英国・リーズ大学 社会学・社会政策学科（障害学研究センター）
Dr. Simon Prideaux
７月７日 午後６時１５分から７時４５分まで（６限「障害者福祉論」）
演題： Disabled People and Self Directed Support Schemes:
Re-Conceptualising Work and Welfare in the 21st Century
障害者と自律支援スキーム：21世紀における仕事と福祉を再概念化する
※通訳付き
リーズ大学はイギリス障害学のメッカ＆ジグムンド・バウマン氏のかつての勤務校＆早稲田大学の提携校です。
聴講希望者は直接教室（戸山キャンパス34号館１５１号教室までどうぞ。
岡部耕典
以下、レクチャーサマリー
This article critically explores and adds to research on the social benefits of self directed support schemes for disabled people and their families. We argue that, although research to date has defined the benefits of such services within conventional ‘cost-benefit’ frameworks, this approach has failed to address the more significant challenge to traditional models of welfare and particularly the role of users of these schemes as employers. The article begins the process of repositioning understandings of welfare and work with reference to self directed support services. In so doing we argue that future research and policy should be based on a more thorough analysis of the less acknowledged socio-economic costs and benefits of these developments for users, their families, personal assistants and local/national economies.
Dr. Simon Prideaux
７月７日 午後６時１５分から７時４５分まで（６限「障害者福祉論」）
演題： Disabled People and Self Directed Support Schemes:
Re-Conceptualising Work and Welfare in the 21st Century
障害者と自律支援スキーム：21世紀における仕事と福祉を再概念化する
※通訳付き
リーズ大学はイギリス障害学のメッカ＆ジグムンド・バウマン氏のかつての勤務校＆早稲田大学の提携校です。
聴講希望者は直接教室（戸山キャンパス34号館１５１号教室までどうぞ。
岡部耕典
以下、レクチャーサマリー
This article critically explores and adds to research on the social benefits of self directed support schemes for disabled people and their families. We argue that, although research to date has defined the benefits of such services within conventional ‘cost-benefit’ frameworks, this approach has failed to address the more significant challenge to traditional models of welfare and particularly the role of users of these schemes as employers. The article begins the process of repositioning understandings of welfare and work with reference to self directed support services. In so doing we argue that future research and policy should be based on a more thorough analysis of the less acknowledged socio-economic costs and benefits of these developments for users, their families, personal assistants and local/national economies.
