GreenTechSupport GTS 井上創学館 IESSGK

GreenTechSupport News from IESSGK

news20090920nyt1

2009-09-20 19:59:57 | Weblog
[Today's Paper] from [The New York Times]

[Asia Pacific]
Tuna Town in Japan Sees Falloff of Its Fish
By MARTIN FACKLER
Published: September 19, 2009

OMA, Japan — Fishermen here call it “black gold,” referring to the dark red flesh of the Pacific bluefin tuna that is so prized in this sashimi-loving nation that just one of these sleek fish, which can weigh a half-ton, can earn tens of thousands of dollars.

The cold waters here once yielded such an abundance of bluefin, with such thick layers of tasty rich fat, that this tiny wind-swept seaport became Japan’s answer to California’s Napa Valley or the Brie cheese-producing region of France: a geographic location that is nearly synonymous with one of its nation’s premier foods.

So strong is the allure of Oma’s tuna that during the autumn fishing season, tens of thousands of hungry visitors descend on this remote fishing town, located on the northernmost tip of Japan’s main island of Honshu. On a recent Sunday, dozens of tourists, filmed by no fewer than three local television crews, crowded into an old refrigerated warehouse on a pier where Oma’s mayor presided over a ceremony to slice up a 220-pound bluefin into brick-size blocks for sale.

“This is a pleasure you can only have a few times in your life,” said Toshiko Maki, 51, a homemaker from suburban Tokyo, as she popped a ruby-red cube of sashimi into her mouth.

But now the town faces a looming threat, as the number of tuna has begun dropping precipitously in recent years because of overfishing. This has given Oma another, less celebrated distinction, as a community that has stood out by calling for greater regulation of catches in a nation that has adamantly opposed global efforts to save badly depleted tuna populations.

Just a decade or two ago, each boat here could routinely catch three or four tuna a day, fishermen say. Now, they say Oma’s entire fleet of 30 to 40 boats is lucky to bring in a combined total of a half-dozen tuna in a day.

The problem, they say, is that all the fish are being taken by big trawlers that come from elsewhere in Japan, or farther out to sea from Taiwan or China. Some of these ships even use helicopters to spot schools of tuna, which they scoop up in vast nets or catch en masse with long lines of baited hooks. According to local newspapers, there have been repeated incidents of small fishing boats from Oma and other ports intentionally cutting such trawl lines.

“I’m furious at Tokyo’s bureaucrats for failing to protect our tuna,” said Hirofumi Hamahata, 69, the president of the Oma fishermen’s co-op, who has worked as a commercial fisherman since age 15. “They don’t lift a finger against the industrial fishing that just sweeps the ocean clean.”

Such flares of temper are rare in normally reserved Japan, and especially in conservative fishing communities like this one. But this is a town fiercely proud not only of its tuna, but also of how it catches them: in two-man open boats, using hand-held lines and live bait like squid.

Mr. Hamahata described catching tuna in this traditional way as a battle of wits against a clever predator that he called “the lion of the sea.” After hooking one, the contest becomes a battle of strength: he said it typically took one or two hours to pull a big tuna close enough to the boat that it could be stunned with an electric charge.

In one Hemingwayesque battle, Mr. Hamahata said he fought for 12 hours with a huge bluefin that finally broke free.

Despite such difficulties, Oma’s fishermen said they preferred their generations-old fishing method because it allowed them to catch just large, adult fish, leaving the smaller young ones to sustain local stocks.

Fishing experts say the overfishing is a result of a broader failure by the Tokyo authorities to impose effective limits on catches in its waters. Indeed, Japan, which consumes some 80 percent of the 60,000 tons of top-grade tuna caught worldwide, has lobbied hard against efforts to limit tuna catches, such as are now being proposed by European countries for the Atlantic Ocean.

“There are too many entrenched interests whose objective is maximizing profit, not sustainable use,” said Masayuki Komatsu, an expert on the fishing industry at Tokyo’s National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies.

In Oma, catching a big tuna has become rare enough — and the market price high enough — to be cause for celebration. On a recent evening, family members rushed to the pier to greet one boat that had caught a 410-pound bluefin, whose tear-shaped body had to be hoisted off the boat’s deck with a forklift.

Moving quickly to gut and ice the fish to preserve its value, workers from the fishing co-op presented the footlong dorsal fin as a trophy to the captain’s wife, who said it was the first catch in 10 days. The workers said the fish would fetch more than $10,000 at Tokyo’s Tsukiji Fish Market.

“Catching a tuna is like winning the lottery,” said another fisherman, 23-year-old Takeshi Izumi, who said his boat had yet to catch a tuna this season.

To maximize prices, Oma has registered its name as a trademark that can be used only with tuna brought ashore here. This has made Oma a brand that is gaining recognition even outside Japan. In March, a sushi chef from Hong Kong paid some $50,000 to buy half of a 280-pound Oma bluefin.

The prices can be even higher: In 2001, a Japanese buyer paid a record $220,000 for a 444-pound Oma bluefin.

One unfortunate side effect, said the town’s mayor, Mitsuharu Kanazawa, was that few of Oma’s 6,200 residents can now afford their own town’s tuna. However, he said the fish have been a boon to the town’s economy, pumping in some $15 million a year from fishing and tuna-related tourism.

After a popular 2000 TV drama featured Oma, the town increased tourism by starting a three-day tuna festival every year in mid-October, which now draws 15,000 visitors a day, as well as hordes from the Japanese media, Mr. Kanazawa said.

“We Japanese have a weakness for brands,” said Ryuko Nishimura, 43, a homemaker from Kuroishi, a three-hour drive away. “It makes the tuna taste two or three times more delicious.”

But with tuna now in danger of perhaps disappearing, the mayor said the town was struggling to find another local product to keep the tourists coming.

“We tried kelp and abalone,” Mr. Kanazawa said, “but nothing has the appeal of tuna.”

news20090920wp1

2009-09-20 18:59:01 | Weblog
[Today's Newspaper] fom [The Washington Post]

[MLB > American League]

NY Yankees VS Seattle
Final1234 56789RH EScore
NY Yankees1001410121018 110
Seattle0000 1000017 01

W: Sabathia (18-7) L: Fister (2-3)


Sabathia wins 18th, Yankees beat Mariners 10-1
By GREGG BELL,
AP Sports Writer

SEATTLE (AP) CC Sabathia ignored a scary comebacker off his chest for his 18th victory, Mark Teixeira homered twice and drove in a season-high five runs and the New York Yankees resumed their cruise to the AL East title with a 10-1 win over the Seattle Mariners on Saturday night.

Sabathia (18-7), who was 1-3 in early May, allowed four hits and one run in seven innings to bolster his candidacy for the AL's Cy Young Award. He walked two, struck out eight and tied Adam Wainwright of St. Louis for the major league lead in wins.

