(1/6) Justice Radhabinod Pal: The Life and Times of the Tokyo Trials Jurist
With a sharp sensitivity to the interrelationships between morality, vocation, and traditions, he raised questions in the trial that continue to be important in the study of war crimes.
We would like to share the insights and analysis by Dr. Monika Chansoria.
Dr. Monika Chansoria is a Senior Fellow at The Japan Institute of International Affairs (JIIA) in Tokyo. Previously, she has held appointments at the Sandia National Laboratories (U.S.), Hokkaido University (Sapporo, Japan) and as Associate Director of Studies at the Fondation Maison des Sciences de l’Homme (Paris). She specializes in contemporary Asian security and weapons’ proliferation issues, nuclear strategy, and Great Power politics and strategy in the Indo-Pacific.
The insights and analysis by Dr. Monika Chansoria originally appeared in the Japan Forward.
(1/6) Justice Radhabinod Pal: The Life and Times of the Tokyo Trials Jurist
(https://youtu.be/rITbb4vEErE)
(2/6) Did Justice Radhabinod Pal condone the atrocities? Was he being soft on Japan?
(3/6) War Victors Cannot Establish New Crimes to Punish the Losers, Justice Pal Told the Tokyo Trial
(4/6) ‘Plague of Imperialism’: Questioning the Omission of Hiroshima-Nagasaki Atomic Bombings in Tokyo Trial Ruling
(5/6) Long After Tokyo Trial, India’s Justice Pal Keeps Place of Honor in Japan’s Political Memory
(6/6) Justice Pal’s Tokyo Trial Review: Imperialism, Colonialism Greater Crimes Than Aggression
