予言されていた？アメリカで語り継がれる予言の真相とは【 都市伝説 ニュース 速報 】
Has humanity not yet been able to shoot a realistic UAP?
UFOs and UAPs have been witnessed and filmed all over
・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・
If you tweet a real UFO picture to a UFO researcher... most of them don't show any interest lol. So does that mean most researchers are fakes? Real UFO pictures are useful for exposing fake researchers lol.
::////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Why are there no UFO images in the world?
o Cameras themselves have switched to digital, and their performance has deteriorated drastically compared to film cameras lol
o Considering the probability of photographing a UFO, you don't make any money from it lol If you had to put a price on it, it would be about 100 million yen per shot lol
********************************************
ついに、UFO構造物の原理が発見される？
「光で検出できない“不可視な”円柱構造 光や電磁波を反射や散乱しない構造を単一物質で実現
| 東工大ニュース | 東京工業大学 https://titech.ac.jp/news/2019/044158」
*********************************************
撮影したUFOの構造が、パイプ状だったので、不思議だと思っていた・・・・・ しかし、２０１９年ごろのニュースで、
それが、「光で検出できない“不可視な”円柱構造 光や電磁波を反射や散乱しない構造」と判明？
これで、撮影したUFOが、信ぴょう性のあるものとして証明できたかもしれない？
***************************************
the world,
Unfortunately, most of them were shot with a toy
camera,
It only captures
the light around UFO_UAP.
That's probably because most
of them were shot
at night.
So, if you can take a clear image, its value
is
From $ 100,000 to $ 1 million.
Are there aliens malicious and bystanders?
At least there
are no good ones?
Here, the original vintage print was made in the 1980's.
There is some material that costs it, but it is not available to make
this, now ·
With a personal computer, it is possible to make negatives. That is, no
darkroom is needed.
After that, paper, photosensitive material, acrylic paint, ultraviolet
fluorescent lamp.
I used a technique that does not use a camera for classical technique.
Make it with black and white negative film. Coloring printing method. It
is not a commercially available color print system.
Modern pictures are completed with digital data on the computer.
Classical technique photography consists of an amalog camera, film, and
finally on paper
Thus, the effect is determined, and in digital it is an impossible
finish.
Pigment photography production is surprisingly . However, as there are
many variable elements, like the normal picture, you can not always make
the same thing. That's where the interest is divided. This is a photo
illustration to the last. It is not computer graphics either. The
ultimate goal is the original vintage print.
Has humanity not yet been able to shoot a realistic UAP?
UFOs and UAPs have been witnessed and filmed all over
・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・
If you tweet a real UFO picture to a UFO researcher... most of them don't show any interest lol. So does that mean most researchers are fakes? Real UFO pictures are useful for exposing fake researchers lol.
::////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Why are there no UFO images in the world?
o Cameras themselves have switched to digital, and their performance has deteriorated drastically compared to film cameras lol
o Considering the probability of photographing a UFO, you don't make any money from it lol If you had to put a price on it, it would be about 100 million yen per shot lol
********************************************
ついに、UFO構造物の原理が発見される？
「光で検出できない“不可視な”円柱構造 光や電磁波を反射や散乱しない構造を単一物質で実現
| 東工大ニュース | 東京工業大学 https://titech.ac.jp/news/2019/044158」
*********************************************
撮影したUFOの構造が、パイプ状だったので、不思議だと思っていた・・・・・ しかし、２０１９年ごろのニュースで、
それが、「光で検出できない“不可視な”円柱構造 光や電磁波を反射や散乱しない構造」と判明？
これで、撮影したUFOが、信ぴょう性のあるものとして証明できたかもしれない？
***************************************
the world,
Unfortunately, most of them were shot with a toy
camera,
It only captures
the light around UFO_UAP.
That's probably because most
of them were shot
at night.
So, if you can take a clear image, its value
is
From $ 100,000 to $ 1 million.
Are there aliens malicious and bystanders?
At least there
are no good ones?
Here, the original vintage print was made in the 1980's.
There is some material that costs it, but it is not available to make
this, now ·
With a personal computer, it is possible to make negatives. That is, no
darkroom is needed.
After that, paper, photosensitive material, acrylic paint, ultraviolet
fluorescent lamp.
I used a technique that does not use a camera for classical technique.
Make it with black and white negative film. Coloring printing method. It
is not a commercially available color print system.
Modern pictures are completed with digital data on the computer.
Classical technique photography consists of an amalog camera, film, and
finally on paper
Thus, the effect is determined, and in digital it is an impossible
finish.
Pigment photography production is surprisingly . However, as there are
many variable elements, like the normal picture, you can not always make
the same thing. That's where the interest is divided. This is a photo
illustration to the last. It is not computer graphics either. The
ultimate goal is the original vintage print.
