文明のターンテーブルThe Turntable of Civilization on September 2016

日本の時間、世界の時間。
The time of Japan, the time of the world

It is as if he had not studied as if he had not read the second half of Article 11 of the Convention

2017-06-15 15:30:09 | 日記

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

The National Assembly unanimously bailed out war criminals

Trying to judge a crime that is not based on the provisions of any international law goes against the principle of "ex-post facto law prohibition".

Ex-post facto law ban (Ex post facto law) means that the law should not be applied retroactively to the facts before enactment, and is considered to be one of the criteria for separating civilized and non-civilized countries it was.

 "Law does not go back" is the fundamental principle of the rule of law, and it is not about civilized countries to violate it.

In the feudal era of Japan, if the lord orders to break his neck, it could not avoid doing so, but that is not recognized as a civilized country.

"The various rulings" of the Tokyo Tribunal handled Japan to the invading country and to fix on one-sidedly, seven hangings, sixteen life imprisonment, and two incarceration.

After Japan recovered from independence, the forces that claim that Japan is an aggression country, "Japan is a bad man," took a big deal of congratulations.

Their characteristics are in conveniently saving points that overturn their arguments.

As I wrote in the August 2005 issue, for example in the recent Yasukuni Shrine issue, Asahi Shimbun and Koichi Kato, the House of Representatives, insisted that "Japan accepted the Tokyo trial under the San Francisco Peace Treaty" However, in reality, Japan just accepted the "various judgments" of Tokyo trials.

But they argue vehemently that it "accepted the Tokyo trial itself".

It is as if he had not studied as if he had not read the second half of Article 11 of the Convention. In the second half of Article 11, there are conditions to stop "various judgments", that is, to abolish it.

Japan abolished various judgments based on this.

It did not complain from any country.

The Asahi Shimbun etc. may deliberately neglect (ignore) this fact.

And in the same way, both the Prime Minister and Chief Cabinet Secretary of Japan inattentive to one’s studies state that it "accepted the trial" state it calmly.

After the establishment of the Peace Treaty, unanimously revised bereaved families protection law was passed in unanimity at the 16th Special Diet session in 1953.

We unanimously decided to treat people who became war criminals in the Tokyo trial etc., like ordinary person killed in war, including the Socialist Party and the Communist Party.

Japan was recognized as an aggression country, and the people who were most pleased were the left wing guys including the Communist Party.

Before the war they were repressed, and from the perspective of them, Japan before the war is a bad country.

But what was the Communist Party before the war?

In other words, it is the Japan Branch of Comintern, they were fellows who were planning the subversion of Japan by receiving money and orders from Comintern.

The remnants went into where vacancies were made by Purge (occupied Japan) decree, penetrated into the world of postwar academism and journalism.

It also entered the educational circle in the form of Japan Teachers Union.

That they hold "syphilis bacteria" called Tokyo Tribunal historical view.

We are about to finish syphilis soon.

ジャンル:
ウェブログ
この記事についてブログを書く
この記事をはてなブックマークに追加
« どの国際法の条文にも基づい... | トップ | その詐欺ぶりがいちばんよく... »

トラックバック

この記事のトラックバック  Ping-URL
ブログ作成者から承認されるまでトラックバックは反映されません。