He also kept New York six games ahead of second-place Boston for the division lead, with 13 games left in the regular season.

One night after closer Mariano Rivera was stunned by a game-winning, two-run home run in the bottom of the ninth by Seattle's Ichiro Suzuki, the Yankees reduced their magic number for clinching a 14th postseason appearance in 15 seasons to two games. Their magic number to clinch the division is nine.

Teixeira's five RBIs leaves the MVP candidate with 118, most in the AL. He is second in the AL with 37 home runs, two behind injured Carlos Pena.

Sabathia was coasting while up 6-0 in the bottom of the fifth, thanks to Teixeira's three-run homer in New York's four-run fifth. Then Franklin Gutierrez hit a liner high off Sabathia's chest near the collarbone. Manager Joe Girardi and a trainer rushed to Sabathia from the dugout, and captain Derek Jeter ran in from his shortstop position. For a moment, the key to New York's postseason rotation seemed to be in jeopardy.

Nah. The burly left-hander simply winced, rubbed where the ball hit, talked for a minute and then shooed everyone away.

Sabathia finished the inning but lost the shutout when third baseman Alex Rodriguez skipped a rushed, one-hop throw way past Teixeira at first base on a ball hit by Jose Lopez. Gutierrez scored from first on the error.

Hideki Matsui hit his 26th home run in the fourth, a towering drive off rookie starter Doug Fister that had the large crowd gasping. It was his 86th RBI. Matsui had arthroscopic surgery on his knee last Sept. 22 and has had his knee drained multiple times this season, and Girardi said before the game he may not have been able to predict such production this season for the 35-year-old.

Robinson Cano had four of New York's 18 hits, three of them doubles.

Fister (2-3) allowed nine hits and six runs in four-plus innings. The 25-year-old allowed half that many runs when he beat New York on Aug. 16.

NOTES: Sabathia improved to 6-1 at Safeco Field. He also regained the AL lead in innings from Seattle's Felix Hernandez. Sabathia has thrown 220 1-3. ... Carlos Silva, Seattle's $48 million starter, allowed two hits, a walk and a run while getting two outs in the eighth. It was his first appearance since a start on May 6. He missed 114 games while on the disabled list with a bum shoulder. ... The crowd of 43,173 - many of whom were wearing purple, No. 10 jerseys of Washington quarterback Jake Locker - gave one of the night's loudest roars before the seventh inning. A replay of the Huskies' last-second field goal that upset No. 3 USC earlier in the day across town flashed on the video scoreboard. Most of the Mariners watched the thrilling finish on the clubhouse televisions before they went out for batting practice. Some players were tense and on the edge of their cushy couch.

news20090920lat1

2009-09-20 17:34:32 | Weblog
[Today's Newspaper] from [Los Angeles Times]

[World]
CIA expanding presence in Afghanistan
The buildup coincides with new warnings that the Taliban has continued to gain territory and strength. McChrystal wants to improve intelligence on the Taliban and focus on reducing the number of bombi

By Greg Miller
September 20, 2009

Reporting from Washington - The CIA is deploying teams of spies, analysts and paramilitary operatives to Afghanistan, part of a broad intelligence "surge" that will make its station there among the largest in the agency's history, U.S. officials say.

When complete, the CIA's presence in the country is expected to rival the size of its massive stations in Iraq and Vietnam at the height of those wars. Precise numbers are classified, but one U.S. official said the agency already has nearly 700 employees in Afghanistan.

The influx parallels the U.S. military expansion and comes as the nation's spy services are under pressure from Army Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal to improve intelligence on the Taliban and find ways to reverse a series of unsettling trends.

Among them are a twofold increase in the number of roadside bombs, a growing sophistication in the kinds of assaults aimed at coalition troops and evidence that a Taliban group has developed an assembly-line approach to grooming suicide bombers and supplying them to other insurgent organizations.

U.S. officials have also been alarmed by a more sophisticated suicide attack: sending multiple fighters armed with guns to carry out coordinated assaults before detonating their bombs.

The spies are being used in various assignments -- teaming up with special forces units pursuing high-value targets, tracking public sentiment in provinces that have been shifting toward the Taliban and collecting intelligence on corruption in the Afghan government.

The intelligence expansion goes beyond the CIA to involve every major spy service, officials said, including the National Security Agency, which intercepts calls and e-mails, as well as the Defense Intelligence Agency, which tracks military threats.

The Obama administration is under pressure to show progress in Afghanistan, calculating that it has only until next summer before public support for the war effort collapses.

The deployments coincide with new warnings from U.S. spy services that the insurgency in Afghanistan has continued to gain territory and strength.

"The Taliban is at its most capable level since 2001, when it was ejected from the country," said a Defense Department official who has access to classified intelligence estimates. The official, and others, spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the subject.

The official said the Taliban's geographic gains have slowed only because it has already pushed into almost every area with a significant Pashtun population, the tribal networks that make up the Taliban's home turf.

"They seem never to have a shortage of manpower," the official said. "And there doesn't appear to be any shortage of funding."

Officials said the insurgency is believed to have 15,000 to 20,000 fighters. The estimates are broad, officials said, because there are loose affiliations among the groups, each of which has fighters with varying commitments to the cause.

"You're not talking about fixed formations that rely solely on full-time combatants," a U.S. counter-terrorism official said. "Numbers ebb and flow; bands of fighters appear and vanish."

CIA spokesman Paul Gimigliano declined to comment on the scope of the agency's presence in Afghanistan. But a U.S. intelligence official said that spy agencies "anticipated the surge in demand for intelligence." The official said the intelligence community "has, for some time now, been deploying more officers to Afghanistan."

The CIA's buildup is the latest in a series of escalations there. After having only a few operatives there after the Sept. 11 attacks, the agency's presence climbed to about 150 by the end of 2001, and 300 at the close of 2005.

A recent Senate report criticized the CIA's role in Afghanistan over the last eight years, saying the agency provided large amounts of money and support to warlords, some of whom had ties to the drug trade and parlayed their U.S. backing into high-level positions in the government.

The agency's station is based at the U.S. Embassy in Kabul, the Afghan capital. It is led by a veteran with an extensive background in paramilitary operations, officials said. But the bulk of the CIA's workforce is scattered among secret bases and military outposts that dot the country.

Most recently, the CIA has been preparing to deploy Crisis Operations Liaison Teams, small units that are attached to regional military commands, giving officers access to information gathered by the CIA as well as satellites and other sources.

One of the largest concentrations of CIA personnel is at Bagram air base north of Kabul, the headquarters for U.S. military special operations forces and for years the site of a secret agency prison.

McChrystal is expected to expand the use of teams that combine CIA operatives with special operations soldiers. In Iraq, where he oversaw the special operations forces from 2003 to 2008, McChrystal used such teams to speed up the cycle of gathering intelligence and carrying out raids aimed at killing or capturing insurgents.

