If you are a nascent tech media company it's always a good idea to launch a me-too service that goes head-to-head with both Apple and Google. Or at least, one imagines that was the discussion around the offices of TriPlay, the platform-agnostic cloud computing company behind the just-launched service MyMusicCloud. The service is entering is entering this fray.
On its site the company offers a somewhat nonsensical comparison chart that portends to show the difference between MyMusicCloud and Apple iCloud and Google Music Beta and Amazon Music Player, that, truth be told, feels like an afterthought. To be fair, the TriPlay was likely working on its Music service before iCloud or Google Music launched, so the service itself is likely not a reaction to those offerings. The tagline for the launch though, "Finally, total music freedom," sounds a few months too late.
The promotional video for MyMusicCloud touts the advantages of crowd-based storage lockers in general (it almost looks like a PSA) but doesn't specifically address Apple or Google (or any of the slew of others edging into the space), but rather drops the bomb that -- wait for it -- you can access your music without strangling yourself with USB cords.
MyMusicCloud has a store with 11 million songs int it (prices start at .19 cents a song), but what they (and parent TriPlay) are really selling is storage. As such, your first 2GB are free (which translates to about 500 songs at an average nitrate of 128 kbps), but then you have to purchase one of the storage plans (the comparison chart fails to mention that Google Music is completely free, for the time being). The comparison chart also erroneously states that Google Music doesn't work on Apple devices (there's not native app, but the player is acceptably accessible through Safari's mobile browser) and Google's Music Manager downloads to Mac device with no problem.
So, are there enough people out there who want access to their music everywhere, who trust neither Apple nor Google nor Amazon and are unsatisfied with the other options out there, to support yet more cloud-based music services?
On its site the company offers a somewhat nonsensical comparison chart that portends to show the difference between MyMusicCloud and Apple iCloud and Google Music Beta and Amazon Music Player, that, truth be told, feels like an afterthought. To be fair, the TriPlay was likely working on its Music service before iCloud or Google Music launched, so the service itself is likely not a reaction to those offerings. The tagline for the launch though, "Finally, total music freedom," sounds a few months too late.
The promotional video for MyMusicCloud touts the advantages of crowd-based storage lockers in general (it almost looks like a PSA) but doesn't specifically address Apple or Google (or any of the slew of others edging into the space), but rather drops the bomb that -- wait for it -- you can access your music without strangling yourself with USB cords.
MyMusicCloud has a store with 11 million songs int it (prices start at .19 cents a song), but what they (and parent TriPlay) are really selling is storage. As such, your first 2GB are free (which translates to about 500 songs at an average nitrate of 128 kbps), but then you have to purchase one of the storage plans (the comparison chart fails to mention that Google Music is completely free, for the time being). The comparison chart also erroneously states that Google Music doesn't work on Apple devices (there's not native app, but the player is acceptably accessible through Safari's mobile browser) and Google's Music Manager downloads to Mac device with no problem.
So, are there enough people out there who want access to their music everywhere, who trust neither Apple nor Google nor Amazon and are unsatisfied with the other options out there, to support yet more cloud-based music services?