The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.
Fundamental recognition is weird
It is around a program of "news girls" on Tokyo MX TV, there has been a dispute even with protest action at Higashimura - Takae, Action Participants may get in under the vehicle, jump out in front of the running vehicle, they parked the car irregularly, making the passage of general vehicles difficult, The Japanese government clearly states that dangerous and illegal interception acts are taking place.
I also visited the site many times, disturbance of official duties, which undercut under-regulation on site to add assault to police officers are also frequent, Mr. Kaya's "unnecessary restrictions on demo" and "unreasonable restrictions" pointed out are not applicable at all.
We also look doubtful his recommendation for the broadcasting law.
Radio waves are public property.
Some people brought ideology and strange doctrine to broadcast programs, it will not be allowed to play the radio waves.
We must respect the freedom of independence and freedom of expression as much as possible.
But that does not mean you can do anything.
Whatever you say, whatever coverage or arbitrary editing you do, there is no such thing as being good.
Needless to say, there is no sense in saying that you can report on fabricating.
I think that Article 4 that imposes fairly neutral broadcasting on broadcasters is a necessary provision from the viewpoint of public welfare.
For criticism of former Asahi newspaper Mr. Takashi Uemura, Mr. Kaya has decided it is "harassment".
However, Mr. Kaya writes a report without looking directly at the fact why Mr. Uemura was criticized and what he did.
Mr. Uemura was charged with responsibility, there was a mistake to be criticized.
Ignoring such circumstances, simply, Public opinion is bashing up Mr. Uemura, Mr. Kaya's way of thinking is the same as the assertion of anti-Japanese group itself.
It is not the only problem that the description of the report is poor in evidence and corroboration.
＊The description of the report written by Kaya lacks any evidence or corroboration.
But the problem of the report is not only that.
Contents that he wrote extensively like the advertisement tower as it is as it is normally held by specific organizations, we cannot help but say that the basic perception itself is strange.