"He was able to plan during the day and do raids at night, sometimes multiple raids if he could move the information quickly enough," said a former senior U.S. military intelligence official who worked closely with McChrystal in Iraq. "What he's trying to do is get his decision cycle quicker than the bad guys."

Afghanistan presents intelligence officials with steep challenges. Current and former CIA officials said that operatives and analysts account for only about one-third of the agency's footprint in Afghanistan. The others are involved in support functions -- such as providing security and managing computer systems -- that are particularly daunting in Afghanistan because of the country's size and the woeful state of its infrastructure.

The CIA is also carrying out an escalating campaign of unmanned Predator missile strikes on Al Qaeda and insurgent strongholds in Pakistan. The number of strikes so far this year, 37, already exceeds the 2008 total, according to data compiled by the Long War Journal website, which tracks Predator strikes in Pakistan.

The agency recently submitted a request for additional Predators from the Air Force, which manages the U.S. drone fleet, one official said. For years, the CIA drones were operated from inside Pakistan, but some are also flown from an air base across the Afghan border near Jalalabad.

A drone strike last month killed Pakistan Taliban chief Baitullah Mahsud. U.S. officials said they are watching closely to see whether his death leads to even a temporary drop in the number of suicide bombings.

Mahsud's organization had become a major supplier of suicide bombers to other insurgent groups, training attackers that in some cases would be deployed to carry out strikes in Pakistan or Afghanistan.

"He turned it into a business," the Defense Department official said. "Putting people through a process to indoctrinate them, prepping them to execute and then basically they can be bartered or sold."

Though other U.S. officials said Mahsud did not appear to have been motivated by financial gain, they did confirm the supplier arrangement.

"He didn't sell suicide bombers like a commodity for profit," said a U.S. counter-terrorism official. "He'd offer resources -- in this case human beings ready to die -- to his sympathizers in exchange for things he needed. These were deals among tribal figures, not outsourcing agreements among corporations."

For eight years, the CIA's main priorities in Afghanistan were to hunt for Al Qaeda, manage relationships with warlords -- doling out inducements that included cash and, in some cases, Viagra -- and rebuild the Afghan spy service. The difficulty of that task was underscored this month by the assassination of the service's No. 2 official.

But the agency's role is likely to shift under McChrystal, who has placed a greater emphasis on protecting civilians and rooting out government graft.

U.S. spy agencies have already stepped up their scrutiny of corruption in Kabul. The recent Senate report described a wiretapping system activated last year that is aimed at tracing ties between government officials and drug kingpins in the country.

news20090920gdn1

2009-09-20 14:56:37 | Weblog
[News] from [guardian.co.uk]

[Environment > Farming]
Milk 'strikes' and shortages hit Europe as UK dairy industry reels from crisis
Dairy farmers in the UK and across Europe are quitting because prices are so low. Some are refusing to deliver their milk, sparking fears of widespread shortages that could begin this week

Jamie Doward, home affairs editor
The Observer, Sunday 20 September 2009 Article history

It is among the finest of England's dairy products; the cheese St George himself might choose when dropping in to his local for a ploughman's. But next time you are in the supermarket, take a closer look at the blocks of cheddar: an increasing proportion of the hard yellow cheese, which has been produced in England since at least 1170, does not come from within the British Isles. Figures from DairyCo, the body that campaigns for the UK's dairy industry, reveal that between January and June we imported 62,003 tonnes of cheddar compared with 48,633 tonnes in the same period last year.

And even cheddar labelled "packaged in Britain" is not the domestic product patriotic consumers may have been led to believe. It is likely to have been imported from southern Ireland but, thanks to a legal loophole, given a "British" credit because it has been wrapped in Britain.

So why is Britain now importing so much of a cheese that it gave to the world? The answers are complex, but they can be boiled down to two words, now the subject of furious farmers' protests around the globe: milk prices.

While the economics behind the price of a pint may seem of interest only to listeners of Farming Today, they go to the heart of Britain's food security programme and so have a direct impact on us all. For almost a decade, falling milk prices have seen dairy farmers complain bitterly of squeezed profits. Little attention has been paid to them, but now the aggressive buying tactics employed by major supermarket chains have prompted many smaller dairy farmers to leave the industry, claiming they cannot turn a profit from their cows, and there are renewed calls for the government to step in to save the industry.

The Royal Association of British Dairy Farmers (RABDF) says the number of dairy farmers in the UK has halved in a decade to 17,060, and farmers are still quitting at an average rate of 14 a week. This downward trend was bucked, briefly, in 2007 when global milk prices soared as the world economy boomed and countries such as India and China saw a surge in demand for all things dairy. Irish farmers in particular took advantage of rising milk prices to boost production, bringing a boom in cheddar production, much of which went into storage. Then, as the recession took hold, demand dried up and global milk prices resumed their downward trajectory. Today the best price Britain's dairy farmers can expect for their milk is just under 22.5p a litre, down more than 20% from the 13-year high of 27.3p achieved last October.

The decline may not seem much but, given the soaring costs of fuel and food for cattle, it means that most UK dairy farmers are now selling their milk at a loss.

While some hope to ride out the recession, others have not been so fortunate. In June the Dairy Farmers of Britain co-operative collapsed, owing £59m to its bankers. A report by its receivers, PricewaterhouseCoopers, blamed a flawed business plan, poor management and bad decision-making, all of which were brutally exposed when plunging milk prices hit home. At one stage the co-op was forced into a fire sale of its cheese at £500 per tonne below its market value. More than 600 jobs were lost.

Small wonder, then, that milk production in the UK is dwindling. Today the industry is producing 12.5bn litres a year – 1.5bn less than two years ago, its maximum quota agreed with the EU.

As production has fallen, and cheaper milk – and cheese – becomes available from abroad, the UK has found itself consuming not just vast amounts of foreign cheddar but a million litres of milk from Europe each day, according to the RABDF.

It is unlikely that our embattled dairy farmers will want to increase production in the short term. In a globalised market, where dairy farmers from the US to Russia are currently making losses, there remains severe deflationary pressure on milk prices. Groups representing European milk farmers claim that world prices have sunk so much they are now having to sell milk at half their production costs, leaving more and more of their members unable to pay their bills.

The mood is turning sour. Last week 300 tractors dragged milk containers over fields in southern Belgium, dumping a day's worth of production. Similar protests were made in Germany, France, the Netherlands and Luxembourg. The crisis has driven many EU farmers into a "milk strike", with thousands refusing to deliver to the industrial dairy conglomerates that produce everything from skimmed milk to processed cheese.

Romuald Schaber, president of the European Milk Board farmers' group, said that up to half the milk-farmers in some areas are refusing to deliver, and predicted that the first shortages could hit some supermarkets on the continent as early as this week. "We are looking at a real catastrophe," he said. "Nobody can produce milk at these prices."

