GreenTechSupport GTS 井上創学館 IESSGK

GreenTechSupport News from IESSGK

news20091206lat

2009-12-06 19:58:24 | Weblog
[Today's Newspaper] from [Los Angeles Times]

[U.S. & WORLD > Environment]
Denmark's green credentials obscure some unpleasant facts
Though lauded for adopting wind power, its high recycling rate and its progressive policies, Denmark generates the most waste per capita in the EU and most of its energy still comes from coal.

By Henry Chu
December 6, 2009

Reporting from Copenhagen - Something is rotting in the state of Denmark. Lots of things, actually, and it's a bit of an embarrassment for this Scandinavian nation as it prepares to host a widely anticipated global environmental summit this week.

Denmark is proud of its image as one of the greenest countries in the world; it's probably why it was chosen as the site of the 15th United Nations Conference on Climate Change.

But beneath the gloss lurk some inconvenient truths, including the fact that, pound for pound, Denmark produces more trash per capita than any other country in the 27-member European Union.

The Danes tossed out 1,762 pounds of garbage per person in 2007, the latest year for which EU-wide statistics are available. That's more than the Dutch (1,386 pounds), the Brits (1,258) and the French (1,190); a lot more than the Greeks (986); and double the Lithuanians (880).

It even surpasses the Americans (1,690 pounds), who are often held up as the boogeyman of heedless, needless consumption. By the numbers, Denmark is one of the most wasteful -- in both senses of the term -- societies in the world.

To be fair, the Danes are far more eco-friendly in terms of what they do with all that rubbish. A good portion of it is gardening waste, rather than soda cans and the like. Recycling rates are extremely high, and enormous incinerators around the country don't just burn trash but convert it into energy. About 5% of garbage ends up in landfills, compared with 54% in the United States.

But, critics say, there has been no sustained push here to cut down the volume of trash at its source.

"We never, ever in Denmark made a campaign to reduce waste," said Martin Lidegaard, chairman of Concito, an environmental think tank here in the Danish capital. "I'm very critical that we haven't done more to prevent waste. We should."

As nations come together to find ways to protect the planet, the waste problem here points up the challenges that remain in trying to change human behavior. That's true even in a country as environmentally conscious as this one.

Denmark has certainly made important strides in tapping wind energy and encouraging Copenhagen residents to abandon their cars by providing an extensive network of bicycle lanes throughout the city.

The country also is one of the most energy efficient. Officials proudly point out that their economy has managed to grow 70% since 1980 while keeping electricity consumption nearly stable.

Yet beneath that lies another unhappy reality. The Danish may lead the world in producing wind turbines, but much of their power still comes from coal-fired plants, major emitters of greenhouse gases.

Wind furnishes about 20% of the electricity supply -- an impressive proportion compared with other nations, but actually less than what many Danes think is the case.

"There are many myths about Denmark," Lidegaard said. "Yes, we have a lot of wind [power], and we are good at that. But it's still very, very little compared with coal."

When it comes to individual behavior, Danes exhibit plenty of the same tendencies as residents of other rich but less environmentally sensitive nations.

This remains a highly consumerist society. One of Copenhagen's biggest attractions is Stroget, billed as the world's longest pedestrian shopping street. Souvenir shops, luxury stores, high-end boutiques featuring Danish design and cafes peddling $7 cups of cappuccino attract throngs of residents and tourists.

Despite warnings from environmentalists that such consumption isn't sustainable in the long term, personal spending remains a popular pastime.

So is eating plenty of meat.

Meat consumption has been linked to climate change because of widespread deforestation to create pastureland or to grow feed crops and because of the gases, such as methane, released into the atmosphere by belching, flatulent livestock. In an analysis of worldwide meat-eating trends spanning 40 years, the U.N.'s Food and Agriculture Organization concluded that Denmark topped the carnivore list.

In 2002, the last year of the study, the average Dane consumed a whopping 321 pounds of meat -- nearly a pound a day. For Americans, the figure was 275 pounds.

Lidegaard says that Denmark's reputation as a world leader in other "green" sectors may have blinded Danes to issues closer to home, even in their own kitchens.

"We have been so happy and self-satisfied about our energy system that we have completely forgotten that before we begin to use energy, before we begin to consume, we could do a lot of things to cut down our footprint on nature," he said.

Here in Copenhagen, the Amagerforbraending plant is one of the city's two principal incineration centers. It receives huge mounds of detritus every day out of dumpsters serving more than half a million residents, garbage that either can't be recycled or that residents didn't bother to sort.

Monster ovens burn the stuff at temperatures in excess of 1,700 degrees; cleansing agents remove toxic gases and other chemicals before the smoke billows out of a 500-foot-tall smokestack.

