文明のターンテーブルThe Turntable of Civilization on September 2016

日本の時間、世界の時間。
The time of Japan, the time of the world

The author of this column and I had been seeing that her real intention is different

2017-06-11 09:43:30 | 日記

* There is a dictum, there is the child is father to the man, in Japan.

It is impossible to obey Tsujimoto's reflections and obedience obediently. *

Yesterday, I wrote so but it was proved that my supposition was right yesterday.

Nevertheless, how far is the Asahi Shimbun Company that has set these people up to the forefront of the anti-Abe government by lifting such human beings for several years, is a treasonist-like, traitor-like newspaper company?

The United Nations or humans who are called special spokespersons, Tsujimoto and the Asahi Shimbun, if they are media and politicians in China, they will be felony or dead, once thinking about it,

It is better to say things to Japan.

In other words, it is not an exaggeration to say that democracy is going too far in Japan.

The following is from the column of today's Sankei newspaper front page.

Emphasis on sentences and * ~ * are me.

Preamble.

Ms. Tsujimoto said, "I do not want to suck up the air near the family" "I have bad feeling for Emperor and that family" in a book published in 1986, it was written as.

In this regard, at the House of Representatives Constitutional Review Board on August 8, she emphasized that he was a student's remark about 30 years ago and said, "I felt keenly that the idea was one-sided and I deeply regretted."

Human thought and ideas are easy to change, and it is also common for us to be ashamed of ourselves as knowledge and experience deepens.

"We must honor the symbol emperor prescribed in the Constitution."

Ms. Tsujimoto was talking about at the House of Representatives Constitutional Review Board.

However, a single question remains.

Ms. Tsujimoto does not go back for thirty years, she wrote in her 1998 publication after she became a House of Representatives.

* That is to say Tsujimoto lied in the National Assembly is not quite an exaggeration *

"The provisions concerning the emperor from Article 1 to Article 8 ((Constitution)) should be deleted"

"Regarding the emperor system, I personally disagree, it is resistant"

Likewise, in the book published 2000, "It is good to delete the provisions on the emperor in the first chapter of the Constitution, Article 1 to Article 8"

"To be exact, it is not" the abolition of the Emperor System ", and the provision on the emperor is removed from the Constitution."

It respects an emperor as long as there is regulation in the constitution but is real intention to be different?

* The author of this column and I had been seeing that her real intention is different *

ジャンル:
ウェブログ
この記事についてブログを書く
この記事をはてなブックマークに追加
« Le Japon est un ancrage sur... | トップ | Hy is die eienaar van die b... »

トラックバック

この記事のトラックバック  Ping-URL
ブログ作成者から承認されるまでトラックバックは反映されません。