Will milk shortages on the Continent have an impact on the UK's supplies? "When you look at the level of milk production we've got now, compared with five years ago, that makes it look more likely," said one senior dairy industry source. Worryingly, the autumn is a time when milk yields from dairy herds drop, placing further constraints on supply.

But such concerns may be dwarfed in the longer term as the dairy industry fails to attract a new generation of farmers. Research conducted by the RABDF found the average age of a British dairy farmer is 49, while a typical herdsman was 42. Few currently in dairy farming knew of anyone aged under 25 who wants a career in their industry.

The findings raise questions about what happens when the current generation retires or simply walks away en masse. There are warnings that Britain will continue increasing the amount of cheese and milk it imports unless dairy farmers here get a better price for their milk and have an incentive to start producing more.

The RABDF wants a pledge from supermarkets and cheese producers to source more milk and dairy products from within Britain in a bid to guarantee the long-term future of the industry. Waitrose and Marks & Spencer are two of the big chains that have taken some positive steps, according to the RABDF, but it believes much more could be done by all the major players – and the government.

Cheddar is likely to be at the forefront of the battle. "This business of importing cheese in blocks and then repackaging it as 'British' has got to change," said Lyndon Edwards, chair of the RABDF.

The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) has promised it will look into the issue, but the association's wider hope – that the supermarkets and big dairy distributors will opt to buy British – may be a forlorn one in a cut-throat retail environment. Edwards said he was puzzled by Defra's stance on securing the future of dairy, given the government's new focus on sustainability. "People are going out of business, and in the last 10 years 50% of dairy farmers have quit," he said. "Defra talk about food security in one breath but say something else in another."

Yet for all the despondency in the dairy sector, almost all involved agree that it would be quite wrong to pen its obituary now. Dairy UK, the trade body that represents milk processors and distributors, said it was "cautiously optimistic" about prospects. Even Edwards expresses hope. "If you've been in this business for this long, then you've got to be an optimist," he said. They believe a phased liberalisation of EU milk production – due to come into full force in 2015 – should help the UK's dairy farmers. Germany, for example, is allowed under the EU quota system to produce some 25bn litres of milk a year – twice what the UK is currently producing. When this system is finally dismantled, the argument runs, the gloves will come off and Britain's redoubtable dairy farmers can take on their foreign counterparts on a level playing field for the first time.

"The UK is one of the most competitive and efficient milk producers in the EU," said Helen Eustace, an economist with DairyCo. All the available data suggests that global demand for milk can only increase, she believes. "That's why competitive British dairy farmers should be confident that average prices will, in the medium – and long – term, return profits."

If they can just hold on until then…

news20090920gdn2

2009-09-20 14:48:50 | Weblog
[News] from [guardian.co.uk]

[Environment > Wildlife]
Grizzly bear decline alarms conservationists in Canada
Demand for halt to hunting after decline in salmon stocks is blamed for bears starving to death

Tracy McVeigh
The Observer, Sunday 20 September 2009 Article history

First it was the giant panda, then the polar bear, now it seems that the grizzly bear is the latest species to face impending disaster.

A furious row has erupted in Canada with conservationists desperately lobbying the government to suspend the annual bear-hunting season following reports of a sudden drop in the numbers of wild bears spotted on salmon streams and key coastal areas where they would normally be feeding.

The government has promised to order a count of bears, but not until after this year's autumn trophy hunts have taken place. It has enraged ecology groups which say that a dearth of salmon stocks may be responsible for many bears starving in their dens during hibernation. The female grizzlies have their cubs during winter after gorging themselves in September on the fish fats that sustain them through the following months.

"I've never seen bears hungry in the fall before, but last year they were starving," said British Columbian wildlife guide and photographer Doug Neasloss. "I noticed in the spring there weren't as many bears coming out, but I felt it was premature to jump to conclusions." But now, he said, "there just aren't any bears. It's scary."

It was the same story, he said, from other guides over 16 rivers where once they would have been encountering dozens of grizzly bears. "There has been a huge drop in numbers. I've never experienced anything this bad." Reports from stream walkers, who monitor salmon streams across the vast territories, have been consistent, according to the conservation group Pacific Wild – no bears, and more worryingly, no bear cubs.

"There are just no bears out there, I'm hearing that from every side now," said Ian McAllister from Pacific Wild. He said that because a few grizzlies have been wandering close to centres of human habitation people thought there were plenty of bears around. "In fact it's the shortage of food that's driving them into town. They're starving," he explained.

In one river alone, the Fraser on Canada's west coast, 10 million sockeye salmon were expected back to spawn there this summer. Only one million turned up. Canada's Ministry of Environment announced in July that it would ban hunting of grizzly bears on an additional 470,000 hectares, bringing the total protected area for grizzlies and black bears to 1.9 million hectares.

The news came after Jane Goodall, the renowned wildlife campaigner, added her voice to the campaign against the hunts, which are for trophies, not meat.

"I'm very distressed and shocked that the bear hunt – grizzly bear and black bear – is continuing in a country like Canada," she said. "These bears are such amazing, magnificent creatures and there are so many secrets still to discover about their lives."

Grizzlies once roamed across most of North America and the Great Plains until European settlers gradually pushed them back. Only 1,000 remain in the contiguous US, where they are protected, but the number is less clear in the vast wilds of Canada and Alaska, where they are prized by hunters who shoot hundreds of the 350kg giants every year, providing a lucrative income for provincial governments that license the hunts. "It's appalling wildlife management, considering the widespread concern for coastal bears at the moment," said McAllister.

Indigenous groups have added their voice to the call to save the bears, pointing out that trophy hunting is against their traditions and threatens tourism, which is a vital source of income for the remote areas of Canada.

But a senior biologist with the US National Wildlife Federation said the evidence remained anecdotal and called the reports "alarmist". Bears would not starve so quickly because of the decline in salmon while there were other food sources, such as berries, around, Sterling Miller told reporters. He said the long-term impact of the salmon decline on bears was a serious issue, but several years of data would need to be compiled to reveal a change in population trends.

A report released last week showed species numbers to have fallen dramatically in the province of Alberta, where local officials have decided to suspend the annual hunting season despite intense lobbying from hunters. "There's no question that bears are worse off now than 20 years ago – both in numbers and range," said Jim Pissot, of the group Defenders of Wildlife.

news20090920gdn3

2009-09-20 14:31:08 | Weblog
[News] from [guardian.co.uk]

[Environment > Climate change]
UN plans 'shock therapy' for world leaders on environment
Pared-down summit will force heads of rich states to listen to those of third world in hope of kickstarting radical action

Suzanne Goldenberg, US environment correspondent
The Observer, Sunday 20 September 2009 Article history

The United Nations is planning a form of diplomatic shock therapy for world leaders this week in the hope of injecting badly needed urgency into negotiations for a climate change treaty that, it is now widely acknowledged, are dangerously adrift.

