米国原発新設前進 日立リトアニアに原発建設仮契約

米国では1979年のグリーンマイル島原発事故以来34年ぶりに原子炉設計を認可したようだ。
オバマ大統領は次世代原発の建設を2010年1月に表明している。

そのような中、2011年3月11日東日本大震災により福島第一原発事故が起こった。
米国が34年もの間原発の建設をしていなかったのは原発事故の被害の凄まじさを知っていたからだろう。

しかし、米国はその悲劇を忘れつつあるのか、また事故の原因となった原発を建設しようとしている。
しかも、福島第一原発事故の直後であるというのに…
福島第一原発事故によってその悲劇を思い出したのではないかとも思うが、なぜだろう。

原発は大きなお金が動くことは言うまでもない。
原発を建設・売却しなければ大きな機会損失を被るのかもしれない。

日立はリトアニアに原発の建設で仮契約したみたいですね。
日本では今後建設は困難だと思う。
なぜなら、日本は原発のその便利さ以上にその惨さを知っているからだろう。
それならば、その惨さを知らない海外でお金になる原発を売るのか？

私は原発を即座に反対するわけではないが、新たな建設は日本でも海外でもするべきでないと思う。
やはり、原発は必ずしも安全とは言い切れないからだ。
おそらく大丈夫だろうの“おそらく”が取り返しのつかないことを引き起こすかもしれない。

おそらく、米国も日本の日立も原発についての機会損失を考慮しているのではないかと思うが、
小さな可能性が起こってしまった時の無限の損失を費用に計上するならば原発を新規建設しないほうが、
機械利得をえているに違いない。

原発問題は様々考えさせられる。
私もこのブログを書きつつ、日々の電気は原発だと思うとどうすればよいのかと葛藤している。


にほんブログ村

Traveling to China.

I went to China three nights stay with my father this September.
It was my first time to have a trip with my father just two of us.

The room we stayed at first night was so modern and gougerous.
There is wall between bedroom and bathroom.
The wall is made of glass.
I was able to see the bath room from the bedroom.
Of course we withdrew the curtain not to get seen each other.



We went to Hong Kong, Macau and Shanhai.

It seems that there is no houses other than condminium to live in Hong Kong to use the small city effectively.
The space of Hong Kong was limited therefore it is too small for the population in Hong Kong.

Macau seems like i was being in Europe.
There are many European buldings so Macau is chosen to be one of the wourld hiritage.
Beside there are a lot of casinos there.

We went to Shanghai last two days.
There is the third tallest tower in the world which is called SWFC. It is shorted for Shanghai Wourld Finacial Center.
We went to top of the SWFC.



It seems that the second tallest tower in the wourld will be completed in near future nearby SFWC.
The high is 672m.

I felt that china thirives and getting prosprous more and more.

JPCPA vs USCPA in japan

There are many difficult licences in japan,above all it is said that there are three difficult licences to get in japan.
Those are lawyer, Japanese CPA and high level government official.

I will talk about differences between Japanese CPA and USCPA(the american institute of cpa).
I dont want you to get this wrong way but i conclude first that jpcpa is much more difficult than uscpa.

First of all,japanese cpa pass rate is 6.5% last exam ,on the other hand uscpa pass rate is about 50% each subjects.
With regard to uscpa, it's made in english ,so the uscpa pass rate is down to approximately 30% each subjects for japanese.
Even so,the pass exam rate is so much higher than japanese one.

Second it is said that it takes more 5000 hours to pass jpcpa exam ,on the other hand 2000 hours is enough to pass the exam of uscpa even tough english skill is low.

Third the number of jpcpa is about 20,000 while the number of uscpa is more 350,000.
There is other licence to do tax tasks except for jpcpa ,which is licenced tax accoutant.
Jpcpa are entitled to become a licenced tax accountant but licenced tax accoutant can't be a jpcpa without passing the exam.
The number of licenced tax accoutant is about 70,000 including jpcpa.
The point is that it's not so difficult to be an uscpa.

Thereforer, uscpa can't audit and can't do any tax tasks in japan.
I conclude that jpcpa is so much more difficult than uscpa to get.