In 2007, the center incinerated 463,000 tons of rubbish. But the plant was able to convert that trash into energy using steam from water heated in the ovens. About 80% was fed into the municipal heating system, and 20% went into the electricity grid.

"It's obvious that it's a smart thing to take waste and turn it into energy," said Esben Norrbom, a consultant at the plant. "You take care of two problems at once."

But, according to the Danish government's own "hierarchy of waste," recycling and incineration should be subordinate to cutting down on waste production.

One thing, though, that's certain not to improve the numbers for Denmark: the thousands of diplomats, negotiators, experts, academics, scientists, activists and journalists converging on Copenhagen for nearly two weeks.

They may be coming to save the planet. But they'll leave behind tons of extra trash.

news20091206nyt

2009-12-06 18:55:59 | Weblog
[Today's Newspaper] from [The New York Times]

[Money & Policy]
Senate Clears Way for Home Health Care Cuts
By ROBERT PEAR
Published: December 5, 2009

WASHINGTON — Snowflakes swirled around the Capitol on Saturday, whipped by wintry winds, but on the Senate floor inside, a heated debate raged as Democrats and Republicans traded jabs over legislation to achieve President Obama’s goal of near-universal health insurance coverage.

By a vote of 53 to 41, the Senate on Saturday rejected a Republican effort to block cutbacks in payments to home health agencies that provide nursing care and therapy to homebound Medicare beneficiaries.

Republicans voted against the cuts, saying they would hurt some of the nation’s most vulnerable citizens. Most Democrats supported the cutbacks, saying they would eliminate waste and inefficiency in home care.

The Democrats’ health care bill would reduce projected Medicare spending on home care by $43 billion, or 13 percent, over the next 10 years. The savings would help offset the cost of subsidizing coverage for the uninsured.

Mr. Obama planned to visit Capitol Hill on Sunday to attend a meeting of the Senate Democratic caucus. The caucus is split over several major provisions of the bill, including one that would create a government health plan to compete with private insurers.

A handful of Democrats and Senator Olympia J. Snowe, Republican of Maine, met Saturday to explore ideas for a possible compromise on the public plan.

In the past, weekend sessions of Congress have dealt with momentous issues like impeachment or fiscal emergencies. But the Saturday session — the sixth day of Senate debate on the giant health care bill — felt, in some ways, like an ordinary workday, as senators debated the health care bill in public and tried to thrash out differences in private.

The Senate majority leader, Harry Reid, Democrat of Nevada, said the Senate had to meet Saturday so it could finish work on the bill before the end of the year.

“Fourteen thousand people lose their health insurance every day in America,” Mr. Reid said. “The American people don’t get weekends off from this injustice. Bankruptcy does not keep bankers’ hours. The bills don’t go away just because it’s Sunday or Saturday. The pain is still there. And so our work continues this weekend.”

Senator Bob Casey, Democrat of Pennsylvania, said: “We gather on a Saturday, which is rare. But it is entirely appropriate and, I think, essential that we spend the time on a weekend to debate this bill and get it passed.”

The Senate Republican leader, Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, said his party would not bow to pressure from Mr. Reid.

“The majority leader believes that somehow if we stay in on weekends, Republicans are going to blink,” Mr. McConnell said. “I can assure him we are not going to blink. The longer we discuss this with the American people, the more unpopular it becomes.”

Indeed, Republicans appeared to relish the debate.

“A fight not joined is a fight not enjoyed,” said Senator John McCain, Republican of Arizona.

Senator Bob Corker, Republican of Tennessee, said, “I would not want to be any other place than on the floor today talking about the most important piece of legislation we probably will deal with in our tenure here.”

Much of the debate Saturday focused on what Mr. McCain had said as the Republican presidential candidate in 2008. Democrats said it was odd to see Mr. McCain styling himself as a defender of Medicare because, in the past, he had favored deep cuts.

Mr. McCain denied that he had tried to cut Medicare benefits.

Democrats said Republicans were stalling. Republicans tried to put Democrats on the defensive.

“I don’t understand what it is that would cause my friends on the left, on the other side of the aisle, to throw seniors under the bus,” Mr. Corker said.

Senator Max Baucus, Democrat of Montana and chairman of the Finance Committee, said, “Nobody here is trying to throw seniors under the bus.”

Mr. Baucus, a principal author of the health care bill, noted that his mother was receiving home health care and said he would not do anything to hurt beneficiaries.

“We are reducing overpayments,” Mr. Baucus said. “We are rooting out fraud. We are getting the waste out. The savings go back in Medicare and extend the solvency of the trust fund.”