UN chief Ban Ki-Moon and negotiators say that unless they can convert world leaders into committed advocates of radical action, it will be very hard to reach a credible and enforceable agreement to avoid the most devastating consequences of climate change.

As the digital counter ticking off the hours to the Copenhagen summit – which had been supposed to seal the deal on climate change – hit 77 days today, progress at the UN summit in New York is seen as vital. Nearly 100 heads of state and government are to attend the summit, for which a pared-down format has been devised.

"We need these leaders to go outside their usual comfort zones," said one diplomat. "Our sense is that leaders have got a little too cosy and comfortable. They really have to hear from countries that are vulnerable and suffering."

Rajendra Pachauri, head of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which won the Nobel peace prize with Al Gore, agreed. Commenting on the leaders attending the G20 summit in Pittsburgh next week, he said: "We need to remind these people about impacts of climate change – the fact that they are inequitable and fall very heavily on some of the poorest people in the world. We are likely to see a large number of failed states if we don't act in time."

The heads of state attending the UN summit are to be stripped of their entourages. Each will be allowed just one aide, generally their country's environment minister, in the sessions.

Instead of set-piece speeches, leaders will be paired off to chair discussion groups. Britain will be with Guyana, Tuvalu with the Netherlands, and Mongolia with the European commission.

The leaders will also lunch with environmental activists and chief executives of corporations who have been pressing their governments for action. At dinner, the leaders of the biggest polluting countries will dine with the leaders of Bangladesh, Kiribati and Costa Rica – which are among the primary victims of climate change.

By the end of the day, the rationale goes, the leaders will be imbued with a new sense of purpose. Leaders of rich countries will have been galvanised to take on the big emissions cuts – 25-40% over the next decade, 80% by 2050 – needed to keep temperatures from rising more than two degrees above pre-industrial levels, the temperature set by science to avoid the most calamitous effects of climate change.

The leaders will also, it is hoped, have some understanding of the threat to poorer countries. And, at the very least, they will have more of a common purpose in tackling the problem. "We need to gather together. We don't want to blame or point fingers at each other," said Yaqoub al-Sanada, counsellor at the Kuwaiti mission to the UN. Kuwait – one of the biggest producers of oil – will co-chair a discussion session with Finland.

The UN is hoping for help from Barack Obama. The US president will speak at the session, and there is anticipation he will deliver a strong signal that America is committed to action. There is growing anxiety for those kinds of reassurances, especially as opposition to Obama's green agenda grows in Congress. "The first question I get any time I meet with anybody is, 'Where's the legislation? How's it going?'," Todd Stern, the State Department's climate change envoy, said. There are also reports that China's president, Hu Jintao, in his first appearance at the UN, will announce new commitments to curb pollution – the kind of signal that will be crucial to boost negotiations in the days leading up to Copenhagen.

"We can get a successful outcome from Copenhagen. It is achievable, but at the moment it's in the balance," said John Ashton, Britain's climate change envoy. "We need to close the gaps."

Those gaps grew over the summer. There is what Ashton called the "ambition gap" – the failure of leaders of the big polluting countries to sign on to the deep emissions cuts needed. Then there is the "finance gap" – the failure of industrialised states to come up with a package on how to compensate poor countries that will suffer the most devastating consequences.

Britain came forward last June with an estimate of £61bn a year by 2020. Negotiators are frustrated that major industrialised states have not set clear figures on how much they are willing to commit, or how they will provide the funding.

Some climate change experts and negotiators have already begun planning a fallback position should the December Copenhagen summit fail to produce a strong enough agreement.

In Washington, Obama administration officials now talk openly about negotiating beyond Copenhagen. "Let's not make that one particular time the be-all and end-all, and say that if it doesn't happen we are doomed," Steven Chu, the energy secretary, told reporters.

Thinktanks are already starting to work on what is being called "Plan B" – scenarios for how the world could come up with an action plan before it is too late. But some are not holding their breath.

"It seems to me that Copenhagen is not the end of this," said Tim Wirth, the president of the UN Foundation, and the man who, in the 1980s, helped to write the first cap-and-trade plan for acid rain. He added: "We are going to have Copenhagens for the rest of our lives."

news20090920bbc1

2009-09-20 07:56:42 | Weblog
[One-Minute World News] from [BBC NEWS]

[Middle East]
Page last updated at 00:31 GMT, Sunday, 20 September 2009 01:31 UK
Obama to meet Middle East leaders
President Barack Obama will meet Israeli and Palestinian leaders on Tuesday to try to relaunch peace talks.


Mr Obama will hold separate talks with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, before a joint meeting.

Efforts to restart the peace process have so far been blocked by disagreements over Israeli settlements.

A senior US official told the BBC that there was no expectation of an announcement after Tuesday's meetings.

He said the meetings are "clear sign of the President's personal commitment to this issue."

But he added that it was critical to put the discussions "in context".

"Nine months ago there was a war in Gaza," he said. "The Israeli government has only existed for five months.

"And now these three leaders are going to sit down in the same room and continue to narrow the gaps."

Mr Netenyahu's office issued a statement welcoming the invitation to talks and saying they would be held "without preconditions", Reuters news agency reported.

'Deep commitment'

The announcement of the meetings, which will take place on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly in New York, came after US envoy George Mitchell's latest round of shuttle diplomacy ended without agreement.

The White House said the meetings next week would continue efforts by Mr Obama, Mr Mitchell and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton "to lay the groundwork for the relaunch of negotiations".

{The road is now blocked
Mahmoud Abbas
Palestinian president}

Mr Mitchell said Mr Obama's desire to personally engage at this juncture showed his "deep commitment to comprehensive peace".

The US envoy held a series of meetings with Mr Netanyahu last week in a fresh attempt at getting a deal on Jewish settlement activity.

He also went to the West Bank to talk to Mr Abbas.

Mr Mitchell was hoping for a consensus before all sides attend the UN General Assembly, but he returned to the US without reaching any agreement.

Mr Abbas and the US administration have been demanding a complete freeze on Israeli construction activity.

Mr Netanyahu had previously offered a temporary freeze for several months, but not in East Jerusalem or in cases where homes have already been approved.

He noted this week that there had been a slowdown in settlement construction, but that work would continue on 2,400 units currently being built.

'New conditions'

On Saturday, both sides were reported as blaming each other for the lack of any agreement to resume the peace process following Mr Mitchell's visit.

Israeli foreign ministry spokesman Yossi Levi said the Palestinian Authority was "preventing the resumption of the peace process by making conditions that it has not made in the past", AFP news agency said.

It was not reported which conditions he was referring to.

But Mr Abbas said Israel was to blame for not agreeing to a total freeze in settlement building.

"The road is now blocked," he told journalists in Cairo.

"There is no more work [for Mr Mitchell] with the Western or Palestinian sides because we are complying with all our duties.

