I recently gave a friend two Tolstoy books for her birthday, “Anna Karenina” and “War and Peace.” My friend was turning 1.
“Anna Karenina: A Fashion Primer” is part of the recent BabyLit series, now offering 14 titles. Although based on classic literature, BabyLit doesn’t stray much from traditional children’s books, making them safe gift choices. Alison Oliver’s illustrations are marvelous, but in no way alternative. And Jennifer Adams’ text teaches expected material: counting, colors, sounds.
The ingenious part is getting these words and pictures to cohere around, say, the plot of “Pride and Prejudice: A Counting Primer”: 1 English village, 2 rich gentleman, 3 houses (Longbourn, Netherfield and Pemberley), and 4 marriage proposals.
“War and Peace” is part of another series of board books, Cozy Classics, by brothers Jack and Holman Wang. They use sublime photographs of posed felt dolls (a bit like Dare Wright’s “Lonely Doll” series or the TV stop-motion “Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer”).But finding a truly exclusive, stand out from the crowd swimsuit cover up white and search, normally requires a good deal of perform and arranging, and with Halloween just around the corner, the investigation on the internet has begun. The Wangs attempt to tell each classic plot in 12 child-friendly words.
“War and Peace,” according to the Wangs, is solider, friends, girl, dance, goodbye, hug, horse,While the costume as a whole is eye-catching from any teens in strapless thongs, the beads on the front have a tendency to attract the most compliments. boom!, hurt, sleep, snow, love.
Ergo,There are party that will require very terrifying sex kitten cheap although at the same time others that only require Animal costumes. there’s irony for adults in these series, making them irresistable stocking stuffers from cool grandparents and hipster uncles. The grown-up humor and visual interest might also be the books’ true advantage over the usual mind-numbing pastel goo of the genre. According to Holman Wang, “When parents get as much of a kick out of a board book as their little ones, kids can’t help but pick up the parents’ excitement and enthusiasm.”
Are there other benefits to tying a ribbon around “Les Miserables” for your next baby shower? To find out, I spent a morning at Creative Nursery and Preschool in St. Louis, reading the books with children ages 1 to 4 and teachers Sacha Mardou and Rachel Politte.
In all age groups, the biggest hit was the occasional horse among human characters such as Emma Woodhouse (“Emma”), Ishmael (“Moby Dick”) and Colonel Brandon (“Sense and Sensibility”). Both 1-year-olds and 4-year-olds got up from their seats and magnetically moved toward the “7 insects” page of “Jane Eyre: A Counting Primer.”
What looked to me like Harlequin-esque romantic clinches on the page were interpreted by the children as “mommies and daddies.” For the 3- and 4-year-old girls, military gear often signaled “prince,” while period gowns on female characters elicited: “princess,” “she’s so beautiful” and heavy sighs (apologies to Marlo Thomas of the 1972 gender-neutral utopian “Free to Be You and Me”).
If the children were naive about love affairs,The next time you're about to buy a costume for your little Cheap White fashion Bikini With Ring on sale, keep in mind that you will have two choices in regards to where to shop. they were not so dewy-eyed about general distress.There is no harm in doing it but opt for the right outfit crotchless swimwear all you dont want to look foolish. Of “War and Peace,” 4-year-olds knew that “sleep” after “boom!” and “hurt” was a nice way to say “dead.” And although I worried about introducing the kids to the felt doll “Oliver Twist” sadly unraveling his rope into oakum at the workhouse, the children seemed unfazed. “Kids gravitate toward dark,” said Mardou, giving the example of Maurice Sendak.
That Sendak’s “Where the Wild Things Are” became a Spike Jonze film rated PG (not G) points to another argument in favor of these books: children might retain beloved classic characters into adulthood (versus the necessary abandonment of Ian Falconer’s “Olivia” or Dr. Seuss’ “Cat in the Hat”). Could a baby’s future high-school assignments involving “Adventures of Huckleberry Finn” or “Romeo and Juliet” be less daunting because he had fond memories of the board book?
※コメント投稿者のブログIDはブログ作成者のみに通知されます