文明のターンテーブルThe Turntable of Civilization on September 2016

日本の時間、世界の時間。
The time of Japan, the time of the world

United Nations special rapporteur's visit to Japan, which was planned

2017-06-18 11:38:36 | 日記

The following is a reprint.

Co-authored by Nagae Kiyoshi and Hasegawa Hiroshi who sent a life as the spirited reporter of the Asahi Shimbun, "Who did this to the Asahi Shimbun" WAC BUNCO, the first edition of 2016/12/17, 980 yen It is a book to be read By all Japanese citizens and people all over the world, the article of today's Asahi newspaper was proved correctly.

At the same time the following chapters also proved that the paper I immediately wrote about David Kaya and wrote was absolutely right.

United Nations special rapporteur's visit to Japan, which was planned

Nagae

In fact, it said that it would like to ask a question from "Weekly Shincho" about Ms. Takaichi Minister's opinion over the broadcast law.

When I said that "Takaichi's remark is the writing vigorously" by the reporter of "Weekly Shincho" "As of this morning, the number of times the Asahi Shimbun has collected 44 times, The Mainichi Shimbun is 21 times, the Asahi Shimbun has twice as many.

The Sankei is 18 times, Yomiuri is zero "was counterattacked.

I suggested that "Surely, Asahi, an article criticizing Takaichi one color, I think that's true, it is more news and more stylish to report variations in the number of impressions", but it never published any of my remarks (lol).

- Asahi was criticizing the opinion of Ogawa Eitarou et al. 'Viewers' meeting seeking compliance with the Broadcast Law' by editorial of April 13 <criticism of TBS, Good speech activity?>, Strictly.

<There are various ways to criticize the program, broadcasting ethics / program improvement organization (BPO) is also functioning. Nonetheless, it is not a genuine speech activity to let the broadcasting station's revenue sources shake and change the media attitude>

Hasegawa

What ... I can not stand reading at all.

Asahi regards Ogawa san et al as "Abe cheering group" and thinks that criticism against TV stations such as TBS is seen as a support shoot to the administration.

Is not it too simple to see things?

Nagae

If there is a backing of the fact, I am fine if it is simple.

However, simple without facts tend to instigate, and it is difficult for a middle class who is in business to read newspapers.

Hasegawa

There was also a movement that seems to be only one that is consistent with the movement of criticism of Takaichi's remarks.

United Nations special rapporteur David Kaya (a professor at the University of California, Irvine) who is an American visiting Japan.

On April 19th he told a news conference at the Foreign Correspondent Association and stated "The independence of Japanese press is facing a serious threat."

Nagae

It was exactly "Keep it in order", it was a visit Japan of Mr. Kaya who gives a feeling of plotting against plotting to give off a strong smell.

- Takita Makiko reporter of Sankei Shimbun, <United Nations special rapporteur's visit will be adjusted as each country has consulted from the UN side. On the homepage of the Japan Federation of Bar Associations reported that "there is a high possibility that a visit will be realized if there are many visit requests".

There is a possibility that the JFBA and people of "angry" type called "Japan's report is dangerous! Please come by all means!"

Hasegawa

Mr. Kaya seems to have interviewed the appropriate people such as journalists and casters, but when you submit a report to the United Nations, you should specify clearly what kind of story you heard and made a report to the United Nations You should.

Other special rapporteurs have kept the so-called one line so to speak.

- But when you read the full text of Mr. Kaya's press conference, "Many journalists say" Please give me anonymity "when giving information to me. I think that it is unusual."

This seems to be received by Mr. Kaya "There is pressure of the government in Japan, there is something bad about revealing his name." In fact, many of them "journalists" do not want to be verified simply Is not it a retrospective attitude that?

* In this chapter, the Asahi Shimbun and the so-called scholar, which is synchronized with this, and the JFBA etc.,

In other words, the reasons for collusion and oppression by paraphrasing a bill to prevent terrorism, etc. as a conspiracy crime are clearly manifested. *

ジャンル:
ウェブログ
この記事についてブログを書く
この記事をはてなブックマークに追加
« テロ等に対する防止法案を、... | トップ | 産経が報じなければ、高市氏... »

トラックバック

この記事のトラックバック  Ping-URL
ブログ作成者から承認されるまでトラックバックは反映されません。