"The focus has to be on the Israeli side."


[Americas]
Page last updated at 07:59 GMT, Sunday, 20 September 2009 08:59 UK
Three Afghans held over US 'plot'
Three men have been arrested in connection with an alleged plot to launch an attack in the United States, the US Justice Department says.


Two Afghan-born men, a father and son, were arrested in Denver, Colorado.

A third man, also from Afghanistan, was later detained in New York, the department said.

The men are accused of making false statements related to "a matter involving international and domestic terrorism", the statement said.

The FBI was investigating several people "in the United States, Pakistan and elsewhere, relating to a plot to detonate improvised explosive devices in the United States", the Justice Department said in court documents related to the arrests.

US media have reported that the investigation was focusing on a possible plan to attack a public area in New York.

David Kris, assistant attorney general for national security, said the arrests were part of "an ongoing and fast-paced investigation".

"It is important to note that we have no specific information regarding the timing, location or target of any planned attack," AFP news agency quoted him as saying.

'Not true'

The arrests followed three days of questioning by federal authorities of Najibullah Zazi, the Colorado-based son.

Earlier this week officials searched the Denver home of Mr Zazi, a 24-year-old airport shuttle driver.

He and his father, Mohammed Zazi, 53, will appear in court in Colorado on Monday. Ahmad Wais Afzali, 37, will appear in court in New York the same day.

In a telephone interview with the Denver Post newspaper on Saturday, Najibullah Zazi denied media reports that he had admitted any link to al-Qaeda or involvement in terrorism.

"It's not true," Mr Zazi said. "I have nothing to hide. It's all media publications reporting whatever they want. They have been reporting all this nonsense."

[Europe]
Page last updated at 08:20 GMT, Sunday, 20 September 2009 09:20 UK
Italian Afghan dead brought home
The bodies of six Italian soldiers killed in a suicide attack in Afghanistan have arrived in Rome.


They have been met by the Italian President Giorgio Napolitano, family members and an honour guard.

On Monday a state funeral will be held with a minute's silence in schools and public buildings across Italy.

Their deaths on Thursday were the single biggest loss the country has suffered since it sent troops to Afghanistan five years ago.

The BBC's correspondent in Rome Duncan Kennedy says it was a moving moment when President Napolitano placed his hands on each of the six coffins.

The deaths have made a powerful impact on Italy, with extensive coverage in newspapers and on television.

Our correspondent says the killings have started a fractious debate about Italy's role in Afghanistan.

There are now more than 3,000 Italian soldiers in the country, mostly in the capital, Kabul, and the western area of Herat.

Some political parties have called for their withdrawal but earlier this week, the Italian Foreign Minister Franco Frattini said the troops must remain in Afghanistan despite the high price Italy is paying.


[Asia-Pacific]
Page last updated at 09:35 GMT, Sunday, 20 September 2009 10:35 UK
Taiwan city to screen Kadeer film
A documentary about exiled Uighur activist Rebiya Kadeer is to be shown in Taiwan's second city, despite concerns that it will anger China.


But officials in Kaohsiung said the film would be shown this week, not during a festival next month as originally planned.

Businesses had urged the city to cancel the screening, fearing repercussions.

China has accused Ms Kadeer of orchestrating recent violence it its Xinjiang region - a charge she denies.

In July about 200 people were killed in ethnic violence between the region's Muslim Uighurs and Han Chinese settlers.

Security has remained extremely tight there since then, amid reports of ongoing tensions and sporadic violence.

Australian furore

Officials in Kaohsiung said that they would show the documentary, The 10 Conditions of Love, four times in the coming week.

"To draw the curtains over this controversy as soon as possible, the film will be screened ahead of schedule," the city said in a statement.

{ CHINA'S UIGHURS
> Ethnically Turkic Muslims, mainly live in Xinjiang
> Made bid for independent state in 1940s
> Sporadic violence in Xinjiang since 1991
> Uighurs worried about Chinese immigration and erosion of traditional culture}

Local tourism officials had spoken out against the move, Taiwanese media reported, fearing it would drive Chinese tourist numbers down.

Rebiya Kadeer heads the World Uighur Congress, which represents the Uighur community in exile.

Once a prominent businesswoman in Xinjiang, she was jailed for five years for sending newspaper reports about the Uighurs - some of whom want greater autonomy from China - to her US-based husband.

When the film was shown at the Melbourne Film Festival, diplomats urged Australian organisers to withdraw it, several Chinese films were withdrawn and hackers - apparently Chinese - attacked the festival's website.

The move by the Taiwanese city is likely to spark an angry response from Beijing - already irked by a recent visit to Taiwan by Tibet's spiritual leader, the Dalai Lama.

China considers the exiled Dalai Lama a dangerous separatist and self-governed Taiwan to be part of its territory.

news20090920bbc2

2009-09-20 07:40:10 | Weblog
[One-Minute World News] from [BBC NEWS]

[Americas]
Page last updated at 01:53 GMT, Sunday, 20 September 2009 02:53 UK
Colombia eases terms for hostages
Colombian President Alvaro Uribe has eased the terms for the release of 24 police and soldiers being held by Marxist Farc rebels.


He agreed that the hostages can be released one by one, dropping an earlier demand that they must all be released at the same time.

"This should be done in a short time, so that the torture does not continue," a government statement said.

The Farc rebels had offered to release two of the soldiers in April.

The father of one of the soldiers, Pablo Moncayo, has staged a high profile campaign, walking across Colombia wrapped in chains to call for the release of his son.

In a separate development, Colombian authorities have extradited a 37-year-old alleged Farc leader to the US.

US prosecutors say Nancy Conde Rubio, also known as Doris Adriana, was involved in smuggling drugs to the US as well as sending large quantities of weapons and other supplies to the rebels.

The Colombian security services are reported to have used information gained from monitoring her phone calls to organise a dramatic jungle rescue last year of 15 hostages.

The rescued hostages included the French-Colombian politician, Ingrid Betancourt, and three Americans.

The Farc, which is largely financed by drug trafficking, has been pursuing its rebellion against the government since 1964.

Mr Uribe has taken a tough stance against the rebels.

news20090920reut1

2009-09-20 05:57:45 | Weblog
[Top News] from [REUTERS]

[Green Business]
Pittsburgh showcases green economy at G20 summit
Sun Sep 20, 2009 1:53am EDT
By Rebekah Kebede and Herbert Lash

PITTSBURGH/NEW YORK (Reuters) - The collapse of the U.S. steel industry forced Drew Mihalek in 1977 to leave Pittsburgh, a onetime capital of industry that President Barack Obama will show to world leaders this week as a "bold example" of a new green economy.

Mihalek, 58, recalls bubbling caldrons of metal during summer jobs at U.S. Steel as a college student. Now he works in a dust-free workplace as environmental health and safety manager at Solar Power Industries, a maker of solar cells.

