The following is a rough draft.
On January 1, I was casually watching NHKBS1 when I saw a program titled "Capitalism of Desire 2022: Beyond the Dilemma of Growth and Distribution.
It was an online dialogue.
One of them is a scholar born and raised in the Czech Republic, a communist country.
The other was Chinese? Korean? The other was a man with glasses who looked Chinese or Korean and spoke English like them.
As I watched, I immediately thought, "Don't they know that there is a system called Japan? I thought.
It's not surprising that Czechs don't know.
But this man of unknown nationality?
Aha, so this is the foolish Koichi Saito, huh?
His expression and demeanor were absolutely unattractive to women.
Of course, there's no accounting for taste so that he might be married or something.
Anyway, Mr. Toru Hashimoto.
Is Osaka okay with using the taxpayers' money to hire a man like this as an associate professor at Osaka City University?
He probably has never taken a walk around Kyoto, Shiga, and Nara, even though Osaka City University employs him.
So he is entirely ignorant that Japan, the best system in the world, has existed since ancient times.
His interlocutor, a scholar from the Czech Republic, is probably the exact opposite of the instantaneous water heater qualities of Toru Hashimoto, so he put up with Saito's foolishness.
Saito's essays are based on the knowledge that he has acquired at his desk, and in addition, they are the rigid and foolish arguments of a communist who is built on Marx's theory of capital.
He got frustrated and criticized Saito's childish ideas several times, saying, "I grew up in a communist society and nation, so I know...
What is the purpose of NHK featuring such a program?
If it was to make Saito's stupidity known, wouldn't they still broadcast it for the exact opposite?
Even so, Saito's childish common argument is beyond stupid.
What is NHK's motive for using public airwaves for such a long time to broadcast an editorial by such a person?
