市川團十郎さんと子どもの預言が一致…

市川團十郎さんと子どもの預言が一致…










・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・
If you tweet a real UFO picture to a UFO researcher... most of them don't show any interest lol. So does that mean most researchers are fakes? Real UFO pictures are useful for exposing fake researchers lol.
::////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Why are there no UFO images in the world?
o Cameras themselves have switched to digital, and their performance has deteriorated drastically compared to film cameras lol
o Considering the probability of photographing a UFO, you don't make any money from it lol If you had to put a price on it, it would be about 100 million yen per shot lol


********************************************
ついに、UFO構造物の原理が発見される？
「光で検出できない“不可視な”円柱構造 光や電磁波を反射や散乱しない構造を単一物質で実現
| 東工大ニュース | 東京工業大学 https://titech.ac.jp/news/2019/044158」
*********************************************
撮影したUFOの構造が、パイプ状だったので、不思議だと思っていた・・・・・ しかし、２０１９年ごろのニュースで、
それが、「光で検出できない“不可視な”円柱構造 光や電磁波を反射や散乱しない構造」と判明？
これで、撮影したUFOが、信ぴょう性のあるものとして証明できたかもしれない？









This is a UAP shot with a film camera.
However, since no one has succeeded in shooting UAP yet,
is it impossible to prove? Or rather, no one has seen it?
Even in the US military, the main body has not succeeded yet,
just by shooting the shadow of UAP.


**********************************************
The history of science is the history of alchemy,
and the history of lies is also ww
So can't you trust it until you confirm it yourself?
Did you confirm the existence of UAP by leaving it on the film?
Well, even in the US Navy, it's only monochrome shooting,
so ww color shooting may be the first time in history?


**********************************************
Quiet supersonic aircraft

* Photographed experimental aircraft in Europe

**********************************************

"Experiment" ... Real UAP image, {UFO, UA
SNS of groups and individuals who saw P, research, etc.}
Stick it on and see the reaction.
Progress to the present …… Almost no reaction www
Is it so brainwashed by the media?

**********************************************

Image usage fee
US $ 100
Amazon Gift Code

*********************************************

UAP is always wrapped in force field, so it is difficult to shoot w
Even with the US Navy Top Gun, even if you say "I see it almost every day",
when I look at the image, there is a lot of out-of-focus w
At the angle of the sun , The moment the main body was miraculously seen through,
I was able to shoot ww


Did the Pentagon's UAP-approved, alien search make sense? In other words,
aliens do not come to the earth, are they only monitoring with UAP probes?


/////////////////////////////////////////////////

"Members of the UAP Task Force are having a hard time
getting cooperation from the Air Force." ...
So far, only the U.S. Navy and the Pentagon have
acknowledged the UAP phenomenon? UAP report
from the U.S. Air Force Is there no case?
My camera is $900.
Still, I will take a picture so far.
US Air Force cameras cost $900,000.
What kind of UFO have you photographed?
・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・

Early satellites could not avoid persistent cloud cover. Similarly, UFOs are hidden behind persistent cloud cover.
However, in daylight, the entity can sometimes be seen through.


・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・
UFOs are difficult to see with the naked eye, but film cameras are sensitive to the infrared region, so they can be photographed.
UFOs usually travel in the infrared region.
And you can see the body in the magnetic force field.
・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・
In the age of film cameras, UFOs could be photographed,
Is it no longer possible to shoot UFOs with digital cameras?
That's because digital cameras are equipped with powerful IR cut filters.
・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・
。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。

UFOs operate in the electromagnetic domain, invisible to the human eye. Older cameras can capture the infrared region, which is part of that electromagnetic spectrum.

。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。

UFOs are difficult to see with the naked eye,
In the age of film cameras, UFOs could be photographed,
Is it no longer
possible to shoot UFOs with digital cameras?
That's because digital
cameras are equipped with powerful IR cut filters.

・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・
Infrared light has the characteristic of being easier to pass through the spatial absorption band than visible light, so it is effective for grasping UFOs hidden behind it.


The reason why unidentified flying objects cannot be photographed well with a digital camera is that they have a strong infrared cut filter. Film cameras can shoot well because they don't have it.

/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////



Modern ・ ・ ・ ・ ・ with scanner, import, soft, expanded negative, printer output www

If so, you can say that it is good to print full-color images by classical technique arrangement, www

The greatest feature of this classic technique is the final, printing process, by hand, doing www

Sensitivity of photosensitive ink, color taste, thickness of coating, unevenness required condition ...

Pretty, the variable element works on the work of the work is the difference from ordinary photos www