Mihalek calls the change in his hometown "kind of like my own personal revitalization." That shift will be in the spotlight this week as leaders from the Group of 20 nations meet in various "green" buildings -- a visible image of the new economy touted by the Obama administration.

Debate before the Pittsburgh summit of leading developed and developing countries has focused on bankers' pay, regulation of the financial sector and how governments should withdraw from the enormous stimulus packages enacted to blunt the global economic crisis and spur growth.

Climate change and tackling high unemployment are other issues on the G20 agenda, tying into Obama's vision for a green economy and why Pittsburgh is hosting the summit. But hopes for millions of new green jobs in the U.S. economy may prove more ambitious than many advocates and investors dream of.

Central to a green economy are education, innovation and research, which Pittsburgh offers through schools like Carnegie Mellon University and the University of Pittsburgh. Also key are an educated work force and plentiful raw materials.

Andy Hannah, chief executive of Plextronics, a company that makes organic solar cells and organic light-emitting diodes and uses photoactive inks to print solar cells, said Pittsburgh offers the right mix of corporate and university talent.

Hannah also said Pittsburgh was a prime location for setting up Plextronics because raw materials such as aluminum, glass and plastics are produced locally.

Patrick McCarthy of ATRP Solutions, a polymer maker using technology developed at Carnegie Mellon, also said the key elements for a green company come together in Pittsburgh.

"In this city, we have a history of materials companies commercializing products. This expertise is not everywhere in the country," McCarthy said.

GOVERNMENT KEY TO RENEWABLE ENERGY

Despite all its strides -- Pittsburgh has one of the largest green collar work forces for a U.S. city its size -- some doubt green jobs will be a major engine for the economy.

Lester Lave, an economics professor and director of the Green Design Institute at Carnegie Mellon, said neither oil or coal will be replaced any time soon. He also said politicians were overly optimistic in their assumptions about new jobs.

"You are not going to be overwhelmed with (green) jobs in energy," Lave said. "I think the vast majority of jobs are going to be in the retrofit area and those can be good jobs."

There has long been debate along left-right political lines about the viability of green energy and the large government funding needed to get renewable energy off the ground.

The $787 billion economic stimulus package that Obama signed into law in February included more than $60 billion in clean energy investments.

A green economy would boost energy independence and reduce a chronic U.S. trade deficit, advocates say. But that dream is still far away: solar and wind power accounted for just 0.6 percent of U.S. energy consumption in 2008, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration.

Another selling point for a green economy is that a green collar work force earns 10 percent to 20 percent more than other jobs, the Council of Economic Advisors has said. And those jobs are more likely to be union jobs, the council said.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics estimated in May 2008 there were 9.9 million people employed in U.S. production, and 3.3 million in computer and mathematical sciences, where salaries averaged $74,500 a year, more than double that of manufacturing.

For all the talk about jump-starting the U.S. economy and spurring jobs, some say that impact has yet to be felt.

"I hear a lot of thunder, but I see no rain," said John Bucher, a senior executive at Solar Power Industries, where Mihalek works.

WAITING FOR TIPPING POINT

The poster child for a green economy is solar power, which is expected to drive jobs growth, especially in installation.

But costs still outweigh benefits and industry experts say grid parity is a tipping point that is several years away. Grid parity refers to when solar costs come in line with the cost of electricity from the power grid.

"If the incentives aren't there, then it's hard to justify the price of the system itself," Bucher said.

Investors have made big bets on solar energy. There are about 45 publicly traded companies in the sector whose market capitalization is about $50 billion.

A number of catalysts could spark a sudden conversion to solar panels, as was seen with the rapid adoption of cell phones in the late 1990s, said Shawn Kravetz, president of Esplanade Capital LLC in Boston, who has a fund dedicated to solar energy.

A tipping point could come earlier than many think, perhaps by 2011, especially if carbon taxes or a cap-and-trade program aimed at limiting carbon emissions comes about, Kravetz said. A fall in panel prices, cheap financing and the first solar panel to go up in a neighborhood are enough to spark sales, he said.

"People are more aware that solar isn't a newfangled technology, it's by-and-large a 30-year-old technology that works," he said. "We just need to get the cost to where it's cost effective, and where, thanks to some government support, we're finally there."

(Editing by Frances Kerry)


[Green Business]
Japan to propose green technology, funding: minister
Sun Sep 20, 2009 12:19am EDT
By Chisa Fujioka

TOKYO (Reuters) - Japanese Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama will unveil a plan to support developing countries in technology and funding to fight climate change at a U.N. meeting this week, Japan's environment minister said on Sunday.

Speaking ahead of Hatoyama's U.S. trip, Sakihito Ozawa also said Japan would work toward its own bold goals to cut greenhouse gas emissions by outlining the economic rewards of shifting to clean energy to persuade firms wary of initial costs.

"The 'Hatoyama Initiative' will be announced at the United Nations, and everyone should have high hopes for this," Ozawa told reporters.

Hatoyama said this month the initiative would provide financial and technological support to developing nations working proactively to reduce emissions, but has not made clear what funds or the sort of technology would be provided.

Japan's government, which took office last week, is aiming to play a bigger negotiating role in U.N.-backed talks in December for a new agreement on reducing emissions to replace the Kyoto Protocol, the first phase of which ends in 2012.

The talks have run into deadlock on issues such as sharing out curbs on greenhouse gases among rich and poor nations, and raising funds to help developing countries tackle global warming.

Ozawa declined to elaborate on the new scheme for developing countries, but hoped it would be an incentive for big emerging economies such as China and India to join a new climate agreement.

NEED TO PERSUADE BUSINESS, HOUSEHOLDS

Developing countries have insisted that industrialized countries shoulder most of the cost of resolving a problem they caused in the first place.

"I think the Hatoyama Initiative will be one big tool," said Ozawa, who will join Hatoyama this week for the U.N. meeting of world leaders on climate change and a G20 summit of leading and emerging economies in Pittsburgh.

A former banker and an expert on economic policy, Ozawa said he would also work at home to persuade businesses and the public to build toward a target of cutting emissions by 25 percent by 2020 from 1990 levels.

The target, much tougher than the previous government's, faces resistance from industry as Japan emerges from its deepest postwar recession. Media have stressed the burden on households to install new equipment such as solar panels.

"I want to outline an (economic) model that shows that climate change is not necessarily negative for the economy, but that it could rather be a driver for growth," he said.

He said he hoped to draft a plan outlining the economic model within the next two months.

Details on policies, including an environment tax, to help Japan meet its new emissions reduction target would be subject to discussion with other cabinet ministers, Ozawa said.

The new government is also planning to launch a domestic emissions trading market with compulsory volume caps on emitters, although details such as which sectors will be covered have yet to be thrashed out.