But Senator Mike Johanns, Republican of Nebraska, said, “The cuts will hurt real people.”

And Senator Susan Collins, Republican of Maine, said: “The Medicare home health benefit is under attack. The impact of these cuts will ultimately fall on seniors. Home health agencies will simply not be able to afford to serve seniors living in smaller communities off rural roads.”

Four Democratic senators joined 37 Republicans in voting to block the home health cuts. The four were Evan Bayh of Indiana, Blanche Lincoln of Arkansas, Ben Nelson of Nebraska and Jim Webb of Virginia.

news20091206gdn

2009-12-06 14:55:37 | Weblog
[News] from [guardian.co.uk]

[News > World news > Animals]
Indonesia: Suspect in smuggling of rare kangaroos held
Associated Press
The Observer, Sunday 6 December 2009 Article history

Indonesian police arrested a man accused of smuggling 10 rare kangaroos by boat from New Guinea, a police spokesman said yesterday. The Indonesian suspect was detained on Friday as he offloaded the kangaroos, of a small, rainforest-dwelling variety, in Surabaya, capital of East Java. Five of them had died. The five survivors were taken to the Surabaya sanctuary. The illegal trade in rare and exotic animals is rampant in Indonesia. The suspect could face up to five years in jail.


[News > World news > Iran]
Iran: Nuclear chief calls for 20 uranium facilities
Associated Press
The Observer, Sunday 6 December 2009 Article history

Iran's nuclear chief says that his country needs 20 industrial-scale uranium enrichment facilities, a dramatic expansion in defiance of United Nations demands to halt the programme. Ali Akbar Salehi's announcement comes days after the government approved a plan to build 10 new plants.

The official IRNA news agency quotes Salehi as saying Iran needs the sites because it aims to generate 20,000 megawatts of electricity through nuclear power over the next 20 years.


[News > Science > Climate change]
Break-in targets climate scientist
New incident raises fears of a smear campaign

Robin McKie
The Observer, Sunday 6 December 2009 Article history

Attempts have been made to break into the offices of one of Canada's leading climate scientists, it was revealed yesterday. The victim was Andrew Weaver, a University of Victoria scientist and a key contributor to the work of the Inter-governmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). In one incident, an old computer was stolen and papers were disturbed.

In addition, individuals have attempted to impersonate technicians in a bid to access data from his office, said Weaver. The attempted breaches, on top of the hacking of files from British climate researcher Phil Jones, have heightened fears that climate-change deniers are mounting a campaign to discredit the work of leading meteorologists before the start of the Copenhagen climate summit tomorrow.

"The key thing is to try to find anybody who's involved in any aspect of the IPCC and find something that you can … take out of context," said Weaver. The prospect of more break-ins and hacking has forced researchers to step up computer security.

Fears of further attacks by climate-change deniers have also put Copenhagen delegates under increased pressure to reach a comprehensive deal to limit carbon emissions, with Britain's chief negotiator, energy and climate change secretary Ed Miliband, warning last week that there was no certainty that a deal would be reached. "We need to have our foot on the gas all the time," he said on Thursday. "We should not be complacent about getting a deal." It was crucial that Britain, and Europe, showed ambition in setting an agenda for a tough, binding agreement and not let the efforts of climate sceptics derail negotiations, he added. "Our children will hold us in contempt if we fail now."

Analysts say the key to success at Copenhagen would be the establishment of a treaty in which developed countries agree to make major carbon emission cuts while developing nations make lesser, but nevertheless significant reductions of their own. Ultimately, the aim is to ensure that the world's output of CO2 begins to decline by 2020. If this is not achieved, temperatures will rise by more than 2C and take the world into uncontrollable global warming.

In addition, the Copenhagen summit will also have to establish a mechanism by which the west will pledge to pay billions of pounds in aid to the developing world to introduce renewable technologies and other climate-control measures. So far, there is little sign of rapprochement, particularly over the issue of cash aid from developed countries.

"Rich nations tell us they are going to Copenhagen to seal a deal, but we say not an unfair deal. We will never give way," said Abdalmahmood Abdalhaleem Mohamed, Sudan's ambassador to the UN. Bangladesh's senior delegate was equally robust, describing the $10bn so far offered by the west as "peanuts".

However, there was more encouraging news last week when India's prime minister, Manmohan Singh, announced he would attend the summit, joining Gordon Brown and President Barack Obama on the final day of the meeting. India is the world's fourth biggest emitter of greenhouse gases and has just pledged to cut its carbon emissions by 20-25% by 2020. India had previously been reluctant to commit itself to carbon cuts. Singh's new stance suggests his country is now prepared to be more co-operative.