. Obama to meet him in the middle, Japan could become an important key to the future modernization of the U.S. military and the security of East Asia.

To Mr. Obama’s credit, he had some reassuring words to say about Mr. Abe and Japan during a joint press conference in April. The president thanked Mr. Abe “for your friendship, your partnership, and the progress we’ve made together” on economic issues as well as on regional security as a result of Mr. Abe’s new, if controversial, emphasis on Japan’s right to collective self-defense.

The Obama administration has also made it clear that it will not let China bully Japan over the Senkaku Islands, with the president saying that Japan’s administration of the islands is “a consistent part of the alliance” between the U.S. and Japan.

Still, there will be those at the APEC meeting who would like to put some distance between Messrs. Obama and Abe. One of them is South Korea’s President Park Geun-hye. She’s been furious with Mr. Abe ever since his controversial visit to the Yasukuni Shrine for Japanese war dead, some of whom South Koreans consider war criminals. Ms. Park also attacked Mr. Abe on the issue of Korean “comfort women,” who were forced to service Japanese soldiers during World War II. Ms. Park and her compatriots are seeking a profuse public apology from Mr. Abe.

Likewise, China’s Supreme Leader Xi Jinping would be delighted to see the rift between South Korea and Japan widen. Mr. Xi and the Chinese media have relentlessly emphasized the comfort-women issue. At the APEC summit Mr. Xi will no doubt encourage Mr. Obama to take a more “even handed” approach to the Senkaku dispute. He will also hope that Mr. Obama will distance himself from Mr. Abe’s new defense policy if he suggests it could injure relations between Beijing and Washington, as well as those between Beijing and Tokyo.

Mr. Obama will also be aware of Mr. Abe’s steady drop in popularity at home. “Abenomics” has stalled, and Mr. Abe’s policies on defense and closer military cooperation with the U.S. has come under attack from the pacifist Japanese left.

But Japan is exactly the kind of ally the U.S. needs in the region. With more naval vessels than France and an army larger than Germany’s, Japan can no longer shrug off its share of the military burden in the U.S.-Japan alliance. At the same time, Japan is going to need American help in developing and deploying advanced technology for protecting Japan’s homeland, from antiballistic missile defense systems to unmanned arial vehicles.

And here’s where Mr. Abe’s recent lifting of a decades-old ban on Japanese defense exports becomes crucial. The ban’s end isn’t just good news for Japanese defense firms or for countries like India and Australia, who want to buy advanced submarines and seaplanes from Japan—it’s also good news for the U.S. It raises the possibility of joint ventures between the world’s two most sophisticated high-tech economies in developing future defense systems, from space and cyber defense to robotics and high-end electronic warfare.

Last year, a Japanese company won highest honors at the Robotics Challenge sponsored by the Pentagon’s Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. It’s a harbinger of the military transformation that could arise if Japan continues on the path Mr. Abe has taken—and could counter worries recently expressed by a senior Pentagon official that the U.S. is losing its long-standing military-technology edge to China.

Mr. Abe’s steadfast stand on Japan’s defense doesn’t just bode well for his country’s future or the health of the U.S.-Japan alliance. It’s also good for America’s own future security. Mr. Obama needs to show his support for Mr. Abe at APEC. He must prove that this alliance is built to last.

Mr. Herman is senior fellow at the Hudson Institute and author of “Freedom’s Forge: How American Business Produced Victory in World War II” (Random House, 2012).
------------------------
[jamawns' comment]
------------------------
The U.S.-Japan alliance is the first. That's Japanese national policy.
Unlike a stupid outlaw country pursuing territorial ambition today, the U.S. and Japan had surmounted over past emotional matters such as Pearl Harbor and Hiroshima & Nagasaki, and has cherished the U.S.-Japan alliance by whatever way. The U.S. and Japan know each country has its own respectable history, and do not make historical view into political issue which never contributes to world peace and mutual respect.
We know how strong U.S.-U.K. tie after surmounting over Boston Tea Party or Independent war.
As subtitle shows "Building a relationship with Japan’s prime minister would do more than just strengthen the U.S.-Japan strategic alliance.", P.M. Abe chosen and supported by majority of Japanese eager to strengthen the U.S.-Japan tie not as just a defense ally but as an unshakable political strategic ally which surely contribute to world peace and mutual respect as well as bilateral national interest.