(Editing by Ron Popeski)

news20090920reut2

2009-09-20 05:49:46 | Weblog
[Top News] from [REUTERS]

[Green Business]
Japan eyes mandatory cap-and-trade in 2011/12: Nikkei
Sat Sep 19, 2009 9:54pm EDT

TOKYO (Reuters) - Japan's new government wants to introduce a compulsory cap-and-trade system for greenhouse gas emissions as early as the year to March 2012, the Nikkei business daily said on Sunday.

The scheme would be a key part of Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama's goal to cut such emissions by 25 percent from 1990 levels by 2020, the paper reported on its website without citing sources.

A government panel on the environment is likely to discuss the plan at a meeting later on Sunday, the paper said.

Under the scheme, the government would issue emissions quotas to companies. Firms emitting less than their quotas would be able to sell the surplus, the Nikkei said.

Hatoyama's Democratic Party has said the 25 percent emissions target -- tougher than the last administration's -- is needed for Japan to play a bigger negotiating role at U.N.-backed climate talks in Copenhagen in December, so that emerging nations such as China and India join a new climate pact that goes beyond 2012.

But the new government's emissions target faces resistance from industry as Japan emerges from its deepest postwar recession.

Emissions in Japan, the world's fifth-biggest greenhouse gas emitter, rose 2.3 percent to a record in the year to March 2008, putting the country 16 percent above its Kyoto Protocol target.

(Editing by Dean Yates)

news20090920cbs

2009-09-20 04:04:03 | Weblog
[Today's News] from [CBS News.com]

[U.S.]
Home U.S. DENVER, Sept. 20, 2009
3 Arrests in Colorado Terror Probe
Airport Shuttle Driver, His Father, and Queens Man Charged With Making False Statements to FBI


(CBS/AP) A 24-year-old Colorado airport shuttle driver and his father were arrested on formal charges of making false statements to federal agents in an ongoing terror investigation. A third man was arrested in New York City on the same charges, the Justice Department said Sunday.

Najibullah Zazi and his father, Mohammed Wali Zazi, 53, were arrested by federal agents late Saturday at their suburban Denver homes. Ahmad Wais Afzali, 37, of Flushing, New York, also was arrested, the Justice Department said.

Authorities say Afzali and the 24-year-old Zazi are legal permanent residents from Afghanistan, and the elder Zazi is a naturalized U.S. citizen from Afghanistan.

Each was charged with knowingly and willfully making false statements to the FBI "in a matter involving international and domestic terrorism," the department said in a statement. It emphasized authorities don't know the timing or location of any planned attack.

The FBI is investigating several individuals in the United States, Pakistan and elsewhere in an alleged plot to detonate explosive devices in the United States, the Justice Department said.

In supporting documents filed with the court, federal investigators say a Sept. 11 search of Zazi's rental car in New York turned up a laptop computer that contained an image of nine pages of handwritten notes. Those notes included formulas and instructions about how to build explosives, detonators and other components of a fusing circuit, according to the affidavits.

Zazi was asked about the notes during FBI interviews last week and said he knew nothing about them, the documents said.

When asked about the handwritten notes allegedly found on his computer, Zazi allegedly told federal agents he hadn't written them and that he must have unintentionally downloaded it along with a religious book he downloaded in August. He said he deleted it within a few days after realizing it discussed jihad, the affidavit said.

The FBI's court filings also say Zazi admitted to FBI agents last week that in 2008 he received al Qaeda weapons and explosives training at an al Qaeda training facility in Pakistan, near the border with Afghanistan.

Zazi has repeatedly denied any connection to al Qaeda or to a purported terrorist plot.

Authorities say Zazi rented a car and drove from Denver to New York, crossing into Manhattan on Sept. 10. Zazi said he went to New York to resolve some issues with a coffee cart he owns in Manhattan, then flew home to Denver.

On Monday, FBI agents and police officers with search warrants seeking bomb materials searched three apartments and questioned residents in the Queens neighborhood where Zazi stayed.

A joint FBI-New York Police Department task force feared Zazi may have been involved in a potential plot involving hydrogen peroxide-based explosives like those cited in an intelligence warning issued Monday, according to two other law enforcement officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak about the investigation.

Folsom has repeatedly denied any such claims.

The Justice Department claims Afzali told Najibullah that he had been interviewed by law enforcement but denied it when later questioned by FBI agents on Thursday. It also claims Afzali denied telling Zazi that they were being watched.

An arrest warrant affidavit says FBI agents intercepted a phone conversation around Sept. 11 in which Afzali told the younger Zazi that he had spoken with authorities. "I was exposed to something yesterday from the authorities. And they came to ask me about your characters. They asked me about you guys," Afzali told Zazi, according to the affidavit.

However Afzali allegedly lied to authorities about that conversation when federal agents asked him about it Thursday, according to the affidavit.

The department says Mohammed Zazi, who was interviewed last week by the FBI, lied when asked if he knew anyone by the name of Afzali and said he didn't. The FBI said it had wiretapped a conversation between Mohammed Zazi and Afzali during Najibullah Zazi's visit to New York.

Wendy Aiello, a spokeswoman for Zazi's defense team, says Zazi and his father were taken to FBI headquarters in Denver. Zazi's attorney, Art Folsom, met the father and son there late Saturday.

The Zazis were scheduled to appear in federal court in Denver on Monday, the Justice Department said. Afzali was to appear Monday in federal court in the Eastern District of New York.

If convicted, each would face eight years in prison.

Zazi had been scheduled to go to the Federal Building in Denver on Saturday for a fourth straight day of FBI questioning. However, the meeting was canceled so Zazi could meet with his attorney, Aiello said.

A senior U.S. intelligence official in Washington told The Associated Press Friday that Zazi has indicated that he is directly linked with al Qaeda. The official, who spoke on condition of anonymity in order to discuss intelligence matters, said Zazi played a crucial role in an intended terrorist attack but that it was not immediately clear what the targets were.

Folsom dismissed the official's remark, calling it "rumor." Folsom also said Zazi never met with al Qaeda operatives and isn't involved in terrorism.

Another official familiar with the investigation told the AP on Thursday that Zazi had contact with a known al Qaeda associate. The official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because the investigation is ongoing, would not provide details on the location or nature of the encounter.

The official said agents have been monitoring Zazi and four others in Colorado as part of a terrorism investigation.

FBI agents in Denver questioned Mohammed Zazi on Friday about his son's background, said attorney Armstrong Graham.

The FBI has searched Zazi's apartment and his uncle and aunt's home in suburban Denver. Authorities have not said what they found there.

U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder said Friday that the FBI was "working this case around the clock" in New York, Denver and other parts of the country but that there was no imminent threat.

Zazi was born in Afghanistan in 1985, moved to Pakistan at age 7 and emigrated to the United States in 1999. He returned to Pakistan in 2007 and 2008 to visit his wife, Folsom said.